"Pisses ME off."
Seriously, I would rather just buy an Ultimate edition... At least the content wouldn't have to be unlocked via the internet that NOT EVERYONE HAS.
OH WAIT... You're locking costumes as well? COSTUMES!?
Capcom, I love you, I grew up with you, and I'mma still buy your games, but seriously, **** this noise.
2, Take picture of the proof and you doing the "cool story bro" smile/thumbs up
3, Host it on the internet
4, Spam embed them in every comment thread of every Capcom Unity post
5, ????
6, Capcom apologise and never do it again!
Combined with how poorly Raccoon City was/is, I have a feeling it won't be too long. THQ is possibly going down soon too. I wonder how long it'll be before Ubisoft and Activision will follow? Acti will take considerably longer (read: Whenever their fans get tired of paying for the same game every year), but I see Ubi following after Capcom.
So early adopters are expected to pay $20 more for all the content on-disc, pretty much twice what Vita players will be paying.
Solution? I wait and buy the Vita version USED.
I swear that was half of the fun of MvC2 and is the only reason I bother playing super smash bros.
But no capcom is greedy cooperate company and that is why Kenji jumped ship with the resident evil creator and all of the great developers at capcom before him.
These are the kinds of things we're going to have to get used to. We rooted and cheered gaming on as it surpassed all other forms of entertainment, spending billions of dollars in doing so. Did we really believe for a moment that gaming-as-big-business would be any less impersonal and soulless as any other big industry?
The current state of the industry is a direct reflection of its audience.
Where would the fun be if nobody knew that they did it? That would be like graffiti tagging a wall in a ghost town or 'flashing' people at a nudist resort!
That suggests that you think that Capcom thought more of their customer base than they most likely actually do.
IT. MAKES. NO. FUCKING. SENSE.
I've gone through every possible explanation in my head and none of it makes sense. It's sooooooooooo fucking stupid.
Not that I'm a fan of on-disc DLC, but I can see why they went this route.
At what point did it become a reasonable expectation to have to pay extra for a feature on something you've already paid for? Want to use the cruise control button on your car, insert a credit card for a $500 one time charge. Want to watch a blu-ray on your new LED tv, pay 50 to enable the feature.
How is withholding content from a consumer on something they physically own and legally paid for even remotely legal? When can the SEC get involved in this?
That was it for me.
Not saying I won't EVER buy a Capcom game again (I'll prob pick up RE6), but I'm definitely passing on their fighting games... at least until the 2nd or 3rd version of the game is out and down to $20.
Now we have to wait for their marketing scheme to finish which is around May.
That was it for me. "
Ditto, although RE6 is also off my buy list. That's not because of this DLC stuff. That's because I bought RE5.
Fool me once....
I'm by no means implying any of this should be accepted as normal. "There is effectively no distinction between the DLC being 'locked' behind the disc and available for unlocking at a later date," is an outright laughably ridiculous line.
What I'm saying is that if Rome is burning, we're far too busy spreading gasoline to play a fiddle. For years we thought we were so cool, as sweet baby gaming beat the shit out of the dusty old entertainment codgers. Even today we cheer gaming on as it mops the floor with movies and music. Were we ever cheering gaming's ability to tell a better story? Its ability to touch an audience like no other medium? Its incredible ability to create worlds and experiences that dwarfed other mediums ability to do so?
No, we celebrated its ability to take it to the established entertainment industry. Society stuck its chin up at us and we loved every second of economic beatdown gaming handed it in retaliation. Meet the new king, same as the old king.
I'm saying we made our bed with this shit. We practically begged the industry to make more money off us for years, and celebrated them when they did so. What did we think would happen?
Because, fightin' turnamintz is everything, yo.

My other side is quite ok with it, as I wouldn't have to pay for the DLC. I explore every game I buy, and you'd be surprised the things you find on the discs.
Most of it still does, its just the biggest publishers have sold out.
And when someone comes in and changes the industry forever, its going to be companies like Capcom, EA and Activision that get caught with their pants down and forced to conform to the new model.
Happened with music, books, movies and TV shows already. Video Games can't hold out forever. They might seem mighty now, but they can be forced to conform by whoever changes the industry for the better and more accessible.
My belief is it won't be a company that made it a point to treat their customers like shit. There are still quite a few big names out there that don't treat customers like shit and likely never intend to.
EA, Capcom, THQ, Ubi Soft and Activision are just the ones with the most to lose, that's why they act like they do. They're not bullies, they're cowards afraid of the future.
Buy their games or don't buy them, but I know they're all going to be phased out in time, possibly within a decade. Their models are not sustainable in the long term, each model has tasted backlash. If they're just going to drive themselves off a cliff anyway, I don't have THAT much of a problem supplying them with the gas money.
So yeah, basically the DLC had to be on the disc to ensure PS3 gamers the same experience as their Xbox 360 counterparts. Although I doubt CAPCOM would ever put it so bluntly. I doubt they'd want to throw Sony under the bus.
Essentially: if it wasn't for the extra budget, we would have never had this content in the first place. If that is the case here, then I do believe it is fair of Capcom to charge us for the 12 characters since they were developed on a separate budget that needs to make money back separately.
The murky side of this comes when you see that they put it into the game- for all I know of programing, it could very well be the case that it is easier for them to balance the game and make sure it doesn't crash if they include all the chars from the start. But you have to be transparent about these things- throwing out a bunch of non-explanations that people prove wrong time and again will ruin your goodwill far more than being honest and say "We put extra money into these guys, you put extra money into them to enjoy them too".
Then again, I have no idea if Capcom is following this model so for all I know, they might just be evil money-grubbing bastards and I just wrote this long comment for nothing. Carry on then.
Because unlike bioware, crapcom could care less about its fans. As long as they keep making money they don't care.
Poor Megaman Legends 3....
What's next people are going to report Square Enix for not releasing Final Mix versions of Kingdom Hearts in America?

surf dtoid with 






Rising (10+)
People you follow






































follow








