Quantcast


Future Clancy titles converging, publishing at its finest photo

According to EndWar programmer Vinh-Dieu Lam, the Tom Clancy universe will become one solid entity spread out between multiple games. Previously, Tom Clancy games only adhered to the storyline within their respective series. Now, it looks as if upcoming RTS EndWar will become the keystone to anchoring future Clancy games together.

Lam set the stage with GamePlayer by first describing some of the lighter tie-ins in EndWar:

Some of our airstrikes come from the HAWX list of fighter jets, some of the Ghost Recon units are in the game, like Scott Mitchell is the commanding officer of the American army, so there are a few tie-ins. It all acts as a basis for future tie-ins.
Lam then went a step further in terms of what Ubisoft wants to do with their exclusive license in the near future:
...in [later] versions you’ll find, say, missions generated in the next Ghost Recon (presumably GRAW 3) affecting the world map in the next EndWar (presumably EndWar 2). So maybe in the next EndWar you will need to attack Paris but before you can it may generate some sort of Splinter Cell recon mission or a Ghost Recon mission or things like that. But that is the direction we are looking at.
This opens the door to an amazing amount of both cool and fairly scary things. Hopefully, we won’t have to buy the upcoming emo version of Splinter Cell to be able to understand what would happen in GRAW 3. In a worse (but very imaginary) scenario, could you envision buying one game to be able to play another?

[via Shacknews]








More gaming stories around the web. Got news? Submit yours to tips@destructoid.com



Post a comment! You can also post a photo below:

Comment with Facebook





Click connect and comment instantly!

Comment with Dtoid





New? SIGN UP - it takes 5 seconds

19 comments | showing # 1 to 19
prev next

Xzyliac's Avatar - Comment posted on 10/18/2008 17:31
Xzyliac
Curious as to whether this has anything to do with the Splinter Cell delay. I mean that entry needed a redo from the start but this can probably only help in laying out a foundation.
dr3nd4r's Avatar - Comment posted on 10/18/2008 17:38
dr3nd4r
well, like brad says, it's very interesting and scary at the same time
Brian Szabelski's Avatar - Comment posted on 10/18/2008 18:10
Brian Szabelski
This is a double-edged sword. On one hand, it could necessitate people buying multiple games just to unlock things, and that could be quite expensive. But if Ubisoft can pull the mechanics of this off, it could be one of the most impressive and interesting things to happen to gaming in quite some time.
ajaxender's Avatar - Comment posted on 10/18/2008 18:25
ajaxender
I love the concept, and it makes total sense. However, its open to abuse, as everyone points out, and you just cant trust EA anymore...
ajaxender's Avatar - Comment posted on 10/18/2008 18:27
ajaxender
Oops, my bad, Ubisoft. Cant trust Ubisoft. Admittedly they are better than EA, but still, i too am not sure about this.
bmdubya's Avatar - Comment posted on 10/18/2008 18:34
bmdubya
I'm looking forward to emo Splinter Cell. Does that make me a bad person?
Matthew Blake's Avatar - Comment posted on 10/18/2008 18:34
Matthew Blake
From a creative perspective, I actually really like the idea; to see a wide variety of stories working together in one universe would make the Tom Clancy franchise as a whole greater than the sum of its parts.

It sounds like what they're planning are modular missions, sprinkled throughout all of the various games, that, depending on how it's completed, can affect the story (and thus gameplay) of other games. The only thing that worries me is how they determine what affects what, and how. I'm not sure if the interconnected storylines will only depend on one player, or if it will be based on how many people complete or fail a mission overall. Still, this is an incredibly intriguing idea, and a remarkably risky one...
SidewaysMatty's Avatar - Comment posted on 10/18/2008 20:00
SidewaysMatty
Sounds like a good idea, from creative and business perspectives. If someone gets into one game, they may become interested in getting another.

As long as there is still an individual focus on each series, and there is no more rush jobs like Vegas 2 (don't get me wrong, I loved it, just clearly a rush job to tie up the first game and cash in). I wouldn't be suprised to see some games getting rushed to fit in with another game supposed to come out earlier.
Maurice Tan's Avatar - Comment posted on 10/18/2008 20:02
Maurice Tan
Adding this can make a more coherent universe over multiple games without necessarily having to play all games. Cross-game changes would be hard to do right, but I guess they could use player decisions impact a campaign if they just use the savedata of the other game. As long as you don't have to swap games to get ahead or anything...
SnakeDude4Life's Avatar - Comment posted on 10/18/2008 21:30
SnakeDude4Life
Let's not forget the rumored Tom Clancy MMO...
Sharpless's Avatar - Comment posted on 10/19/2008 06:34
Sharpless
I don't think it will ever get to the extreme point that you described, Brad. I like this idea, though. I just wish the mythos was a little more interesting. I don't really think I'd care too much, if they overlapped.
Holyetheline's Avatar - Comment posted on 10/19/2008 08:35
Holyetheline
That is one hell of a cool idea. It might make the game feel broken though. Or confused perhaps.
B-Radicate's Avatar - Comment posted on 10/19/2008 11:23
B-Radicate
I think if handled properly, it could be very cool. Kind of like how Halo 3: Recon will play alongside the story established in Halo 3.

I hope this means the next Rainbow Six title will be brought into the semi-future with some advanced tech more akin to the Splinter Cell series, along with cross-game abilities (being able to destroy lights and cutting power supplies in RS a la SC would be an AMAZING way to make the RS games feel fresh and more alive).

Plus, creating a solid universe to tell interlacing stories would legitimately make me want to play more Tom Clancy games, if it meant it would flesh out the experience for me. Go Ubisoft.
Edco's Avatar - Comment posted on 10/19/2008 13:16
Edco
Does sound like a solid direction, tho I've always wondered the level of involvement Clancy actually has. His writing and world are involved of course, but does he actually dedicate time into evolving his 'gamingverse?'
Capn Birdseye's Avatar - Comment posted on 10/19/2008 14:56
Capn Birdseye
It could be a pretty cool idea, if done right.

Either way, I love R6 and SC as they are, so I have no problems if they decide to keep the existing setup either.
Sharpless's Avatar - Comment posted on 10/19/2008 14:57
Sharpless
@Edco
I'm pretty sure Clancy sold off the rights to these games, didn't he? I thought there was a semi-recent deal where the company effectively took it out of his hands -- though, I don't think he was ever all that heavily involved to begin with. I assume it's like how George Lucas isn't really involved with the Expanded Universe novels.
Capn Birdseye's Avatar - Comment posted on 10/20/2008 06:14
Capn Birdseye
yeah I dont get the whole sam fisher emo thing. He just looks like a transient to me, not some whiny brat that listens to stupid music...?
smihtv41721's Avatar - Comment posted on 04/23/2011 06:33
smihtv41721
Thanks a lot for enjoying this beauty article with me. I am appreciating it very much! Looking forward to another great article. Good luck to the author! all the best!
Love Messages
prev next

Comment with Facebook





Click connect and comment instantly!

Comment with Dtoid





New? SIGN UP - it takes 5 seconds

Comments policy

Destructoid is an open discussion community. You don't need to "audition" to post a comment - just speak your mind. We respect differing opinions on the site, so have at it. Be smart, funny, insightful, clueless, or cute -- but back it up with substance. Keep your cool, keep it fun. We only ask that you act respectfully and above all: don't be a troll and ruin it for everyone else. Don't bring down gamers or we'll, you know, gently shoot you in the face and stuff you into a flaming mailbox. Each comment is your opportuntity to make this community awesomer. Is that even a word?

Avoiding the banhammer only requires common sense: spamming, trolling, racism, NSFW stuff, and other forms of sucking will not be tolerated. If anyone is griefing please report abuse. Be good. Don't suck!