Quantcast


Developer will continue to 'move camera gaming forward' somehow photo

Yesterday, an EyeToy designer told gamesindustry.biz that developers (Zoe Mode) for You’re in the Movies are using “technical elements that are not reliable” and that Microsoft has done a particularly poor job supporting its Xbox Live Vision Camera. Today, Zoe Mode’s executive producer Paul Mottram fired back by saying that the studio is pushing camera technology forward.

Certainly background segmentation is a non trivial task but feel we should embrace the challenge in order to move camera gaming forward. As with other camera games, there is an element of user set-up required to ensure the technology works robustly but this is a small price to pay for the advantages background segmentation provides.
I like challenge embracement, I just wish this were with a different game. I really don’t think the crowd that is rushing out to buy You’re in the Movies is particularly interested in the game even working. They just really like Burt Reynolds or running from pretend dinosaurs.

[via gamesindustry.biz]








More gaming stories around the web. Got news? Submit yours to tips@destructoid.com



Post a comment! You can also post a photo below:

Comment with Facebook





Click connect and comment instantly!

Comment with Dtoid





New? SIGN UP - it takes 5 seconds

7 comments | showing # 1 to 7
prev next

Half left's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/26/2008 09:48
Half left
That 'Civilian' is a terrible dancer. My eyes are offended.
Rational Animal's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/26/2008 09:54
Rational Animal
Camera gaming, as it stands, is such garbage. The Playstation Eye was a waste of money and I won't repeat the mistake with the Vision Camera. Why is there such little innovation/effort being put into this arena?
RAB's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/26/2008 09:56
RAB
this shit is fucking retarded
Timmeh's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/26/2008 10:27
Timmeh
They could do some cool stuff by using a camera as a controller, really putting you into a game. Instead they churn out shitty garbage where you are superimposed onto some stupid, ugly, sub-par looking scene doing idiotic crap.
Monodi's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/26/2008 10:28
Monodi
I have never found camera games to be fun (except for the GameBoy accesory). I remember back in 2001 when webcams were still the wow-holy-shit Logitech included a couple of migames in it. I found it to be interesting but its not fun to burst virtual bubbles or tackle a volleyball with your finger while it goes shit crazy all over the screen.

One of the reasons I am septic about the DSi camera feature btw.
Sharpless's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/26/2008 13:33
Sharpless
In order for it to "continue" moving forward, it would've had to have been moving forward in the first place. It wasn't. It's stupid, and so it shall continue to be stupid.
TheStripe's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/26/2008 16:54
TheStripe
I pay lots of money to look at beautiful avatars acting out the actions from the controls I manipulate. I don't want to stare at my own face while I swat at invisible buttons.
prev next

Comment with Facebook





Click connect and comment instantly!

Comment with Dtoid





New? SIGN UP - it takes 5 seconds

Comments policy

Destructoid is an open discussion community. You don't need to "audition" to post a comment - just speak your mind. We respect differing opinions on the site, so have at it. Be smart, funny, insightful, clueless, or cute -- but back it up with substance. Keep your cool, keep it fun. We only ask that you act respectfully and above all: don't be a troll and ruin it for everyone else. Don't bring down gamers or we'll, you know, gently shoot you in the face and stuff you into a flaming mailbox. Each comment is your opportuntity to make this community awesomer. Is that even a word?

Avoiding the banhammer only requires common sense: spamming, trolling, racism, NSFW stuff, and other forms of sucking will not be tolerated. If anyone is griefing please report abuse. Be good. Don't suck!