Quantcast
Destructoid Japanator Tomopop Flixist
Dtoid Forums now support TapATalk and ForumRunner on your iOS/Android devices. Whoot.

Eidos: 'Artistic' Kane & Lynch not ready to die yet photo

Has critical and commercial failure spelled the end for the Kane & Lynch series? According to Eidos president Ian Livingstone, it hasn't. He believes that the characters of Kane and Lynch are just too good to kill off, and we have not seen the last of them. 

"We haven’t made any announcements about Kane & Lynch going forward, but we all know that Kane and Lynch are two amazing characters who have a lot of brand equity," he says. "Kane & Lynch 2 clearly had a Marmite effect on people.

"You either loved it or hated it. Some people liked the juddering camera, home video style. Others absolutely hated it. Some loved the characters. Some didn’t like the characters. But it’s artistic, thrill-a-minute instant action stuff. I thought it was a great game, but I can understand people might not have liked it."

I don't think it's quite so black-and-white as Livingstone paints it. For example, I love Kane and Lynch as characters, I just hate the shitty games that IO Interactive puts them into. I loved the concept of Dog Days' juddery camera, I just hate how the game's three-hour campaign gave me a headache because of it.

I agree that Kane and Lynch as characters have serious potential, but I don't think that potential will be met with IO at the helm. Sorry, but Dog Days demonstrated that they just can't hack it anymore. 

Eidos: Kane & Lynch "will not disappear" [Eurogamer]








More gaming stories around the web. Got news? Submit yours to tips@destructoid.com

Jim Sterling serves as reviews editor for Destructoid.com, head of the Podtoid podcast, and produces a number of news stories, original features, one-of-a-kind videos. With his passionate argumentative style, controversial opinions, harsh delivery, and dedication to brutal honesty Sterling is a name that you can't help but recognize. Likes PS2, iPod Touch, Silent Hill 2, Metal Gear Solid, Dynasty Warriors 3 Meet the rest of the team



Post a comment! You can also post a photo below:

Comment with Facebook





Click connect and comment instantly!

Comment with Dtoid





New? SIGN UP - it takes 5 seconds

40 comments | showing # 1 to 40
prev next

Regnier's Avatar - Comment posted on 12/02/2010 09:11
Regnier
I actually liked the first kane and lynch. The story was awesome but the gameplay didn't deliver as much as I wanted it too. Hay sorta off topic do you guys remember Goblin Commander. I miss that game just sayin
munkee's Avatar - Comment posted on 12/02/2010 09:20
munkee
aesthetically I loved Dog Days. I really enjoyed playing a lot of it too. But, the gunplay really needed to be better for a studio with as much experience as Eidos. The main fuck up for me was that the gameplay never went anywhere. I did the same shit over & over & over again. Then, to top it off the last levels just ramped up the difficulty to a level that wasn't fun, just infuriating. Its a shame. I have kept the game purely for its visuals and atmosphere. I just hope that Eidos can nail the gameplay next time.

On the upside, i feel that Dog Days is one of the more aesthetically interesting out of the realistic games made in recent times. I think they got that spot on!
munkee's Avatar - Comment posted on 12/02/2010 09:23
munkee
IO Interactive, not Eidos
StingingVelvet's Avatar - Comment posted on 12/02/2010 09:25
StingingVelvet
The jumping camera can be turned off, and in the PC version the youtube effects can be turned off too. I played through once with and once without and honestly it was better without for me, but then I'm a PC elitist graphics whore and all that so I like my crisper details.

Game was good I thought, just too short.
Regnier's Avatar - Comment posted on 12/02/2010 09:27
Regnier
@munkee although I never played dog days the first one had some of those really frustrating moments where it doesn't explain what to do or where to go I.e. The dump truck part
Enzi's Avatar - Comment posted on 12/02/2010 09:30
Enzi
Give the K&L property to a studio who can actually code a good game. The first one was horrible to play but K&L2 really took shittines to a whole new level. I will never play such a game again even though it's just 3 hours.
Klarden's Avatar - Comment posted on 12/02/2010 09:35
Klarden
I liked both games, actually. Just finished the second one, and it's current price of 19.99 on Steam is just about perfect for it. never had problems with the art style of the game (i even stopped noticing it after several levels), which may be my personal thing or again the way it feels on PC. And the game played quite good on PC. Much better than the first one, if not for diminishing the impact of coop.
The first one had better story and situations you are put in, though. And better characterization. But that's the difference of the art styles between the games.
I hope they do a really solid game the third time, or do something as good as the second one on PC but for lower price than the normal one.
Jawmuncher's Avatar - Comment posted on 12/02/2010 09:37
Jawmuncher
If they can make a non shit game that keeps the heat feel from the first Kane and lynch then I have hope.

Biggest flaws of k&l have been gameplay issues and shitty settings for the characters like the war part in the second half and all of k&l 2
kainsec's Avatar - Comment posted on 12/02/2010 09:39
kainsec
Yea I love the characters and the potential of Kane and Lynch but Eidos is clearly unable to make a good game for them to be in. They need to go the third party route for this license if they want it to succeed.
Fugly Duckling's Avatar - Comment posted on 12/02/2010 09:49
Fugly Duckling
I picked up the second one on Steam when it was on sale. Better than the first in terms of style, but gameplay is still lacking. It's an interesting concept and story for the most part, but not a very good game.
StingingVelvet's Avatar - Comment posted on 12/02/2010 10:04
StingingVelvet
@ IV Backstab MC

Uhh... you shoot the people on the dump truck, then you shoot the people that show up. It wasn't really complicated.

Don't ever try and play something like Hexen, you're brain would explode.
Regnier's Avatar - Comment posted on 12/02/2010 10:07
Regnier
@stinging velvet. It would have been easier if the people on the dump truck were easier to hit with the wonky controls. :( I dunno guess I'm stupid I jept trying to shoot the damn driver and it would never work
TXYeti's Avatar - Comment posted on 12/02/2010 10:11
TXYeti
"Brand equity?" Really? Just because people have heard of a thing, doesn't mean it's a good thing. Just ask Enron.
JFF's Avatar - Comment posted on 12/02/2010 10:17
JFF
What is Marmite effect? I can't find a proper translation and marmita means traveler food's in my language.
runtheplacered's Avatar - Comment posted on 12/02/2010 10:17
runtheplacered
Well here's the thing.. the Hitman games are pretty great. Kane & Lynch suck pretty badly. So if Hitman 5 is great I'd think that's a good sign to hang up Kane and Lynch once and for all as that proves IO is still capable of making a good game... just their IP sucked. If Hitman 5 sucks then IO just doesn't know how to make games anymore.
Evergreen's Avatar - Comment posted on 12/02/2010 10:23
Evergreen
I feel like the franchise is/was forced into being a franchise without much consumer support. 2 crappy games, a decent comic, and a film on the way? Why? The first game didn't do that great, neither did the second. Why is Eidos trying to force a franchise out of these characters?
DAVYDOCK's Avatar - Comment posted on 12/02/2010 10:29
DAVYDOCK
The visual style should be used again in some other game ( a cloverfield game awww )
but the game was keek.
Stevil's Avatar - Comment posted on 12/02/2010 10:36
Stevil
Did the sequel flop? I remember it doing well for the first couple of weeks, but that was probably because GAME were selling it at ridiculously cheap prices. I never bothered picking up the sequel despite liking the first one. I was just put off by the way they wasted a great visual idea.

Like Jim says, the characters are great; it's just that they get lumbered with bad stories and average gameplay.

@Evergreen: The first one sold over a million copies, believe it or not. That's why they wanted a sequel. Bad reviews don't always mean bad sales.
fetusmilk's Avatar - Comment posted on 12/02/2010 10:38
fetusmilk
stick to the hitman games IO, and dont fuck it up!
wisearse's Avatar - Comment posted on 12/02/2010 10:38
wisearse
even i still wonder to myself; why do i still find this title so promising?
Chongomaster's Avatar - Comment posted on 12/02/2010 10:43
Chongomaster
@JFF:

The Marmite effect is when people either really like something or they really hate it with no one sorta liking it . It's named of the spread Marmite (http://www.marmite.com/).
LB Jeffries's Avatar - Comment posted on 12/02/2010 10:45
LB Jeffries
This strikes me as a fascinating example of negative equity and the impact of having a product so notoriously divisive just to see what everyone is yammering about. Does it sell games? Apparently so.
JQM78's Avatar - Comment posted on 12/02/2010 10:57
JQM78
As for K&L II, I liked it....as a rental. As for purchasing it, no way. The campaign was fun, but short, and since I'm not into multiplayer, it was not worth a purchase. Put more replay value into the campaign, Like some role playing-1st person shooter elements (like Borderlands) and I'd possibly buy it.
DAVYDOCK's Avatar - Comment posted on 12/02/2010 11:04
DAVYDOCK
It's 3rd person son, not gonna happen.
Qraze's Avatar - Comment posted on 12/02/2010 11:17
Qraze
here's what you do with any new k&l games.

scrap the notion of playing as them, instead, you're job is to hunt them, you are a fuct in the head bounty hunter with a weird obsession for candlestick holders and scales/weight measuring devices.

they both have metaphoric meanings that shine late into the game that work into puzzles or something.
Klarden's Avatar - Comment posted on 12/02/2010 11:29
Klarden
Btw, Jim, to continue on my "PC version was good", i think if the problem of the camera you had is not [only] becuase of personal things, it may be also because of the resolution and monitor size. I played it on 19' with 1280x1080 which is a higher resolution on a smaller display. It may have something to do with my reaction to the style versus yours.
I'm not defending the game, i just came to the conclusion that, surprisingly, the game playes and feels much better on PC, than consoles. But, i guess, that won't get you to try out the PC version -_-
Nowanmai's Avatar - Comment posted on 12/02/2010 11:38
Nowanmai
TL;DR comments
I don't think it's IO's fault. Publishers still get a lot of say in how the game is gonna look and feel. Well, maybe, it wasn't publisher's fault. Look at first Kane & Lynch. It was brilliant, IMO. As well as most of the Hitman games. And, yes, I still look forward to next Hitman game more than everything else. Let's see, if they can outdo themselves yet again.
That is, if they do another Hitman game, which is my favorite game series ever. Or, one of the best. *khm* Thief *khm*
Felipe Choque's Avatar - Comment posted on 12/02/2010 12:06
Felipe Choque
I played and loved both of them.
StingingVelvet's Avatar - Comment posted on 12/02/2010 12:15
StingingVelvet
@ IV Backstab MC

Ah, well I played the PC version so the controls were pretty standard.
runtheplacered's Avatar - Comment posted on 12/02/2010 12:23
runtheplacered
@ Klarden,

http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/hitman-5-out-xmas-2011-at-the-earliest

And I agree with Thief... Now that Warren Spector has put down the Mickey Gloves it's time to get back into some Thief business.
runtheplacered's Avatar - Comment posted on 12/02/2010 12:25
runtheplacered
Holy shit, I just saw this..

http://eidosmontreal.com/en/games.html

So there is a Thief 4 in the works. Nice.
Altraum's Avatar - Comment posted on 12/02/2010 12:51
Altraum
"I love Kane and Lynch as characters, I just hate the shitty games that IO Interactive puts them into."

Pretty much wraps up any comment I would have made.
Klarden's Avatar - Comment posted on 12/02/2010 14:23
Klarden
@runtheplacered
I wasn't the one with the Thief and Hitman comments:)
And knew, that both Thief 4 and Hitman 5 are in works. Doesn't make the fact less awesome, though:)
Sæglópur's Avatar - Comment posted on 12/02/2010 15:46
Sæglópur
Honestly, the Hitman games played like shit. Hell, the controls were worse than in Kane & Lynch. So seriously, I wasn't surprised when Kane & Lynch was flawed to the core. However, unlike Hitman--which has most run its course--I do believe Kane & Lynch has some serious potential--but let's be honest, it'll take a hell of a comeback to make people give this one a 3rd chance. I'm willing to give it another chance, though. Great characters, no doubt.
Klarden's Avatar - Comment posted on 12/02/2010 15:52
Klarden
@RaidenFan
Let me guess, you shot your way through in Hitman?
RWarrior1CO's Avatar - Comment posted on 12/02/2010 16:49
RWarrior1CO
How about putting these two in a different genre? I can't be the only one who finds it odd that two fairly incompetent thugs spend their time shooting everyone in the world. Surely they can get up to more inspired shenanigans than that.
munkee's Avatar - Comment posted on 12/02/2010 17:33
munkee
I'm with RaidenFan on this and agree with his/hers entire comment.

I was a sneaky mother fucker in hitman, i love stealth games and I still thought it was shitty. Nice idea, some nice settings, but clunky as hell and irritating to play. I'm surprised that it has such a big fan base.
Klarden's Avatar - Comment posted on 12/02/2010 17:59
Klarden
@munkee
had no problems with how the stealth missions played since the first Hitman, seriously.
shooter missions were stupid, sure. I still have bad memories of Columbia missions in the first one
Doos's Avatar - Comment posted on 12/03/2010 03:34
Doos
Both Hitman and Kane & Lynch need to wander off to a better dev.

I've always wanted to like both franchises but the game engines are fuggin' terrible.
Timstuff's Avatar - Comment posted on 12/04/2010 13:09
Timstuff
Why is it that the buiness suits think it's their duty to ram this franchise down our throats even if we don't want it? They got Jeff at Gamespot fired for not giving the first one a good enough review, they've been pushing for a movie version since before it was even out, they acted like the release of Kane and Lynch 2 was the second coming of Christ... And meanwhile, gamers all yawned and rolled their eyes. It was a "nothing to see here, move on" affair, and yet Eidos acts as if we should all be shouting from the mountains "ZOMG KANE AND LYNCH IS BIGGER THAN CALL OF DUTY!" whenever they stamp this game's name on something.
prev next

Comment with Facebook





Click connect and comment instantly!

Comment with Dtoid





New? SIGN UP - it takes 5 seconds

Comments policy

Destructoid is an open discussion community. You don't need to "audition" to post a comment - just speak your mind. We respect differing opinions on the site, so have at it. Be smart, funny, insightful, clueless, or cute -- but back it up with substance. Keep your cool, keep it fun. We only ask that you act respectfully and above all: don't be a troll and ruin it for everyone else. Don't bring down gamers or we'll, you know, gently shoot you in the face and stuff you into a flaming mailbox. Each comment is your opportuntity to make this community awesomer. Is that even a word?

Avoiding the banhammer only requires common sense: spamming, trolling, racism, NSFW stuff, and other forms of sucking will not be tolerated. If anyone is griefing please report abuse. Be good. Don't suck!