games  anime  |  toys
Destructoid is gaming news, community, videos, and sometimes love. Take the tour or jump in with Facebook:

 


Halo Wars DLC is already done, being held in stasis  photo

Aah, downloadable content. Videogame publishers must have spunked with the fury of a thousand Suns after they realized what could be done with it. Like creating the stuff long before a game's release and stockpiling it for later. Paging Halo Wars.

Yes, the DLC for Halo Wars isn't just planned -- it's as good as finished.

"The main thing is that DLC was built into the game design from the very beginning so we've actually been working on DLC all along," explains lead designer Graeme Devine. "It was never the plan to finish the game THEN start work on the DLC.

Just in case you were wondering why Halo Wars won't just ship with more content rather that deliberately holding stuff back, don't worry. Devine has that argument all taken care of:

"I think the thing with DLC is that, if you release it all, how do you sustain interest in the game? One of the ways of sustaining interest in a game is with DLC. So I think it is there for that purpose and does a good job.

"I think if you get it all it's like a massive blitz of content in your face and you don't get all the value of everything we've put into the game. I think the game contains an awful lot in the box already so DLC is a good way to be able to add to that experience."

You can't really argue with the logic of "we want to keep people buying and playing our stuff," but the idea of holding back content rather than making it later still seems really tacky to me. I'd prefer that the game I buy at launch have 100% of the resources and attention behind it, but then, we've all learned by now that games are not made based upon what's best for the consumer.


Continue: More Xbox 360 stories





prev next

31 comments | showing # 1 to 31

VengefulPenor's Avatar
VengefulPenor at 11/17/2008 19:42
That sounds cool but, I would rather them put more effort into the game itself. DLC just seems like a money grab for the most part.
grafkhun's Avatar
grafkhun at 11/17/2008 19:44
you do know that there is always the possibility that DLC is free, Burnout Paradise for example, free DLC. just b/c DLC is announced doesn't 100% garuntee it needs ot be bought. Sure it'll probably cost something in the end, but, don't give up hope right at the starting block.
enfaw's Avatar
enfaw at 11/17/2008 19:44
companies are greedy etc.
eternalplayer2345's Avatar
eternalplayer2345 at 11/17/2008 19:47
I'm still waiting for the game where it's free to download but every level is DLC, that way you can "play at your own rate"
VengefulPenor's Avatar
VengefulPenor at 11/17/2008 19:48
That is true grafkhun. I hope it is free. I always get suckered into dlc then I don't use it.
grafkhun's Avatar
grafkhun at 11/17/2008 19:53
vengefulpenor- same, I'm actually interested in Halo Wars, I may rent it down the line.

eternalplayer- that is a awesome idea! *joins you in waiting for said game*
king3vbo's Avatar
king3vbo at 11/17/2008 19:54
Put it in the game, you fuckwads. Then again, it's not like I'm going to play Halo Wars
Josh Tolentino's Avatar
Josh Tolentino at 11/17/2008 20:04
This is EXACTLY what people were worried about when DLC was still a random concept to consider between boxed expansion packs! Sure, it's almost a given for any major title these days that additional content is in the plans, but for God's sake, DON'T HOLD BACK. At the very least, if you ARE holding back ANYWAY, DON'T FUCKING TELL US YOU STUPID TWATS.

This isn't like selling Horse Armor, it's selling us the horse's legs and saddle post-purchase.

Fuck.
moocow21's Avatar
moocow21 at 11/17/2008 20:05
The chances of me playing this game were <5% already, seeing as it's a console RTS. Now those chances are 0%.
brainderailment's Avatar
brainderailment at 11/17/2008 20:13
Burnout: Paradise calling, says your an asshole.

I agree.
CelicaCrazed's Avatar
CelicaCrazed at 11/17/2008 20:16
Put it in the game?? But it's already in the game!! You just need to pay to unlock it. First DLC up, unlock the highly-coveted "save feature" to save your in-game progress. Five Dollars.

Haha I'm exaggerating but it'll be a dark day if things really do go this way >_>
Knigge's Avatar
Knigge at 11/17/2008 20:23
Welp. I recently decided I'd rather not buy the game, but this pretty much seals it. Thanks, Microsoft!
Necros's Avatar
Necros at 11/17/2008 20:30
This is wrong. If it's this far in advance, that should be in the game. Either that, or just don't tell us about it. It may be the same result (provided it's not obvious like the Vader/Yoda DLC for SCIV), but at least we'll feel better about it.
CharleyTony's Avatar
CharleyTony at 11/17/2008 20:41
Yeh or this guys's logic to make any sense, then that DLC would have to be free. I almost nevr buy premium DLC, sometime it becomes free after a while and the other times I just dont get it.

Adding about 5% to my game doesnt warrant a 10$ purchase when that game was 60$ and most of the time I waited for it to op in price to buy it !
I love buying a fun game but being nickled and dimed is getting annoying.
This just in... having to buy an overpriced HDD in order to have space to store your overprice and held back from that actual game is completely crazy !!!!
TheGuero's Avatar
TheGuero at 11/17/2008 21:53
Yes, of course, deliberately remove content from the game so that you can release it down the road as DLC. This is the only way to keep a game interesting. How about leaving everything in it and then wait to see how the game fares and what the fans want to see.

It's absolutely retarded to hold stuff back to "keep interest" in the game. How about you try to "keep interest" in your community and it's fans.
garison's Avatar
garison at 11/17/2008 22:00
I don't want to pay full price for half a game, then have to pay more money later to play the rest.

You know, what we as gamers could do about this is just not buy Halo 3: Recon,

but I don't expect any of you guys to do this, I know that you will all be lined up for hours in the middle of the night, begging for Bungie's hot, steaming, money hungry spunk splattered in your face.
F Whipple's Avatar
F Whipple at 11/17/2008 22:05
Don't they realize the best way to sustain interest in a game is to make it completely awesome the first time.

EPIC FAIL!!
Coldbrand's Avatar
Coldbrand at 11/17/2008 22:37
This shit is going to keep happening more and more as these companies get greedier and dirtier with their fucking slimy business practices.
Sharpless's Avatar
Sharpless at 11/17/2008 22:40
As long as the game itself has enough content in it at launch, then this is okay. It doesn't sound like they're shortchanging us.
MechaMonkey's Avatar
MechaMonkey at 11/17/2008 22:49
I was upset, but that actually sounds like a rational justification. As long as they provide good support for the game down the road instead of just releasing DLC and washing their hands of the affair, I think it's somewhat reasonable, if, as Sharpless said, it has enough content to stand on its own at launch.
manasteel88's Avatar
manasteel88 at 11/17/2008 23:33
If this was EA with Madden or whatever they're Halo equivalent is they'd have been nailed to the cross. Since its Microsoft and Halo some say its reasonable?

This kinda upsets me because if they were gonna nickel and dime the game then at least I'd be happy that some of it goes to the studio that made it and would use it for the sequel or other projects. That's not the case this time around.
GohanGVO's Avatar
GohanGVO at 11/17/2008 23:43
I appreciate the honesty in saying it is done. However, that now sets the expectation that it should be either free or already on the disc.

I hope it IS free, or the content is rather sizable (and cheapish).
GnappyAssassin's Avatar
GnappyAssassin at 11/17/2008 23:57
It's not like this is the first time this has ever happened, plenty of other developers and publishers push for this kind of thing because it improves the shelf life of whatever game they're making which- in turn has the potential to introduce more people to their work. Along with more cash comes more gamers, and we can all appreciate that. I guarantee you that Halo 3 wasn't done when Bungie started working on Recon, and I know that it didn't make the game any worse because of it.

Point is, any successful game gets locked content wise pretty early so that they can focus on making what is there work correctly. The fact that they want to add more to the experience isn't ALWAYS a desperate plea for cash.
animateria's Avatar
animateria at 11/18/2008 01:40
Its still a way for them to make money.

It justifies them selling more copies as well as DLC.

It justifies them making money at the consumers expense.

Look at Criterion, they made the first content free to create more interest in Burnout. I would think the first Halo Wars DLC being free would be justified in a similar manner.

If its already done, it should have been in the disk. This is no different from Katamari 'DLC'. Its just easier to swallow because its not in the disk.

But I'm fine with their decision. Its their job to make money, but lets not sugar coat the fact.
Noah's Avatar
Noah at 11/18/2008 01:43
Their reasoning is supposed to sound like a good idea, but when you think about it it's like, "Ok I see...WAIT WHERE'D MY WALLET GO!?
ajaxender's Avatar
ajaxender at 11/18/2008 03:40
I dont mind if they start thinking of further content before the game is finished. I dont mind if they figure the game is nearly done, so they can grab a few people and get them to start playing around with stuff or even start making proper content.
But when you have finished content ready to go in your game that isnt on the disc, you have fucked up. This tells me you have not put the full game(as you have created it) on the disc and hence it is not worth the retail price.

In fact, i wouldnt care at all if they said its all free DLC. But hell, even if they wanted it to be (and with an attitude like this, fat chance) MS would force a price on it.
KaL YoshiKa's Avatar
KaL YoshiKa at 11/18/2008 06:07
Unless it's free this is a dick move of the highest order.

"Yeah...we made more stuff for the game but we cut it out deliberately so we could make more money later"

That'd be like cutting out the last 3 chapters of a book to sell later to "keep interest". Well good news you've just lost my interest in this game. So when's Dawn Of War 2 coming out?
wardrox's Avatar
wardrox at 11/18/2008 06:12
His comment is only valid if it's free DLC.
Dexter345's Avatar
Dexter345 at 11/18/2008 14:26
If they just want people to play and enjoy all of their content instead of releasing it with them game, then sure, release it as DLC... for free.
B-Radicate's Avatar
B-Radicate at 11/18/2008 21:17
Well, I WAS looking forward to buying this game. So much for that. Fuck this DLC bullshit.
Iroquois Pliskin's Avatar
Iroquois Pliskin at 11/18/2008 22:11
"I think the thing with DLC is that, if you release it all, how do you sustain interest in the game?"

Oh, i dunno....how about "make a good fucking game"?

There are PLENTY of games from the Pre-DLC era that are still more than interesting enough for me to pick up and play now. Even if i've already played and beaten them, they're still THAT good...

This was back when developers were creative, talented, and original.....now everything's the same formula...

1 Release incomplete buggy game
2 Patch the shit out of it for the next 6 months
3 Monsoon of DLC "micro-transactions"
4 ???
5 Profit

These days, it's either devs have forgotten how to make truly epic games, or, they make games that are almost epic, but are so flawed that you forget all the good in them, and just see what's messed up. and their rational is that they don't hafta do the job right the first time, because the game's already been hyped all to hell, everyone's going to have it, the bugs can be patched out later, and DLC will drive future profits....

Kojima is the rare exception....his games are epic, they're not broken, and they don't rely on DLC to drive sales or future profit...they're so good, that they actually sell themselves...imagine that..
prev next

Comment with Facebook





Click connect and comment instantly!

Comment with Dtoid





New? SIGN UP - it takes 5 seconds

Comments policy

Destructoid is an open discussion community. You don't need to "audition" to post a comment - just speak your mind. We respect differing opinions on the site, so have at it. Be smart, funny, insightful, clueless, or cute -- but back it up with substance. Keep your cool, keep it fun. We only ask that you act respectfully and above all: don't be a troll and ruin it for everyone else. Don't bring down gamers or we'll, you know, gently shoot you in the face and stuff you into a flaming mailbox. Each comment is your opportuntity to make this community awesomer. Is that even a word?

Avoiding the banhammer only requires common sense: spamming, trolling, racism, NSFW stuff, and other forms of sucking will not be tolerated. If anyone is griefing please report abuse. Be good. Don't suck!

 
New on Destructoid.TV play all videos

Loading
Loading Destructoid Videos




    Win this!
    Reminder: We're giving away six copies of Magnacarta 2!



    Dtoid Twitter    Got news?   tips@destructoid.com

    Reviews & Previews
    Mahjongg Artifacts 2 review
    Dragon Age: Origins review
    Lost Winds: The Winter of the Melodias review
    Osmos review
    Space Invaders Extreme 2 review
    Half-Minute Hero review
    JU-ON: The Grudge review
    Kenka Bancho: Badass Rumble review
    Thexder Neo review
    Domino Rally review
    more reviews
    PS3's 256-player MAG
    Rooms The Main Building
    Skate 3
    Hudson's bringing back the Bonk
    James Cameron's Avatar
    Bomberman Battlefest
    Calling
    Bad Company 2's multiplayer
    Partying like it's 1959 in BioShock 2's multiplayer
    BioShock 2 through the eyes of Big Daddy
    more previews


    - The Dtoid Army is 49607 strong -

    Showing Cblogs with 3+ faps   show all

    Call for entries: do the wrong thing

    New to Dtoid? Read the survival guide




     Originals
    Jim Sterling: How to respond to a videogame review





















    More Destructoid Originals




     Popular now more
























    Destructoid's editorial lovefest is:
    Nick Chester
    Editor-in-Chief
    Jim Sterling
    Reviews Editor
    Dale North
    News Editor
    Hamza Aziz
    Community Manager
    Anthony Burch
    Features Editor
    Rey Gutierrez
    Video editor & director
    Niero
    Founder, publisher
    Letters to the editors
    tips@destructoid.com
    Associate Editors
    Ashley Davis Jonathan Holmes
    Brad Nicholson Jonathan Ross
    Brad Rice Jordan Devore
    Chad Concelmo Matthew Razak
    Colette Bennett Tom Fronczak
    Conrad Zimmerman Topher Cantler
    Dyson Samit Sarkar
    Contributors
    Adam Dork
    Ben Perlee
    Daniel Lingen
    Joseph Leray
    Joe Burling
    Mikey
    Will Maddock
    Stella Wong





     

     
      get involved

    register or login
    post a blog
    post a forum
    enter a contest
    contribute a news tip
    suggest a feature
    be a guest editor
    support

    new member's guide
    login assistance
    tech support
    report abuse
    email our editors
    read our dev blog
    nuclear crisis?
    keep in touch

    RSS feed
    Twitter
    Facebook
    Myspace
    Flickr
    Game nights
    Meetup+play online
    seriously

    about Destructoid
    advertising
    terms of use
    privacy policy
    jobs at MM
    buy our crap
    our network

    Tomopop
    Japanator
    Despingation?




    Destructoid is an independently-run publication forged by our love of video games and the gaming community's need of accountable enthusiast press
    living the dream since March 16, 2006