Time to start a psychology project! *glasses shine*
I mean, im not outraged or anything, but why not just put a warning label on it and sell it only to adults
WARNING, CONTAINS: RAPE.
I'm all about freedom. So if someone wants to play or make these games more power to them. If I don't like them(and I don't) I won't buy them. End of story. It's not like anyone is getting raped in the process. It's a game.
Just want to reiterate that I can put a trashbag over someones head and strangle them to death in a game.
Ideas taken mainly from here
http://journal.neilgaiman.com/2008/12/why-defend-freedom-of-icky-speech.html
I would also say that running around shooting prostitutes in the face a la GTA is depraved as well.
BUT WHEN YOUR RESOURCES GO DOWN AND YOU DESPERATELY NEED AN INDUSTRIAL BOOST DON'T GO BACK CRYING
Banning things does not make them go away. I think the bigger question is should we allow private bodies or government committees to censor/ban things. I'm a fairly liberal person, and therefore intervention into this sort of thing irks me. I agree rape is a bad thing, but there are many bad things in the world, and they do not all need to be banned.
The bottom line is, you (I assume from your vehement posting against any mention of this subject) and I never played these games previously, and regardless of the banning or not banning, will continue to not do so. However, once you start agreeing to censorship, you open a whole can of worms.
You also do not know whether taking this sort of thing off the market is going to have any effect on a persons ability to get hold of media of this nature, nor what effect removing it will have. Lets face it prohibition doesn't seem to work in any other area. As I said earlier, it's easy to add a 'consent' scene (which could be skippable, who knows).
So basically, I don't think anyone cares particularly about rape games being banned. I think people are concerned as to the effects of ceding more control to 'the man'.
Sorry, but I have to side with SubOrbital on this one. This isn't the good fight. We're not manning the barricades for Gasper Noe's right to make films like Irreversible, where the severity of the rape scene serves as a contrast to the equally mindless (and erroneous) brutality of the revenge meted out by the main characters. We're not speaking up for the right of people to epouse political views, or advocate anti-corporate movements that governmments and companies alike may find threatening, with the consquences of having your life destroyed through litigation, or state-sponsored harassment being quite real. I don't think that banning is really the right way to go, but more relevant issues surrounding freedom of speech won't likely be any the worse off for its disappearance.
Now, if I'm being presumptuous about the intended audience for such games, please feel free to correct, but they mainly seem like a palliative for lonely, insular, borderline-mute Japanese men - people so socially awkward that they barely exist. I reckon that teaching them to stick their head out the door once in a while, and meet some real wimmins would be ten times more helpful...
Lets a make a game called poke-her-when-mums not looking snap where you try to take pictures of naked children. No? Thought not
The law is a huge blunt weapon not a scaple like you want it to be they take this then one day they WILL come for something you want. One time somewhere there will be a public outcry in response to some event alot of people will be angered alot of people will overreact. Then men and women on committies will decide that they have the power to appease the populace they will think of their careers they will think of re-election they will use that event that crisis to do something to subdue the panicy flawed humanbeings that we are.
You cannot and should not expect that the worlds to be rainbows, unicorns, and giggles its not it will never be. people will exploit anything they can to get what they want.
That is why you cannot say oh good they got rid of such and such because soon such and such will be something you like something you want and you will see the publics reaction as what it is overdone extreme and idiotic.
I can guarantee you that if the government had the power to ban a specific type of game when the tragic acts of columbine took place that violent fps would be banned and likly 3ps would be banned as well.
In short child pornography is bad as it involves real children as is real rape but fake child pornography and fake rape are no where near the same level as their counterpart. I would rather rape games not exist but not because some group decides that it should be banned.
Essentially, your argument is that rape entertainment is not as bad as kiddy porn because children do not get exploited in the making of it. Well in that case, you are claiming that it's okay for MAKING child pornography to be illegal, but enjoying it is harmless. The double standard some gamers have shown about rape as entertainment is very alarming to me, and you are not doing our community any favors with this "anything goes" mentality. I do not consider myself "pro censorship," but as a society we've got to have SOME sense of boundaries, at least when it comes to sexual abuse. Sexual abuse is NOT erotic, and exploiting it as entertainment to make money is not something that should be allowed.
Now something I would like to pose to you a book is written it contains a great story and is hailed as a classic a must read but in the book the author describes vividly rape what would make this any different then a game? what would give this anymore reason to exist? and by the way its not a book its a comic.
Your arguments are all emotive, and thats a dangerous place to be. You claim that people who fantasize about rape are the sickest and lowest people in society, maybe they are, I havent seen the rating scale, but where do they fit in next to mass murderers?? What about genocidal megalomaniacs?? Is the person who loads this software up instantly a worse person than hitler??
starhawl is genuinely concerned that giving control over this area of censorship could leak into other areas, other mediums, or other genres. And I have to say I agree with him.
Yes, in a perfect world this stuff would not exist, but I would wager that its only a small minority that actively seek it out. I would also wager that a far more vocal majority are keen on banning things, claiming it helps society.
These games have been available for years in Japan, and Im not aware of any problems they have caused, until overzealous media got involved and tried to preach emotive morality. You seem adamant you want a new set of controls in place to protect someone from something. But you have to consider where this could possibly lead.
I think that while I would prefer rape not be in ANY game, that I would find it acceptable if it was clearly portrayed as a grotesque crime. Silent Hill has rape and shows it in the light it deserves: that it is disturbing and wrong.
It is also a concept that most men will never understand (which is a fortunate thing). Rape is degrading to women; it is both physically and emotionally traumatizing, and some people never recover from the experience. I don't even know how to put into words how horrifying rape is for others to fully understand. Death is something that eventually cannot be prevented which is why most people are desensitized to it, but rape can ALWAYS be prevented, and no person should be desensitized to the point where they think it is ok. Ever.

surf dtoid with 

Rising (10+)
People you follow














follow