surf dtoid with 
Rising (10+)
People you follow
BF 4 won't be out for a long while yet. People should calm down. Was there ever any doubt they would make a BF 4? Come on.
I can still play 1943 on my PS3.
I can still play 1943 on my PS3.
You mean the 3 years until BF4 they doing to keep up BF3
HOLY SHIT BREAKING NEWS
hell you can still play BF2 and BF:BC2 online
HOLY SHIT BREAKING NEWS
hell you can still play BF2 and BF:BC2 online
Of course EA will still support BF3. They don't shut down the servers of old games until the sequel has been out for a couple of months.
Well, it sure means that they split their resources rather than concentrating on one thing or the other.
People overreact to the reveal.
Many people will still play bf3 after bf4 is released. I will still be playing bf3 if bf4 is not 2143.
Hell I can still find many games on BC2 still.
Many people will still play bf3 after bf4 is released. I will still be playing bf3 if bf4 is not 2143.
Hell I can still find many games on BC2 still.
I still play Modern Warfare 2 and World at War online pretty regularly. I don't get why the Battlefield fanboys are all pissed off.
Do they really need anything in terms of suport with battlefield 3?
There is hardly any offical servers anymore
There is hardly any offical servers anymore
People still play bf2? Seriously? Fuck that, I gotta fire that baby back up then. Commander mode FTW.
@Pint Sized Slasher
Do you play WaW on PC? Because I don't see how you could play on 360, it's like a fucking cesspool of hackers 24/7.
Do you play WaW on PC? Because I don't see how you could play on 360, it's like a fucking cesspool of hackers 24/7.
Sure still isn't the best experience and I'm doubting DICE will ever fix it.
Seriously, having 4 this soon is so disappointing.
Seriously, having 4 this soon is so disappointing.
and by "support" they mean "continue to pump out paid DLC right up until they completely replace the game.
Support like how they killed off a load of official console servers and let a load of shitty servers fill the void with random kicks?
Yeah. Brilliant support.
Yeah. Brilliant support.
I end with an eh, I didn't really enjoy battlefield 3. Oddly enough bad company 2 was significantly more intense and tighter online experience. There was nothing to really match the feel of battlefield 2.
@Pint Sized Slasher: Of course you don't understand. You can't seem to grasp the difference between P2P(Call of Duty) and Dedicated Servers(Battlefield). Maybe once you get that, you might see why people could be upset if support is lost.
I can't believe people are flippin' out this hard !
I'm a long time Battlefield fan without a doubt, but putting that aside and just using common logic ;
@ Chpow - That's the most ignorant comment I've read today. By, "support", they mean supporting like they have thus far. Let's see, they patched and fixed easily over 500 problems that the community had with Battlefield 3, so I'd say that's pretty phenomenal support on a technical level. Also, yes you have to pay for DLC, because someone has to get paid for the time that it takes to make the content. Basic economics. Come on son. There's a LOT of new content already and more on the way. Also, Battlefield games don't really ever get replaced. People are still playing everything from Battlefield 2 up to where we are at now without a problem.
I really don't see the problems people have with the custom server update. It's extremely easy to find DICE hosted servers and just as easy to find a good server with good players who won't kick you randomly. I have hundreds of hours into BF3 and that's happened to me only a handful of times, so I really don't know how you all have such bad luck.
And there's been a Battlefield game every 2-3 years pretty much since the series started. Sure, it's a little bit quicker for a numbered entry, but I trust Dice to push out quality games in the series.
I'm a long time Battlefield fan without a doubt, but putting that aside and just using common logic ;
@ Chpow - That's the most ignorant comment I've read today. By, "support", they mean supporting like they have thus far. Let's see, they patched and fixed easily over 500 problems that the community had with Battlefield 3, so I'd say that's pretty phenomenal support on a technical level. Also, yes you have to pay for DLC, because someone has to get paid for the time that it takes to make the content. Basic economics. Come on son. There's a LOT of new content already and more on the way. Also, Battlefield games don't really ever get replaced. People are still playing everything from Battlefield 2 up to where we are at now without a problem.
I really don't see the problems people have with the custom server update. It's extremely easy to find DICE hosted servers and just as easy to find a good server with good players who won't kick you randomly. I have hundreds of hours into BF3 and that's happened to me only a handful of times, so I really don't know how you all have such bad luck.
And there's been a Battlefield game every 2-3 years pretty much since the series started. Sure, it's a little bit quicker for a numbered entry, but I trust Dice to push out quality games in the series.
I'll say they'e supporting it, even their DLC has DLC!
http://pixelgrater.com/2012/07/17/first-ever-dlc-for-dlc-announced/
http://pixelgrater.com/2012/07/17/first-ever-dlc-for-dlc-announced/
"I trust Dice to push out quality games in the series."
I've put a 100 hours into it myself but only for the gameplay. Everything else from curved bullets to the UI to the lack of mods to the shitty respawning to the random suicides to the fact that Metro has not been expanded to fit 64 players, there's still a ton of problems that are needed to fix and alter. MW3 made me realize that we need to put more expectations to our multiplayer but it's sad that many gamers on dedicated gaming sites no less, are lowering their standards. Expertly designed gameplay can only take you so far.
I've put a 100 hours into it myself but only for the gameplay. Everything else from curved bullets to the UI to the lack of mods to the shitty respawning to the random suicides to the fact that Metro has not been expanded to fit 64 players, there's still a ton of problems that are needed to fix and alter. MW3 made me realize that we need to put more expectations to our multiplayer but it's sad that many gamers on dedicated gaming sites no less, are lowering their standards. Expertly designed gameplay can only take you so far.
No thanks, EA. Between the "balancing" that makes lone wolf players more viable to the rent-a-server, you've somehow managed to make Black Ops 2 look appealing to me. How the fuck did that even happen?
@ The Cast
While the Frostbite 2 engine does have some hiccups, it's still a great multiplayer experience.
How are the spawns screwed up ? The spawn system works great. all it takes is a second to figure out where the best spot to spawn is.
There's enough content to keep me happy without mods and I've played a lot of hours since release. There will be almost an entire new games worth of multiplayer content after End Game is released.
Expertely designed gameplay matters a lot in a multiplayer environment. On top of that, the map design of Battlefield 3 is unparalleled. Theres a few levels that people may personally dislike, but across the board, it's still exciting after hundreds of hours.
Also, ctg867 - BF2s servers are still active, and that got released 7 years ago. FYI, battlefield 3s servers will be around for a long time, without a doubt.
While the Frostbite 2 engine does have some hiccups, it's still a great multiplayer experience.
How are the spawns screwed up ? The spawn system works great. all it takes is a second to figure out where the best spot to spawn is.
There's enough content to keep me happy without mods and I've played a lot of hours since release. There will be almost an entire new games worth of multiplayer content after End Game is released.
Expertely designed gameplay matters a lot in a multiplayer environment. On top of that, the map design of Battlefield 3 is unparalleled. Theres a few levels that people may personally dislike, but across the board, it's still exciting after hundreds of hours.
Also, ctg867 - BF2s servers are still active, and that got released 7 years ago. FYI, battlefield 3s servers will be around for a long time, without a doubt.
They will continue to support BF3, but yet all the issues people have been complaining about and features previously promised are only going to be addressed in BF4. In other words they will keep supporting BF3 by churning out shitty overpriced $DLC because it is still a profitable endeavor.....but support in terms of the fixing their game, we are all fat out of luck!
Jim, fuck off with the EA hate, its getting really annoying now. In fact fuck off back to rubbing your cock all over COD which we know you love.
@ mrpragmatic
What features previously promised are not going to be addressed ? What issues exactly? They've addressed SO many problems the community has had already, and they're only going to continue to do so. Besides the occasional glitchiness of frostbite 2 I have had no technical problems with battlefield since the last patch.
Whether or not we can agree on that, in no way is the DLC shitty and overpriced. Like I said, for 50$ you get an entire games worth of quality content over the next 9 months. So I really don't see how that is shitty and overpriced. The packs they've released so far are great.
What features previously promised are not going to be addressed ? What issues exactly? They've addressed SO many problems the community has had already, and they're only going to continue to do so. Besides the occasional glitchiness of frostbite 2 I have had no technical problems with battlefield since the last patch.
Whether or not we can agree on that, in no way is the DLC shitty and overpriced. Like I said, for 50$ you get an entire games worth of quality content over the next 9 months. So I really don't see how that is shitty and overpriced. The packs they've released so far are great.
lol @ liveanimals. "An entire games worth of quality content". Fuck off EA shill. Some maps and maybe some guns and vehicles are not an entire game.
Tell the rest of your faceless EA defender buddies to come at me.
Tell the rest of your faceless EA defender buddies to come at me.
DICE and EA should take a page out of Harmonix's playbook and just make all the BF3 content forwards compatible (or port it over), provided the two games are not dramatically different (and I have no reason to believe they will be).
@ usedtabe
Glad to know your an aggravated idiot. I was having an actual conversation while, you're just being a douchebag. Come at you ? Are you fucking serious bro ? Wow.
Also, some maps? Try 16, which is more than any battlefield game has launched with. So yeah, an entire new games worth of maps. Weapons? Their will be 30-40 new guns after End Game is released. Which is not entire games worth of weapons, battlefield 3 launched with over 55, but it's still a lot, not to mention the additional various vehicles that have been an will continue to be added.
Faceless EA defenders? Haha you're such a joke !
Last time I checked I had a face. Thanks for your concern though. Also, I could give a shit who publishes what, I play good games.
Glad to know your an aggravated idiot. I was having an actual conversation while, you're just being a douchebag. Come at you ? Are you fucking serious bro ? Wow.
Also, some maps? Try 16, which is more than any battlefield game has launched with. So yeah, an entire new games worth of maps. Weapons? Their will be 30-40 new guns after End Game is released. Which is not entire games worth of weapons, battlefield 3 launched with over 55, but it's still a lot, not to mention the additional various vehicles that have been an will continue to be added.
Faceless EA defenders? Haha you're such a joke !
Last time I checked I had a face. Thanks for your concern though. Also, I could give a shit who publishes what, I play good games.
Like I said, some new maps, guns and vehicles are not the equivalent of a brand new game. And faceless means you're another in a long line of avatar-less EA ponyboys. Good show with gallop, but I can only give you a 2/10 bro.
I read "support" in this as meaning "we have more DLC in the pipeline to sell you"
And of course they're gonna keep the servers up for BF3. They got rid of the majority of the official ones, after all. Long as suckers keep lining up to throw money down on adding features back to games that used to be standard to the total package, EA and Activision will be in good business for a long time.
It's amazing that anyone who has become the least bit familiar with the games industry in the past 6 months to 2 years could possibly be surprised by something like this.
And of course they're gonna keep the servers up for BF3. They got rid of the majority of the official ones, after all. Long as suckers keep lining up to throw money down on adding features back to games that used to be standard to the total package, EA and Activision will be in good business for a long time.
It's amazing that anyone who has become the least bit familiar with the games industry in the past 6 months to 2 years could possibly be surprised by something like this.
@ usedtabe
Lol you're such a joke. Avatarless ea pony boy? Ohhh how creative. Once again, I'm not sure if you can read, but;
I don't care who publishes anything. And avatars are pointless.
And you sir, are just unbelievalely stupid! All good though, not my problem.
Lol you're such a joke. Avatarless ea pony boy? Ohhh how creative. Once again, I'm not sure if you can read, but;
I don't care who publishes anything. And avatars are pointless.
And you sir, are just unbelievalely stupid! All good though, not my problem.
@usedtabe
You do realize that you attacked him first by calling him a faceless ea pony and then you turn around to say he's lost for calling you stupid because you called him a stupid name that attacked his integrity. Do you have no recollection of what you write ? Because you have to make sure you don't sound like an idiot if you don't want to be called as one.
You do realize that you attacked him first by calling him a faceless ea pony and then you turn around to say he's lost for calling you stupid because you called him a stupid name that attacked his integrity. Do you have no recollection of what you write ? Because you have to make sure you don't sound like an idiot if you don't want to be called as one.
xStahl: Yes, but I also addressed his tired, weak argument. He in turn just slung insults and completely ignored anything else. Do try and keep up.
ugg pas cher soldes bottes ugg pas cher femme bottes ugg homme ugg pas cher soldes bottes ugg chaussures nike pas cher air max tn nike tn tn shox air max 90 t 90 windows 8 cl¨Ś windows 8 T¨Śl¨Ścharger Windows 7 win xp office 2010
follow
