Nevertheless, informative blog plox!
It's not nearly as complicated as it seems, and any questions or confusion you have can almost always be remedied with some time on google.
There might be a snag here and there, but that's part of the fun, cause once you get it figured out, the victory's just that much sweeter.
On my second build, i had intended to pull the dvd drive, and the power supply from my old pc, but had spaced checking the connections of the dvd drive and it wasn't compatible with new motherboard.
I had a problem booting up too that i had researched for a couple hours before finally calling a computer shop in town for some input, they didn't have much to say because it could have been so many different problems, so they said i could bring it in and they'd at least check it out real quick, luckily the guy there had a thought and checked my power supply, and it had apparently fried, so i had to buy a new one.
However, my computer sits next to me now, a lean mean processing machine i dubbed "Beastlehoff", and i love it.
Then another important thing - what resolution do you suppose it will run on?
And is RAM really so expensive in USA? I mean, in Ukraine you can get a good 1600 4Gb (1 stick) module for like 20$. Goodram or Hynix. Or even Transcend
Plus, i don't think it's a good idea to do a 2-core CPU recommendation. If it's not a bad port like Black Ops or something like that, 2-core might be enough. But 4-core is a better choice. And in 4 or even 6-core config AMD really shines with pricing. For example, Athlon II x4 645 is cheap and powerful. So is Phenom II x6 1090T (for a 6-core).
As for an HDD i'd really recommend Black-series from WD. Blue and especially Green are better for archive-like storage. Black is best for system and program storage.
As an alternative for a thermal compound i'd name MX-3 from Arctic Cooling. One of the best out there. Silver is a classic, though
For a GPU (and AMD CPU for that matter) i'd recommend to wait till September. Why? New AMD series CPU's and GPU's may come out. And even if the newer ones will be expensive, the older series might get a discount. And buying a 67xx (especially 6790. i'd recommend XFX or HIS with their IceQ cooling) is more preferable if you have a 1650+ resolution.
http://www.newegg.com/Product/ComboBundleDetails.aspx?ItemList=Combo.687210
Core I3
4 gigs of ram
400+ psu
Case
HDD 1 tb
DVD reader
mother board for 336
Then the card of your choice for under 500$
Hurry, we need more Jim Sterling trolling all over the place.
"Adding it all together without the price cuts brings us to a slim total of $698"...
huh?
http://www.cpubenchmark.net/cpu_lookup.php?cpu=Intel+Core+i5+660+%40+3.33GHz
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16819115072
Decent places are http://overclockers.co.uk, Ebuyer, and Amazon. Do not order from PC-Titan.
1156 motherboards and CPUs are going to be discontinued, that's why they're so cheap.
Don't be a fool, get 1155.
spot on? those requirements are pretty blunt , there is a huge difference between a quadcore and a quadcore ( yeah , you read that correctly )
honestly , i hope you build this computer and try to run bf3 on it when the time comes , cause 6670 is not a graphics card ment for gaming.
-> http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/AMD/HD_6670/6.html
as you see there , it doesn't even cope with BC2 at any decent resolutions.
@stardog , do you know basic electrics? volt / watt = amps
500 watt on the 12 volt is always going to be 41 amps
the problem with cheap psu's however is that they lable them as 500 watters while they might actually only deliver 300 watts on the 12 volt.
If you go with AMD on the same budget you can grab a true quad core for 50-100 less or even a 6 core processor for about the same maybee even saving 20 or 30 bucks. Which BF3 would benefit alot more from. As with other programs and modern games.
My i5 2500K is working great without breaking a sweat (no over-clocking). I've got a decent bit beefier GPU though. That being said, BF is a fairly CPU intense game as well; behind all of the pretty graphics is a lot of physics enabled objects and generally alot of moving shit flying around! Unlike many shooters all the projectiles have a physics model to calculate (bullets drop over long distances, as do RPGs etc.) That, plus all of the vehicles flying, driving, and crashing around can tax the CPU.
Anyway, very good of you to try to help people out who may be intimidated by the process or think that you have to spend thousands of dollars to run BF3 because of how damn sexy it is. I just built my first rug 2 months ago. Spent roughly a grand and have been able to run everything i've thrown at it at maximum settings or close enough that i couldn't really tell the difference.
FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKK
P.S Can anyone tell me if you can replace laptop graphic cards?
is NOT from Battlefield 3. It's from a SOCOM US Navy Seals game! (SOCOM Confrontation)
Honestly. You might as well put Soap McTavish from Modern Warfare on there.
And speaking of the build... THAT is fail too! What the hell are you doing putting an 1156 board here? You can get a core i5 2500k (LGA 1155) for the same price as the core i5 660. With the 2500k, you get the benefit of 4 cores, but with the 660, you get 2 cores with hyperthreading (4 threads). 4 distinct cores is usually faster than 2 cores with hyperthreading, especially in a processor-intensive game like Battlefield. Not only that, the Sandy Bridge chipset (2500k) is more power efficient and resource efficient than the previous generation of processors, considering it's a new architecture on the same 32 nm process.
To the readers: Buy the core i5 2500k (or cheaper LGA 1155 processor), find an appropriately-priced LGA 1155 micro-ATX board (can be had for the same price as the one listed in the article), and you can use the same RAM. Boom! More powerful CPU for the same price. Not only that, the architecture is actually still relevant, considering they're already phasing out LGA 1156 hardware.
Really, dude. First a picture from a completely different game (I mean, you working for a *Gaming Journalism* website!), and your recommendations for outdated architecture. I seriously hope no one took your post seriously and went off to Newegg to overpay on parts. You know better than that.
This might be the case with some games, but it definitely is not with current Battlefield titles. The audio in Bad Company 2 and BF3 is very dependent on your CPU.
Why are you recommending a $220 dual-core Intel CPU when you can get a true quad-core Intel CPU for the same price?
core i5 760 - $210
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16819115067
Or an quad-core or six-core AMD CPU for even less money?
Phenom II X4 980 - $190
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16819103934
Phenom II X6 1100T - $190
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16819103913
Selecting a last-gen dual-core CPU...I don't get it.
This might be the case with some games, but it definitely is not with current Battlefield titles. The audio in Bad Company 2 and BF3 is very dependent on your CPU.
Why are you recommending a $220 dual-core Intel CPU when you can get a true quad-core Intel CPU for the same price?
core i5 760 - $210
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16819115067
Or an quad-core or six-core AMD CPU for even less money?
Phenom II X4 980 - $190
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16819103934
Phenom II X6 1100T - $190
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16819103913
Selecting a last-gen dual-core CPU...I don't get it.
My word of warning though, is that I bought a big after-market heat-sink and that greedy bastard hogs the space above a RAM slot, so I'm limited to 6Gb rather than 8Gb. Maybe a time will come where I'll have to put the stock heatsink back on to get an extra 2Gb out of my system but for now, I'm fine.

surf dtoid with 






Rising (10+)
People you follow







































follow









