Actually quite tempting, as it seems like a decent bundle for the price, and I'm a bit over-due for a graphics card(currently have a Geforce 9600GT that is acting up occasionally.)
This is a pretty sweet deal. I want to upgrade my card soon, and I've been eyeing the 560 Ti.
It will play the game judging from the game's minimal specs, but I'm not so sure about it being a smooth experience.
Though, the $200+ range of videocards is too high for me. I have a 2 year old $120 card that still allows me to play Crysis 2 at 1680x1050 (my monitor's native resolution). The more expensive cards get outdated at pretty much the same speed as the sub-$150 cards, so I have forgone considering those.
They don't get outdated as quick right now, just because of almost a limit of how far they can push GFX while still being able to run on consoles.
Battlefield 3 may change that, but right now, those mid-high range cards look tastier as speed becomes king.
Though honestly, you shouldn't have much problem with a GTX 450-460 for 99% of your gaming needs. Mainly because multi-plat is now more common than ever so consoles tend to...anchor down how far an fast PC games are advancing.
Which honestly, you won't hear me complain about too much. If means they don't go overboard and I'm stuck trying to pay crazy money to run new games every few months. As it is, my PC should be more than enough for the rest of this consoles gen and for a while after that.
Disagree. I had an ATi x1600 and AMD Athlong 2Ghz dual-core. Throwing in a 560ti made a lot of games playable on high detail.

surf dtoid with 






Rising (10+)
People you follow




























follow


