Quantcast


GDC 10: Creating the cinematic experience of Uncharted 2 photo

Uncharted 2 delivers what its devs called an "active cinematic experience." "Active" represents player interaction, "cinematic" represents the "movie quality" they want their games to have, and "experience" represents the sum of all the game's parts.

At Naughty Dog, they're all about creating an awesome story. They shape their games around it, with their goal being to get the player emotionally invested. The purpose of their GDC talk was to give other developers a look at how such a game is created.

If that sounds interesting to you, hit the jump for a summary of the talk. Also, spoilers.

Even though Uncharted 2 is hinged on story, it and gameplay have to be considered at the same time when making a game of its ilk. This is because one can motivate the other; if story is shoehorned in later on in development, the game will suffer for it. Naughty Dog's narrative story team is also the gameplay team. This makes things a lot easier, because the two need to be able to constantly communicate and collaborate.

When coming up with a story, the first question to ask is, "What genre are we working on?" The one you choose will help to define your story, setting, characters, mechanics and pacing. When making the Uncharted games, they started by knowing they wanted to work with the pulp-action adventure genre.

 "You have to understand the genre inside and out before making decisions about your story," they told the audience. Naughty Dog researched the genre they chose extensively, looking at movies like National Treasure, The Mummy, Die Hard, and the Indiana Jones series for inspiration.

Once you've got your genre, it will make it easier to ground your game. Grounding defines your limitations to help you better create a believable world with believable characters. For example, they would never have Nathan Drake use a jetpack to get to the top of a building. It just wouldn't match the character or the world.

An actual example of grounding was taken from one of the game's first missions: in it, Nathan and Flynn break into a museum and have to get past a lot of guards. Instead of giving the player many weapons to do the job, they only have a tranquilizer gun for this section. They did this because Nathan Drake's character would never kill innocents, and it was the only way to ensure that the player couldn't screw that up.

While story beats are represented by cutscenes, pacing is the gameplay sequences sandwiched between them. It is crucial in maintaining a player's interest throughout the course of an active cinematic experience. 

After a cutscene, a player's interest tends to dip until they get to the next bit of story. But Naughty Dog wanted to make the in-between more like a rollercoaster than a steady trip. This is why Uncharted 2's gameplay almost constantly changes without any set order. As they very succinctly put it, "When you get bored, switch yo' shit up."

If your cutscenes are too close, there's not enough gameplay, and if they're too far apart, there's not enough motivation to get the player to the next one. The guys pointed out that they had the latter problem in the part of the game where Schafer gets kidnapped. They tried to make the gameplay more varied, which led into their next topic, a design element they dubbed "the gap."

Basically, a gap is an unexpected element that comes in during gameplay, which changes your initial goal. The example they gave for this was the well-known Nepal section. The first goal is for Nathan and Chloe to get to the goal, but that alone is not a very interesting story.

Then comes the first gap: the attack helicopter.

This creates a new goal for the player, which is to avoid being shot. The further the player gets in this section, the more gaps are thrown at them, including enemies to get past and the collapsing building. Not only does this create a challenge for the player, but it creates a challenge for the character, story-wise. The fact that the player and Nathan Drake face these unexpected events together creates a stronger emotional bond between the two.

Next on their list of topics was contrast. They used this technique to make Uncharted 2's dramatic moments really stand out. In the museum, Drake gets to the treasure, which is an upbeat moment. But then Flynn takes the treasure for himself, creating a downbeat moment. Them working together was contrasted by the betrayal.

Cutscenes are a huge part of the Uncharted 2 experience. The biggest point they stressed about them was that they should not be made to show big action sequences, but to show emotional moments. Without the input of the player, these scenes can show exactly the story the game wants to tell.

Because each one is emotionally important, the transition between gameplay and cutscenes have to be as smooth as possible. The guys pointed out that many developers do a poor job of transitioning by not preparing for potential continuity breaks; if, for example, your character is facing a different way than when the cutscene starts, it can really pull you out of the game. So what's a better way to make a transition? The way they did it in Uncharted 2, of course!

Most transitions in the game happen during forced player actions. For example, while at the wrecked train, the game forces the player to jump off of it at a certain point, at which point the cutscene begins. The truck scene mentioned earlier is another example, as the cutscene won't trigger until the player moves Nathan to a specific area of the map. It's much easier to make a smooth transition from something like that.

Next, they discussed scenes, which are the miniature stories they fit inside of the broader story arc. Unlike gaps, which do not constitute any emotional change, these always accompany a minor change in the protagonist. The example they gave us for this concept was Nathan's arrival to Nepal. The climax of the scene occurs when Nathan gets cornered by a truck, then Chloe comes in, blows it up, and the scene ends. Nathan's world is changed; Chloe is back in his life and he didn't get killed.

They stressed how important it is to have the tone of the gameplay match up with the tone of the narrative. At this point, they looked at the injured cameraman scene, where Nathan must carry the aforementioned cameraman while under fire. The in-game consequences for this are that he can't take cover or move as quickly as usual. Character states from previous cutscenes are also maintained through the gameplay sequence; in this case, Chloe is pissed off at Nathan, so she says abrasive things and stays ahead, while Elena says supportive things and stays back to cover him.

This led to a discussion about conflict. "Conflict is the only thing that moves your story forward," they said, moving on to the next topic. There are three levels of conflict: extra-personal, personal, and inner conflict. The cameraman scene was engaging because all three were used.

But they had a problem when trying to design Flynn's death. The relationship between him and Nathan was built up and torn down several times throughout the course of the story. There is even a point where you are forced to work with him again, as enemies. All of this conflict was manufactured to build up emotional hate toward Flynn's character, so that it could be resolved in a boss fight by the player. Unfortunately, time ran out and they couldn't quite line up character motivation, so they had to kill him in a cutscene instead. In the future, they will try to pinpoint problems like these earlier.

To round out their talk, they touched on a few smaller ways they made the world and characters of Uncharted 2 feel more alive. Dialogue was a huge one, of course, but another important one was giving them contextual movesets. A few examples they gave were Nathan putting his hands up when near fire, shivering in the cold, and stumbling when hurt. They also replaced inappropriate actions in certain places, like the Tibetan town, where the button that normally punches gives out handshakes.

In conclusion, they told their audience, "Stop thinking about stories being seperate from gameplay." They've got the right idea in thinking this way, as the process behind Uncharted 2 has made evident.








More gaming stories around the web. Got news? Submit yours to tips@destructoid.com



Post a comment! You can also post a photo below:

Comment with Facebook





Click connect and comment instantly!

Comment with Dtoid





New? SIGN UP - it takes 5 seconds

23 comments | showing # 1 to 23
prev next

New Lie Salad's Avatar - Comment posted on 03/17/2010 13:07
New Lie Salad
You do realize that nathan kills one of the security guards by throwing him of a cliff right? Man it was a good game, but nathan was so wierdly characterized.
New Lie Salad's Avatar - Comment posted on 03/17/2010 13:14
New Lie Salad
Also, that sounded way more douchey than I intended it to. My bad.
fetusmilk's Avatar - Comment posted on 03/17/2010 13:23
fetusmilk
awesome read. its nice to read how they go about creating the story and linking it with the game play. i agree alot of games dont do this very well.
fulldamage's Avatar - Comment posted on 03/17/2010 13:24
fulldamage
@New Lie Salad:

Yeah, gotta agree, that was something my friends and I just found to be really strange - he has his big "I wouldn't shoot someone!" moment, and then you go on to amass body counts in the double and triple digits. I appreciate what they were trying to do, but maybe they should have just eliminated that scene because there's a total disconnect happening there.
Ashley Davis's Avatar - Comment posted on 03/17/2010 13:25
Ashley Davis
@New Lie Salad: Hey, no worries man. I only relayed here what was discussed in the talk, but I am aware of all the little ways they messed up Nathan's character. It's interesting to see their thought processes, and hopefully they'll be even tighter on that stuff in UC3 so that Nathan stops scaring us every once in a while.
Qraze's Avatar - Comment posted on 03/17/2010 13:27
Qraze
blaw blaw blaw great action/adventure game.
TheCleaningGuy's Avatar - Comment posted on 03/17/2010 13:32
TheCleaningGuy
It's interesting to see the way that ND thinks about gameplay and narrative going hand in hand. Ludonarrative dissonance my ass! :)
Qraze's Avatar - Comment posted on 03/17/2010 13:33
Qraze
but i do appreceiate you bringing it to us though.
Mr Andy Dixon's Avatar - Comment posted on 03/17/2010 13:44
Mr Andy Dixon
@New Lie Salad

"You do realize that nathan kills one of the security guards by throwing him of a cliff right?"

Yeah, I thought that part was funny as well. I assumed they only added that part to the scene to show you how the "throw off a cliff" action worked (since it was kind of the "training level"), and because they wanted to keep the funny dialog that went along with it ("There's a guy above you!" followed by "There's a guy below you!").
Nikotine's Avatar - Comment posted on 03/17/2010 14:04
Nikotine
@New Lie Salad
The guard Nathan throws off the building lands in water and you can see movement afterwards in the short cutscene. They really thought of everything lol
Poopface Morty's Avatar - Comment posted on 03/17/2010 14:15
Poopface Morty
"The guard Nathan throws off the building lands in water and you can see movement afterwards in the short cutscene"

No shit? I need to look out for that again when I play through on Crushing.
adrianboy's Avatar - Comment posted on 03/17/2010 14:45
adrianboy
What i feel kind of strange is how Drake shows some disbelief about the power of the Cintamani stone in the beginning, after seeing the power of el Dorado, but there may be a fault in my comment. Nevertheless, i agree that it really is a game that mixes a superb game with a great cinematic experience.
LazyAza's Avatar - Comment posted on 03/17/2010 16:05
LazyAza
I found it odd that ND went to the trouble of making a decent stealth mechanic and then had you kill every single bad guy in the entire game. In the movies they are inspired by the heros never kill anywhere near as many bad guys as Drake does. In this sense he really isn't any different to a Kratos or a Marcas Fenix. I really hope they address this in Uncharted 3, I'd really like them to give us the option of being a non-blood thirsty killer like every other game protagonist that's ever existed. Bad guys or not, a 'character' such as Drake wouldn't kill as many people as he does in his games unless he's a total psycho.
airbagtelex's Avatar - Comment posted on 03/17/2010 16:29
airbagtelex
@ adrianboy

I think they wanted to make the character to fully develop without having to play the first game. If he had believed off the bat that the stone possessed powers, a person who didn't play the first game would think THAT to be unrealistic, and wouldn't buy the entire plot.
airbagtelex's Avatar - Comment posted on 03/17/2010 16:33
airbagtelex
@ LazyAza in the final battle with the main russian boss (i forget his name) he addresses this in the dialog. He asks drake how many hundreds of men he's killed on his journey.

I applaud Naughty dog for NOT making drake like every other batman-esque hero who wouldn't kill a henchman. In real life, cops shoot people, why wouldn't drake?
airbagtelex's Avatar - Comment posted on 03/17/2010 16:34
airbagtelex
to elaborate, i'm not saying it's right for him to kill people, but it's deffinitely more realistic AND better reflects our society, there are never clear cut heroes and villians. So once again, hats off to naughty dog for acknowledging that fact, especially because the mention drake's killings at the end of the game.
Emrah's Avatar - Comment posted on 03/17/2010 17:37
Emrah
@new lie:
If you keep on looking, you'll see that the guard survives the fall, and swims across. Luckily, doesn't start screaming to warn others.

BTW, the guards look more arabic than turkish. It's a bit silly - you couldn't have bearded personnel in Turkey, and the skin color does not match (moustache would be fine). Nothing against arabic people, but they couldn't get it right.
Daniel Wales's Avatar - Comment posted on 03/17/2010 19:35
Daniel Wales
WTF How does the guard survive that fall? His bones would be crushed on the impact, silly silly game.
ExpertPenguin's Avatar - Comment posted on 03/17/2010 19:37
ExpertPenguin
It's been said a bunch of times, but yep, the guard you throw off the building lands in the water and swims away.

But for Nathan's impressive bodycount by the end of the game, isn't he always caught in firefights with people trying to kill HIM for some strange reason? Drake said he wouldn't kill unarmed bodyguards, but I think concessions can be made for militia trained to shoot him dead on sight.
Edicus's Avatar - Comment posted on 03/17/2010 22:47
Edicus
@New Lie Salad

"You do realize that nathan kills one of the security guards by throwing him of a cliff right? Man it was a good game, but nathan was so wierdly characterized."

If you pay attention he falls into the water, and you can see him swimming to shore.
Stoph's Avatar - Comment posted on 03/19/2010 21:41
Stoph
Do people not read the comments before posting? Actually, they must read them because everyone responds to the first comment as if that was all they read. So, read the first comment only then start commenting...makes sense...
Marsel Kisaam's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/18/2011 03:11
Marsel Kisaam
Many hundreds of men he's killed on his journey
generic cialis canadian
Rezaur Rahman's Avatar - Comment posted on 04/23/2011 04:44
Rezaur Rahman
Dude!!! I am not much into reading, but somehow I got to read lots of articles on your blog. It’s amazing how interesting it is for me to visit you very often.
cadent itero
prev next

Comment with Facebook





Click connect and comment instantly!

Comment with Dtoid





New? SIGN UP - it takes 5 seconds

Comments policy

Destructoid is an open discussion community. You don't need to "audition" to post a comment - just speak your mind. We respect differing opinions on the site, so have at it. Be smart, funny, insightful, clueless, or cute -- but back it up with substance. Keep your cool, keep it fun. We only ask that you act respectfully and above all: don't be a troll and ruin it for everyone else. Don't bring down gamers or we'll, you know, gently shoot you in the face and stuff you into a flaming mailbox. Each comment is your opportuntity to make this community awesomer. Is that even a word?

Avoiding the banhammer only requires common sense: spamming, trolling, racism, NSFW stuff, and other forms of sucking will not be tolerated. If anyone is griefing please report abuse. Be good. Don't suck!