games  anime  |  toys
Destructoid is gaming news, community, videos, and sometimes love. Take the tour or jump in with Facebook:

 


Destructoid review: WarioWare: Snapped! photo

The DSi is officially out in stores, and so far the thing is selling like crazy. It's strange for a console that has so few true exclusives at launch to be so hot. Thus far, the only games you can only play on the DSi are a handful of DSiWare exclusives: download-only games made specifically for the console. The most high-profile DSiWare title out right now is definitely WarioWare: Snapped!, the sixth game in Nintendo's ever-popular "micro-game" series. 

I love WarioWare. It's probably the only series that, in my opinion, has yet to strike out even once. Does WarioWare: Snapped! hold up the WarioWare tradition of good, dumb fun, or is this the first flop in the series' history?

Hit the jump to find out.

WarioWare: Snapped! (DSiWare)
Developer: Intelligent Systems
Publisher: Nintendo
Released: April 3, 2009
MSRP: 500 DSi Points

For the eleven minutes I actually spent playing WarioWare: Snapped!, I had a generally fine time. The approximately two hours I spent trying to get the game to properly recognize my face and hands? Not so much.

The game is basically a glorified tech demo for the DSi's camera. In theory, there is nothing wrong with that. Wii Sports was a tech demo, not even a glorified one, and it still managed to sell Wii consoles and make millions of people very happy. The difference is, Wii Sports controls pretty well. The controls for Wario Ware: Snapped! are fair at best, and a nightmare at worst.

The game consists of twenty micro-games and one playable credits sequence. The first few games control better than the rest, as they work extra hard to teach you how to think about controling a game. It does take a few minutes to adjust to playing a game that requires no buttons or controler of any kind. You'll use your hands and head to grab a few coins; you'll pretend to be a wet dog and shake your head like nuts until you're dry. You don't actually see your face and hands on-screen while you're playing, just a sillhouette. It works well to let you know what the game sees, and what it's reacting to, while not forcing you to look at your own face the entire time. That happens later. After you play through five micro-games, WarioWare: Snapped! shows you an animated highlight reel of all the stupid faces you made while playing.

It's not so bad; cute and quirky in the WarioWare style, but notably more easy and shallow than any other game in the series. Unlike past WarioWare titles, if you lose a micro-game in WarioWare: Snapped!, there is absolutely no penalty; you just go on to the next one. There are four sets of five micro-games to play, and you can literally lose every single one and still make it to the end. 

There is one penalty for failing a micro-game; you won't get to look at yourself acting like a jackass. The game only shows you the highlight reels of the micro-games you succeed in. For some, this may feel like a punishment, but personally, I actually liked not having to watch myself look like a dick after trying my damndest to play a game that becomes practically unplayable. 

Those first five micro-games are forgiving, but as the game goes on, they get more and more impossible to play. The last five require you to play with another person. For those keeping track, that's more or less a fourth of the total game. This is where the game really starts to punish you. If it loses the ability to recognize either you or the person you're playing with, the game just quits on you. No pause until it can recognize you again, no"move onto the next one" option; just instant death. It's just not forgivable for a game to kill you for its own inability to let you control it. I mean, imagine that you have a dog that you're trying to teach tricks to, and every time it screws up, it hits you on the nose with a newspaper. Is that a dog you'd keep around?

In fact, the only times I didn't succeed in WarioWare: Snapped! was when the game was doing it wrong. Unlike other games in the series, you get what feels like forever to complete each micro-game. It's almost impossible to not do them right, as long as the game can see you properly. Those last co-op games took me forever to beat. I had to go into three different rooms, and eventually ended up scrunched up against my toilet with a friend, staring at my DSi, trying to get the game to look at me right. 

It was then that I said aloud, "I don't think this game could be any less fun if it tried."

Things did get a little better from there, though. The game's credits sequence is by far its best attribute. Unlike the rest of the game, you can actually play the credits for high scores, the controls always work, and it actually takes some skill to play.You control a little flying rollercoaster car, and your goal is to ram into the names of the guys who made the game as they come flying at you. It sort of feels like a simplified version of Bit.Trip Beat, but with the camera set from the back. There are even enemies to avoid, and cakes to collect. 

It's this credits sequence that will keep me playing that game off and on for the next few days. The rest of the game will be something I revisit much less often, probably only when showing the DSi off to people that don't own one, or in a few years when I've totally forgotten everything about the game and play it again out of sheer ignorance. That's pretty bad for a WarioWare game. Every other title in the series is worth revisiting at least every couple of months. I wish the same could be said for WarioWare: Snapped!. A great credits sequence isn't enough to keep the game from getting a...

Score: 4.0 -- Below Average (4s have some high points, but they soon give way to glaring faults. Not the worst games, but are difficult to recommend.)


Continue: More Wario stories





prev next

26 comments | showing # 1 to 26

Scary Womanizing Pig Mask's Avatar - Comment posted on 04/08/2009 14:05
Scary Womanizing Pig Mask
Yeah, you could tell this game looked bad when even Iwata couldn't get it to work right.
pd771's Avatar - Comment posted on 04/08/2009 14:08
pd771
Nintendo: We don't even have to try anymore.
atastysammich's Avatar - Comment posted on 04/08/2009 14:08
atastysammich
Personally? Yes. Yes, I would keep a dog capable of hitting me with a newspaper. That thing would be a friggin' genius.

Shame this one doesn't sound as solid as the rest of the series! Maybe a sequel down the line will tighten things up once players and developers have gotten a better feel for the camera?
Anus Mcphanus's Avatar - Comment posted on 04/08/2009 14:14
Anus Mcphanus
Yeah, the games a good laugh to try out but I don't see anyone coming back to it too often. Good thing it's cheap then!
gatorsax2010's Avatar - Comment posted on 04/08/2009 14:15
gatorsax2010
That's a bit disappointing, but I expected this after I saw the video of Iwata. Even the first shot of the menu screen showed that this would be a lesser WarioWare game. At least I still have Twisted!
A New Challenger's Avatar - Comment posted on 04/08/2009 14:16
A New Challenger
Rhythm Heaven is the real WarioWare sequel.
Droll's Avatar - Comment posted on 04/08/2009 14:20
Droll
Just a quick question:
Can you really review a game that
A) on it's own, only costs 5 dollars, and
B) if you purchased a DSI, you can acquire for free with the 1000 points that come with the console?
Wouldn't it be better to "review" the DSi, and let consumers know if it's a reasonable upgrade for DS owners or DS newcomers, rather than attempting to review free games?
ZombiePlatypus's Avatar - Comment posted on 04/08/2009 14:22
ZombiePlatypus
Only twenty micro-games and poor controls? Not so sad about avoiding the DSi now, since this was the only reason I even entertained the idea of getting one. And actually, a dog that can smack people with newspapers sounds like an awesome animal to keep around.
njsykora's Avatar - Comment posted on 04/08/2009 14:25
njsykora
@Droll

We can review it, because those 1000 points could be better spent on a different game further down the line.

Also, Jonathan Holmes gave a Nintendo game a low score....am I aeake?
Harris Hatsworth's Avatar - Comment posted on 04/08/2009 14:39
Harris Hatsworth
@ Droll

They reviewed Nobi Nobi Boy and it only cost $5 dollars. And like with this game they said it was mostly a piece of a crap but since it's only five bucks you're not going to pay through the nose if you decide to get it.
The-Excel's Avatar - Comment posted on 04/08/2009 14:43
The-Excel
A rushed title for a half-hearted effort at a new console. I don't like where this is going.
Tristero's Avatar - Comment posted on 04/08/2009 15:03
Tristero
A 4? Wow, I'm totally shocked. A 4 from Holmes is serious business. You know a game was just asking for it with these results. I'm officially scared off. It sounds broken from the way you describe it.
Monodi's Avatar - Comment posted on 04/08/2009 15:18
Monodi
I am getting Henry Hatsworth first anyway.
007's Avatar - Comment posted on 04/08/2009 15:38
007
It's nice to see that Nintendo is going in a new direction...
Discarded Couch Sandwich's Avatar - Comment posted on 04/08/2009 15:45
Discarded Couch Sandwich
I think i'll be keeping my 1000 points now. Eventually something worthwhile will come out, and i'd rather get that than spend my free points on a quick distraction straight away..
Chronic Logic's Avatar - Comment posted on 04/08/2009 15:59
Chronic Logic
Yeah, I figured this would happen. Just stick with the good ol Wario Ware we know and love.
eskimo bob's Avatar - Comment posted on 04/08/2009 15:59
eskimo bob
I knew this was going to fail after even the first gameplay trailer I saw of it. the Wario Ware games are about quick pace and forcing you to adapt quickly from one objective to another. even when it moved to the Wii it failed at this and this is not exactly fixing that problem. ah well, I'll still have the GBA version and-... FUCK, I TRADED IT IN! at least I have Rhythm Tengoku Gold...
NihonTiger90's Avatar - Comment posted on 04/08/2009 20:23
NihonTiger90
Sucks, but things will get better when everyone's got a better grip on making the cameras work.
Dexter345's Avatar - Comment posted on 04/08/2009 21:41
Dexter345
A four from Holmes is a negative two from anybody else. This must be terrible.

Personally, I thought Touched! wasn't great either. This isn't a series that can do no wrong.

Still, this has only got twenty microgames? Didn't the first one have like, 100+?
Shadowiii's Avatar - Comment posted on 04/09/2009 00:14
Shadowiii
Way to go Nintendo, whoring out what is one of your best series into something stupid.
Bah.
Twisted Imp's Avatar - Comment posted on 04/09/2009 00:21
Twisted Imp
@Sexter345 (that was first a typo, but it's too epic a typo to change)
It's only got twenty cause it's only worth $5. Or if you just buy the DSi, free.
Naim Master's Avatar - Comment posted on 04/09/2009 00:43
Naim Master
Wow , that's pretty disapointing ...
Jonathan Holmes's Avatar - Comment posted on 04/09/2009 19:26
Jonathan Holmes
It's funny how I've gotten a rep as a Nintendo fanboy, as I think I've only reviewed a couple of Nintendo made Wii games, and I didn't give them amazing scores.

That said, I LOVE Birds and Beans. If you're looking for a funny, weird, challenging DSiWare purchase, and you don't already have the first WarioWare game, buy Birds and Beans immediately.
BlackFreefall's Avatar - Comment posted on 04/11/2009 21:37
BlackFreefall
Rhythm Heaven is fun. Err wrong post.
TJF588's Avatar - Comment posted on 04/12/2009 02:11
TJF588
Damn Nintendo, and placing WarioWare's red-heads in 'ere. Tugging my heartstrings, though I don't have a DSi to worry about this with.

Much as I'm a whore for the 'Wares, I might just put off this one for however long until the next WarioWare is out or even past (depending on when I can grab a DSi). Time to boycott (unless they do some free DLCing to Snapped!)?
Chack's Avatar - Comment posted on 04/20/2009 13:27
Chack
I didn't expect that! I'm sad for "Ware", but thanks for the recommendation of "Birds and Beans" Holmes.
prev next

Comment with Facebook





Click connect and comment instantly!

Comment with Dtoid





New? SIGN UP - it takes 5 seconds

Comments policy

Destructoid is an open discussion community. You don't need to "audition" to post a comment - just speak your mind. We respect differing opinions on the site, so have at it. Be smart, funny, insightful, clueless, or cute -- but back it up with substance. Keep your cool, keep it fun. We only ask that you act respectfully and above all: don't be a troll and ruin it for everyone else. Don't bring down gamers or we'll, you know, gently shoot you in the face and stuff you into a flaming mailbox. Each comment is your opportuntity to make this community awesomer. Is that even a word?

Avoiding the banhammer only requires common sense: spamming, trolling, racism, NSFW stuff, and other forms of sucking will not be tolerated. If anyone is griefing please report abuse. Be good. Don't suck!

 
New on Destructoid.TV play all videos

Loading
Loading Destructoid Videos


    Win this!
    Dive in! meetup+play for a chance to win a PC

    Dtoid Twitter    Got news?   tips@destructoid.com

    Reviews & Previews
    Assassin's Creed 2 review
    Crossfire Remote Pistol review
    Resident Evil: The Darkside Chronicles review
    Left 4 Dead 2 review
    Call of Duty: Modern Warfare Reflex review
    more reviews
    Driver
    Avatar
    GT Racing Motor Academy
    Bad Company 2 beta dishes out meaningful experiences
    Legend of Zelda Spirit Tracks
    more previews


    - The Dtoid Army is 51001 strong -

    Showing Cblogs with 3+ faps   show all

    Call for entries: do the wrong thing

    New to Dtoid? Read the survival guide




     Originals
    Ashley Davis: Badass of the Month Club: Terry S. Taylor





















    More Destructoid Originals




     Popular now more






















    Team Destructoid   tips@destructoid.com
    Nick Chester
    Editor-in-Chief
    Niero
    Founder, publisher
    Jim Sterling
    Reviews Editor
    Hamza Aziz
    Community Manager
    Dale North
    News Editor
    Rey Gutierrez
    Video editor & director
    Anthony Burch
    Features Editor
    Colette Bennett
    Tom Fronczak Brad Nicholson
    Ashley Davis Ben Perlee
    Conrad
    Zimmerman
    Chad Concelmo
    Jonathan Holmes Jonathan Ross
    Brad Rice Jordan Devore
    Will Maddock Matthew Razak
    Dyson Joseph Leray
    Topher Cantler Samit Sarkar
         
      Dexter
    Adam Dork
    Daniel Lingen
    Hollie Bennett
    Joe Burling
    Mikey
    Stella Wong

    Josh Tolentino




     

     
      get involved

    register or login
    post a blog
    post a forum
    enter a contest
    contribute a news tip
    suggest a feature
    be a guest editor
    support

    new member's guide
    login assistance
    tech support
    report abuse
    email our editors
    read our dev blog
    nuclear crisis?
    keep in touch

    RSS feed
    Twitter
    Facebook
    Myspace
    Flickr
    Game nights
    Meetup+play online
    seriously

    about Destructoid
    advertising
    terms of use
    privacy policy
    jobs at MM
    buy our crap
    our network

    Tomopop
    Japanator
    Despingation?




    Destructoid is an independently-run publication forged by our love of video games and the gaming community's need of accountable enthusiast press
    living the dream since March 16, 2006