This article was funny itself, but that line was hilarious. This series is shaping up to be one of my favourites. Keep it up!
Heh. I know you were kidding, but I think 3.9 falls outside the range of "reasonable disagreement." Reasonable disagreement is Killzone 2 getting an 8.9 somewhere. It's amazing that people who haven't played the game feel the need to defend it from a reviewer who has put it in that special sub-5.0 category for games that are just-not-even-kidding bad.
I rofled throughout this article; re-read that statement, and rofled some more.
Stand up job.
banging her...
then finding out she has AIDS."
LOL. Some of the other comments are good but that part takes the cake.
banging her...
then finding out she has AIDS
I hate it when that happens!
Also, I don't understant Portuguese that much but I think it says that "whenever there is a new Sonic game they always give it a bad review and that he preafers Gamespot because it gave the game a 6" or something like that.
P.S. They still put out Nintendo Power? Man, I haven't seen an issue since the mid 90's.
Speaking of Twilight Princess you should see if you can dredge up some comments on the reviews for that game for a future segment (not that you're in need of material); I remember a lot of vitriol on anything below nine for that game.
Haha, joke aside, why is a score below 6 like an "F" in video games? Shouldn't a 5 be a average rating? It seems like most reviewers give games scores between 7 and 9. If a game gets a score below 7 fans think the reviewer is too harsh. If a game gets a score higher than 9 fans think that reviewer is being too generous. I think that reviewers are forgetting how to quantify the factors of how good or bad a game is.
"Damn Nintendo fanboys...
whenever comes out a sonic game, they piss all over them.
It seems that the game is not even out yet and it's already been given poor scores. that's why I prefer gameSpot, I think they gave it a reasonable 6 =)
I'm not a fanboy, but judging from the videos..."
Stupid Nintendo Fanboys ...
every time a new sonic game comes out they already criticize it ...
For me , it looks like the games isn't even out and they already said it is sh*, that's why I like gamespot more , they gave it a basic 6 =)
I'm not a fanboy , but by the videos ...
That said, I have declined to purchase several games I was on the fence about in the first place due to bad reviews. Usually, though, its not just *one* review, but a multi-tiered investigation that ultimately swings the tide. With games as expensive as they are, one can never be too cautious.
It all makes sense! And when you consider the name of the school that Bush was at on 9/11, remember evidence hidden by the Knights Templar, and factor in the Roswell report, you finally see the truth! They can't hide their conspiracy forever!
Like Kane & Lynch , Army of Two , Silent Hill:HC or Enchanted Arms.
I love this place.
This is of all games to suck too. I remember seeing the first video and immediately being reminded of a new-age Sparkster (which would be AWESOME AS HELL, by the way).
Remember that, for that is the eloquentliest I could put that, hopefully.
Here's my impression of a Sonic hater:
"IF YOU EVEN REMOTELY ENJOY ANY 3D SONIC GAME EVER YOU ARE A RETARD THAT DESERVES TO DIE. IF YOU DEFEND SONIC GAMES YOU ARE AN IDIOT FANBOY THAT SHOULD BE OPENLY HUMILIATED. SONIC FANS ARE OBVIOUSLY ALL MORONS AND THE GAMES ARE BAD EVEN THOUGH I HAVE NEVER PLAYED A SONIC GAME IN MY LIFE."
Grow the fuck up. These games are getting better, and you all know this.
Honestly.. Do you think that the people who publish that magazine aren't being paid by Nintendo? Nintendo Power is an advertisement engine. If they were indeed serious gamers, they would refuse to write for such a publication. It took them 10 years of making magazines to finally let other companies advertise in the magazine. Do you think that Future US would still have the publishing rights if Sony and Microsoft ads appeared on the pages of their so-called magazine? It's called NINTENDO Power. It says NINTENDO on the cover! It's obvious that they're going to give all the games they see on the Nintendo systems a high score.. Do they compare the games they write about to other console specific titles? The integrity of that publication is null and void. I stopped being a Nintendo fan a very long time ago.. maybe I'm old enough to remember them giving piece of shit games like Milons Secret Castle a spot on the top 10.
they suck. and because of their previous shenanigans, I will not read, nor will I advocate it as a serious gaming publication.

surf dtoid with 






Rising (10+)
People you follow


























follow