Got news?   tips@destructoid.com  |  Never miss a story:   RSS + Twitter + YouTube
Hey! New here? Destructoid is a gaming discussion community, updated nearly every 20 minutes. Make a quick avatar to comment and enter our contests. Take the tour!

 


Home Controversy updates

God himself may have laughed, but Neil Diamond and Sony are no fans of parody

9:11 PM on 09.29.2007, Gameboi 28 comments

God himself may have laughed, but Neil Diamond and Sony are no fans of parody photo
     Controversy

If there's one thing that's a given in life, it has been to expect the unexpected. Live long enough, and you'll see pairings of people, places, and things that you'd never dream of being mentioned in the same sentence. Such is the humorous case of a small blog called the Hardcore Christian Gamers Association, a 70's music icon, and Sony.

While I can't officially confirm anything at this point (damn Internet Matlocks insurance), the story goes a little something like this: Drew Koehler, host of the podcast for the above mentioned site, decides that it would be humorous to create a parody of Neil Diamond's "Hello Again" song as a way of joining in on the Halo hysteria.  One of the podcast's listeners does the usual thing and uploads the song to YouTube with some Halo footage, and viola... all the ingredients for a great controversy are accounted for.

From here, the exact details get a little fuzzy, but it appears that Neil may have been offended by the content, and uses Sony as a proxy to send one of those nice cease-and-desist emails that our very own PR Nightmare could travel the circuit giving lectures about. On what grounds? Well they are going with the obvious one of "copyright infringement."

Hit the jump for more details, the supposed email response from Sony, and one nagging question that begs to be answered.. is this for real?

Not having viewed the video in question (or even heard the song), I have to wonder what the big deal is surrounding this. Is Neil upset that Weird Al Yankovic didn't think of it first? Does this really in any way infringe on an actual song (other than a similar title and words that rhyme with the original)? Do you think Sony's legal team sheds any tears at the thought of crushing something even remotely associated with a competitor's product? Most of all.... is this for real? I still have some doubts, but this is too damn good to pass up. See the reponse letter for yourself:

Dear Mr. Koehler,

Sony/ATV Music Publishing, on behalf of Stonebridge Music, is the exclusive administrator of 100% of the musical composition entitled “Hello Again” (Diamond, Lindgren) (the “Composition”).  It has recently come to our attention that you have created a parody version of the Composition entitled “Halo Again” (the “Parody”) and have subsequently distributed the Parody as a download via your website www.christian-gaming.com (the “Site”) and as part of a video currently streaming on YouTube (the “Video”).  

Please be advised that your unlicensed and unauthorized use of the Composition constitutes a serious infringement of Stonebridge Music’s copyright.  Demand is hereby made that you immediately cease and desist from streaming and/or distributing the Parody and the Video, via the Site or otherwise, and destroy all copies of the Parody and/or Video in your possession.  Failure to comply shall result in Sony/ATV pursuing any and all remedies available to it including, without limitation, litigation.

The foregoing shall not be deemed to limit or prejudice Sony/ATV or Stonebridge Music’s rights, all of which are specifically reserved.

Sincerely,

Sean Melia

Director

Business Affairs & Licensing

 

Want to know the real kicker behind this thing? Neil might have been none the wiser had he not been "supposedly" emailed a link to the song in question by the site's admin, SOG KampsAlot. Check out his comments on the page, under the original story:

September 28 2007 16:26:55
Before we take it out on Sony, who I really don't care about much at all, there is some background info everybody needs to know about this.

I've held off until I got the details of what and how everything went down regarding this; but now that I know, here goes my confession:

I found an email address that was supposedly for Neil Diamond himself, and I then emailed Neil Diamond with the link to the MP3 and a link to the YouTube video with a whimsical email stating something along the following,

<blockquote>
"We are in need of Neil Diamond to sing his song “Hello Again”, with just a few minor changes ... A rough draft of the song found here ... But it just doesn’t have that Diamond touch!"
</blockquote>

I wasn't even sure it was Neil Diamond's email address (it was "something"@Large-ISP.com"). But I took a chance, thinking it might get us some exposure, and, well, I guess it did :-(

Apparently, it was indeed Neil Diamond's address, and Neil Diamond was not amused, as I thought he would be.

I think there may be an important life lesson here, so gather 'round kids. Nintendo doesn't like its employees blogging negative stuff about the workplace, and Neil Diamond/Sony might very well not be the best place to show off your Halo parodies. Contrary to popular belief, the Internet is serious business. Now if someone would kindly send us a copy/link of the video in question. Surely it must be grand!

[TheGeekMedia, Via N4G


Next page: More Sony stories




grrza's Avatar
grrza at 09/29/2007 21:27
Isn't parody considered fair use under copyright law? I thought that's how Weird Al managed to do his thing without getting 12 law suits every album...
maex's Avatar
maex at 09/29/2007 21:31
its a touchy area, legally. sometimes copyright holders may not mind if a derivative work is created if there isn't any financial gain on the part of the party that created the derivative work. other times it could be deemed a fair use as long as it didn't directly infringe on the rights of the original copyright holder.
unfortunately, when it comes to music in the united states, copyrights (whether it is warranted or not) are prosecuted incredibly aggressively. Also, with things like youtube that can instantly spread new content to a massive audience, you never know who is going to take offense.
still...Sony and Mr. Diamond really need to step back and ask what harm this has actually done to them.
Kfizz's Avatar
Kfizz at 09/29/2007 21:34
well he ask to do it and has to talk to there people before hand. plus fare use is only if you use a ad or it was in a tv ad or you are reviewing the content.
Neonie's Avatar
Neonie at 09/29/2007 21:34
Big Buisness has no sense of humor.
Bricfa's Avatar
Bricfa at 09/29/2007 21:36
Weird Al asks permission every time.
Gameboi's Avatar
Gameboi at 09/29/2007 21:37
*chuckles* I wonder how many people remember this song? I do, but then again, I'm old ;-)
KevlarGibs's Avatar
KevlarGibs at 09/29/2007 22:09
pretty sure right to parody is covered in our right to free speech. the only way i can seen this being a legitimate complaint is if it were an actual coommercial using it... then they could pull that stupid "it could confuse the public into thinking neil diamond was supporting halo, and that could somehow tarnish his good name"

I think realistically, Microsoft would have more of a case if they wanted to make a big deal out of this than sony and neil diamond do. notice how microsoft isn't making a big deal out of this though... that's because it's bad business to harass your fanbase, but also because it isn't a big deal... it's someone on the internet having some fun.
jumbledthought's Avatar
jumbledthought at 09/29/2007 22:41
Right to parody Neil Diamond's song is covered under 1st amendment. Right to make parody (or funny song) of something else USING Neil Diamond's song is not covered, as I understand it. I am not a lawyer, I just read the internets.
Gamechamp's Avatar
Gamechamp at 09/29/2007 22:48
Actually, even though Weird Al asks permission, that doesn't mean he has to. Legally, he can make and sell the parodies without permission. However, he just asks them 'cause he's nice like that.
Gamechamp's Avatar
Gamechamp at 09/29/2007 22:48
Actually, even though Weird Al asks permission, that doesn't mean he has to. Legally, he can make and sell the parodies without permission. However, he just asks them 'cause he's nice like that.
Gamechamp's Avatar
Gamechamp at 09/29/2007 22:48
Actually, even though Weird Al asks permission, that doesn't mean he has to. Legally, he can make and sell the parodies without permission. However, he just asks them 'cause he's nice like that.
The Grudge's Avatar
The Grudge at 09/29/2007 22:57
*Hits Gamechamp over the head to stop the re-pos.

I always thought parodies were legal as long as it was clearly understood as being one.
Christiangamer's Avatar
Christiangamer at 09/30/2007 00:23
I love that Podcast! heh I don't see what Sony's problem is... it's not like the guy is making a profit off of it.
Orionsaint's Avatar
Orionsaint at 09/30/2007 00:34
Oh great Neil Fuckin Diamond just discovered the Internets.

Where's Will Ferrell when ya need'em?
Orionsaint's Avatar
Orionsaint at 09/30/2007 00:36
Oh great Neil Fuckin Diamond just discovered the Internets.

Where's Will Ferrell when ya need'em?
maex's Avatar
maex at 09/30/2007 00:37
Fair use is a very grey area in copyright law. Fair use is commonly associated with school use as well as non commercial reviewing or short , non commercial uses. However, the language of fair use legislation is such that this particular use would be covered under both Fair use and, most likely, the 1st amendment. People tend not to argue fair use, though, because it is such a muddled area (use by schools for classes being the on real exception to that).
Necros's Avatar
Necros at 09/30/2007 01:11
Eh, no big loss, never liked Neil Diamond that much anyways.
Sharpless's Avatar
Sharpless at 09/30/2007 02:29
Neil Diamond vs. God. WHO WILL WIN?
Mxyzptlk's Avatar
Mxyzptlk at 09/30/2007 10:21
Neil Diamond is still alive?
Volomon's Avatar
Volomon at 09/30/2007 10:47
@grrza Weird Al licenses the songs, that probably why he doesn't get sued.
Jim's Avatar
Jim at 09/30/2007 11:30
It's really time to limit copyright laws to a sensible amount of what can and can't be done with stuff.

Next time Metallica will copyright a guitar riff and off we go... straight to hell.
Ed Cetera's Avatar
Ed Cetera at 09/30/2007 12:34
"Isn't parody considered fair use under copyright law? I thought that's how Weird Al managed to do his thing without getting 12 law suits every album..."

Well, Weird Al took a lot of heat for his parody of James Blunt's "You're Beautiful" and as a result, it was taken off his "Straight Outta Lynwood" album (even though, last time I checked, it was offered for download on Weird Al's website). Plus, Coolio openly complained about Weird Al's parody of "Gangta's Paradise," resulting in Weird Al writing a letter of apology to Coolio.
phamtq's Avatar
phamtq at 09/30/2007 13:20
That letter sounds like a standard cease and desist. If the parody creator simply emails back stating that first amendment and fair use covers parodies and cites the correct sources, they'll back down.

I've seen it done before MANY times. Their bark is worse than their bite. No court is going to want to set a precedent that says parody is not covered under fair use and the first amendment. That would open the door for thousands of companies/people to sue parody creators. All those political cartoons would be illegal, Weird Al's songs would be illegal, etc...
Sharpless's Avatar
Sharpless at 09/30/2007 15:27
For the last time, Weird Al has to get the rights to do his direct parodies. After all, he's using the original artist's music, even though it's a parody. That's why Al doesn't get in trouble - because he contacts the appropriate people and clears it with them.
Im OK's Avatar
Im OK at 09/30/2007 16:54
Anyone remember this? I'm fairly sure that was a situation similar to this one.
Fading Star's Avatar
Fading Star at 10/01/2007 01:53
Help us Weird Al, you're our only hope.
prev next

Returning Dtoiders: login now to post a comment

Destructoid is an open discussion community. You don't need to "audition" to post a comment - just Create an avatar now - it's fast and free: PLUS you also get your own gaming blog and begin posting stories and uploading videos in our open community area that may also appear on our home page. Sign up and we'll guide you through it, it's easy and 100% anonymous.




 Original Videos

 Reviews
Mad Dog McCree Gunslinger Pack
Overlord II
Yosumin Live!
Let's Tap
Ghostbusters: The Video Game (Wii)
View all Game Reviews

 Community blogs -   39783 Dtoiders!

This month's theme: Untapped Potential

New to Dtoid? Read the survival guide


 Originals

How Pokemon Red is blatantly better than Pokemon Blue











more original Destructoid stories



 Popular now more













Destructoid is:
Nick Chester
Editor-in-Chief
Jim Sterling
Reviews Editor
Dale North
News Editor
Hamza Aziz
Community Manager
Anthony Burch
Features Editor
Rey Gutierrez
Video editor & director
Niero
Founder, publisher
Letters to the editors
tips@destructoid.com
Associate Editors
Ashley Davis Jonathan Holmes
Brad Nicholson Jonathan Ross
Brad Rice Jordan Devore
Chad Concelmo Matthew Razak
Colette Bennett Tom Fronczak
Conrad Zimmerman Topher Cantler
Dyson Samit Sarkar
Contributors
Adam Dork
Ben Perlee
Daniel Lingen
Joseph Leray
Joe Burling
Mikey
Will Maddock
Stella Wong




get involved

register or login
post a blog
post a forum
enter a contest
discuss a review
contribute a news tip
write a guest editorial
support

new member's guide
login assistance
tech support
report abuse
email our editors
read our dev blog
nuclear crisis?
keep in touch

RSS feed
Twitter
Facebook
Myspace
Flickr
Game nights
Meet-ups
seriously

about us
advertising
terms of use
privacy policy
jobs at MM
buy our crap
our network

Tomopop
Japanator




Destructoid is an independently-run publication forged by our love of video games and the gaming community's need of accountable enthusiast press
living the dream since March 16, 2006