I see you whining and bitching, but I don't see any real opinion. An opinion consists of both a belief and the reason you've come to that belief. All I've seen so far is belief, no reasons, therefore, troll.
:D
Anyway, Too Human's demo made me metaphorically vomit, I hated it.
Also, a lot of people seem to be joining the "I love Dyack!" fad. Imbeciles.
I found this website yesterday when I had a problem with Castle crasher and liked the site. Then I read this review. Now I liked Too Human and I definately agree that it's a hate-it-or-like-it game. But this review, LOL, I'm re-reviewing more than I am actually understand. This review makes absolutely NOOOOOO sense.
First off, this is definately stuck into the Norse Myth. Any denial? Do some research. The ending, I won't spoil, had EVERYTHING to do with Ragnarok - JUST LIKE IN NORSE...imagine that? Tyr died to Garm...guess it didn't happen in Norse mythology? And one of the Norn's being called a wench (One of the three distinct personalities - again - go back to your research)...what's new? "takes eight hours for the game merely to say "Loki is a bad guy" first off - lol 8 hours; second - research. Imagine that - no one thought a god would create a war of Chaos vs Order. I laughed at anything that was brought up about the story. Everything that was mentioned is irrelevent and, honestly, biased.
This review was meant to be harm to the game more than it was creditable. Terrible review - sell your Xbox.
BTW - another thing you forgot to note in your review...That 'pathetic roll' makes you temporarily immune to damage. Research? ;)
Also, I'm flat calling you a liar with this one, the Valkyrie cutscene takes 10 seconds, I timed it, if you count the time Baldur falls to the ground, add maybe 2 or 3 seconds, still a far cry from 25 as you're claiming.
And while you mention the classes, you don't mention how you can customize them, 3 skill trees and one choice of human or cybernetic aligment, you could make 2 champions and make them worlds apart.
Its fine you disliked it, I already got my enjoyment out of Too Human and traded it for something else but this review is incomplete and at least in one portion has an outright lie. I expected better from this place.
Still endlessly amusing to me to see all the drones get behind you, its almost stalkerish, kinda scary really, all the devotion.
@Hookah
You are my new best friend, I love you.
a troll calling others troll... interesting... if you were as important as you believe you are... you wouldn't have to put dog $h!t in your head to make others laugh... your comments obviously show a lot about the kind of mindset you walked into before you even started reviewing the game. "didn't like their precious game" you are practically admitting that your so call review is nothing but an attempt by a troll in order to bring himself attention that otherwise he wouldn't have.
You obviously wrote this $h!t in order to bring yourself that otherwise you wouldn't have without taking under consideration how sensitive the credibility of a site can be... people out there don't know your name.. hell I don't know your name... people are saying, "Destructoid Review"...
do you think it's a coincidence that you are the only site that reviewed this game this low? Look at the comments, look at all the other reviews... including the bad ones (6-7/10) which give a reason why to give a low score...
I would also like to ask how did you come into a 2/10...
can you brake it down in the Graphics, Sound, Control, Music, story, online, etc...
This is an example, why a troll shouldn't be reviewing games...
It seems to be working though and the kids are eating it up. Many of whom seem to be perfectly content as long as the review stirs up drama.
(No, I don't think Too Human is any better than a 6/10.)
I agree with a whole lot of what you said about the gameplay and the annoying things... but still had fun a lot of the time, so despite the bad stuff, I'd personally still give it at least a 6... probably a 7+ if it wasn't quite so buggy, and an 8+ if it were actually balanced so you didn't have to die repeatedly.
Cheers
stop bashing Jim. He is actually writing a real review on a game that is horrible. If you want to write your own review on this piece of garbage, be my guest. But no, you have to act like the little, zitfaced trolls you are living in your moms basement. Can't you guys just actually grow up in life and stop bashing people who are TRYING to give a truthful review of a game.
Actually, screw 50% of all gamers, you guys are epic fail because you act as though you guys are seriously injured when someone doesn't like THE SAME GAME AS YOU. It's called life, a little thing that commenters like hookah can't seem to understand. Leave Destructoid and never come back again. EVER.
How come Mr. Sterling is the one who reviewed this? I mean don't get me wrong, it was a very well-written review, and I'm sure the game itself deserved the low score. It's just been no secret that Mr. Sterling hasn't been a big fan of this game from the beginning, so it was kind of a given that the score would be low. I figured we'd see how other editors liked/disliked the game in the review. Not saying that we absolutely needed that, but I was kind of expecting it.
Please understand, I'm not attacking anyone. I'm just curious about that particular part of the reviewer choice process. Well written, Jim, and thanks for the honest review.
Granted, after playing the terrible demo, I don't care about this game, so it doesn't really bother me.
However, that being said, Destructoid, you are a great site, but you are kind of falling off lately... please don't fall victim to your own excesses......
@Hookah
You are the goddamn stupidest son of a bitch that I've ever seen on Destructoid, and I've lived through WiiSucks, Quest, Hells_666, Cube, and I even have a soft spot for puppet. Your head is so far up your own ass, you look normal.
your forgot your own name cock sucker ... still hopping to get a job with Dtoid ... fucking loser ... i'm sure you don't even have a 360 so why are here acting like a pro of gaming , when your just a fucking loser ... get a job ... and most of all ... a life dumbass !
I agree with some that this review is not quite complete; there are a number of things Jim doesnt bring up that could make a difference (co-op, different classes, skill trees, etc etc).
However, whats there is well written and seems like a valid opinion to me. Its not a biased bashing of the game - he even gives it credit for what it does well, even says it can be fun every now and then. However, based on what I read, whatever parts of the game Jim played deserve a 2. Maybe overall the game deserves a bit more, but I dont know, and I dont care; im not buying it to find out.
How else would you attack Dyack than attack his game?
I don't care as much as most of these people do, however. As long as it's really your opinion and not meant to bother Dyack with a ridiculously low score.
I was distracted by mythbusters when typing this.. It's supposed to be "how else would you attack Dyack than by attacking his game?" or something like that....
Doesn't sound like a good time to me. I expect a game (ESPECIALLY the first in a proposed series) to set its characters and story up without having to whip out a pocket reference book for it to make total sense.
Wouldn't Nick still have some say, being Editor-In-Chief? I thought the pecking order pretty much goes down from there.
In any case, I don't agree or disagree with anything in particular. This game didn't look interesting to me in the least...all I saw for past "however the fucking long" was a hype fest of a game that looked incredibly average.
However, the commentary on the Valkyrie cutscene after dying pretty much sealed the deal for me. That would drive me absolutely batshit.
Wait, on second thought, don't.
Honestly, though, I'd like to know what compels people like Hookah to keep reading and commenting. Do you just like disagreeing with people and bitching at them? Why do you defend this game so adamantly? Why do you hate Castle Crashers so much? I can't imagine your possible motivations. Can you manage to explain that much?
Wait, wait, wait, wait.
Are you still whining about your saved game on Castle Crashers?
Or are you trolling for trolling's sake?!
So you came to a Too Human review to complain about Castle Crashers?
Do these threads come with proofs or Cliffs Notes? I'm not following the reasoning.
"too human is the worst game i ever loved."
A coworker of mine said something really similar today, which is why I'm really interested in checking out the full game. Though maybe I should read Jim's review first. :D
I really wanted to like this game, I was looking forward to it for ages, but unfortunately it just fell short on so many levels.
So many problems would have been fixed if only the relegated sword attacks to a face button and left the camera on the right stick. People need the tactile feedback of smacking a button to simulate melee attacks, moving a stick is just too unsatisfying.
Also, totally agree with Cyberxion and some of the others. Silicon Knights haven't really done anything great - Eternal Darkness was pretty average IMO, and Legacy of Kain was great in its day, but that was a LONG time ago.
1) What score would you give it then?
2) The saved file deletion/corruption either isn't deleting the saved file every time, or isn't affecting everybody, otherwise there would've been a bigger outcry at the Castle Crashers review, and across the internet as a whole. If it's the online functionality that's broken, and the game itself is 100% playable and enjoyable offline, then it isn't fundamentally broken at it's core, and therefore still "works". There are problems, and the severity depends primarily on weather your main co-op game is on or offline (with online play apparently being the main problem causing the save deletion), but the game at it's core isn't broken to the point where it cannot be played period.
Lemme see your version... just one go on. Its called casual for a reason it fuckign sells. Dont make sweeping statements about a country based on anything for example. "Thebza is a cunt so everyone in (where he comes from) is a Cunt".
Btw Great review Jim goign by Destructs scoring fo 5 as average. The Demo pained me thank allah Mercs 2 is out so i can play a good game after the traditional summer gap. (apart from arcade)
The whole industry thinks you're a fucktard, too.
For the Dark Knight Salon.com gave it 50% despite it being the best film this year and almost certainly 10/10. Just giving something a low score doesn't make it more Valid. Vent somewhere else if your looking for a fight about how good it is. Is it becuase the game hurt you? Took away your save? Let it out mate, Cry and be Healed.
Apparently, the only reason I can't put the game down is because Jim Sterling tells me it's good. Nevermind that I've leveled two characters past level 20 before this was even posted, I wasn't actually enjoying it until I knew Destructoid approved it.
Seriously, Buttpipe, I don't really care about reviews. I don't really care about scores. I like several games that are seriously horrible. Same thing with some movies. I don't really give a damn that Mr. Sterling thinks Too Human is a pile of shit. I like it. I like reading his work because he's an abrasive, overtly (sometimes painfully so) honest blogger. I hate Dynasty Warriors games. Sir Sterling loves them. I find it hard to believe that from a few sentences of Anti-Troll "get-the-hell-off-my-favorite-gaming-blog" blather that you know enough about me to make any judgements about me. You've been so far off every try, so why not go haunt the IGN forums with other people that are too busy bitching about CC's online play to enjoy the local bits.

surf dtoid with 

Rising (10+)
People you follow


















follow