But nope. Ol' gates fell short. The fucking idiot.
Plus having the largest market share among operating systems comes with a hefty paycheck which can't be avoided.
I do agree that $50 for P2P multiplayer is criminal and so are the micro transactions but people keep paying for it so they're not going to stop.
All of these problems really make me miss the PS2...
That's just me, price only comes in when I don't know if I'm going to have fun with it or not. I snapped up BlazBlue, Fallout 3, Gears, and Viva Pinata at their original prices, because no matter what the price, I was going to have fun with those games.
Really wish I would have waited on LBP....
In regards to the Live price hike: they succeeded, and no one even realizes it save a few smart Dtoid readers. Games drop for $15 all the time now and it's supposedly "normal". Give it time, and you'll start hearing these suspect interviews with developers that say "all the time we put into this game shows. $20 is more than your money's worth for what you get": I guarantee it. All MS has to do is find some other gravy train like Braid to ride, and it's bye bye $15 games. It's almost too easy!
I also think developers should take a stand against MS in terms of themes. If Jonathan Blow really was forced to charge 250 points for the Braid premium theme, he should have pulled the plug.
Long story short, I stand by my opinion that DLC ruins the industry. When we as consumers now have to pay for unfinished games, cheat codes, costumes that used to just be unlocked by "holding R1 while selecting", and worst of all content we already own on the disc (unlocks), something is terribly wrong. When DLC hits full force (IE when developers convince us that digital distribute is the way of the future), we won't own our games anymore.
And yes, they are doing well for themselves. I bought a second one, an elite, just so I could get a new warranty and have a backup console.
Still, I love my PS3 just because it's still my original one 3 years later.
Everything else though, I couldn't agree with you more. Especially paying for Xbox Live. There is absolutely no reason for them to charge for it when PSN is free, other than pure greed.
Also, cocks.
You get the blame because Microsoft's just going to put me on hold.
Also, the reason for commercials in a paid service is so they won't have to charge even more for the service; they help keep costs down. This is why movie theaters show commercials before movies: they need money, and you don't make much off of tickets.
I made sure to specify console gaming.
I love my 360, to death in fact, since we've gone through 4 of them in the last 2 years between multiple gamers. One of them is about to be out to the cleaners in a few days as well. But they still have me hooked on their product.
My main complaints with the system have always been related to the themes and content and NXE. If I simply had more options for the many themes I bought during the year prior to the NXE, I'd be satisfied. However, I'm left feeling like they took my money and split. And yes, they should allow more free content. If the manufacturer of that content doesn't want money from it, then that's the way it should be. I fear that they may start charging for non-game-crashing-fix patches soon as well.
No matter the issues I have with them, they've still managed to come out on top for me for the time being - so they win my monies.
Really? You must've not had a first gen PS2. I had to send mine in no less than three (!) times and at the end of the day I had to buy a slim just so I could still play my library.
That being said, a lot of the reasons in this articles are the reasons why I happily chose a PS3 over the 360. I like both, but whereas the PS3 has a fairly hefty up front cost, it really seems the 360 lures you in with a (relatively) low price and then proceeds to nickle and dime you to death.
And Jim nailed it when he said that "fear" is the the predominant emotion of the 360 gamer. I have a good friend who more or less has to do the towel trick anytime he wants to play anything because his warranty is up.
In short, the 360 is a good console with some great exclusives, I just didn't find it to be the worth the headache.
The Wii is the equilent of a console slut as she'll let ANYTHING in there.
The 360 was concieved with a weakened immune system and a breathing problem.
The PS3 is... Well it would be fine if it wasn't for abusive dad Sony!
That's why fanboys are retarded. Even if there is a console to defend it certaining isn't in this generation.
@Scarritt
He made the exact same type of article for Sony. This may be hard to take but sometimes people say bad things about games NOT because they have some stupid personal vendetta about that certain console but because they are genuinely doing something RETARDED
@DaedHead8/Topher
I can still use my own pictures as themes so I've no idea where you got that from.
For the record, I'm on my 4th PS2 because of the shitty DVD drives they have. Just shut up and play games that you enjoy to play. Freakin whiner.
I disagree with this article. Microsoft had tons of business getting into the console market, after all windows is *the* gaming platform.
So the hardware failure thing is an issue, but they have a 3 year warranty to help that. The new HDMI mobo chips are more reliable anyways.
Look at the game lib! Almost every game coming out is either only on 360 or 360 and some other console. Look at Valve, they tried the PS3 and hated it! Now the PS3 is getting no L4D2 or HL2 EP3.
Even if you can null out all of the above, the fact remains that the Xbox invented the in-game community. If it wasn't for Xbox Live, where would we be?
I guess you did specify the console market. My mistake. I made my point primarily because I was a huge Sony Fanboi when the Xbox came out and I used to make a lot of silly statements regarding microsoft's unwelcome status in the games industry. I later realized how stupid it was to make such comments and I guess I want to stop others from sounding stupid as well. Mission failed I guess, eh? Lol
But again I have to disagree with you saying that Microsoft's Natal push is alienating their core audience.
As a 360 owner, I have no desire to purchase Natal, but I certainly don't feel alienated. Natal is simply an addition to the Xbox. It's an attempt to widen their audience.
They aren't creating Natal at the expense of hardcore games. It's clear that they are still heavily pushing the hardcore games that their system is known for.
Anyways, about Microsoft
It took a company with the balls and funds to make ONE Operating System for PC, establish a standard, otherwise we'd have like 4 or 5 semi competent hack jobs. To their credit, MS did just that. People can brag all they want about Linux but it's a work of love, not a plausible business model. To this day you still can't game for shit on it and it's the ONLY worthy "competitor" to Windows. Just imagine if all we'd have is a bunch of different open source OS to choose from. Chaos I tell you.
Think about that for a second.
It's almost a new record!
@liam12360
If it wasn't for Xbox Live, where would we be?
We'd have less of the arcade releases around, but they'd be sold in disc form, and all games would ship with 100% of their content, like they used to.
It's fun to customize your gaming experience. Microsoft wants money for that. Hence, they ruined the fun.
All in all excellent article, not as well focussed as the Sony one but still not bad. Good work Jim.
Just kidding - all hardware manufacturers are bastards. :p

surf dtoid with 






Rising (10+)
People you follow




























follow