surf dtoid with 
Rising (10+)
People you follow
lol waiting for a "super" version for sure :P
i want all of my content on disc and unlocked and ready to go :P
i want all of my content on disc and unlocked and ready to go :P
im going to get the dlc characters whether they are on-disc or not. hell, if they are on disc it will save me some time and HD space. i personally prefer on disc dlc for fighting games, since its better than mandatory compatibility downloads that put all the data on your HD anyway in order to play online. i dont get the outrage, really.
100% all on disk, Elena gameplay here
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2w97xsUbJHY&feature=player_embedded
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2w97xsUbJHY&feature=player_embedded
Wow. This one is fairly bad, even for Capcom. I was going to wait for a re-release anyway, but shit.
Dear Jonathan Holmes,
Not sure where I'm supposed to post tips, but you can credit this to Ryan Guiterrez "Gootecks" and the youtube author 'SoulReaper'. It's a video of Elena as a playable character. http://youtu.be/2w97xsUbJHY
Not sure where I'm supposed to post tips, but you can credit this to Ryan Guiterrez "Gootecks" and the youtube author 'SoulReaper'. It's a video of Elena as a playable character. http://youtu.be/2w97xsUbJHY
Well I am the guy who uploaded the videos. I was on Gamefaqs when they said that Megaman and Pacman character models were in the game. I got the game early from a small video game and card shop in a nearby town. Well when I heard on Gamefaqs that the data was there I immediately scanned the disc. First the 'assets' folder, and then the 'movie' folder, and then onto the sound folder. Now I know they are there because the voice folders are divided my three letter code names, shortened for the character. Well in the battle folder, the most obvious 'GUY', has both the english and japanese voice files. I am assuming this is the voices for when they fight. So in this folder the three letter names are and you should be able to guess them: ALS, BLK, BRY CDY, CHR, DDL, ELN, JAC, LEI, LRS, MGM, PCM, SKR. These are the folders for your battle data. Now there are 29 movies in the movie folder. 26 are for the two man team ups, 2 are for the single entry, and 1 for the generic team of anyone. So they are on the disc. So yeah you have to buy the characters to unlock them, because they damn sure won't be free. The sound files themselves are in a format which I will not give out, but there file sizes are very compressed. The video that I upped is all .wmv. Playable on any computer. Also this game is region-free. Sony and Tekken are very close friends. So I suspect they wanted to entice people because really Tekken is Sony/PS franchise. Tekken 6 was the only Tekken to come to another console. So yeah Sony users rejoice, M$ users pay up. So thanks Capcom I am a faithful 360 owner.
Well I am the guy who uploaded the videos. I was on Gamefaqs when they said that Megaman and Pacman character models were in the game. I got the game early from a small video game and card shop in a nearby town. Well when I heard on Gamefaqs that the data was there I immediately scanned the disc. First the 'stream' folder, and then the 'movie' folder, and then onto the sound folder. Now I know they are there because the voice folders are divided my three letter code names, shortened for the character. Well in the battle folder, the most obvious 'GUY', has both the english and japanese voice files. I am assuming this is the voices for when they fight. So in this folder the three letter names are and you should be able to guess them: ALS, BLK, BRY CDY, CHR, DDL, ELN, JAC, LEI, LRS, MGM, PCM, SKR. These are the folders for your battle data. Now there are 29 movies in the movie folder. 26 are for the two man team ups, 2 are for the single entry, and 1 for the generic team of anyone. So they are on the disc. So yeah you have to buy the characters to unlock them, because they damn sure won't be free. The sound files themselves are in a format which I will not give out, but there file sizes are very compressed. The video that I upped is all .wmv. Playable on any computer. Also this game is region-free. Sony and Tekken are very close friends. So I suspect they wanted to entice people because really Tekken is Sony/PS franchise. Tekken 6 was the only Tekken to come to another console. So yeah Sony users rejoice, M$ users pay up. So thanks Capcom I am a faithful 360 owner.
So what? The game has a shitload of characters as it is, and it's not like we wouldn't get our money's worth. Capcom's planned budget includes revenues from DLC, whether that's on the disc already or not. So these characters, or more likely the whole game, would not exist (in this form at lease) otherwise.
Don't like it? Don't buy it (or buy used I guess). Vote with your wallet, nobody is stopping you.
Don't like it? Don't buy it (or buy used I guess). Vote with your wallet, nobody is stopping you.
Yea, I'm sorry. Capcom has gone from my favorite Japanese publisher to my least favorite within the past year. I know they're a business, but their business stinks.
Fuck Capcom. MvC3 was the last Capcom game I will ever buy. There non-fighting titles will be rented. Actually renting still helps them. If I want to play a game published by Capcom again I will just buy it Used.
Fuck Capcom. MvC3 was the last Capcom game I will ever buy. There non-fighting titles will be rented. Actually renting still helps them. If I want to play a game published by Capcom again I will just buy it Used. Yeah, I want Resident Evil 6 but I will be buying it used. I am done giving them my money.
Holmes why are you making a mountain out of a mole hill? You should know better than this...
Games are provided a certain budget; they use this budget to create content. When you have DLC you are provided additional budget to create additional content. If DLC didn't exist then these 12 characters wouldn't exist. When they make the DLC is completely irrelevant.
For the guy asking what is stopping them from adding the DLC characters back into the core product... Well, that is an incredibly stupid question. That would mean that they went WAY over budget, making the game far less profitable. That would be an incredibly bad move on Capcom's part; if they did this, and I was a stock holder, I would dump my stock as quickly as possible.
The people who are freaking out and calling this an outrage are being absolutely irrational; you aren't willing to look at the factual information that is being provided. You are too simple to realize that you are NOT being "tricked" or "robbed". Or maybe you simply don't want to acknowledge the truth because it is more fun to stomp your feet and make inflammatory statements.
Video games are a business, if you want them to stick around then they need to be profitable. This is not "a new low" and it sure as hell isn't an "outrage"; just try to think about it rationally.
Games are provided a certain budget; they use this budget to create content. When you have DLC you are provided additional budget to create additional content. If DLC didn't exist then these 12 characters wouldn't exist. When they make the DLC is completely irrelevant.
For the guy asking what is stopping them from adding the DLC characters back into the core product... Well, that is an incredibly stupid question. That would mean that they went WAY over budget, making the game far less profitable. That would be an incredibly bad move on Capcom's part; if they did this, and I was a stock holder, I would dump my stock as quickly as possible.
The people who are freaking out and calling this an outrage are being absolutely irrational; you aren't willing to look at the factual information that is being provided. You are too simple to realize that you are NOT being "tricked" or "robbed". Or maybe you simply don't want to acknowledge the truth because it is more fun to stomp your feet and make inflammatory statements.
Video games are a business, if you want them to stick around then they need to be profitable. This is not "a new low" and it sure as hell isn't an "outrage"; just try to think about it rationally.
@Voxeril
inb4 capcom takes it down huehuehuehuehue censorship
gg modern gaming, saw this coming years ago
inb4 capcom takes it down huehuehuehuehue censorship
gg modern gaming, saw this coming years ago
haha
Capcom being the same as usual.
Didn't care about this game before, and I still don't.
And most ppl that care will buy it regardless, it seems.
Capcom being the same as usual.
Didn't care about this game before, and I still don't.
And most ppl that care will buy it regardless, it seems.
Holmes you're always sucking on M$'s balls. If it were the other way around you'd be okay with it. If you own both systems it shouldn't bother you so much.
I defended capcom in a previous comment. I was under the impression that the characters/costumes were incomplete. I changed my mind. I want this shit for free now.
Ready to buy Darkstalkers guys? It's just saddening to me that Capcom can sell all these games, constantly pulling this crap, and yet Soul Calibur V struggles.
@spman2099
I would submit it is you who is being irrational, as you are using incredibly flawed logic as a basis for your argument.
A game is certainly provided a certain budget, this is obvious. However, the budget provided for the development of an item is just that, an investment in the final outcome of that development. It is terrible business to gimp your own item as a means of garnering continuing profit through added content, as you cannot predict the future, and your product may not sell enough to see a return on that investment.
Your assessment that this is a normal action, and a respectable one at that, seems to disregard the fundamental issue with this kind of business model. If it is established that you are gimping product with the understanding that you will make money off the de-gimping of said product, how many of these products are sacrificed up knowing that only some can become the kind of hit necessary to recoup and profit? Is it a 1-1 ratio, a 2-1 ratio, maybe a 10-1 ratio?.
Would you advocate that 50% of games that try this become failures in their attempt to utilize such a business model? This is assuming the ratio is indeed 1-1, which it is almost certainly not. Let's say it is 3-1, that means for every one success, the publisher has wasted money on 3 other games, and screwed their consumers out of content they paid for as part of the purchased disc knowing that at the end of the day, a larger percentage of games will fail rather than succeed. The same can be said for shoehorned multiplayer, but that's another conversation.
So am I simple? I would say there is serious problems with your "games cost money to make, gaming is a business" argument when you are defending a business model that is wasteful at best for every game that is not a guaranteed hit. Assuming the status quo is a model that can be used as a benchmark, without questioning whether that status quo is indeed sound enough to do so, seems far more simple.
I would submit it is you who is being irrational, as you are using incredibly flawed logic as a basis for your argument.
A game is certainly provided a certain budget, this is obvious. However, the budget provided for the development of an item is just that, an investment in the final outcome of that development. It is terrible business to gimp your own item as a means of garnering continuing profit through added content, as you cannot predict the future, and your product may not sell enough to see a return on that investment.
Your assessment that this is a normal action, and a respectable one at that, seems to disregard the fundamental issue with this kind of business model. If it is established that you are gimping product with the understanding that you will make money off the de-gimping of said product, how many of these products are sacrificed up knowing that only some can become the kind of hit necessary to recoup and profit? Is it a 1-1 ratio, a 2-1 ratio, maybe a 10-1 ratio?.
Would you advocate that 50% of games that try this become failures in their attempt to utilize such a business model? This is assuming the ratio is indeed 1-1, which it is almost certainly not. Let's say it is 3-1, that means for every one success, the publisher has wasted money on 3 other games, and screwed their consumers out of content they paid for as part of the purchased disc knowing that at the end of the day, a larger percentage of games will fail rather than succeed. The same can be said for shoehorned multiplayer, but that's another conversation.
So am I simple? I would say there is serious problems with your "games cost money to make, gaming is a business" argument when you are defending a business model that is wasteful at best for every game that is not a guaranteed hit. Assuming the status quo is a model that can be used as a benchmark, without questioning whether that status quo is indeed sound enough to do so, seems far more simple.
@OneRed
How did they "gimp" the product? The game has a very expansive roster... If you are claiming that they removed content in order to sell it at a later date then you still don't understand how the whole DLC thing works.
Those 12 characters were created using a budget allocated for DLC; thus, if they weren't going to be sold as DLC then they simply would never have been created.
Nothing has been "gimped"; you are not paying for the "degimping" of the product when you buy the DLC characters, you are paying for the DLC characters that were created using money that was never part of the original budget.
The characters being on the disc only shows that the DLC content was developed along side the primary content. Once again, it was developed with DLC money that would never have been allocated if DLC didn't exist.
It isn't like this is an insubstantial game people, there are a lot of characters ready to be played with the primary release...
Your outrage comes from a lack of knowledge. I feel like trying to explain this will never work; people don't want to understand, they want to be angry.
How did they "gimp" the product? The game has a very expansive roster... If you are claiming that they removed content in order to sell it at a later date then you still don't understand how the whole DLC thing works.
Those 12 characters were created using a budget allocated for DLC; thus, if they weren't going to be sold as DLC then they simply would never have been created.
Nothing has been "gimped"; you are not paying for the "degimping" of the product when you buy the DLC characters, you are paying for the DLC characters that were created using money that was never part of the original budget.
The characters being on the disc only shows that the DLC content was developed along side the primary content. Once again, it was developed with DLC money that would never have been allocated if DLC didn't exist.
It isn't like this is an insubstantial game people, there are a lot of characters ready to be played with the primary release...
Your outrage comes from a lack of knowledge. I feel like trying to explain this will never work; people don't want to understand, they want to be angry.
@shinta
I wanted darkstalkers so hard, you have no idea. At this rate even if they release it (mml3 is a grim prediction for all of capcoms cult hits), it would prolly only have like 10 characters with "more fabulous dlc on the way in the form of paid disc content unlocks! Enjoy, suckers!"
Go suck a fat one, capcom.
I wanted darkstalkers so hard, you have no idea. At this rate even if they release it (mml3 is a grim prediction for all of capcoms cult hits), it would prolly only have like 10 characters with "more fabulous dlc on the way in the form of paid disc content unlocks! Enjoy, suckers!"
Go suck a fat one, capcom.
@spman2099
Unless you were present at budget allocation meetings you're just talking out your ass. I really don't see how you could defend this sort of practice at all.
As for the whole 'if they weren't created using a seperate DLC budget they wouldn't exist at all' crap, what about the costumes? Those used to be free unlockables in all sorts of games before DLC became prevalent. There were secret/unlockable characters in every fighting game, and those never seemed to cause undue financial burden on developers.
Unless you were present at budget allocation meetings you're just talking out your ass. I really don't see how you could defend this sort of practice at all.
As for the whole 'if they weren't created using a seperate DLC budget they wouldn't exist at all' crap, what about the costumes? Those used to be free unlockables in all sorts of games before DLC became prevalent. There were secret/unlockable characters in every fighting game, and those never seemed to cause undue financial burden on developers.
Not surprised at all. I pre-ordered MvC3 and was very suspicious when BOTH Shuma-Gorath and Jill Valentine's download came under 1MB.
What's that, Ono? Blanka isn't ready and you guys are having some trouble transitioning him into the SFxT engine?: http://youtu.be/9aifTbLl7HI
@spman
Yes, they are gimping the product. They are selling you something, not telling you that they have sold that to you, and lead you to believe you must pay to receive it at a later date. The content is on the disc, which means it was developed before the game was sent out to cert, regardless of the money that was spent on making it.
You are arguing that semantics are more important than fact. The fact is Capcom is making people pay twice for the same product. Your argument against this fact is completely fallacious, as well. Whether or not the budget was separate does not matter, the semantics of a budget allocated to the development of a product do not dictate whether or not you can charge people twice for it. There is no argument against this, you cannot mislead your customers because of semantics you can simply make up and expect that to be a valid explanation. They could separate the budget of any game into dozens of pieces, put all those pieces onto a disc, and by your rationale it would be okay for them to sell you unlock codes for all those separate pieces you already paid full price for. They could just say "all these pieces were made on separate budgets", and all that would change is the nomenclature used. It's utterly illogical.
And the very basis of your argument is flawed. You are assuming that this business model is a good one. And again, I would like you to think about the amount of money wasted on games where this model ends up not working, not unlike shoehorned multiplayer, and the reverberating effects these wasteful practices have had on the cost of game development over the last 6 or 7 years.
Explain and rationalize the benefits of paying twice for the same product, in practical terms. These things are in the final product, how they got there is immaterial, so it is indisputable fact that you paid for this content once already
If you are going to condescend, try not to do so with a fallacious argument based on flawed logic. Otherwise you look like an ass.
Yes, they are gimping the product. They are selling you something, not telling you that they have sold that to you, and lead you to believe you must pay to receive it at a later date. The content is on the disc, which means it was developed before the game was sent out to cert, regardless of the money that was spent on making it.
You are arguing that semantics are more important than fact. The fact is Capcom is making people pay twice for the same product. Your argument against this fact is completely fallacious, as well. Whether or not the budget was separate does not matter, the semantics of a budget allocated to the development of a product do not dictate whether or not you can charge people twice for it. There is no argument against this, you cannot mislead your customers because of semantics you can simply make up and expect that to be a valid explanation. They could separate the budget of any game into dozens of pieces, put all those pieces onto a disc, and by your rationale it would be okay for them to sell you unlock codes for all those separate pieces you already paid full price for. They could just say "all these pieces were made on separate budgets", and all that would change is the nomenclature used. It's utterly illogical.
And the very basis of your argument is flawed. You are assuming that this business model is a good one. And again, I would like you to think about the amount of money wasted on games where this model ends up not working, not unlike shoehorned multiplayer, and the reverberating effects these wasteful practices have had on the cost of game development over the last 6 or 7 years.
Explain and rationalize the benefits of paying twice for the same product, in practical terms. These things are in the final product, how they got there is immaterial, so it is indisputable fact that you paid for this content once already
If you are going to condescend, try not to do so with a fallacious argument based on flawed logic. Otherwise you look like an ass.
What I thinks it's odd about this is that the characters appear to be actually complete. So those characters would be finished by late january or early february when the game went gold.
But the ESRB leaked the existence of Alisa and they don't rate DLC.
So any chance of those characters being unlockables or anything like that ? Other doubt is Megaman/Pac-man characters. Why release them next week is they are already on disc ? It doesn't make any sense, at all.
So the possible scenarios are:
-Content is complete and being held to be purchased as DLC later
-Content is lacking polish and will be released later(free DLC or not)
-Unlockable characters inside the game
I really wish to believe scenarios 2 and 3. I will be buying this game so let's see what happens next.
But the ESRB leaked the existence of Alisa and they don't rate DLC.
So any chance of those characters being unlockables or anything like that ? Other doubt is Megaman/Pac-man characters. Why release them next week is they are already on disc ? It doesn't make any sense, at all.
So the possible scenarios are:
-Content is complete and being held to be purchased as DLC later
-Content is lacking polish and will be released later(free DLC or not)
-Unlockable characters inside the game
I really wish to believe scenarios 2 and 3. I will be buying this game so let's see what happens next.
Man, I'm really looking forward to this game, but man, d*ck move. "OUR GAME IS WORTH MORE THAN A PETTY $59.99 MWAHAHAHAAAA!!!!"
Apparently telling a mod on the capcom-unity forums that they are "grasping for straws" because every time they request proof of COMPLETE on disk DLC the proof is shown to them and then they change what they want to see.
"prologues have no voices so aren't complete" - proof voices are stored on disk but in a dif file format
"we've only seen a couple character models but not all" - all models revealed
"the models are all gray with no animation" - skin files linked as being different file format, animation shown
"we don't know if they have complete movesets" - leaked character shown
"we don't know if they are balanced yet"
I say "you really seem to be grasping at straws at this point." and my post is edited and I'm told I was "harassing a mod"
"prologues have no voices so aren't complete" - proof voices are stored on disk but in a dif file format
"we've only seen a couple character models but not all" - all models revealed
"the models are all gray with no animation" - skin files linked as being different file format, animation shown
"we don't know if they have complete movesets" - leaked character shown
"we don't know if they are balanced yet"
I say "you really seem to be grasping at straws at this point." and my post is edited and I'm told I was "harassing a mod"
@OneRed
I would keep arguing with you, but I would just be repeating what I have already said. There is no winning this argument; like I said earlier, people don't care about the truth, the truth is less sexy than outrage...
So carry on with your nonsense arguments, I hope it makes you feel deeply satisfied. I am sure many other mouth breathers will give you their approval. Fight the power or whatever...
On another note, I wouldn't talk down to you if you weren't below me. So yeah, better yourself and I will be less condescending.
I would keep arguing with you, but I would just be repeating what I have already said. There is no winning this argument; like I said earlier, people don't care about the truth, the truth is less sexy than outrage...
So carry on with your nonsense arguments, I hope it makes you feel deeply satisfied. I am sure many other mouth breathers will give you their approval. Fight the power or whatever...
On another note, I wouldn't talk down to you if you weren't below me. So yeah, better yourself and I will be less condescending.
Capcom sure are taking dlc business to a whole new level of wtf. I mean day one dlc I get, I know how games are made, but forcibly locked content just because you made a deal with someone? that's fucked.
It would be fine if the ps3-only characters were eventually just patched in to the 360 version but you know they are going to charge for them.
It would be fine if the ps3-only characters were eventually just patched in to the 360 version but you know they are going to charge for them.
@spman
The only thing you have argued is that we don't know how DLC works and "it was on a separate budget". You have no way of addressing how the semantics of how pre-certification budget allocation justifies charging consumers twice for the same product. In fact, you don't have any real insight into how that budget was allocated at all, you're just taking their word for it.
But please, go on insulting all of us. It's clear that your assumptions are fallacies, so you may as well double down on the "you're all too stupid to understand what I've said" tripe.
The only thing you have argued is that we don't know how DLC works and "it was on a separate budget". You have no way of addressing how the semantics of how pre-certification budget allocation justifies charging consumers twice for the same product. In fact, you don't have any real insight into how that budget was allocated at all, you're just taking their word for it.
But please, go on insulting all of us. It's clear that your assumptions are fallacies, so you may as well double down on the "you're all too stupid to understand what I've said" tripe.
I submitted Capcom to the Better Business Bureau (www.bbb.org) and filed a complaint against them for knowingly and intentionally withholding finished content paying customers have on their discs from them AND for falsely advertising these on-disc characters and costumes as "downloadable content" when it's now been proven you don't download squat since it's all there.
Do whatever scams you want, but don't LIE about it, misrepresent the truth, and mislead customers into paying for something other than what they're actually getting.
I encourage a few others to do the same and file a complaint.
Do whatever scams you want, but don't LIE about it, misrepresent the truth, and mislead customers into paying for something other than what they're actually getting.
I encourage a few others to do the same and file a complaint.
So glad my internet was out today and I missed this article. I probably would have been raging all day. I'm so worn out on companies and their DLC bullshit
DLC is fine, when it' actual DLC. You know, going through the process of downloading. This is disappointing news.. Very.. If you serve me a plate of food, I expect to be able to eat all that is on it; not to go for the green beans to be told how I can't have it unless I pay more.
Now keep in mind that this isn't minutia like some people are whining about. Like DLC that is announced to be released few months after, ie: LA Noire and Potentially ME3. Or Getting bonus cosmetic items. The exclusion of characters in a fighting game DOES affect the game, in a direct way.
I got lucky and found a place that broke release date and plan on sinking TONS of hours into playing the game but 1 character that I REALLY want to play is now DLC and it annoys me to no end that I can't use him, even though he's on the flippin' disc. It's not a deal breaker and i'm not losing perspective on life because of it but I really want Cody to be part of my team. Don't put him in my game disc unless I CAN USE HIM!
Now keep in mind that this isn't minutia like some people are whining about. Like DLC that is announced to be released few months after, ie: LA Noire and Potentially ME3. Or Getting bonus cosmetic items. The exclusion of characters in a fighting game DOES affect the game, in a direct way.
I got lucky and found a place that broke release date and plan on sinking TONS of hours into playing the game but 1 character that I REALLY want to play is now DLC and it annoys me to no end that I can't use him, even though he's on the flippin' disc. It's not a deal breaker and i'm not losing perspective on life because of it but I really want Cody to be part of my team. Don't put him in my game disc unless I CAN USE HIM!
Firstly, just speak with your wallet. It's the only language they'll ever understand.
Secondly, considering that it's the 25th Anniversary for the Street Fighter series this year, it would have been a nice gesture to have these 14 characters in the game by default.
But what do I know...
Secondly, considering that it's the 25th Anniversary for the Street Fighter series this year, it would have been a nice gesture to have these 14 characters in the game by default.
But what do I know...
@Zerix Someone tell this guy he JUST did EXACTLY what he is calling out Capcom for. Not to mention at least with Capcom games they were balance changes, additional characters, features, etc; no different than when MMOs do class changes.
I could go on and on about un-tournament worthy MK is and the looong list promises that NR never had and COULDN'T deliver. Outside of that initial buzz that it generated with that 10k PDP comp it's a mediocre fighting game. Terrible Training mode, Initial nightmare of dealing with block infinites, a 2 to 4 month stint where certain costumes for characters were not allowed in majors because they reverted characters back to previous builds, unreliable frame data, the list is can go on and on. It's the best MK in the series, the best story mode I've seen in ANY fighting game but outside of that not much else..
I could go on and on about un-tournament worthy MK is and the looong list promises that NR never had and COULDN'T deliver. Outside of that initial buzz that it generated with that 10k PDP comp it's a mediocre fighting game. Terrible Training mode, Initial nightmare of dealing with block infinites, a 2 to 4 month stint where certain costumes for characters were not allowed in majors because they reverted characters back to previous builds, unreliable frame data, the list is can go on and on. It's the best MK in the series, the best story mode I've seen in ANY fighting game but outside of that not much else..
@spman2099 I don't care about their profit margins. I don't care about their budgeting. I really don't care about their business model. What I do care about, as a consumer, is that I get what I pay for. I paid for the disk and should have access to everything on said disk without having to pay extra for it. If they don't want to give it to us with the game don't put it on the disk. It's an incomplete product that we are buying. I really like the line up, but I believe the ethics of it from a consumers stand point are lacking. I am buying the product and should not be treated so horribly. The fact that they have yet to explain why Pacman and Megaman are on the disk but exclusive to PS3/Vita makes me weary of them.
@rancor09 Sony fans bitch when there's shit exclusive on 360. We object to something being exclusive to PS3 and we're not allowed to? Nice double standard.
@rancor09 Sony fans bitch when there's shit exclusive on 360. We object to something being exclusive to PS3 and we're not allowed to? Nice double standard.
Good thing that the game is a piece of shit full of comeback mechanics and fucking gimmicks.
I'll just wait for final showdown.
I'll just wait for final showdown.
Karavision: The game looks fun, what comes close to a comeback mechanic at this moment looks like it'll require specific set ups to be useful, and the gimmicks might actually improve the game.
Don't buy it, don't buy ME 3 either or games from other publishers that are eager to encourage these terrible practices. You are the solution to save this medium, don't give these people your money.
Capcom What da' Hell? At this pace nobody will support RE6 on release day!
Sooner or later they will learn managing DLC this way will mean negative events down the road.
Sooner or later they will learn managing DLC this way will mean negative events down the road.
....um...shit, my bro just bought it yesterday. After looking at this new evidence, I'd probably am never going to buy any of this unless they just patch them in at this point.
In other news... you can now vote for characters you want in Tekken x Street Fighter on the Tekken facebook page. So there's that...
https://www.facebook.com/tekken
https://www.facebook.com/tekken
I'm not usually one to complain about DLC. I generally buy it for the games that I like and don't bother with it for the games that I don't, Even then, it's almost always new content that's either been added or cut content raised from the dead of the cutting room floor. I don't mind that. That's not really something to get worked up about, as far as I'm concerned. It wasn't going to be in the game anyway, so why not add it later? Hell, I'm even ok with costumes and new weapons, as long as they're not overly priced...
But this, this is just slimy... There's no way to defend this, and why would I even want to...
But this, this is just slimy... There's no way to defend this, and why would I even want to...
follow
