surf dtoid with 
Rising (10+)
People you follow
For the record Nick SMB3 is definitely ONE OF the best Super Mario games of all time. Maybe not THE best, but one of them for sure.
"The best one is Super Mario World, and that's final."
I KNEW I wasn't the only one who felt this way!
SMB3 is bad ass, don't get me wrong. but it doesn't beat 96 levels and Yoshi double-jumps.
I KNEW I wasn't the only one who felt this way!
SMB3 is bad ass, don't get me wrong. but it doesn't beat 96 levels and Yoshi double-jumps.
Galaxy 2>Mario 64>Mario World>Mario 3.
Yea, most of them are good :D - however, I think Galaxy 2 knocks it out of the park.
Yea, most of them are good :D - however, I think Galaxy 2 knocks it out of the park.
@Magnalon
You cant compare the 3D Marios to the 2D Marios. It's just not fair to compare the completely inferior Mario games to the immensly better 2D ones.
Anyways.
Mario 3 > World. World is just 3 on sissy Easy Mode.
You cant compare the 3D Marios to the 2D Marios. It's just not fair to compare the completely inferior Mario games to the immensly better 2D ones.
Anyways.
Mario 3 > World. World is just 3 on sissy Easy Mode.
Both 3 and World are absolutely incredible. I'm not sure I can really differentiate them based on quality.
@Seph
Ummm - I'm not sure where you were when Mario 64 came out, but that pretty much revolutionized 3D gaming as we know it, two years before Ocarina of Time.
As far as Galaxy 2 is concerned, I think you need to experience the incredible level design yourself - some of the best levels of all time in any platformer are housed within Galaxy 2's disc.
Ummm - I'm not sure where you were when Mario 64 came out, but that pretty much revolutionized 3D gaming as we know it, two years before Ocarina of Time.
As far as Galaxy 2 is concerned, I think you need to experience the incredible level design yourself - some of the best levels of all time in any platformer are housed within Galaxy 2's disc.
Thank you Nick for kickstarting a pointless argument about trying to pick the best game out of one of the best and most diverse (gameplay-wise) series in video games. Most of them are wonderful, so it doesn't matter which one is 'best', whatever the hell that means.
I will say though that I want another game in the vein of the American version of Mario 2. That game is just so deliciously weird.
I will say though that I want another game in the vein of the American version of Mario 2. That game is just so deliciously weird.
SMB3 > SMW.
And all because of a single giant boot. If there is a bigger power trip than riding that boot in gaming I don't want to know about it.
And all because of a single giant boot. If there is a bigger power trip than riding that boot in gaming I don't want to know about it.
Galaxy 2 and Mario 64 have nothing on Super Mario World or Super Mario Bros 3. The galaxy series is okay, but feels kinda stale. I don't know why anyone is even talking about 64... It was great for its time, but it isn't as good as many of the other games in the series.
"* For the record, this is not true. The best one is Super Mario World, and that's final."
Troll baiting dumbass is dumb. And yes Super Mario 3 is the best. World has pretty awful level-design by comparison. Yoshi does nothing to fix this.
Troll baiting dumbass is dumb. And yes Super Mario 3 is the best. World has pretty awful level-design by comparison. Yoshi does nothing to fix this.
A few things...
First, I removed the "one of the" portion of that sentence. The disclaimer thing was added afterwards, and now I realize it doesn't make as much sense as it should.
Second, there's a long running argument about which is "the" best game in the series. It's obviously a stupid argument, one where there is no right answer. The debate quite often centers around 3 and World, with people getting heated when it comes to defending their game of choice. I realize it's a stupid argument, and it's one that I find quite funny, particularly when people get personally worked up over it. If you're upset over the fact that I honestly think World is a better game than 3 (such as Matt, who resorted to name calling), then you really need to get your priorities in order.
And since it's fun to argue over these things (keyword here is "fun"; stop taking this stuff so seriously), I don't like much of the level design in 3, to be honest. When you quickly run through many of them (after taking off with the racoon tail) in under 30 seconds, well... I don't know how I feel about that, even after all of these years.
In summary: if your heart rate rose at all when posting a comment, go take a walk or something.
First, I removed the "one of the" portion of that sentence. The disclaimer thing was added afterwards, and now I realize it doesn't make as much sense as it should.
Second, there's a long running argument about which is "the" best game in the series. It's obviously a stupid argument, one where there is no right answer. The debate quite often centers around 3 and World, with people getting heated when it comes to defending their game of choice. I realize it's a stupid argument, and it's one that I find quite funny, particularly when people get personally worked up over it. If you're upset over the fact that I honestly think World is a better game than 3 (such as Matt, who resorted to name calling), then you really need to get your priorities in order.
And since it's fun to argue over these things (keyword here is "fun"; stop taking this stuff so seriously), I don't like much of the level design in 3, to be honest. When you quickly run through many of them (after taking off with the racoon tail) in under 30 seconds, well... I don't know how I feel about that, even after all of these years.
In summary: if your heart rate rose at all when posting a comment, go take a walk or something.
Remember guys, like Nick said - it's fun to argue about stuff like this.
Otherwise, there's no point in having a comment section if we can't comment...
Otherwise, there's no point in having a comment section if we can't comment...
follow
