 |
|
9:03 PM on 09.28.2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 
[SilverDragon1979 talks about how much he hates all of the big name titles coming out at the same time during the end of the year for his Monthly Musing piece. -- CTZ] The summer is about to end and it’s almost time to usher in that very cold period of the year known as fall and winter. With it will come a great many wonderful things, such as football, turkey, snowmen, and chestnuts roasting on an open fire. Along with all of those chestnuts will come a huge deluge of videogame releases. Now I’m not talking about a slight increase in the number of videogame releases, I’m talking about the Burje Dubai of videogame releases. Between the months of October and November there are over 120 individual games being released in 2008. I don’t know about you, but I don’t have the time or the money to play even a small percentage of these games, and that’s why I hate the onslaught of fall/winter videogame releases.
The Massive Number of Fall/Winter Game Releases for 2008 As I already mentioned, there are over 120 individual games coming out between the months of October and November. I know this because I actually took the time to count them all up. Now this number does not even include the different versions of each game coming out over multiple platforms. If you actually look at the number of games coming out over all platforms, it’s closer to the 400 range. That means that over the span of a year where 800 games come out, 50% of them are released in only 2 of the 12 months. This is just absolutely absurd Let’s take a closer look at just some of the popular titles for this year to see when they are actually coming out in relation so each other. 10/14 – Dead Space 10/14 – Saint’s Row 2 10/14 – SOCOM: Confrontation 10/21 – Fable II 10/21 – LittleBigPlanet 10/21 – Far Cry 2 10/26 – Guitar Hero: World Tour 10/27 – Red Alert 3 10/28 – Fallout 3 11/04 – Resistance 2 11/04 – End War 11/07 – Gears of War 2 11/10 – Mortal Kombat vs. DC 11/11 – Call of Duty: World at War 11/11 – Mirror’s Edge 11/13 – World of Warcraft: Wrath of the Lich King Look at all those incredibly popular titles coming out, and if you notice they are all within one month of each other. That’s 16 games in less then a month, so almost a game every two days. Do these companies really need to release all of these games so close together? Does this actually benefit them? How do you find time to play all these games? According to USA Today, the average age of people who play videogames are between 25 and 40. I am 28, and I can tell you that all these people who are between 25 and 40 do not have a lot of free time on their hands to play videogames. These people have full time jobs, relationships, families, yard work, and other hobbies that all take up their time. With all of these responsibilities, it can be very difficult to actually find the time to sit down and play a game for more then 1-2 hours a day. I don’t typically find the time to sit down until 10PM at night to play, so I can definitely attest to there just being too many other responsibilities that take up my videogame playing time. For most of the people I know, it can be very tough to play more then 1-2 games a month. What are these people supposed to do when 15 high profile games come out in the span of a single month? They can’t play them all. They can’t even play half of them. What ends up happening is they only purchase one or two of these games at full price. Then as time passes they end up purchasing the other games months later as they drop in price. I spent the last year playing games that came out last fall and winter. The only games I played this year that actually came out in 2008 were Metal Gear Solid 4, and Grand Theft Auto IV. That is absolutely crazy that it took me a year to play all of the games that came out in the span of three months. So I have to ask the question, how is a person supposed to find the time to play all of these games? The answer is that they never do find the time. No one hates as much as the Angry Video Game Nerd Feel my Hate! Videogame publishers are a bunch of greedy bastards. I can’t blame them though, because their entire purpose is to make money and keep the stock holders happy. They don’t make the games. They don’t pour their hearts and their precious time into these games like the developers do. The publishers simply decide when to release the games in order to make the most money, and that happens to be right before the Christmas season. Who cares if it happens to correspond with all of the other publishers releasing all of their games at the same time, making it seemingly impossible for gamers to play them all. If they get their money they are happy, and let me tell you parents are going to spend the money. I worked at Electronics Boutique for four years and I saw how crazy people get during Christmas. If their kids want five games, the parents are buying them five games. It doesn’t matter how unpractical it seems for their kid to get five new games, because no one is practical during Christmas time. Is it really impractical for these publishers to release their games during the other ten months of the year? Do you have to be a big name title like Grand Theft Auto IV or Metal Gear Solid 4 to actually get sales if you release your game during the spring or summer? Maybe if these companies actually found good ways to market their games they could get sales. Maybe if they actually tried spacing their games out over the period of the year and market them accordingly they might get the same sales as if they just released them over Christmas. I’m not in marketing though so I probably don’t know what I’m talking about. Maybe there is just no way to ever make as much money releasing a game if it’s not during the Christmas season. I might not be in marketing, but I am an avid videogame player, and I can honestly say that it is just absolutely crazy to release 400 games over the span of two months. Lots of companies are missing out on my hard earned cash because I will never find the time or the money to play all these games. Well that’s too bad for them. I will simply continue to hate the fact that this is the way the industry works, and maybe if I find the time, I’ll actually get around to playing some of these games.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
I find the time. Its in a few years when all these games are less than ten dollars.
I will be scooping most of those games up, that's for sure. As for time to play them?? That's not even the point. The point is having them within arms reach should I decide to play them.
But yes, I do I agree as a business strategy it's retarded to clump all of these games together on the retail shelf.
Also, Fuckballs?? LOL.
I hate it too. I love the season fall+winter (hence my screenname) but the games are annoying in short bursts.
ALSO you forgot Left4Dead
We are told all the time that the 'average gamer' is getting older. this practice seems to be partly due to a time when the majority of gamers were younger people and thus a lot of sales came from gifts. With that age bracket you mention, this isn't such a contributing factor and to starve people most the year for decent games then release so many that people have to make a choice about which they want is idiotic.
When you release so many highly anticipated titles at the same time, people are going to prioritise and the games at the bottom of their list are very likely going to end up as pre-owned sales. Y'know, those things the industry keep bitching about yet actively encourage.
But then there's plenty of examples in this industry of stagnant business models being used again and again for fear of breaking the status quo. Shareholders play far too great a role in something they understand little about, this is just another example of that. I'm pretty sure most people between 25-40 years of age don't rely on people buying them games for Christmas, but try explaining that to the corporate suits.
Man, I agree with this 100%, it is extremely annoying having to spend all this time. It's made more annoying by friends; you have to prioritize with your gaming friends, otherwise you'll be left alone. Of course you could just ignore them, but most of these games have some sort of multiplayer that's enjoyable. As Timmeh said, people then prioritize and the games people don't want as much get pre-owned sales, it's a really weird cycle and it's pretty gross.
I bitch about this in every release date comment I make. You missed a couple other games, like Star Ocean First Departure and Castlevania: Order of Ecclesia, and WiiMusic(ugh). Every console has a huge release on October 21st.
I've decided to narrow down the games I'm getting this holiday, but I feel it's still too much and I won't be able to play all of them. I want to get Rock Band 2 (PS3), LittleBigPlanet, Star Ocean, and Castlevania on the 21st, and Fallout the week after. Still that's 5 games in 2 weeks, at least I can play the portable ones at work.
I don't understand why they still do this. I can get releasing Kids games and shitty movie license games at Christmas, because they get the most sales by uninformed parents that way. But what parent is going to go into a store and pick out Fallout 3 for their son for Christmas? Games made for adults are going to sell whenever they're released, as long as they do a decent job advertising. I'm pretty sure GTA4 and MGS4 sold pretty well, if you release a game during a drought, people will buy it.
This year so many great games are going to get lost in this rush. Good thing is we should be able to find a handful of them in a bargain bin after not too long. Maybe they'll learn after Far Cry 2 (just an example) sells like shit because they released it the same week as LittleBigPlanet, Fable 2, and WiiMusic (sigh).
I've gotta give props to EA for pushing Dead Space forward a week though. I know it's only a week but it was a smart move. I think more people will buy it day 1 because there's less competition that week, and people will actually get a chance to play it.
And sorry for the long comment, but whose gonna review all this shit? Is Destructoid going to start hiring people for the holiday season?
It really does suck. Reeally.
And as a grown up dude with a wife, eventually kids and a job, it sucks even more. Back then as a kid, I had nothing but time during winter break to catch up. And college winter break? Forget about it. I was ready for more games by February.
I've resigned myself to locking in on a few of these titles, and promising myself that I'll catch up to the other ones. Fable II, Mirror's Edge and Lich King (also Wario Ware shake it, outside of your window above) are about all I'm putting into my "schedule" and budget. The rest will need to hype me into impulse buy. Even Fallout 3 (just never played he originals)
My list of must-have purchases this year (euro dates):
SEPTEMBER:
- Wario Land: Shake it! (26th)
My 18th birthday is on Monday, so I'll probably get some money to compensate for this purchase.
OCTOBER:
- LittleBigPlanet (22nd)
- Fable 2 (24th)
- Far Cry 2 (24th)
- Fallout 3 (31st)
Now this is going to be an extremely hard period for me as a gamer. I'll have 2 days to enjoy LittleBigPlanet, before Fable 2 and Far Cry 2 is released 2 days later. But there cant be room for more than 2 games in such short time (I love the number 2), so I'll delay the purchase of Far Cry 2 for later this year. That way I can properly enjoy LittleBigPlanet and Fable 2. Then 7 days after Fable 2, Fallout 3 is released...
NOVEMBER:
- Gears of War 2 (7th)
- Banjo Kazooie: Nuts & Bolt (21st)
DECEMBER:
- Prince of Persia (2nd)
And just another 7 days after Fallout 3, Gears of Wars 2 is released... Geez...
I'm planning on putting Banjo & Kazooie N&B and Prince of Persia on my Christmas wishlist, so that means there will be a moderately large gap on the calendar without game releases. But that suits me fine, as I'll probably have an exam near the end of the year. As mentioned earlier I delayed the purchase of Far Cry 2, so I might get that game if I feel like filling the gap.
TBA 2008:
- Castlevania: Order of Ecclesia (?)
As much as I hate games being delayed in Europe, I actually hope this one comes out later, so I'll get time to play other games.
TOTAL: 4400 NOK
(440 USD I think, due to the trend of just adding a zero to the US prices when the game publisher decides the Euro prices. The actual US price when you convert the currencies is 757 USD, giving an indication to how expensive games are over here.)
Up and coming 2008 releases that I might buy some other time:
- Call of Duty: World at War
- Dead Space
- EndWar
- Mirrors Edge
- Resistance 2
I will ONLY buy LBP and Gears2 at full price. All the others have to prove their worth to me via "fight to the death" for my monies. I don't mind because I will buy the others at reduced prices and I will play through the ones that don't suck next summer during the "drought".
I'm with you Dragon. I don't have the time or the money to play even a fraction of these games.
I guess the only positive is that I can get them for much cheaper later on. I'm not even going to play most of them these year because I won't even be in the country from December to May!
Totally agree with you man, (hey I'm 28 too). I've just got my new PC yesterday, so I'm catching up with some older games and I've also got my eye on Left 4 Dead too. I've barely got the time to play these games, as most days I'm working until almost 8pm every night (it was 11:30pm) on Friday. Why these releases aren't spread out over the year just doesn't make sense to me.
I just want LBP and L4D. And the Korg DS-10 if it ever comes out.
But yeah, I've got no time and a little monies. I can easily afford a few games, but I just don't have the free time I used to.
So I'll just keep some of these games on my radar for the summer months. But this deluge of games at the end of the year seriously needs to change.
I totally agree. My video game playing has gone from playing every cool title that came out when I was younger, to now when I pretty much only play Team Fortress 2 because of its lack of significant time commitment.
I didn't even own a next-gen system until recently when the Dragon here conspired with my girlfriend to help to get me a PS3. Now I have a few more gaming options, but my time to play the good ones is limited, and this game deluge doesn't help.
Out of all these games, I have determined that I will only be playing Fallout 3. May be Mirror's Edge if I can find the time.
On a side note, might I also point out that publishers can manage to make financial successes out of totally crappy games during the American holiday season. This is not a good pattern for gamers.
so many games with war in the title, I dont know which to choose!
I have sliced and cleaved my list down to four games, the others a mass of limbs swimming in thick, murky blood on the floor.
And by that of course I mean I'll be getting Fable, Fallout, Mirror's Edge and Little Bit.
Congrats on the frontpage promotion, Silver Dragon.
My wallet is in tears right now. I hoping LittleBigPlanet holds me over until most of those games come down in price.
Just looking at october through december it's like a clusterfuck of win, but I have to pay for that win in fifty dollar increments. Gamefly helps but just barely. I had to put three to four game on hold till next summer just because of the density OF good games.
I just look at the game that will last me longest and keep my attention for a very, very long time.
Last season (this summer) I brought COD4, and it DID keep my attention for months, this season it will be LBP
Seeing as I am a creative person, this appeals to me the most out of all the games released for the rest of the year.
In fact, apart from Fallout 3, I do not intend to buy a game full price until next year, I play what I want to play, unlike many gamers I do not care for having piles and piles of games to play through, I buy a game, I want to savour it to the fullest.
Other games can wait, simply because they do not warrant a purchase at this time!! :)
Also, FRONT PAGED!!!
Cool,eh? :D
these are must haves on release day for me. im gonna be so poor but happy.
midnight club:LA
Dead Space
Fallout 3
LittleBigPlanet
Saint’s Row 2
need for speed:undercover
I agree, and being poor doesn't help.
Also, you forgot LEft 4 Dead
A slight advantage to having only one console and one handheld, aside from a slight feeling of missing out on certain games you don't have to shit yourself about trying to grab all the best games out there.
I agree I spend the whole year wanting new games and then when the fall comes I can't even begin to figure out which games I want because there are too many, so I usually end only getting the big games and leaving the smaller ones out. I would probably by some of them if they were sold at other times during the year.
That being said, I will probably be getting LBP, Mirror's Edge, Rock Band 2, probably FIFA 09. Yep I am an American and I want the soccer game!
Great write-up, dude, and I totally agree. I think I'm going to have the money to pick up one or two of the ten or so games that I really want to buy between now and Christmas, and that's a damn shame.
I'm saving my purchasing dollars (at full price, anyway) for either Rise of the Argonauts, Fable 2, or Fallout 3 (all released a week after one another in October), and Gears 2.
Everything else will just be added to my GamFly list or get picked up in a few months on sale.
PS - I've only purchased 3 games this year (Smash Bros., GTAIV, and Vegas 2).
Banjo-Kazooie, Dead Space, Fallout 3, and Gears 2 are probably the only games I'll be able to afford even though I want 90% of the ones you listed. Dammit, why didn't I save my money?
Hell I haven't even finished Persona 3 yet. Really I don't know how one can play all the hot Fall/Winter video game titles and hold down a job and get laid regularly...
God the one time of the year where people wait in long lines to ebgames to burn a huge hole in there wallet because no one wants a sweater for a gift. They want every single game thats sold out.
@ Holiday
I think you have to pick two of the three. Hardcore gaming, getting laid regularly, and having no job is the dream option.
honestly? I disagree with you 100% Allow me to explain my opinion.
Most gamers are twentysomething to 40 (crap this is my last year I guess) They have no time to play all the games because they all come out at the same time. Do these games have a shelf life I wasn't aware of? For me, the only game on that list I'm really geeked about is Fallout 3. I will buy it on release day.
(which, by the way, I will bet my mortgage payment it will be available everywhere and I won't be one of the IDIOTS that preordered it in the hopes of whatever it is they are hoping for that ends up waiting a week after release date because EB games shipping sucks ass.)
anyway, where was I? Oh yea, while I'm playing the crap out of Fallout 3 I can be reading reviews of all these other games I might want. Some of them are gonna suck. Trust me, I'm friggin 40! Ive seen this over and over again. My guess is Fable 2 and Farcry 2 will be BIG letdowns. Theres only 27 people on the planet that have the alien mutant technology to run farcry 2 and IMO fable 1 sucked. Theres other games doing the same thing better than fable.
So I can use the time to not waste monies on crap.
Also, some of the games I would not have bought will end up being great. I will be able to hear the comments from friend and favorable reviews on these games and, sometimes, find them ON SALE! See, I'm old (did I mention that yet?), so I need a reason to spend money because I have a wife. She will not give me lovin if I spend money on games excessively. But her weakness is she's a woman. If something I buy is on sale, I am off the hook. I don't care if its a friggin Neutron bomb, if I got it on sale I am in the clear. In my mind the only argument against my feelings are the multiplayer games. Sometimes a community that likes a game moves on to the next good game and by the time I get to it's server browser theres not many people left playing (I just bought crysis and was surprised how few people play the multiplayer)
So, to recap, if your gonna run around with your wallet hanging out trying to buy every game you can as soon as you can you will
A. Buy games you don't have time for
B. Buy bad games
C. Miss sales on good games
D. (and I feel this is most important) Miss buying good games you thought would suck. You spent all your money and now that everyone knows it's good theres NO WAY your gonna find it on sale.
and all of this, hate free.
Being a collector (look at my gaming setup if you think you can compete), October onward is a test of pure will as in how many COLLECTORS EDITIONS can I get without going even more into the university student poor house, and being able to wait for a kickass game to go down in price . . . =(
Great C-blog mate. I've had some spells of unemployment over the last 12 months (we quaintly call it the 'credit crunch' over here in the UK, as we're shirt scared of using 'recession') and even I have struggled to play through all of the AAA 2007 titles, with Super Mario Galaxy and Halo 3 being the neglected children!
The only games I plan to buy for myself right now are LBP and Bioshock. I would try to get the other ones, but I don't have a job to get money to spend on them.
Fortunately, I'm 15 and therefore still live with my parents, and thats where Christmas comes in. That's what Christmas is about. Making other people buy stuff that you don't have the money for. And I really only ask for for Mirror's Edge, Fallout 3, and maybe Far Cry 2.
Also, I DO have more moneyz, but thats for buying people stuff for Christmas. I'm not a total jerk.
I'm only buying Fable 2 and maaaybe Rock Band 2: the disc when it's out in Europe.
Most of the other games sound like stuff I'd never play again after one playthrough, so those will just be rentals/downloads.
I only really care about Fallout 3.
There's a few games in there I would want. So yeah I am gonna be in debt for a few years of yeah.
I was just talking about this with a buddy of mine yesterday. He said I was crazy for not reserving dead space. I told him Im' broke and I haven't even bought the games I wanted yet lol....THERE ALL RESERVE!
I complain about this all the time! I work in education, where I have TONS of free time in the summer and there is nothing new worthwhile to play. Too, I live in NYC and take mass transit to/from work every day - and I end up just beating Contra 4 over and over again since nothing new and worthwhile seems to come out for the DS unless you're into ponies or something. So - these things affect me even more than probably a lot of the other frustrated gamers out there. Game companies: YOU CAN MAKE A HUGE PROFIT BEING THE ONLY GAME RELEASED IN THE SPRING/SUMMER.
It's not all bad, guys. Many of us have (high school or college students) have more time (and money) in the summer, and by then some of the big releases from last winter are a lot cheaper. Games like Mass Effect or Assassin's Creed from last winter were like $40 by summer, for instance.
Now, if they simply released a bunch of those games in the summer instead of in the winter, you'd essentially be in the same boat, but would be paying half-price for the games you wait until summer to play.
Just because it comes out in winter, doesn't mean you have to buy it then! As for me, only a few of those games are must-buys for me, at least right away.
I don't need to eat anyway.
Saints Row 2, Fable 2, Farcry 2, Mirrors Edge, Gears 2, LBP (If I don't sell my PS3), still need to get TFU, GH: World Tour, and more.....Ugh...
Exactly, most of the year there is a draught of games and then all the MASSIVE titles come out in October/November, So many games which would have got recognition if released in the Spring or Summer are simply buried Alive in the Winter Holidays.
Returning Dtoiders: login now to post a comment
Destructoid is an open discussion community. You don't need to "audition" to post a comment - just Create an avatar now - it's fast and free: PLUS you also get your own gaming blog and begin posting stories and uploading videos in our open community area that may also appear on our home page. Sign up and we'll guide you through it, it's easy and 100% anonymous.