It's so true - and not for graphical reasons at all. The PC version supports 64 players at a time, compared to 24 (more than double!), and dedicated servers/mods. Yea, that's f'ing awesome - Battlefield isn't meant for just 24 players at a time.
You really can't beat jumping into a 64 man dedicated server, and seeing the same people consistently, and knowing it will ALWAYS be up 24/7 rather than relying on random people every time for sometimes inconsistent matchmaking. Considering Activision did it's best to kill old school FPS PC gaming, I can't wait.
Considering how lucky I am while playing (ANY) multiplayer, I expect this to be happening to me over and over again.
@Article: yeah I need to hurry up with my pc upgrade as well for this. Sorry Xbox, but you can't handle the truth..er...game.
I hope we still get the so-incredibly-large-it-could-fit-ten-CoD-maps-within-it sized maps. Why? One word. Jets.
"the sniper class can now hold his breath for a few seconds while trying to take the shot. The counter to that though is that the sniper will sway heavily for a few seconds as he catches his breath."
DONOTWANT.JPG This is a complete Call-of-Dutyization of BF3. In BF2 you didn't have the retarded weapon-sway idiocy that seemingly every FPS has nowadays. I for one do not welcome said change.
"That reminds me, I should start looking into upgrading my computer. No way am I playing Battlefield 3 on a console."
Normally I would say 'fuck that guy' on a comment like this but the last PC game I really played was BF2 oh-so-many-a-year ago. Such fond memories that, I too am looking forward to actually building a new rig just for BF3! Though, I will also get it on 360 because of friends.
This guy put together a nice series of C-Blogs that are pretty informative for people looking to put together an affordable gaming PC. You should definitely check it out.
I've been playing Project Reality and I could not be happier they are adding suppressing fire to BF3! It will completely change the way people approach situations. There is no being a lone hero when you are blind and disoriented by enemy fire. Hopefully this will encourage people to stick to their squads and play as a team.
i wish i could afford a gaming pc :(
tho everyone i know whos getting it is getting it on the xbox
And don't give me that "Everyone using Teamchat for teamwork" bullshit. If we're in squads, we're supposed to coordinate together to achieve a specific objective. You can't coordinate with the other squads on your faction if each squad is locked in their own separate ventrilo server.
So I'm probably getting this on my PS3 and then on my PC at a later date.
And yes, I speak as a console fanboy, but playing this on anything but a high-end computer would be a crime. Sadly that's probably what I'll have to do...
24 is enough for me. Btw can someone explain why the xbox/ps3 couldnt handle more players? Surely its a server/connectivity error or something and not the hardware. Pretty sure they can cope with a few more soldiers on screen.
Whatever the system, people, just please get this game over Modern Warfare 3. It's the only thing I ask of my fellow gamers, support DICE instead of Activision.
My fucking god, I'm so sick of this goddam trend. Snipers don't hold their goddam breath anymore than boxers hold their breath while punching. They breath out slowly while firing. This stupid piece of 'realism' is getting old.
You know have a couch experience with larger maps and 64 players.
for those wanting to see more multiplayer gameplay
Yes it will but not as launch, just like Battlefield 1942, and fuck that Sniper -hold-breath-in change, keep it hardcore
Other than that, I'm perfectly happy.
@DICE: I R NOT DISAPPOINT! Live up to the hype and you can have my monies.

surf dtoid with 






Rising (10+)
People you follow








































follow












