Those words made me realize that AC's plot IS sort of difficult to take in, I guess as a game it's not that bothersome. But as movie, as a movie the plot is much more pivotal and people are going to have to suspend their disbelieve a LOT.
Prince of Persia was a fun summer popcorn flick. It missed the mark in a some ways, but it wasn't a total abortion like a lot of people claimed it to be. At the very least Fassbender is a much better casting decision for Desmond than Gyllenhaal was for the Prince.
I preface this by saying I am a fan of the series, and looking forward to ACIII. But why Assassin's Creed can't just be about playing an assassin in various historical periods is beyond me. Instead it has to be about templars, and virtual reality, and genetic memory, and ancient aliens, and religion, and the freemasons, and probably dark matter, the Kennedy assassination, Stonehenge, the face on Mars and fuck knows what else.
I mean, it's a game about doing parkour and stabbing people in the neck and/or face. Why can't it just be about that?
I guess we'll see, I'm hopeful we have talent and Assassins Creed has promise but, technically Metal Gear would have too. (Thankfully they didn't)
Plathismo likes Tarvu's update.
An Assassins Creed movie has no reason to exist... it's a just a fun game with cool mechanics and a moderately interesting story attached to it. I haven't played a game yet that would make a good film; the critical aspects of each medium are completely different and as far as I can tell, incompatible, and it boggles the mind that anyone could fail to see that.
Bleh.. I wouldn't want him being Desmond directly, I'd want him being the Assassin Desmond is Simulating.
Also, I could have sworn I saw someone in the past 5-6 months that this plot is the plot of something else.. I think a movie.. But now I can't remember what it was or where I read that.
"It's going to be pretty interesting to see a game with such a convoluted premise become a movie."
Hate to assume this, but your job can't possibly be keeping you from watching that many movies, does it? This series premise will probably be a cakewalk to get on screen compared to other convoluted premises we've seen in the last 10 years (alone).
"In any case, Ubisoft is taking this one seriously. It wants a writer and director before it negotiates with a studio, and it'll be using its internal studios to save production costs on visual effects."
In other words, Ubisoft doesn't want to give up even a little control, which is exactly what Microsoft wanted, and tried to do, with Halo, and ended up burying the whole project. 10 to 1 someones going to come out on the other side of this saying they never want to work with Ubisoft again.
As for the visual effects stuff, my knee jerk reaction is that Ubisoft will rush those visuals out, make an excuse, and then bitch that they need a new generation of movies, because they can't possibly make movies, or new IP's in movies, with this generation.
...
...wait, no, nothing is that bad. nvm lol
Altair is pretty young in Assassin's Creed as well.
I could see him as Vidic, or Robert de Sablé though.
Actually yes, Robert de Sablé would be perfect.
Typically actors are much older than the age they're portraying.
Teenagers are portrayed by 20-30 something's more often than not. Best example: 90210.
20 something's can be portrayed by anyone who looks young enough. Heck, I'm 29 and get double-ID'd everywhere I go and my 23 year old GF skates by without a glance.
Age ain't nothing but a number.
Having watched TV series that collapsed under the weight of their own over-complicated mythology in the past (X-Files, Lost), I just don't have much faith that it will end up coherent. It isn't coherent now.
The good news is, it's a game, so it doesn't really matter. Frankly I'm not really following the plot anymore at this point. The last couple of annualized AC titles kinda lost me--I sold Revelations back without finishing it. But what I read about ACIII is rejuvenating my interest in the series--new setting, different development team, three-year development cycle, new mechanics, etc. I have high hopes.
Regarding the movie, I'm also Fassbender fan, but generally speaking, games-to-movies just don't work. Ubi wants to conquer all media, I guess, but there's no need--video games are the media of the future (and present), and movies are largely the media of the past.
Everything is impossible until somebody does it. The only reason games-to-movies haven't worked is because no one's done it right yet. I could see Ubisoft being the first. Never finished watching the short films they did for Ezio's father but they seemed like pretty high quality work to me.

surf dtoid with 

Rising (10+)
People you follow
















follow