Note: iOS 9 + Facebook users w/ trouble scrolling: #super sorry# we hope to fix it asap. In the meantime Chrome Mobile is a reach around
hot  /  reviews  /  videos  /  cblogs  /  qposts

Jack Thompson: Were we wrong to feed the troll?

11:28 PM on 09.27.2008 // Jim Sterling
  @JimSterling

Jack Thompson was one of the gaming community's most hated villains. The man waged a one man war on videogames with lies, half-truths and social misconceptions as his only weapons, and he received much coverage in the gaming press for his obsessive attacks on the industry.

It is for this reason that former ESA boss Doug Lowenstein has laid the blame for JT's proliferation squarely at the feet of people like me, the games media writers who recorded his actions and words for public consumption. According to Lowenstein, it was the gaming press that gave Thompson his power and that, he implies, reflects very poorly on us. 

"The media knew well that he was a charlatan who wholly lacked credibility. But hey, they said, he was news and could not be ignored. That was a cop out. It gave Thompson a platform he might not have had for as long as he did."

Were we wrong to cover Jack Thompson? Did we lack a justifiable reason for giving the preacher his pulpit, or was a man meant to be ignored? Read on for some frank and open thoughts on the subject, from a man who interacted with and wrote about the man more than anybody not called Dennis Mccauley.

"I read with more than passing interest the reports of Jack Thompson's disbarment. Amid all the celebrating among the game industry, one thing I hope emerges is some degree of self examination by the game press of its own complicity in making Thompson what he became.

The game press had a schizoid relationship with Thompson. He was the person they loved to vilify and the person they could not get enough of. Time and again, the game press — and mainstream press — would ask ESA to engage with, or respond to Thompson's latest excess. The media knew well that he was a charlatan who wholly lacked credibility. But hey, they said, he was news and could not be ignored. That was a cop out. It gave Thompson a platform he might not have had for as long as he did.

Mainstream outlets (The Today Show, CNN, Fox) were worse but the game press knew better. But he was the game press' crack. And even as they said privately he was a kook, they treated him as if he was a credible, fair minded critic. That represented an abdication of the critical filtering role the media should play.

There were and are legitimate grounds to criticize the game industry, and there were responsible and fair minded critics like Dave Walsh. But for the game press it was all Jack all the time. So as it takes delight in his apparent demise, it is a good time to contemplate whether the game media itself has matured . You help set the tone for mainstream media coverage and if you validate extremists you give license to the less informed to follow your lead.

It is 35 years since Pong. Your readers and the industry deserve a game media worthy of the best that journalism has to offer.

Doug Lowenstein"

Is the coverage of Jack Thompson a sign of our immaturity? I will turn the question around and ask this: Is the pursuit of maturity in an industry where we write about witch touching DS games really such a noble goal? I can only speak for Destructoid, but I sense that a number of our fellow blogs would agree that part and parcel of our job is to entertain just as much as it is to inform. 

I write to entertain my readers. That is my primary function and my most important aim. Jack Thompson may not really have become important, or even relevant, in the long run, but he was entertaining. Not everyone will agree with that of course, but there is no denying that Jack Thompson was good for business. 

Lowenstein calls the relationship between the media and JT a schizoid one. I would refer to it as a symbiotic one. We gave Jack what he wanted, that's certainly true. We provided him with a soapbox to stand on, we fed his ego, we made him feel special and interesting. But just as much as we gave Thompson what he wanted, he gave us what we wanted. He provided us with laughter, with something to pick apart and discuss. He was a villain, and everyone loves to hate a villain. It can't be denied that he used us. It can't be denied that we used him. And both sides loved it.

That is all well and good, but did feeding the troll create a monster? Did we give this man power and turn him from a joke into something serious? No. Jack Thompson was only famous to the people that he despised the most -- the games industry and its customers. While he may have had brief appearances on FOX News, something that cannot even be confidently attributed to us, he was never world famous, and likely won't ever be. He was "popular" only among hardcore gamers, a demographic that is becoming less of a percentage in the games market itself, let alone society as a whole.

Any power he wielded was and is an illusion. His notorious dealings with Penny Arcade, GamePolitics and myself were contained within our own social bubble, and whatever the future holds for JT, it will likely fail to interest the world at large. His importance is make-believe, his relevance a mere fabrication. We didn't help Jack become anything, because ultimately he became nothing.  

Can the coverage of Thompson be defended from a journalistic standpoint? Perhaps. JT was a loudmouth with more words than common sense, but in a world where reality TV stars can become credible icons, ignoring Thompson could have been a bad idea. It was thanks to us that Thompson was exposed for the duplicitous, vulgar and disrespectful man that he is. His personal attacks on industry figures and his many documented online flame wars with youngsters helped to damage whatever credibility he may have been able to forge. 

Ultimately, however, I must return to my original question. Is it noble to take the "high ground" and the "mature route," even as the industry's biggest critics rely on childishness, ignorance and outright lies to get their point across? It seems these days that "acting mature" really means "doing nothing," which is something that many games industry figures seem worryingly fond of while their work is dragged over hot coals by reactionary and deceptive people who deserve to be told off as publicly and loudly as possible. 

This point goes beyond Jack Thompson and into mainstream media as a whole. As part of a growing medium, it would appear that both the gaming press and the games industry are going through a phase of self-consciousness, where they are afraid of looking immature in front of the older boys, despite the fact that more established mediums are acting like the biggest babies of all. If Geoff Keighley, for example, had told that psychologist to STFUAJPG while debating Mass Effect on FOX News, would he have looked any more immature and pathetic than the rest of the cast who were shouting over each other and flaunting their disrespectful ignorance on public television? I doubt it. If anything, it might have actually got a few members of the widespread audience on his side. 

Doug Lowenstein claims that our readers deserve the best that journalism has to offer. I say no. They deserve one thing, and one thing only -- to be entertained. If that is through hard-hitting attempts at "real" journalism, then fine. If it is through making fun of an old crank with a big mouth and a small shred of dignity, then there's nothing wrong with that either.

Ultimately, there is but one reason why games media covered Jack Thompson as often as it did -- the readers wanted it.

To merely give our readers that which they wanted ... was that a bad thing?

Once again I say this. No.



Jim Sterling, Former Reviews Editor
 Follow Blog + disclosure JimSterling Tips
Destructoid reviews editor, responsible for running and maintaining the cutting edge videogame critique that people ignore because all they want to see are the scores at the end. Also a regular f... more   |   staff directory



 Setup email comments

Unsavory comments? Please report harassment, spam, and hate speech to our community fisters, and flag the user (we will ban users dishing bad karma). Can't see comments? Apps like Avast or browser extensions can cause it. You can fix it by adding *.disqus.com to your whitelists.

 Quickposts
Status updates from C-bloggers

CoilWhine avatarCoilWhine
I'm writing my next cBlog, another Sonic Generations Mod Retrospective. I played all of these early last week, but there are some cool ones I'd like to share
ShadeOfLight avatarShadeOfLight
My favorite Pokemon should be painfully obvious, so here's some love for my honorable #2. Suck it, Garchomp.
ChillyBilly avatarChillyBilly
The best game -
Serethyn avatarSerethyn
The Banner Saga is pretty much a work of art. It's so incredibly pretty. I wonder why there aren't more games that use such a striking art style? The only other game with a similar-ish art style that comes to my mind is Cuphead.
BigDoniel avatarBigDoniel
The best Pokémon is, and always has been, Blastoise.
ChrisHannard avatarChrisHannard
Gotta eat 'em all..
ikiryou avatarikiryou
Why is there so much love for Pokemon, when only Digimon can you offer you the One True Waifumon?
BigDoniel avatarBigDoniel
Why is steam having yet another sale? At this point they'd be better just reducing the prices of the games year-round, instead of having the same games at the same discounted prices every 2 months.
ChillyBilly avatarChillyBilly
Trubbish is the best Pokemon because he's basically a pile of trash.
KeithTheGeek avatarKeithTheGeek
Woke up to find the qposts filled with favorite pokemon. I'm gonna be that guy and say his favorite is Charizard. Too lazy to go dig up a picture, but I don't have to. Yall already know what he looks like.
Shinta avatarShinta
CONTROVERSY: I'm playing Ninja Gaiden Black right now and the truth of the matter is that Ninja Gaiden 2 is the better game. The combat is just so much better, and the pacing is as well. NGB is still a 10/10 to me though. NGB's combat is just alot slower
Sir Shenanigans avatarSir Shenanigans
Since I was a lad who actually followed Pokemon, Scyther was green and sharp and cut his way to my little heart, where he remains today.
JohnSmith123 avatarJohnSmith123
Hmm. I unlocked something called Balam. I wonder what that i-oh. OHHHHH.
Jinx 01 avatarJinx 01
Always respect your waifu. And never have more than one, polyamory is bad mkay
EdgyDude avatarEdgyDude
Just realized Deadpool releases this week and started praying it doesn't suck.
Solar Pony Django avatarSolar Pony Django
You guys probably already know this but Feraligatr is my favorite Pokemon.
JPF720 avatarJPF720
Proudly stand as (possibly) the only person whose favorite Pokémon is this guy
Scrustle avatarScrustle
Haven't cared about Pokemon in about 10 years, but I used to like this guy.
Oridan avatarOridan
Hello, here is a pokémon that I like.
Jed Whitaker avatarJed Whitaker
And another one. And another one. And another one. You smart.
more quickposts


Contest!


Seriously

Invert site colors

  Dark Theme
  Light Theme


Destructoid means family.
Living the dream, since 2006

Pssst. konami code + enter

modernmethod logo



Back to Top


We follow moms on   Facebook  and   Twitter
  Light Theme      Dark Theme
Pssst. Konami Code + Enter!
You may remix stuff our site under creative commons w/@
- Destructoid means family. Living the dream, since 2006 -