I'm the same way though - I always feel so much worse when an animal dies in a movie or whatever, while when a person dies I could care less.
also pokemon is basically the same apart from the blood all over the fighting pokemon's face.
not like i'd buy this crap game anyway. dogs can't bubble beam.
Replace Pikachu and Meowth with a German Sheperd and a Rottweiler and you've got a dogfighting sim.
Now I can get back to some Mortal Kombat so I can rip my friends bspine out and beat him with it in peace.
People.
Can't live with them, can't firebomb them.
But I suppose we do have to pick our battle.
The dogs (or dog derivatives) have to clearly be bloodying each other up for their own benefit or just for fun rather than being coaxed or baited into mauling one another for cash and ego boosting.
You certainly wouldn't want your distribution service to seem like it supports this stuff, would you?
But anyway, while I agree that censorship is wrong, there are some things that are in such bad taste that they offer absolutely no redeeming social value. Leaving a game like this available to people ONLY because "censorship is wrong" is irresponsible imho.
I dunno, I feel it was doomed from the start. I guess if the game was shitty, then it served to be controversial, rather than good. Kind of like that DaVinci Code book. If you haven't read it, just know that the writing isn't all that great, and all of Dan Brown's books follow a basic formula. Important paragraphs end with stupid, random statements that throw the whole thing off.
Well that got off topic. Anyways, good riddance to a game only meant to pimp itself out for attention. I believe they got what they wanted, in the end.
It is a neat idea though and it would be funny if it was a Pokemon parody, but there was no way in hell that the game would ever going to be accepted so the turn out is predictable.
______________________
Greek Episodes

surf dtoid with 

Rising (10+)
People you follow
















follow