Quantcast


GDC 2007: Live for Windows Vista price announced photo

Via Game Informer, Microsoft finally got around to revealing the price of what their Games for Windows version of Xbox Live would cost you. Here are the penny-pinching details:

While Microsoft was quite quiet about Live for Windows Vista, today during a press event prior to the Game Developers Conference the company revealed to Game Informer Online the exact pricing structure for the service. Live for Windows Vista will actually be the same exact price for Vista as it is for the Xbox 360.  Just like with the Xbox 360 there will be a free Silver package as well as a Gold package which retails for $49.99 for a year subscription, $7.99 for one month, and $19.99 for three months.

Good news for gamers who already have an Xbox Live Gold Membership – you’ve already subscribed. Your Live membership works on the Xbox, Xbox 360, and Live for Windows. Your gamer tag and achievements will be used across both Xbox and Vista PCs. Upcoming Vista games like Halo 2 and some exclusive Vista casual games will include achievements and will be able to add to your gamer score.

It's pretty much what we all expected: Same price as Xbox Live on the console and current Gold members would already be allowed into the Vista club. Phew, Microsoft came out clean on that one. Had they charged a penny more for current Gold members, I would have done something very illegal to them for y'all.

 








More gaming stories around the web. Got news? Submit yours to tips@destructoid.com



Post a comment! You can also post a photo below:

Comment with Facebook





Click connect and comment instantly!

Comment with Dtoid





New? SIGN UP - it takes 5 seconds

44 comments | showing # 1 to 44
prev next

Mabec's Avatar - Comment posted on 03/07/2007 04:42
Mabec
fucking sad, MS want us to pay them money for playing games on your PC.
World Famous's Avatar - Comment posted on 03/07/2007 04:44
World Famous
They'll make it worth your while, trust.
ArrestedDeveloper's Avatar - Comment posted on 03/07/2007 04:45
ArrestedDeveloper
I have xbox live for the 360 but paying to do multiplayer on PC (cross platform or not) seems stingy.
Ignignokt01's Avatar - Comment posted on 03/07/2007 04:53
Ignignokt01
This is interesting. Other than the cross platforming shiz, Valve's Steam is similar in what they want to achieve, and that's free.

Hmm... me thinks they need to start living up to their "XBOX LIVE IS GOING TO BE AWESOME VERY SOON' promises... soon.
Velirno's Avatar - Comment posted on 03/07/2007 04:57
Velirno
But...I'm paying 7.99 for three months right now...lucky me I suppose.
Bob Muir's Avatar - Comment posted on 03/07/2007 05:11
Bob Muir
But a penny more for current Gold members would make the package $50 even, and we all know companies won't ever price their products that easily.
sorakasumi's Avatar - Comment posted on 03/07/2007 05:17
sorakasumi
As long as you dont need a Xbox gold as well as pc gold account then i'm happy.

So, there will be achievements in Halo 2? What are they gonna be like? "Smack talk 30 noobs" or "give bad feedback to anyone who beats you ever"
sorakasumi's Avatar - Comment posted on 03/07/2007 05:19
sorakasumi
On a side note you Americans got it nice, a Gold acount is $80 in the UK. (don't even start about the ps3)
Rezbit's Avatar - Comment posted on 03/07/2007 05:45
Rezbit
Wow, I'm so glad this is happening!
crazywes's Avatar - Comment posted on 03/07/2007 06:48
crazywes
I am not getting a big warm fuzzy from this. At first I was like cool beans cause of some of the features of Live. Then I remembered that PC gamers normally get the shaft when it comes to multi-platform games. Good example would be right now GRAW2 is out on the 360, but PC's don't get it until june. So what is the incentive for me as a PC gamer to pay for something that is normally free for me anyways when I get the shaft on the release dates?
Dot's Avatar - Comment posted on 03/07/2007 06:51
Dot
"They'll make it worth your while, trust."
How exactly?
I get all the same features with XFire, but for FREE.
Snaileb 's Avatar - Comment posted on 03/07/2007 07:28
Snaileb
Suh-muh will also rub your mangina.

I can't back that up.
mikeohara's Avatar - Comment posted on 03/07/2007 07:41
mikeohara
it's bad that I'll probably have 2, maybe 3 months on my XBL sub when I finally install Vista.
crazywes's Avatar - Comment posted on 03/07/2007 07:46
crazywes
@snaileb,

I am just not secure enough in my sexuality to go brokeback with summa just yet.
xtofuconsumerx's Avatar - Comment posted on 03/07/2007 08:12
xtofuconsumerx
Dot, I agree with Xfire you get all of the features of XBL and more (join your friends server, it saves a list of your most recented server, your favorite server, auto download updates, voice chat, screenshot, in game chat and more!)...and it is FREE. I think this was a good concept just poorly executed....or thought through for that matter.
Slippy's Avatar - Comment posted on 03/07/2007 08:15
Slippy
Why are all the bitches moaning? and how can you compare xfire to the Live service when you haven't used it yet?

Id rather pay that money for a integrated, well ran service than pay that single price for a game like WoW.
JamesSorensen's Avatar - Comment posted on 03/07/2007 08:19
JamesSorensen
can we use one live account for both vista and xbox??

that would be nice
BlindsideDork's Avatar - Comment posted on 03/07/2007 08:29
BlindsideDork
about time for a new post?
bhive01's Avatar - Comment posted on 03/07/2007 08:38
bhive01
I agree. Everybody is asleep. WTF.
Milofo's Avatar - Comment posted on 03/07/2007 08:39
Milofo
If this cost goes for both your XBox account and your PC then owners of the 360 don't have to worry about paying more. However if they are separate bills, then it seems like they are trying to mil us for all we're worth. I prefer to play PC games online for free so I'd like to keep it that way. Just one reason you don't see me playing WoW.
Matthew Mac's Avatar - Comment posted on 03/07/2007 08:42
Matthew Mac
@James

Yes. To quote the article: "Good news for gamers who already have an Xbox Live Gold Membership – you’ve already subscribed. Your Live membership works on the Xbox, Xbox 360, and Live for Windows. Your gamer tag and achievements will be used across both Xbox and Vista PCs.'
MusashiX2's Avatar - Comment posted on 03/07/2007 08:43
MusashiX2
worth it? how is it gonna be worth it? idc about achievements, and i dont wanna hear ppl on voice chat. i have played PC games for so many years with less lag than on xbox live. why should i be excited about this? if it spreads to a lot of games on the pc, it will be another step towards me being an offline-only gamer.
crazywes's Avatar - Comment posted on 03/07/2007 08:48
crazywes
As per the article excert

"Good news for gamers who already have an Xbox Live Gold Membership – you’ve already subscribed. Your Live membership works on the Xbox, Xbox 360, and Live for Windows"

gitrooman's Avatar - Comment posted on 03/07/2007 08:48
gitrooman
Live for windows is a horrible idea, unless your an xbox360 user.There are tons of programs out there on the internets already that do the same thing, and dont charge you 50 bucks a year. Only reason i see for getting this service is to play with xbox360 players...and that isnt much of a reason. As long as microsoft doesnt require you to use their live service to play games online, i'm indiffrent towards the whole thing.
gitrooman's Avatar - Comment posted on 03/07/2007 08:56
gitrooman
I wonder whas gonna happen a few yeas down the line when they release their new windows, what else are they gonna start charging us for? Internet browsing gold membership, media playing gold membership, porn viewing gold membership.
People, think about it, microsoft wants to chare you for something you can do and get already for free. Do you need me to right up a small faq/guide on getting a service like live, for free on pc? cause i will.
Dot's Avatar - Comment posted on 03/07/2007 08:58
Dot
"and how can you compare xfire to the Live service when you haven't used it yet"
It isn't going to be much different from Live on the XBox, so what the hell are you saying here?
Dot's Avatar - Comment posted on 03/07/2007 09:03
Dot
"Good example would be right now GRAW2 is out on the 360, but PC's don't get it until june."
It's actually a TERRIBLE example because GRAW 2 PC is being released simultaneously with the X360 version actually, except in Europe.
It's the *PS3* version that won't be released until June.
crazywes's Avatar - Comment posted on 03/07/2007 09:11
crazywes
@Dot
Uhh Negative Ghostrider

Yea woke up this morning to a nice old email from game stop saying my order was pushed back to june. Hell I don't even know if I will still be in Iraq 1 month from now, let alone 3.
deanhatescoffee's Avatar - Comment posted on 03/07/2007 09:18
deanhatescoffee
They should allow annual subscribers to upgrade to their latest OS for free, or something.
Kif 's Avatar - Comment posted on 03/07/2007 09:29
Kif
Yeah this seems pretty poor to me too. I'm sure Halo 2 will sell just for the achievements it will have in it.
Dot's Avatar - Comment posted on 03/07/2007 09:29
Dot
@crazywes
Well, ok, you were right, however the release date here(in europe that is) remains unchanged though.
And just to say, well, GRAW2 for the PC is being developed separately - it isn't just a straight port of the X360 version, so at least that explains the delay.
DarQraven's Avatar - Comment posted on 03/07/2007 09:39
DarQraven
Honestly I can't see why you would want to get Live for PC anyway. Instead of dedicated servers, you get host advantage when playing against xbox 360 players. Plus, they'll probably get pounded anyway, so you'd be paying 50 dollars a year to play a laggy botmatch on easy mode. Sounds VERY attractive to me...
PiKo's Avatar - Comment posted on 03/07/2007 09:54
PiKo
gee thanks for being willing to break the law on our account we're flattered!
Aaron Mxy Yost's Avatar - Comment posted on 03/07/2007 09:56
Aaron Mxy Yost
It would be nice if I was already a 360 owner and could access all my purchased Live Arcade titles through my PC as well. I don't think I'd get it otherwise though.
crazywes's Avatar - Comment posted on 03/07/2007 10:12
crazywes
@dot

I take back my statement about PC gamer's getting the shaft on release dates. From what I see we make out better on release dates for the most part. I guess I am just pissed that I have to wait 3 more months to play a game I thought was going to be shipped yesterday.





GuitarAtomik's Avatar - Comment posted on 03/07/2007 10:25
GuitarAtomik
I think this will effectively kill the PC sales for Shadowrun. Unless they can play PC to PC for free.
DarQraven's Avatar - Comment posted on 03/07/2007 10:48
DarQraven
Nah, maybe they'll give it to you for free when you get a year subscription.
gitrooman's Avatar - Comment posted on 03/07/2007 11:11
gitrooman
Microsoft and Free dont belong in the same sentence. Unless its to make a point like this one.
Dot's Avatar - Comment posted on 03/07/2007 11:31
Dot
"Unless they can play PC to PC for free."
PC to PC multiplayer in Shadowrun *IS* actually free.
GuitarAtomik's Avatar - Comment posted on 03/07/2007 11:41
GuitarAtomik
@Dot:
"PC to PC multiplayer in Shadowrun *IS* actually free."

That's what I thought. If they started charging people for that I think there'd be MAJOR backlash. I don't see the problem with this then unless the PC people REALLY want to play the X360 players.
DarQraven's Avatar - Comment posted on 03/07/2007 11:51
DarQraven
Oh darn, I forgot the /sarcasm tags.
It's this damn linux. I keep looking at the pretty cube desktop thingy instead of what I'm typing.
ghnvt's Avatar - Comment posted on 03/07/2007 12:46
ghnvt
@Summa

I hope they make it worth our while. More info first.
Eschatos's Avatar - Comment posted on 03/07/2007 15:58
Eschatos
I swear, if they start charging for PC multiplayer, I'll start a boycott. Who's with me?
leshrac55's Avatar - Comment posted on 03/08/2007 00:59
leshrac55
I have to admit, if this becomes the standard for "Games for Windows" and they start pushing developers into this, it's really not too different than the anti-competitive practices they were engaged in in the 90's (where they told hardware manufacturers they had to bundle their browser and software and nothing else in order to secure the best discounts). They will be using their OS dominance to move into another space (and make money from it): online PC gaming. I sincerely hope this isn't the case.

-Jeff
http://alinktothefuture.com
prev next

Comment with Facebook





Click connect and comment instantly!

Comment with Dtoid





New? SIGN UP - it takes 5 seconds

Comments policy

Destructoid is an open discussion community. You don't need to "audition" to post a comment - just speak your mind. We respect differing opinions on the site, so have at it. Be smart, funny, insightful, clueless, or cute -- but back it up with substance. Keep your cool, keep it fun. We only ask that you act respectfully and above all: don't be a troll and ruin it for everyone else. Don't bring down gamers or we'll, you know, gently shoot you in the face and stuff you into a flaming mailbox. Each comment is your opportuntity to make this community awesomer. Is that even a word?

Avoiding the banhammer only requires common sense: spamming, trolling, racism, NSFW stuff, and other forms of sucking will not be tolerated. If anyone is griefing please report abuse. Be good. Don't suck!