Quantcast


id Software's RAGE is not supporting dedicated servers photo

Modern Warfare 2 infuriated the PC community with the news that it would scrap dedicated servers, then we had Rebellion ducking the subject and making it look as if Aliens vs. Predator might go the same way. Now we have another PC shooter joining the club, as id Software confesses that dedicated servers will be unlikely in RAGE.

"It's not cast in stone yet, but at this point no, we don't think we will have dedicated servers," confesses id's John Carmack. He added that he's glad Infinity Ward did this first so that his studio "won't have to be a pioneer on that. We'll see how it works out for everyone else."

Oh dear. Never before has the name RAGE seemed more appropriate.

The bad news for PC fans just keeps piling up, and it seems that Infinity Ward may very well have sparked a new fad among developers. It would appear that the old landscape is changing, and the era of free n' easy PC gaming might be largely over.

PC gamers will keep the online petition sites busy for quite a while, methinks.








More gaming stories around the web. Got news? Submit yours to tips@destructoid.com

Jim Sterling serves as reviews editor for Destructoid.com, head of the Podtoid podcast, and produces a number of news stories, original features, one-of-a-kind videos. With his passionate argumentative style, controversial opinions, harsh delivery, and dedication to brutal honesty Sterling is a name that you can't help but recognize. Likes PS2, iPod Touch, Silent Hill 2, Metal Gear Solid, Dynasty Warriors 3 Meet the rest of the team



Post a comment! You can also post a photo below:

Comment with Facebook





Click connect and comment instantly!

Comment with Dtoid





New? SIGN UP - it takes 5 seconds

74 comments | showing # 1 to 50
prev
next 50 comments

Snidesworth's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/06/2009 06:02
Snidesworth
The end of days has arrived, it seems.
TewDee's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/06/2009 06:08
TewDee
@Snidesworth - Indeed. The end of fucking days.
HerosPlayDumb's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/06/2009 06:09
HerosPlayDumb
I see Starcraft 2 and Diablo 3 showing up and being hailed as "saving" PC gaming.
HerosPlayDumb's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/06/2009 06:10
HerosPlayDumb
I see Starcraft 2 and Diablo 3 showing up and being hailed as "saving" PC gaming.
HerosPlayDumb's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/06/2009 06:11
HerosPlayDumb
What the fuck?? Why did that double post???
Jon B's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/06/2009 06:11
Jon B
Also, this means no mods for Rage.

What the fuck, id?!
Chris Carter's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/06/2009 06:14
Chris Carter
@Heros
Don't forget EA/Dice! They specifically said they wouldn't go this route.
Knivy's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/06/2009 06:15
Knivy
Oh well, there's always UT classic :P.
whateverthismeanstoyou's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/06/2009 06:17
whateverthismeanstoyou
well, the end of week is here. I guess I will be dicking around Borderland. Don't know what's the big fuzz about the dedicated server. Is it a principle thing? And btw I have been a PC gamer and went thru my share of hosting servers out in ISP for clans, etc. At the end, I have a big gap in my wallet. I like to see where all this is going and see if I like or dislike. Too early to say "Rage!!!!!"
Michael Brown's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/06/2009 06:18
Michael Brown
Give me the power to show that I am right.
bloodylip's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/06/2009 06:23
bloodylip
What Knives said. The great thing about PC gaming is that lots of classic games still have amazing communities behind them. I can start up UT classic, Quake 3, CS 1.6, C&C, Age of Empires, BF1942, etc. and be able to find a game pretty quickly. If they don't support it, no big deal. I just won't be buying that game. Nothing will hurt them more than a lost sale.
ANeM's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/06/2009 06:24
ANeM
@whateverthismeanstoyou
Dedicated servers can handle more players with lower latency and with no worry of problems caused by hosts dropping or by zero ping advantage (It exists, in every game it exists. Be it a half-life Listen server or a Gears of War match on XBL)
Furthermore Dedicated servers support their own communities and allow for proper administration. That guy spinning around in spawn point while calling everyone a fag over the mic.. If you're part of a servers community you're often a steam message away from having that guy dealt with and then you'll never have to deal with his shit again. P2P, the best you can do is a vote kick, and unless he gets a global ban by the developers moderation team (This won't happen because he isn't cheating he is just a dick.. and even then most cheaters won't get banned either) You're bound to run into him again.
Monster w21 Faces's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/06/2009 06:25
Monster w21 Faces
I think it's a bit early to even comment on this.

1) No MP information has been revealed about Rage at all.
2) They clearly say they're waiting to see how it goes. They're not set on their plans yet.
Spectreman's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/06/2009 06:28
Spectreman
* Modern Warfare can send a fuck you for PC users, but I don´t know if Rage are in the same position.
TewDee's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/06/2009 06:28
TewDee
ANeM summed up everything about dedi servers that makes the right.
Chris Carter's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/06/2009 06:35
Chris Carter
I still don't get why ANYONE, Dtoid staff included, would gloat/shit on the PC about lost value and less power to the consumer.

As Bloodlip has beautifully stated, people STILL play Unreal Tournament PC to this day on dedicated servers, and the community is thriving. But sure, we can shit on the PC all day about how "elitist" they are for fun, and ignore the fact that most console games' online support dies after one sequel is released. Modern Warfare 1 on 360 will be dead in a short amount of time: Call of Duty 1 PC is still being played. LOL PC SUX AMIRITE? A SELECT FEW MAKE PC GAMERS LOOK BAD SO LETS SAY THE ENTIRE PLATFORM IS DEAD AND THEY ALL PIRATE LOL.
Resonance's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/06/2009 06:36
Resonance
FUUUUUUUUUUUUCCCCCCCCCCKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKK!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Jon B's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/06/2009 06:38
Jon B
@Magnalon
The hilarious thing is that people who pirate the majority of games don't give a shit about the multiplayer. Yet that's what's being gimped.
ChildOfLore's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/06/2009 06:40
ChildOfLore
I knew the piracy would begin gnawing at the shriveled husk of PC gaming from the inside eventually :(. Well, that and the industry's obvious preference for a console-centered market.
KrazyKraut's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/06/2009 06:41
KrazyKraut
@Magnalon

m8....give it up. A big game pub and a big game dev set a new trend.
A new PC Multiplayer has begun.
KrazyKraut's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/06/2009 06:42
KrazyKraut
a new PC multiplayer era has begun.*
TheToiletDuck's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/06/2009 06:43
TheToiletDuck
I don't know what i'd do if i didn't have dedicated servers on TF2 for example. I certainly would never have learnt about Scatman.

Did iD even consider Scatman when they made this decision?
bloodylip's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/06/2009 06:44
bloodylip
Also, what Monster said. We know nothing of RAGE multiplayer at this point. You know what game just came out and doesn't support dedicated servers? Borderlands. Yet I haven't heard anybody complain about it, aside from the whole retarded Gamespy issue.
GamesAreArt's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/06/2009 06:44
GamesAreArt
@ChildOfLore you do know piracy happens on consoles too? Or do you just live in a hole?
Jim Sterling's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/06/2009 06:46
Jim Sterling
"I still don't get why ANYONE, Dtoid staff included, would gloat/shit on the PC about lost value and less power to the consumer."

I am not gloating. It really does look bad for PC gamers that are into this shit.
vexed alex's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/06/2009 06:49
vexed alex
IN BEFORE SHARPLESS COMES IN HERE TO CELEBRATE!
Chris Carter's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/06/2009 06:50
Chris Carter
@KrazyKraut
Yep! An era in which I abandon PC shooters due to corporate greed, whilst ignorant masses, who would enjoy extra features if they opened their eyes, gloat.

I can see it now: no more mod support for Valve games. Goodbye free DLC!

@Bloody
Most people have found that you need to change your port settings to even play Borderlands online. Personally, I think the game, on PC, is quite shit, considering I can barely find any games in matchmaking, whereas every other game I have with dedicated servers has hundreds of games at any given time.

A lot of reviews have also commented on the issues, and the PC version is actually just a console port.

@Child
Modern Warfare 2 360 has already been leaked, and download numbers are in the tens of thousands: the PC version is nowhere to be found.
Chris Carter's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/06/2009 06:51
Chris Carter
@Jim
I didn't necessarily mean this instance, but some of your past Modern Warfare 2 PC quotes fuel the flames for people to come in and attack PC users like they were the anti-christ.
GamesAreArt's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/06/2009 06:54
GamesAreArt
BUT THEY STILL HAVE M+K FOR FPS's.
Baleur's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/06/2009 06:55
Baleur
lol "ignorant masses".
This is the thing, they are just games. Most people simply dont give a shit either way, they just use games as a temporary form of entertainment, not as a be-all end-all reason to live.
In that context, a first person shooter not having dedicated servers isnt really the end of your life.

The reason i personally almost stopped playing PC games is because of the bugs and tendency to release 90% of all games as unfinished betas.
Chris Carter's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/06/2009 06:58
Chris Carter
@Baluer
I get that, but when I drop $50-$60 bones on a game, it's nice to know that in years from now, I'll still be able to enjoy it on a dedicated server.

I'm still getting mileage out of my Unreal purchases, back when I could only afford a few games a year, and I know I'll be playing World at War and Modern Warfare 1 years from now :D
kittwalker's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/06/2009 07:00
kittwalker
These companies are shooting themselves in the foot. With no dedicated servers, they are not going to be chosen for LAN events, like Multiplay. So, they are forcing a stagnation whereby everyone will just keep playing COD4 and CS:Source.

But, hey, if they don't want folk to buy new games, I guess thats their choice.
Netnavi's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/06/2009 07:01
Netnavi
@KrazyKraut
a new era has begun! We'll call it...the 1980's!
Netnavi's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/06/2009 07:03
Netnavi
@KrazyKraut
or 90's. Though I recall dedicated servers even in the mid 90's.
Jim Sterling's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/06/2009 07:13
Jim Sterling
Magnalon:

I liken it to watching a policeman beat up a Downe's Syndrome kid. At first, it's kind of funny to see the kid get his comeuppance after drooling all over the restaurant floor and putting you off your food. Then as the beating reaches its ninth minute, you stop laughing and start to really feel bad and think "ooh, this is going too far, actually."
AlphaJC's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/06/2009 07:14
AlphaJC
Yeah i like mods they are really fun, its just comes down to a money thing. Developers like IW and Treyarch are making CODs left and right becasue activision wants the mulah, seriously i can see more CODS and guitar heros for the next 5 years, and of course the cows will still keep buying this crap even tho its pretty much the same shit. I just built a beast gaming rig and i ave to here this crap o well. Its not like Quake live sucks that works pretty damn well, maybe theyll do the same type of matchmaking or whatever for Rage. IDK i honestly think developers are really trying to alienate the pc crowd, becasue console market is WAAAAY more profitable.
Chris Carter's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/06/2009 07:21
Chris Carter
@Jim
That just made my day <3. I wish you still wrote for Morphine Nation.
Xzyliac's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/06/2009 07:24
Xzyliac
Isn't one of the things about PC gaming that they can find ways around things they don't like with a team of willing people, some hardware/software development knowledge, and some elbow grease?
Jon B's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/06/2009 07:31
Jon B
@Xzyliac
Yes, that's true, but the fact is that they shouldn't have to.
Xzyliac's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/06/2009 07:33
Xzyliac
@Jon B
Touché.
hornetjockey's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/06/2009 07:56
hornetjockey
None of this surprises me. From the publisher's perspective, they stop making money once you buy the game. If they can offer the "same" experience without dedicated servers, that is what they are going to do. It's capitalism at work, friends. However, if all the EA and Activision games start going this route, I believe they will open the way for a smaller dev to launch a game with crazy modding capabilities and dedicated servers, possibly for a small monthly/annual fee. If I were a dev, that's what I'd be doing right now.
NuDimon's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/06/2009 08:00
NuDimon
Smells like Activision to me. :p
WastelandTraveler's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/06/2009 08:01
WastelandTraveler
I will have to say this news somewhat sucks if it wasn't for the fact that its jumping to conclusions with little to no information. Carmack said it is not cast in stone and they are waiting to see if IW is successful on the PC with the lack of dedicated servers. With the overwhelming response from the PC community, I have faith that it will not be a success.

If it IS a success, there is one other factor to include here. We know NOTHING of Rage's multiplayer, in fact they have not said a single thing regarding it other than this. If the multiplayer is anything like borderlands, with lets say a 4-6 player coop multiplayer limit as id Software hinted way back in 2007 at quakecon, than no Dedicated servers really is not a huge blow to the game. Some house hold connections can handle that amount of players. With id Softwares infamous netcode, and wonderful ability to solving technical issues, I am sure there is something up their sleeve that will suffice.

And finally, this is just a fire feed from another fire. If dedicated servers do indeed leave Rage, that's the only thing we have to worry about. We know mod support is going to be there, we know custom maps and content will be there, and we know we will still have total freedom of configuration with the game as well. I know for sure there are at least two companies that will not abandon their communities, or strip it of all of its customization, and that's id Software and Valve.

The possible loss of dedicated servers with Rage, is peanuts compared to the features and abilities stripped from Modern Warfare 2.
Jon B's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/06/2009 08:02
Jon B
@Hornetjockey
Curiously enough, the first footage of RAGE circled around the huge modding capabilities.
The reason I pick up on that is that they allowed you to do it online. That strikes me as a place they could easily charge for.

Although compare that to the newly released UDK, I don't think many people will take the idTech route.
crusnchill's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/06/2009 08:08
crusnchill
I SAID that this would happen exactly this way. Unfortunately... I was right.
Oh well. Like I said before. The console version of how online gaming works is easier for game companies to control, so it makes sense. It's just not very fun to use multi-player.
AgentMOO's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/06/2009 08:19
AgentMOO
This is bummer, id is one of the first companies that opened up to modders. Team Fortress started on Quake 1 and I have fond memories of playing it back before they even had player models for each class.
Django Reinhardt's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/06/2009 08:27
Django Reinhardt
Aw, rats.
The Kojukinator's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/06/2009 08:50
The Kojukinator
this is great. the big boys will die on pc, and the small boys will fill in the gaps. the pc will become the haven for gamers that want to break away from all the bureaucratic corporate bullshit of the gaming industry. yeah, things are changing... and i'm definitely excited where this will go. i welcome the coming of a new era in pc gaming.
foxhound421's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/06/2009 09:08
foxhound421
the PC community did this to themselves via rampant piracy and now they're all going to cry and rage and sign worthless petitions.

and to HerosPlayDumb: StarCraft II has no LAN support in an effort to stem piracy and i expect Diablo III will be the same deal. this trend isn't going anywhere. remember: Modern Warfare 2, the most recent example of a major game not supporting dedicated servers, is published by Activision too. i wouldn't be surprised to see a similar announcement regarding all of their PC games in the coming months.
prev next 50 comments

Comment with Facebook





Click connect and comment instantly!

Comment with Dtoid





New? SIGN UP - it takes 5 seconds

Comments policy

Destructoid is an open discussion community. You don't need to "audition" to post a comment - just speak your mind. We respect differing opinions on the site, so have at it. Be smart, funny, insightful, clueless, or cute -- but back it up with substance. Keep your cool, keep it fun. We only ask that you act respectfully and above all: don't be a troll and ruin it for everyone else. Don't bring down gamers or we'll, you know, gently shoot you in the face and stuff you into a flaming mailbox. Each comment is your opportuntity to make this community awesomer. Is that even a word?

Avoiding the banhammer only requires common sense: spamming, trolling, racism, NSFW stuff, and other forms of sucking will not be tolerated. If anyone is griefing please report abuse. Be good. Don't suck!