Got news?   tips@destructoid.com  |  Never miss a story:   RSS + Twitter + YouTube
Hey! New here? Destructoid is a gaming discussion community, updated nearly every 20 minutes. Make a quick avatar to comment and enter our contests. Take the tour!

 


Home WHAAAAAAT? updates

Ever wish you could skip the hard parts? Alone in the Dark 5 is going to let you

10:12 AM on 02.19.2008, Gameboi 71 comments

Ever wish you could skip the hard parts? Alone in the Dark 5 is going to let you photo
     WHAAAAAAT?

After seeing Nour Polloni's walkthrough of the tech demo the other day (and your response), it's clear that I wasn't the only one to be impressed by the footage of Alone in the Dark 5. No doubt about it, Eden games has done a fantastic job of piquing our interest for their upcoming survival horror sequel. 

Now comes news with a horrific twist of its own, and it involves a feature in the game that I don't recall ever seeing before now -- the ability to "wimp out" and skip the hard parts. OXM got the interview with Polloni, detailing the game, and were kind enough to share it with us. Most of it smacks of familiarity, but this one detail took the cake: 

"Another achievement is linked to whether or not the player skips. We want everybody to be able to finish our game, so one of the other new features we've added is the ability to skip sections using a DVD-style menu if you get stuck, but always at a cost, and achievements is one way to reward players who don't skip."
I really don't know what to say about that. Making sure that your game's difficulty level is balanced enough so that people have a reasonable chance of seeing the closing credits is great. Giving them the option to skip past the parts that prove too challenging? Not sure I like the sound of that one, at all. Since you can always choose to play through the game as usual, nothing is lost. Still, it ranks as one of the most unorthodox ways of using the Xbox 360's achievements yet. How do you feel about this revelation? Is it a cool new feature, or complete waste of development time?

 


Next page: More Atari stories




Y0j1mb0's Avatar
Y0j1mb0 at 02/19/2008 10:11
I wonder if they'll give you an achievemnet for being a pussy and skipping the hard parts?
Tino's Avatar
Tino at 02/19/2008 10:12
I was gonna make a joke about skipping every single section of the game and beat it without playing it.

But...I'm a little dumbfounded about this feature.

"We want everybody to be able to finish our game,"

At the cost of them not actually playing it I suppose.

I can't really consider one beating a game unless it's actually...you know....played.
3r0t1c n3rd's Avatar
3r0t1c n3rd at 02/19/2008 10:12
Uhh, tough call. Only way I whould use that, is to show someone a cool part of the game, without playing 2 hours to get there.
Chaosye's Avatar
Chaosye at 02/19/2008 10:14
Real endings only count if you beat the actual game?
That would probably work a bit better.
LeonSK's Avatar
LeonSK at 02/19/2008 10:16
Thats sooo fucking weak. I hope the achievement says "Ultra Pansy" -40 points.
twincannon's Avatar
twincannon at 02/19/2008 10:21
Bad idea. Some people are simply going to ruin their experience, and thus their opinion/view of the game, by using said "feature". It's like making a great, balanced and fun RPG, but putting in a hidden super weapon that makes the rest of the game trivial - for any player that finds it and figures it's par the course, he's going to say the game was easy and boring. Yes, it's a good idea in theory, but you have to protect the gamer from the game itself - on both ends of the spectrum.

Another way to think about it, what if putting on god mode was as simple as going into options and enabling it? And how many of you have cheated at a game before and then felt a distinct lack of fun/accomplishment thereafter? It makes a huge difference, even if only subconsciously.

Furthermore, it's a shitty cop out to just making the damned game difficulty balanced and I'm surprised they even think this is worth PR'ing about. Sounds about on par stupidity-wise with the "we're not going to have pause so our game is intense" idea that other developer was raving about.
Sadie G's Avatar
Sadie G at 02/19/2008 10:22
i think it's nice that the developers give gamers a choice instead of forcing you to just keep playing or give up if you suck.
king3vbo's Avatar
king3vbo at 02/19/2008 10:22
Thats a copout, IMO. I wont be using the skip feature
notdryad's Avatar
notdryad at 02/19/2008 10:24
They're going to let you just entirely skip a part of the game? That's stupid as fuck. God damnit, I hate this ribbon for everyone society we live in today.
Jim Sterling's Avatar
Jim Sterling at 02/19/2008 10:25
On the one hand, there is the theory that if you pay for an expensive piece of software, you should be able to access it all without fuss.

On the other, what's the cunting point buying it if you're not going to play it?

Definitely a feature for pussies, though I wonder if this means the devs will be lazy as shit about balancing the game now. :-/
BlackSheep's Avatar
BlackSheep at 02/19/2008 10:26
atleast do what guitar hero 3 did, after you fail it X amount of times, ask if you just want to stop trying and skip.

stupid expert slash.
notdryad's Avatar
notdryad at 02/19/2008 10:29
@Jim Sterling

They could just do difficulty levels; having an Easy difficulty makes a game more accessible to people. Oh wait, that would take some effort on the developers' part, which is obviously something they don't want
big filth's Avatar
big filth at 02/19/2008 10:29
very gay indeed.
RaiRed's Avatar
RaiRed at 02/19/2008 10:30
I suppose some people may like it but in a way it might annoy me.

Like when my mate says he's completed MGS3. I tell him "No you haven't!" It just doesn't count if you play it though on Very Easy with an unlimited tranq gun that has enough kick to bring down a fucking elephant and all the enemies/goons are near blind.
Jetsetlemming's Avatar
Jetsetlemming at 02/19/2008 10:31
Lame. Sounds like a copout in exchange for proper difficulty balancing. If a player reaches a point where it's impossible for him to continue due to difficulty, and I know I've had one or two moments like that in my time, give him a lower difficulty setting, or, god forbid, a cheat code or two. Make the game take note of 20 deaths in a row and in response lower the enemy health or attack damage a bit to compensate or something.
A "DVD-style skip menu" just sounds like a huge fucking lazy solution to proper balance.
Topher Cantler's Avatar
Topher Cantler at 02/19/2008 10:31
Pussies.
Tofucube's Avatar
Tofucube at 02/19/2008 10:35
I think they should change this feature with something like in game difficulty switch. Rather than simply letting you skip it they let you lower the difficulty of that section so that you can actually beat it.
They might even make it so that you cant switch the difficulty unless you die three times in a section. AT least that way people aren't simply bypassing the game.
Danger Shark's Avatar
Danger Shark at 02/19/2008 10:35
This sucks, it reminds me of the instant travel in Oblivion, but with a little more suck thrown into the mix.
Scientist tz's Avatar
Scientist tz at 02/19/2008 10:37
Should I decide to rent the game and decide that I don't like it all that much I could at least see how it ends before returning it.
Barcode's Avatar
Barcode at 02/19/2008 10:38
I don't like it, but I see where they're coming from. I'm sure that the moment the player skips a section is the moment they their "Wimped out" Achievement worth only 10 points and they aren't allowed to get any more achievements.
Boolean's Avatar
Boolean at 02/19/2008 10:42
I think if used properly it could be a great feature, granted not much different from using any cheat codes in the past. Getting to a boss fight you just can’t beat which is enough to make you walk away from the game forever can now be skipped to carry on with the story at the cost of losing the achievement. I think its a great idea if used properly. On the other hand, simply saying “Skip chapter 2” would be a stupid idea because as Tino said, you want everyone to finish the game at the cost of not playing it? Great idea, possibly terrible execution. We’ll have to wait and see.
Polish Hill's Avatar
Polish Hill at 02/19/2008 10:42
I don't know how difficult these games typically are so I won't say "omg anyone who uses this is a huge pussy lolz" but it is strange. I'd be hard pressed to get the same experience out of a movie if I skipped a chapter or two and it seems like the same thing here. I could see this becoming slightly more common in the hopes it will lure in casual gamers but I'm not a fan.
pyr0lyZer's Avatar
pyr0lyZer at 02/19/2008 10:48
laym...i don't feel like i've finished a game's campaign/story mode unless I go through the entire thing myself, even if I DON'T get all the campaign achievements. It would have been better (if not already) to have co-op mode for the harder difficulties like Halo or Gears. But I don't know much about AITD so I could be full of hot gas..
Count Grishnack's Avatar
Count Grishnack at 02/19/2008 10:49
This makes no sense. This is a survival horror game - not some Barbie Horse Adventure, where I could see skipping a valid tool for those who play it.

If you want to make something more people can "get through," make a movie.
Justice's Avatar
Justice at 02/19/2008 11:03
That's quite a good use of achievements I guess but why buy the game only to skip the hard parts?
brad drac's Avatar
brad drac at 02/19/2008 11:07
If this is implemented well, as in you were offered to skip a particularly tough firefight after numerous failed attempts, how the hell can it be a bad thing? This is like complaining about games having an easy difficulty, or fanboys complaining about games coming out on other systems as well as their own. If you don't like an optional feature of a game, don't use it. I personally would never use something like this, when I continually suck at a section, I take it as a personal affront and it makes me even more determined to beat it, but if it lets more casual players enjoy the game, what possible harm?
Noah's Avatar
Noah at 02/19/2008 11:07
I'm not even reading all the other comments to find out if I'm the only wimp here or not...but I think this is awesome. It's no different from closing your eyes during a scary movie.
SpunkyLoveChild's Avatar
SpunkyLoveChild at 02/19/2008 11:10
Yeah.... No thanks, there, AITD. I like to EARN my credits, thanks.
Netrat33's Avatar
Netrat33 at 02/19/2008 11:10
Good god people It's only a option. Don't use it and let the people who need it use it. There are plenty of games that after you died on a boss for the 3rd time for example, you were able to drop the difficulty. Not really that much different. Doesn't affect you in anyway. And I'm sure the achievement is "Don't skip any parts of the game"
Jetsetlemming's Avatar
Jetsetlemming at 02/19/2008 11:11
You know I think it'd find this acceptable if when you opted to skip a section of the game, the game instead showed a video of a better player going through and beating it on the hardest difficulty while audio that said "YOU FAIL AT LIFE" repeated over and over, and the video itself was unskippable.
ScottyG's Avatar
ScottyG at 02/19/2008 11:20
It's definitely a clever alternative to difficulty levels.
Sharpless's Avatar
Sharpless at 02/19/2008 11:21
Shut up, Topher. You're not allowed to talk here, shmuphead. :)

I don't think it's a horrible feature. As long as they penalize players significantly for doing it, then it should be fine. It's obviously not necessary, though.
nwfisk's Avatar
nwfisk at 02/19/2008 11:33
Please - it's a fantastic feature.

I can't tell you how many times I've given up on a game because I can't get past a part. It's not that I won't TRY - I just don't care enough to continue wasting my time. It's an OPTION, what the hell do you care if OTHER PEOPLE "ruin their experience"?

As the gaming mainstream grows beyond that of hardcore gamers, the gap between the most and least skilled players widens. I think this is a fantastic way to handle that issue.

Some people are more interested in the story than they are in grinding against a boss for 12 hours.
B-Radicate's Avatar
B-Radicate at 02/19/2008 11:45
They should put this in WoW. Skip all the stupid grinding. Maybe I'd bother playing it then.
Tubatic's Avatar
Tubatic at 02/19/2008 11:55
Word B. I have a level 70. Let me just make a level 70 with crap gear.
Corak's Avatar
Corak at 02/19/2008 12:28
Yup definatly something for pussies. However, there are a lot of lazy asses out there that if something is to difficult they would rather skip it and this should definatly appeal to them. But probably not to most of the readers on this site.
nicojay's Avatar
nicojay at 02/19/2008 12:49
Aren't features in a game meant to make one feel excited about it. This news does not excite.
mix's Avatar
mix at 02/19/2008 13:13
The only games I ever got stuck on were NES and SNES games as 3 lives and no continues was, I swear, spawned by the devil.

Newer games don't have this problem (I find) as after a few tries everything works out fine thanks to saves.
tincow's Avatar
tincow at 02/19/2008 13:41
How is this new? You can enter cheat codes in lots of games (ex: Half Life 2?) and skip ahead in a DvD style fashion?

It's kind of sad that you'd care whether somebody else skipped part of a game they were stuck on or just plain weren't enjoying to move the story forward. But it's expected in the current environment of "hardcore" gamers who actually take a thing like 'gamerscore" seriously...as if it isn't just the gamer geek equivalent of clipping Betty Crocker points off of cereal boxtops.
CJSchmidt's Avatar
CJSchmidt at 02/19/2008 14:03
After thinking about it for a few minutes, I have to say I really like this idea. Having a wife and a job, I would love it if some games had a "sit back and enjoy the story" mode. If the story and presentation is good enough, why not let someone with bad coordination play through it like an interactive movie? So what if they don't get the same experience you do, it's not like someone else's experience lessens yours.

I think most RPGs should have an adventure mode anyway. 1/10th the encounters with boosted drops and exp. Let you replay a game again without investing another 80 hours. Let busy people enjoy the new Final Fantasy. Show more casual gamers the joy of RPGs. They'll sell more RPGs, we'll get more RPGs... where's the problem?
Samit Sarkar's Avatar
Samit Sarkar at 02/19/2008 14:16
Well, I certainly wouldn’t use it, but it’s an interesting idea to allow a more widespread audience to play through the game. But seriously, they should have “good” and “bad” endings, with the latter being the one that people who skip any part of the game end up seeing.
kawitchate's Avatar
kawitchate at 02/19/2008 14:30
is this game A BILLION times harder than the last Alone in the Dark? it sounds like it's A BILLION times harder if there needs to be a "puss-out" button
Dan CiTi's Avatar
Dan CiTi at 02/19/2008 14:31
So it's like Half-Life, but you don't have to unlock them? Meh. I'll play through it normally.
Kurtz's Avatar
Kurtz at 02/19/2008 14:57
Well, it's a feature that I'd say 99% of people won't use or care... but I hope it won't be a lame excuse for not balancing the difficulty well.

"What do you mean that throwing at you a dozen of rocket launcher armed megazombies it's unfair ? If you are a puss just skip it, no ?"
Doomtrain's Avatar
Doomtrain at 02/19/2008 15:20
Okay. Lets think about it like this.

I play the game. I get to a part I can't beat, no matter how many times I try. I can't skip it. I put it down, and never play it again. I sell the game to GameStop.

I play the game. I get to a part I can't beat, no matter how many times I try. I skip that part, and complete the rest of the game. I may or may not sell the game to GameStop, depending on how good it is.
TheDiamondSutra's Avatar
TheDiamondSutra at 02/19/2008 15:31
Seeing as they theyre aiming for like a primetime serial show style like Lost or Supernatural(?), it sounds alright for players who want a more seamless cinematic(even those are TV shows but whatever) experience.

But it depends on the situation like if its a timed sequence,stubborn boss, or an escort scenario then I wouldnt even hesitate to skip that shit. If the games gonna be as easy as Bioshock which had those same brisk cinematic vibes than thats good enough.
TheToiletDuck's Avatar
TheToiletDuck at 02/19/2008 15:37
@Doomtrain : Well put, my thoughts exactly.

Furthermore, it seems the enjoyment of a game (or at least memory of enjoyment) totally increases when you have beaten it (even if you pussed out). You associate the sense of achievement with this game and then are interested in buying the next one.

You don't have to use it, something extra is always a good thing (take a transexual for example).

On the flip side, it will be good to have an achievement you can ridicule someone about.
TheToiletDuck's Avatar
TheToiletDuck at 02/19/2008 15:38
eek, i DARE me to make less sense.
prev next 50 comments

Returning Dtoiders: login now to post a comment

Destructoid is an open discussion community. You don't need to "audition" to post a comment - just Create an avatar now - it's fast and free: PLUS you also get your own gaming blog and begin posting stories and uploading videos in our open community area that may also appear on our home page. Sign up and we'll guide you through it, it's easy and 100% anonymous.




 Original Videos

 Reviews
Mad Dog McCree Gunslinger Pack
Overlord II
Yosumin Live!
Let's Tap
Ghostbusters: The Video Game (Wii)
View all Game Reviews

 Community blogs -   39681 Dtoiders!

This month's theme: Untapped Potential

New to Dtoid? Read the survival guide


 Originals

Retroforce Recap: so what about those dirty games, now?











more original Destructoid stories



 Popular now more













Destructoid is:
Nick Chester
Editor-in-Chief
Jim Sterling
Reviews Editor
Dale North
News Editor
Hamza Aziz
Community Manager
Anthony Burch
Features Editor
Rey Gutierrez
Video editor & director
Niero
Founder, publisher
Letters to the editors
tips@destructoid.com
Associate Editors
Ashley Davis Jonathan Holmes
Brad Nicholson Jonathan Ross
Brad Rice Jordan Devore
Chad Concelmo Matthew Razak
Colette Bennett Tom Fronczak
Conrad Zimmerman Topher Cantler
Dyson Samit Sarkar
Contributors
Adam Dork
Ben Perlee
Daniel Lingen
Joseph Leray
Joe Burling
Mikey
Will Maddock
Stella Wong




get involved

register or login
post a blog
post a forum
enter a contest
discuss a review
contribute a news tip
write a guest editorial
support

new member's guide
login assistance
tech support
report abuse
email our editors
read our dev blog
nuclear crisis?
keep in touch

RSS feed
Twitter
Facebook
Myspace
Flickr
Game nights
Meet-ups
seriously

about us
advertising
terms of use
privacy policy
jobs at MM
buy our crap
our network

Tomopop
Japanator




Destructoid is an independently-run publication forged by our love of video games and the gaming community's need of accountable enthusiast press
living the dream since March 16, 2006