And what do the hackers deserve? A medal for making it so my shit doesn't work? No thanks. Sony may deserve this, they may not. But don't act like the hackers here are somehow the good guys.
Get that bullshit out of here.
umm, right about the time you said Sony deserved all of this and MORE. That pretty much sounds like you're saying, "Please, step right up and do some more damage!" No?
For serious, I must of watched the pilot on Youtube about 50 times and this was months before the show even really started and Jim comes on with all this as if he's the biggest fan. Jim, you can have Adventure Time but Regular Show is mine damn! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xm71-ZJHiVQ
Oh yeah Sony being hacked and stuff.
About the time you cited just about every reason these hackers are having a go at Sony in the first place. And hacking games on PSN and stealing from the PSN store is NOT ownership rights you moron.
In your eyes Sony has done bad thing, but there better ways to handle it then hacking their systems. You can try not buying their products - I hear that really works.
OK, now we're getting somewhere! So if Sony Deserves more... who do you suggest dishes them out more? Who are you going to call upon to achieve this most noble goal?
On a side note, by wanting Sony to be attacked even more.. you're putting consumers right in the line of fire. Why do you want that?
Plus, - most - people who hack their systems do it to pirate games. It's sad, but true. Did you notice I used the word "most", not all?
You do realize that by say Sony deserves more "punishment" you're giving out a HUGE eff you to the people who develop on their platform and every employee at Sony who needs to put bread on their table? Sony doesn't deserve this and neither do the guys who make a living making games on the Playstation store.
We need to have this conversation. Everyone needs to understand the implications of what Sony is trying to do. The hackers have helped make the conversation possible on a wide scale by their actions. Their actions have resulted in something good. Collateral damage is bad, but any general will tell you it is necessary in a war.
Do i support the collateral damage the hackers are causing to the user, no.
I think this is your problem. You expect to be able to say something but have no "words" put into your mouth. But, in actuality it's not words in your mouth at all. It's called inference. I can infer all sorts of stuff just from you saying a little bit. And it's clear as day that if you find attacking Sony to be glorious then there is glory to be found in being a hacker who is attacking Sony. I can also infer that you don't give a shit about John Doe Consumer because you're willing to fuck him over just to get at Sony.
So, one of two things are happening here. You're either being extremely illogical in how you want Sony dealt with or you're being careless with your feelings. There's really not to many other ways of looking at this.
You are right there is collateral damage. I would guess that there has been collateral damage in every war that has ever taken place. There was collateral damage in WWII, but would you really rather live in a world in which the axis won because we were so worried about the collateral damage we did nothing to stop them?
I do hope that if they catch any of these hackers that they end up being persecuted in criminal court (rather than civil) and I hope they end up doing some prison time with a big cellmate who's gonna be the "man" in the relationship.
The only people who care about what they can do with their systems are hackers. I don't and I'm pretty sure the majority doesn't as well. The PS3 is fine the way it is. The hell the I want to mod it for? I don't even have the knowledge to do that.
Oops, I wrote my last thing out before you wrote that.. Although it still stands..
"Do i support the collateral damage the hackers are causing to the user, no."
You keep saying "nuanced" and that I'm somehow the one confusing the "how" with the goal.. but that's exactly the point, in my eyes. Far before Sony should be dealt with, the consumers are the ones that should be looked after. To use your Saddam Hussein reference.. If the only way to get at Saddam is to kill thousands of innocent men and women.. then guess what? You don't get to kill Saddam. That would be called "wrong", not "nuanced".
And the same logic can be applied here. The hackers may think they're acting on lofty goals, but by fucking everybody else over whatever goals they had in mind are now a moot point as their collateral damage far outweighs anything Sony has done. Hence, Sony is no longer the bad guy in this scenario.
"i'm want the end users ownership rights protected."
But not their credit card numbers?
Let me guess.. nuanced?
Fotiori... perhaps you should be careful in the way you word your posts.

surf dtoid with 

Rising (10+)
People you follow
















follow