Indeed. While I admit it might not work well on a console, I'd still much prefer having the OPTION to have similar camera features, among other things, to enjoy the game with.
Hell, PS3's HAVE USB ports. So it's not like you couldn't add in keyboard and mouse support, right?
@Gaidenrider: Maybe its not the fact the first one was a pc RPG so you thought it sucked ass, but rather that you're a dumbass for no doing any research on a game you plan on buying?
Except its not easy making everyone happy when you have to send out a multi-platform title because developers wants everyone to get the same experience and cut down on time/costs, so this is worrying news to people like me who chose to enjoy the first game on the PC.
I just hope that they can pull their act together and try to achieve what they had done before, because if I'm going to play "exactly" what console users are getting, then I'd rather get the console version for ease, thus thats where the problem lies.
This just went from the sequel to my second favorite game of all time to a rent.
DA:O is a wonderful game that could have been so much better. Though, I guess there might be people out there that wish it was more hack-n-slash actiony instead of tactical. But those people are wrong.
To all the people nagging about the removal of the isometric view, did anyone read this "This means you can still maneuver the camera around the battlefield and issue orders from a remote location, just as you could in Origins."
Maybe it'll be a bit different. Maybe instead of isometric view, they'll call it bird's eye view or panoramic or whatever the f they want to call it. Does it really change anything?
They haven't even released the reveal trailer yet and you're complaining about the gameplay? I weep for the future of gaming.
It's obvious that just like Mass Effect 2, they are going to "streamline" (ie remove) a lot of the RPG aspects of the game.
That would be fine if Dragon Age wasn't billed as a revival of what made Bioware remotely successful in the first place - Baldur's Gate old school RPG gameplay. It worked for Mass Effect because it was already pretty much a shooter first, RPG second with its cover system. Dragon Age is completely different, and I'm starting to really not like what it's going to become - a hack and slash.
I was very concerned for a moment that Mark had jumped ship from Valve. That would have been terrible.
Yeah, I remember seeing that somewhere. I was specifically disappointed about the lack of character transfer, though. Again, I'm not throwing a fit over it or anything, but I was just kind of bummed that I won't be able to continue my first dude's story and I feel sympathy for those who had enjoyed playing other races besides human. How my actions in the first game will alter the Dwarven socio-economic structure in the second game isn't as interesting to me as the personal aspects of the story. Anyway, thanks for offering the clarification.
"That would be fine if Dragon Age wasn't billed as a revival of...Baldur's Gate old school RPG gameplay."
This is exactly why I found all of this news surprising. I think a lot of people who didn't really enjoy or care about the first game are seeing a lot of the concern over the changes as people just bitching about nothing. All of the buzzwords they have used to describe the sequel seem to be an almost 180 from the experience they set out to design with the first game. Considering Dragon Age has been Bioware's most successful game to date, it just seems like an odd move to suddenly change things up. I think most people are willing to see what they do with it, but I agree with your concerns about the change in direction.
To me these responses read:
"Hack and Slash/Shooty simple games are in right now, so we're going to gut this franchise and popularize it".
Of course I'd be a fool to fault a developer for simplifying a franchise: a company's goal is to make money, plain and simple.
But, Dragon Age was the last bastion of "Baldur's Gate-ty" old school RPG gameplay. There are plenty of hack and slash/simplified RPGs out there.
Really? Modding isn't that important nothing amazing has happened in the modding community, and I'm normally a defender of modding. You don't need to act like a dick.
"Good. The pc players are like old people who don't contribute anything to society but want everything done their way. If your demographic can't support itself then you're going to have to get used to some console style changes. Maybe if these games weren't pirated into oblivion on the pc..."
Man, this was incredibly stupid. Why did I have to read this? I really wouldn't know where to begin with this. Every single thing you said is wrong.. and some of the things you said are wrong for multiple reasons, even. What a train wreck of a comment.
I'm beginning to get worried that Dragon Age is becoming Mass Effectified. Mass Effect 2 was a great game but in my eyes... BG was better.
Console-itis indeed.
Nobody on here has said it's going to be the "worst thing ever" or that they're going to "boycott Bioware". People are allowed to voice their reasonable concerns based on the information that's been released. If we're not supposed to talk about it at all until it gets a full-length trailer, or even reviewed, why does Destructoid post articles about it? Just because you're not as invested in this particular issue, that does not give you any kind of special permission to condescend to everybody else in this thread.

surf dtoid with 

Rising (10+)
People you follow
















follow