At the very least, it'll sell around the 700,000 mark, like Lost Odyssey, I suppose. I still don't know what people saw in that game: it was a snorefest.
We will never know. Though I'm wondering if not getting both audio tracks may be part of that, even though they weren't on 10 or, they may have been on a Bluray version.
Uncharted 2 won't use 100% of the PS3's power.
Too Human wasn't good.
All Molyneux games will fall short of the mark.
One of the Versions, (Probs 360's, being a Port and all that jazz), will suffer from the simultaneous development.
Square-Enix will ignore they said this.
If you think FF is going to fail on the 360 and only sell 700,000 units you're deluded.
The fact that you think a well established franchise spanning 20 years is equal in 360 owners eyes to a rather pedestrian rpg with no existing fanbase shows that alone.
Or just complain that it's multi-platform in the first place.
"If FFXIII fails critically"
"At least, it'll sell 700,000"
Where did you get the idea that I did not think it was going to sell well? I'm just curious as to how it's going to play out in terms of PS3 vs. 360 sales. It could shape Square Enix's future dealings with Microsoft as we know it.
I'd only get worried if they said it was going multi platform for the Wii and told me the same story about it not affecting anything. And thats not because I'm a wii hater (even though I am...for some odd reason) but because it would be a blatant lie.
Delays are delays.
Lastly, I think anyone that complains about a game going multi-platform really needs a reality check. From Bioshock to Final Fantasy, more sales means brighter future for a franchise. I'm sure there were game franchises that were saved by that decision alone. A good point was Braid. If it goes multi, then the budget for the next game could be two fold. Or maybe he gets to make two games instead of just funding the one.
I think the whole multi-platform thing is just a soapbox for people who want to justify not being able to buy both consoles when you know if they had the money they would.
Ah, PS3 fanboys. Microsoft might have released the so-called "tard pack" version of their console, but Sony has released a tard pack all their own on this generation of gaming...
Yeah, I said it. Come get me, my IP is 12.10...
Or maybe they are so super awesome that they managed to use 130% of the 360's power! But meh, seriously, I'm tired of hearing about the same shit over and over again, just release the game, pretend no-one cares.
I have hopes in Squeenix, and i think they will deliver a decent product(compared with the PS3 version) to the 360 owners.
but honestly I don't care about all that(and neither do most people), just get me this game already.
Really? That‘s what you guys are upset about? In a game culture of constant delays your argument is that 360 development for FF XII is holding up the process? Game delays are the norm now and to be expected. Chances are it would have been delayed anyway. Is MS responsible for the hold-up of GT5 also? Was MS responsible for the hold-up of Killzone 2?
Some are even postulating that if the game doesn’t sell on the 360 (which it will) it will be a blow to the developer. News flash: even 200,000 extra sales in better than nothing. Especially given that the 360 is cheaper and easier to develop for. Square know this, that why it being developed for the 360. Sometimes I am embarrassed as to how little sense we make as gamers….try reason things without interjecting useless fan vitriol …maybe gaming IS making people stupider.
Really? That‘s what you guys are upset about? In a game culture of constant delays your argument is that 360 development for FF XII is holding up the process? Game delays are the norm now and to be expected. Chances are it would have been delayed anyway. Is MS responsible for the hold-up of GT5 also? Was MS responsible for the hold-up of Killzone 2?
Some are even postulating that if the game doesn’t sell on the 360 (which it will) it will be a blow to the developer. News flash: even 200,000 extra sales in better than nothing. Especially given that the 360 is cheaper and easier to develop for. Square know this, that why it being developed for the 360. Sometimes I am embarrassed as to how little sense we make as gamers….try reason things without interjecting useless fan vitriol …maybe gaming IS making people stupider.
I'll be buying a 360 version. Direct your slings and arrows, now.
Hold your tongues, people. Must you always look for a fight, if PS3 isn't wearing a crown of supreme righteousness? Better yet, don't answer that.
And yes, the people that constantly spout "They're both equal!" are just as jaded as the people that think one is more powerful than the other just because Sony/MS said so.
Every console generation, one system is generally accepted (even by fanboys!) to have the best graphical capabilities.
The N64 was more powerful than the PSone, the Xbox was more powerful than than the PS2 or Gamecube, but this generation all you hear is hyperbole and PR crap.
Does the 360's superior GPU and ease of development beat the PS3's ever-looming in the shadows hard to develop for beast of a CPU (the cell)?
WHEN WILL WE KNOW?!?
Can't we just have some honest multiplatform developers come forth and give us some unrehearsed opinions?

surf dtoid with 

Rising (10+)
People you follow
















follow