Destructoid is gaming news, community, videos, and sometimes love. Take the tour or jump in with Facebook:

 


Games Master's exclusive Arkham Asylum review is suspicious photo

Remember a few weeks back when it was alleged that Eidos had put certain conditions in place with a number of UK magazines, offering an early, exclusive review of Batman: Arkham Asylum if they were met? Rumor had it that Eidos would let reviews go up early if the game scored over 90% and got the front cover of the mag. Well guess what -- UK magazine Games Master just so happens to have an "exclusive" review, and it meets Eidos' terms to the letter.

To say the review is positive would be to severely understate the meaning of the word. The review claims that Arkham is "Not only the best Batman game ever, but one of the finest adventures of its generation." When listing the positive and negative points of the game, Games Master only has one negative: "It has no end."

With a score of 96, a cover story, and nary a bad word to say, it would appear that GM has toed the line perfectly. Whether this is the result of sordid backstage shenanigans, we'll never know for sure, but it's certainly one heck of a coincidence that this "world exclusive review" does everything Eidos supposedly wanted, isn't it?

Eidos has an alleged history of attempting to rig scores and meddle with reviews, so it's not surprising on their end. However, if GM took the bait, or indeed any other media outlet, I'd like them to let me know, just so I make sure I never, ever apply for a job there.


Continue: More United Kingdom stories





prev next

44 comments | showing # 1 to 44

eternalplayer2345's Avatar - Comment posted on 07/25/2009 15:35
eternalplayer2345
"Games Master only has one negative: 'It has no end.'"

ha ha HAHAHAHAHAHA Oh god, this makes me laugh so hard, so happy right now.
Corak's Avatar - Comment posted on 07/25/2009 15:41
Corak
Very interesting Watson, very interesting indeed.
Zantetsuken's Avatar - Comment posted on 07/25/2009 15:49
Zantetsuken
I am disappoint.

Play and GamesTM were always better anyway, but this is just pathetic.

Seriously "It has no end".
DaedHead8's Avatar - Comment posted on 07/25/2009 15:57
DaedHead8
Stuff like this has been happening for years. I remain unfazed and hopeful that the game is fun.
ArcticFox's Avatar - Comment posted on 07/25/2009 15:58
ArcticFox
Why is Eidos always at the center of this kind of Bullshit?
Im OK's Avatar - Comment posted on 07/25/2009 15:58
Im OK
Man this game must be really shitty if Eidos is going to that much trouble. Hopefully the game is still good, and Eidos is just being fucking retarded for no good reason.

That said, I'm going to wait for the Destructoid review. (Just so long as you guys aren't on the take as well. You aren't, are you? You'd totally tell us if you were right?)
Justice's Avatar - Comment posted on 07/25/2009 15:59
Justice
Do people still read GM? Isn't it overpriced these days costing the same amount as official console mags that at least come with demos, videos and more pages. Definitely sounds like a grab for attention to me.
SunKing's Avatar - Comment posted on 07/25/2009 16:01
SunKing
GM's credibility just went from zero to minus one hundred. Congrats.
Turbofail's Avatar - Comment posted on 07/25/2009 16:01
Turbofail
So now no matter what positive press the game gets now, it's going to be covered in slimy skeptisism. Good job trying to control the industry with clocks and/or daggers Eidos, it certainly backfired right in your face, ya stupid twats.
StriderS's Avatar - Comment posted on 07/25/2009 16:11
StriderS
Arkham Aslyum? ASLs are yummy? I point out typos!

I'd be more willing to disbelieve them if Arkham Asylum didn't look so awesome.
ZeroTolo's Avatar - Comment posted on 07/25/2009 16:19
ZeroTolo
I'm pretty sure that the negative is "It has to end" instead of the game having no end.
Necro BABS's Avatar - Comment posted on 07/25/2009 16:22
Necro BABS
The way they are pimping this game one would think edios needs this game to sell really well or they may go the way of midway games
Shael's Avatar - Comment posted on 07/25/2009 16:29
Shael
Look properly at the review. It's not 'It has no end', it's <b>"It has TO end"</b>

Then again, what else is to be expected from Sterling?

Cockeyed, unprofessional and completely missing the fact that GM also stated two OTHER bad points (lame ass final boss and inevitable sequel incoming). Click on the link posted in the article and see for yourself.

Talk about hyping crap up just to get more page hits.

I've no love for GM,hell I never heard of them before now, but it looks like Sterling is just attempting to sensationalize this just to get people to react.
aZZmodan's Avatar - Comment posted on 07/25/2009 16:31
aZZmodan
That's the way to do business people... Eidos isn't the first not the only one...
SetoChaos's Avatar - Comment posted on 07/25/2009 16:31
SetoChaos
I remember when Games Master was good. Now there are a ton of spelling errors every issue. Sadly I'd assume this is just to get an exclusive. I wish Eidos would stop doing this, it makes the Jeff Gerstmann incident which they deny to have anything to do with look very real.
Gyrael's Avatar - Comment posted on 07/25/2009 16:31
Gyrael
Okay, that's too much.
PeeKnuckle's Avatar - Comment posted on 07/25/2009 16:58
PeeKnuckle
Correct. It says "That it has to end". You can see it in the screenshot at RAM Raider's blog. http://ramraider.blogspot.com/2009/07/arkham-asylum-we-have-winner.html There's three negatives listed as well.
Spectreman's Avatar - Comment posted on 07/25/2009 16:58
Spectreman
* Magazines are like old hookers.
Professor Pew's Avatar - Comment posted on 07/25/2009 17:16
Professor Pew
Haha, they call Batman "Bats" in the review. Amazing.

Also, I second Halfleft and ToiletDuck's statements.
Squinshee's Avatar - Comment posted on 07/25/2009 17:41
Squinshee
Fuck off Jim. Have you played the game to completion?

No, you haven't.

Pointing fingers doesn't do anything.
Fanatism's Avatar - Comment posted on 07/25/2009 18:01
Fanatism
I has played this game it has lots of graphics so it deserves big points also jim is fat ololol now I win internets.
ShadowKirby's Avatar - Comment posted on 07/25/2009 18:10
ShadowKirby
96! I haven't played the game but it deserve at least 96.5!
lwelyk's Avatar - Comment posted on 07/25/2009 18:14
lwelyk
Squinshee is right Jim, you should not be suspicious that a game from a company already well-known for shady practices involving reviews gets a suspiciously high score in a magazine. You also should ignore the fact that the review consistently says that parts of the game are the "best ever" or "best this year". Also ignore the part where the negatives section is just two non-statements and one sort of negative thing. You really can't be suspicious, after all, you haven't beaten the game.

Also please fix the typo and factual error in relation to the negatives section.
Projectexodus's Avatar - Comment posted on 07/25/2009 18:50
Projectexodus
I guess I'll wait for the blog reviews and the public feeback then.
Cadtalfryn's Avatar - Comment posted on 07/25/2009 18:51
Cadtalfryn
I had a feeling someone was going to sell their soul to be the first to print this, what with Print media going down the tubes and all, it was just a matter of whom.
Monodi's Avatar - Comment posted on 07/25/2009 18:53
Monodi
I was excited for this game ironically until the moment they were bribing reviews.
rsquad's Avatar - Comment posted on 07/25/2009 19:26
rsquad
Good call, Jim. This smells like bullshit.
Magnalon's Avatar - Comment posted on 07/25/2009 19:33
Magnalon
From what I played of this it's definitely not a fucking 9.6. Will we have any way of knowing if it's legit or not? Probably not. Is there a good chance it's fake? Of course.

Also, (lol) at all the people who haven't seen the repetition and choppy combat in action, yet are defending it because "it's Batman".
Turbofail's Avatar - Comment posted on 07/25/2009 19:48
Turbofail
mmm, I just noticed I said clocks instead of cloaks. Well shit.
Squinshee's Avatar - Comment posted on 07/25/2009 20:49
Squinshee
@lwelyk

It's easy to say they were bribed. But there is no proof, but more importantly, no other reviews to compare this to. I'm not saying they couldn't have been bribed (they very well may have), I'm saying that in order to back up such claims, proof would, you know, help.

If the first review was a 5/10, people would've said, "No wonder Eidos was bribing people!"

You can't have it both ways.
Chronic Logic's Avatar - Comment posted on 07/25/2009 21:28
Chronic Logic
"It has no end"

What the fuck?
runtheplacered's Avatar - Comment posted on 07/25/2009 22:52
runtheplacered
@ Chronic Logic,

Come on man. Read a couple comments. If you did there's no way you would have said that.

I haven't been at Destructoid for a terribly long time, but I'm beginning to get the idea that I should just skip Jim Sterlings writings from here on out. Maybe I'll give a couple more a chance. They just always seem to be inaccurate.
Qraze's Avatar - Comment posted on 07/25/2009 23:18
Qraze
what's fuct up is, when is the game coming out? why are their early review copies now? if they can review the game nearly perfect than the game is done because they ain't mentioning glitches. instead of eidos blacklisting reviewers, reviews should blacklist eidos. fuck this one way or the highway bullshit, it needs to end.
GameraTheGreat's Avatar - Comment posted on 07/26/2009 00:06
GameraTheGreat
Not surprised. I will still get it since I am a huge comic fan. I tend to lean toward what Magnalon said (especially since he actually reviews games and seems to be reviewing this one - did anyone else read that?) and I view the Bat's defense as mostly attributable to membership in the Batman Superfan-Brigade™.

When they (Edios) first announced the delay, I posted a comment that postulated that the reason may have been that the Bat did not stack up well against other super-hero games (Wolverine, Infamous, and Prototype) in the way of pulse pounding action. The mere “human” aspect of Batman lends for combat that is much more “earthbound” than what is found in games based on heroes with powers. Well, I was somewhat hammered by Bat-fans in that thread. Shortly after, I found a PS3 kiosk at Gamestop and played the game. I was kind of underwhelmed.

There are two types of fans that are sort of notorious in the comic world for being hard to talk to; Wolvie and Bat fans will argue you to death regarding the defacto superiority of any merchandise revolving around their heroes. They can beat ANYONE and ANYTHING containing them is pure gold! The Wolverine game actually deserved its praise; I will see when I play Batman whether this review and game lives up to the hype.
peachboy's Avatar - Comment posted on 07/26/2009 01:22
peachboy
i've got to agree with Daedhead, I think this is being blown up a bit.
while i hope this game turns out worth my sixty bucks, the vast majority of games of the same style are the reason things like rentals and the pirate bay exist.
Nogarda's Avatar - Comment posted on 07/26/2009 03:33
Nogarda
Gamers decide for themselves if they like a game or not. you could proclaim it as the best game ever but thier are players out thier so narrow minded that if they arent staring at a variety of guns for 95% od the experience its a load of crap. Sure they have the minds of a pea but its still true. Personally I didnt need a review to get this game I was happy with the demo videos that came out.
aerofan11's Avatar - Comment posted on 07/26/2009 04:14
aerofan11
Eidos, sack your PR people, they're almost as bad as Acclaim's were.
munkee's Avatar - Comment posted on 07/26/2009 09:25
munkee
dominik diamond would never have allowed this!
Cuba Gooding Jr's Avatar - Comment posted on 07/26/2009 18:41
Cuba Gooding Jr
I don't know. Is it as good as GM says it is? Most likely not. But it must be a fairly decent game, otherwise, I doubt they would write such a glowing review if the rest of the press would consider the game average. It just seems like it would be a bad business decision, in the long run.
kittwalker's Avatar - Comment posted on 07/27/2009 06:55
kittwalker
@runtheplacered

Skipping Stirling's articles would be like watching porno and fast-forwarding to the sex, and missing all the important plot developments! Jim is the repair guy who arrived at the sorority house to fix the cable.

His posts might not always be 100% accurate, or 100% spell-checked, but by god he's funny. And that has to count for something.
Holyetheline's Avatar - Comment posted on 07/27/2009 14:42
Holyetheline
@runtheplacered

Come on man! Read some of Jim's articles (especially the funny ones like prototype vs infamous and How Microsoft ruined fun for everybody)... if you did there would be no way you would have said that.
killerbutterfly's Avatar - Comment posted on 08/15/2009 17:14
killerbutterfly
Sterling, you are the KING of typos.
"It has no end"
I have a copy of the issue right next to me, and the negative is "It has AN end"
I would say the typo made me lose faith in your post, but you're right. Something seems a LITTLE fishy in GM towers. Don't let this put you off reading games master magazine though, it really is great. Their reviews are usually really trustworthy. To the bat-cave, my fellows! This means... SUSPICION!
prev next

Comment with Facebook





Click connect and comment instantly!

Comment with Dtoid





New? SIGN UP - it takes 5 seconds

Comments policy

Destructoid is an open discussion community. You don't need to "audition" to post a comment - just speak your mind. We respect differing opinions on the site, so have at it. Be smart, funny, insightful, clueless, or cute -- but back it up with substance. Keep your cool, keep it fun. We only ask that you act respectfully and above all: don't be a troll and ruin it for everyone else. Don't bring down gamers or we'll, you know, gently shoot you in the face and stuff you into a flaming mailbox. Each comment is your opportuntity to make this community awesomer. Is that even a word?

Avoiding the banhammer only requires common sense: spamming, trolling, racism, NSFW stuff, and other forms of sucking will not be tolerated. If anyone is griefing please report abuse. Be good. Don't suck!

 

   Got news?   tips@destructoid.com   |   Dtoid Twitter

New Videos

more videos


Reviews & Previews
BioShock 2 review
Dante's Inferno review
Chime review
Hustle Kings review
iPhone Review Round-up: January review
more reviews
Dawn of War II Chaos Rising
Metro 2033
A trip to the racetracks Days of Thunder Arcade
Double the pleasure, double the fun with Darwinia+
Wizarding world in plastic Lego Harry Potter Years 1-4
more previews


- The Dtoid Army is 56713 strong -

Showing Cblogs with 3+ faps   show all

Call for entries: the Areas of my Expertise

New to Dtoid? Read the survival guide


 Originals
Jim Sterling: How Aliens are blatantly better than Predators





















More Destructoid Originals




We are Destructoid   tips@destructoid.com
Nick Chester
Editor-in-Chief
Niero
Founder, Big Boss
Jim Sterling
Reviews Editor
Hamza Aziz
Community Manager
Dale North
News Editor
Rey Gutierrez
Destructoid Video EIC
Anthony Burch
Features Editor
Brad Nicholson
Managing Editor
Tom Fronczak Colette Bennett
Ashley Davis Ben Perlee
Conrad
Zimmerman
Chad Concelmo
Jonathan Holmes Jonathan Ross
Brad Rice Jordan Devore
Will Maddock Matthew Razak
Josh Tolentino
Joseph Leray
Topher Cantler Samit Sarkar
     
  Adam Dork
Daniel Lingen
Hollie Bennett
Joe Burling
Mikey Turvey






 
 
  get involved

register or login
post a blog
post a forum
enter a contest
contribute a news tip
suggest a feature
be a guest editor
support

new member's guide
login assistance
tech support
report abuse
email our editors
read our dev blog
nuclear crisis?
keep in touch

RSS feed
Twitter
Facebook
Myspace
Flickr
Game nights
Meetup+play online
seriously

about Destructoid
advertising
terms of use
privacy policy
jobs at MM
buy our crap
our network

Tomopop
Japanator
Despingation?




Destructoid is an independently-run publication forged by our love of video games and the gaming community's need of accountable enthusiast press
living the dream since March 16, 2006