A: Apologize
B: Troll and give a new ending as DLC.
Not just for the fan's benefit mind you, but so everyone can point to each "pro" reviewer and fanboy who currently defends the ending and call them the true retard they are for pretending it was ok.
So someone dosnt like a game you like, so what? Its just a videogame as you say; get over it
PLEASE BURN EVERYTHING DOWN. please
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tbghjn7_Byc
Explains why the ending works.
There, I think I fixed the headline.
@Startyde
What do they have to apologize for? Game ended, people didn't like it and should move on. Thats all there is to it.
If every person or company ever to tell a story apologized every time someone didn't like their ending the internet would have been founded to house the library of apologizes we'd probably have instead of porn, possibly at the request of the library of congress, because they couldn't possibly keep up with the spacial demands that such a high volume of incoming apologizes would place on them.
In short: you can't please everyone, and BioWare can only hope Dragon Age 3 (which is my guess at the next time they can massively disappoint on this level again) won't go the same way.
So fucking praying that happens.
The Indoctrination Theory makes a ton of sense. We should discuss this rather than giving a bunch of whiny entitled pricks attention.
Its why the indoctrination idea works.
My money is on Casey Hudson saying in two weeks "it wasn't indoctrination - deal with it", or Epilogue DLC that has nothing to do with the theory.
Who do you think came up with that theory? The whiny "entitled" pricks did. Not only is it fully supported in the argument this article about, it is the number one demand made by the whiny "entitled" pricks over in the official suggestions thread on BSN. Almost every whiny "entitled" prick who has a problem with the ending is crossing his fingers for the indoctrination theory to be real. So anyone in favor of the indoctrination theory is on the same side as the whiny "entitled" pricks. Go figure.
"We would like to clarify that we are actively and seriously taking all player feedback into consideration and have ruled nothing out. At this time we are still collecting and considering your feedback and have not made a decision regarding requests to change the ending."
Which I personally interpret as "Please continue the rage and controversy while we finish up the DLC that proves how wrong you are and how awesome we are."
At least that's what I want it to mean. And Chris, stop urinating in my Raisin Bran.
We're all on the same train, man! I've been a fan since 2007 -- I'm eager to see what Bioware makes of all this.
Casey Hudson and Mac Walters have already defended the ending in a way that implies that is was in fact the ending they wanted. So far what little evidence we have from them points to it being, as you say, a way for fans to justify the nonsensical ending. However, that doesn't mean that they won't take it and run with it. That's what the suggestion thread is up on BSN for, and the indoctrination theory is mentioned in almost every post.
The whole indoctrination thing would have been a fine piece of storytelling, genuinely messing with players in an artful way, unique to the medium of video games.
But I'm with you: as convincing as the arguments are, I think people are grasping at straws, and Bioware will just waive their middle finger at them as the roll around in piles of money or release an epilogue slide show for $10.
Then said Omega Reaper takes the form of a vulnerable memory to convince Shep not to destroy them. Totally stretching it I know, essentially there is no choice. It's be indoctrinated or not.
Its better to just leave the ending as it is than for Bioware to dig a bigger hole for themselves. I'm not waiting around for another ending. They had their chance to do it right and get it out on retail launch.
@Nephilym - The people who are acting "entitled" are the people demanding the ending be [i]changed[/]i, not the people that think the ending makes sense or believe the indoctrination idea.
Dude... You misread my post. Or maybe I misread yours? I thought you were referring to the people unhappy with the ending as "whiny entitled pricks." And if you were, you shouldn't, because they are the ones that brought the indoctrination theory to light in the first place, and I fully support it. So either way, it looks like I'm on your side, asshole. :P
SEE GUYS, WE'RE NOT RETARDED AFTER ALL!
This still sounds like two different groups of people here. As in, you have one group saying "The ending sucks! The Indoctrination Theory would make it ok though." Then you have another group saying "The ending is fine. The Indoctrination theory would be badass."
That doesn't sound like the same thing to me. I mean, if you're trying to convince me that I've got something in common with the people I find distasteful (i.e. those going overboard with rage and/or demanding the ending be changed), fine. I'll accept that. But I'd still counter that there's a right and wrong way to go about things, and they're still very very wrong in that regard.
When watching the video again he mentions "You want to destroy us" several times. He's a lying reaper making a last ditch effort to control you. What I believe is if you pick the right choice shepard gets off the damn floor and uses the console to activate the weapon. We'll find out in DLC and I think that was always in the cards, maybe at this point it'll actually be free. But yes this whole debacle is straight video game tabloid bullshit. An artist shouldn't compromise his vision because people don't like it, in this case I do believe more closure is needed and on the way. People just need to calm the funk down and wait.
Wrong. They are one and the same. Most of the people who want a "new" ending support the Indoctrination theory because they know it's makes too much sense to pass up and would be the best way to seamlessly integrate a more fleshed out ending. Maybe you're not keeping up with this as well as I am, but very few are pushing for a fully edited ending. And if the "entitled" are only the ones who want that, how are they getting any buzz at all? There are so few of them.
Yeah, that's about right. Some think it sucked some think it was okay, but the majority think the indocrination theory is a good one. So there is common ground. That's what I'm trying to clarify here. If you support the indocrination theory, then we're practically on the same team - even though some of us are more aggressive about it than others.
Being the Nature of Bioware games it's natural we'll get shitty DLC following up an Epilogue. Which i'm hoping for Epilogue DLC to explain it all and give closure to your choices and how they shaped the Universe.
Indeed, exactly. I think it's going to be very telling when/if the indoctrination theory is confirmed, when we see how various people react. As in, those that say "Yeah! Awesome!" or those that say "Ok fine the ending sucks a bit less now" or those that say "HA! Bioware gave in to our demands! We made this happen!"
I think that's going to be a great way to distinguish what type of gamer, and person, they are.
So chalk that up to a third party.
That's the problem, dude. That's what YOU'RE doing. You're the one "sheeping" people up with that ONE asshole. I don't think anyone cares to be associated with bullshit like that - not even the ones who demand a better ending. I was pretty upset by the ending, maybe a little too upset at first, but I never felt that I was horribly wronged in some way or thought it would be cool to take legal action. So how is it fair that anytime I discuss how much I think the ending fucking sucked I get lumped into the same category of "whiny entitled pricks" as that guy or anyone else? It's not. So if you have a problem with people "Sheeping" you into a specific group, stop fucking doing it to others.
Can't say I'm surprised this happened tho.
Instead you went off. An you're CAPPING entire words like an asshole. It implies yelling, assholes do that. Please don't.
And this isn't the first time... when ME2 launched the Bioware forums were a spewing cesspool of filth but we didn't get that covered. Same with Dragon Age 2 but DA2 earned it for the most part... and didn't get covered.
First, you've got the stargazer scene, which places people living on the same planet that the Normandy crashed on. Also they reference Shepard which should mean that the reapers did not win and harvest all the intelligent life in the galaxy. Even should the reapers somehow have not found that one planet, that means people with knowledge of Shepard were there somehow, meaning the Normandy scene still happened. Adding the stargazer scene post-credits as some additional indoctrinated delusion makes even less sense. If it means that Shepard fights the indoctrination and then will find a way to defeat the reapers, it means we still have no ending, because we the player don't get to do so.
It also goes against Bioware's philosophy of making choices. There shouldn't be one right choice (destroy the reapers). I remember with DA2, Bioware said that there used to be a way to save your mother from death, but they removed it because they didn't like people thinking that they made the wrong choice. Choices can have different consequences, but there shouldn't be an obvious "right" or "wrong" choice. Of course, that so much of the ending does have a right and wrong choice (renegade trigger with Illusive Man if you don't choose paragon choices), and that there is this ending tied to one choice does mean the philosophy was kinda thrown out the window.
Assholes also refer to people as "whiny entitled pricks," which you did, all the while supporting the one thing that they have been asking for the most (even in the article you were responding to). I was simply clarifying to you that the people you are being a dick to are looking forward to the same thing as you are, making it even shittier for you to call them "whiny entitled pricks." It's like a fat kid calling someone a "lard ass" or a gay dude calling someone a "fag." And if you were referring to a specific person, you should have said so instead of using the same generalized statement that everyone else has been using to refer to people like you, Tristix, and I, who support the Indoctrination theory.
As for that follow-up post I completely agree with you. That's why the majority of the people who would like to see an improved ending have moved to the BSN's suggestion thread, where they can provide constructive feedback to Bioware that may actually be taken seriously. The bitching has died down significantly. It's the gaming sites that continue to perpetuate this stuff.

surf dtoid with 

Rising (10+)
People you follow




























follow











