Note: iOS 9 + Facebook users w/ trouble scrolling: #super sorry# we hope to fix it asap. In the meantime Chrome Mobile is a reach around
hot  /  reviews  /  videos  /  cblogs  /  qposts

Destructoid review: Playing Columbine

3:55 PM on 05.28.2008 // Anthony Burch

erere

Slightly over a year ago, I interviewed Danny Ledonne about his first (and so far, only) independently-developed videogame, Super Columbine Massacre RPG!. Then again, maybe "interviewed" isn't the right word: over the course of about an hour, I lambasted him over what I felt to be the game's most thematically ineffective and irresponsible aspect (namely the second half of the game, set entirely in Hell) and we essentially argued back and forth to no ultimate conclusion.

Now, three years after the game's initial release, Ledonne has released Playing Columbine. Produced and directed by Ledonne, this documentary discusses both the controversy surrounding his game, and the current state of videogames as a serious artform.

Initially, I scoffed at the idea of such a documentary. Even ignoring my own irritation toward Ledonne's game, the prospect of a filmmaker making a documentary about himself whilst simultaneously denying any desire for personal attention rubbed me the wrong way. That said, though, when Ledonne contacted Dtoid with a review copy, I still jumped at the chance to watch it.

Was it as self-aggrandizing as I thought it would be? Is it a legitimate discussion about the nature of violence, particularly when conveyed through interactivity, or is it merely a 100-minute attack on Ledonne's critics? 

Hit the jump for Dtoid's official review. 

First things first: this documentary is nowhere near as bad as I thought it would be. It is, at times, choppy, simplistic, and not even remotely subtle, but it is not the masturbatory Ledonne-filmed, Ledonne-produced lovefest-about-all-things-Ledonne that I had originally feared it would be.

Playing Columbine claims to primarily be about the controversy surrounding the director's game, but it wisely opts instead to spend more time talking about the general demonization of videogames as an artistic medium, and the nature of school violence. Super Columbine Massacre RPG! is used as a jumping-off point to discuss much broader, much more interesting issues: for this, the director is to be commended.

ere

Apart from a few self-interviews and lecture clips sprinkled evenly throughout the film, you don't really feel the presence of Ledonne the Director as he tells the story of Ledonne the Designer. The vast majority of the film relies on (quite compelling) interviews with numerous personalities based in or around the games industry -- you'll find immeasurably more directorial intrusion in a typical Michael Moore film. I know that's not saying much, but my point is, this documentary sounds far more pretentious and self-serving than it actually is

Ledonne assembles a truly noteworthy cast of game designers, media professors, and school shooting survivors who are able to look at the issues he presents from totally different angles. In the first act alone, we get to hear the interviewees talk about games as experimentational play, games as social commentary, and the generation gap between gamers and critics of the medium. Hearing guys like Ian Bogost and Hal Halpin talk about games as art just plain never gets boring, and we've frankly never seen a cast of videogame personalities this large or prestigious assembled in documentary form, and getting to hear all their varying viewpoints is an absolute pleasure. 

These differing viewpoints and topics, however, can admittedly result in a film that does feel somewhat disjointed. The documentary jumps from a general games-as-art discussion to interviews with survivors of the Dawson College shooting,  to a specific retelling of the controversy surrounding the game's Slamdance pulling, with Ledonne's game only barely holding the disparate discussion threads together.

erere

I wouldn't necessarily call this a fault of the film, however; it tackles many topics in an occasionally jarring manner, but it never feels confusing or distancing for very long. When the documentary was over, I felt that I'd actually just watched three smaller documentaries, rather than one cohesive film: since these three little documentaries were different in subject matter and totally engrossing, however, I had almost no problem with the film's occasionally choppy pacing. 

If there is one editing issue which sticks out as being particularly problematic, however, it is Ledonne's disrespect for the viewer's attention span. During literally every minute of the film, the viewer is assaulted with quick cutaways to stock footage and obtrusive graphics which Richard Dawkins would refer to as "Lord Privy Seals."

Allegedly some sort of British filmmaking joke, the Lord Privy Seal identifies an unfortunate habit amongst documentarians who feel the need to emphasize every single word spoken by an interviewee by cutting to a picture or piece of stock footage illustrating the word in question ("The Lord Privy Seal is an antiquated title in Britain's heraldic tradition," Dawkins says; "The joke imagines a low-grade film director who illustrates it by cutting to a picture of a Lord, then a privy, and then a seal.). By the end of the film, I felt somewhat exhausted by the sheer number of (thankfully audio-devoid) clips and bits which fill the numerous interviews which are compelling in their own right.

erere

 

Ledonne also has an inexplicable habit of reminding the audience who certain interviewees are through use of large subtitles...even though the film has already introduced them, and featured them repeatedly throughout the duration. With only fifteen minutes left in the documentary's running time, the audience is still being told who Tracy Fullerton is. Why?

These superficial problems are peanuts, however, to the documentary's ultimate flaw: its lack of legitimate dissenting opinion. While Ledonne includes some very brief interview clips with critics of his game and his personal politics, their opinions are almost immediately stifled by a torrent of lengthier, kindly-edited dissenting views from game designers and independent filmmakers. Less than thirty seconds after being introduced, Jack Thompson is immediately portrayed as a hypocritical douchebag when the interviewer calls him out for contradicting his current statements about the Dawson shooting with those he made on Fox News a year earlier.

I never thought I'd ask for the opportunity to hear Jack Thompson talk more about the danger of videogames, but given the immediate bitchslapping he receives by the hand of the editor and the other interviewees, one can't help but feel sorry for him and the other anti-SCMRPG! critics Ledonne briefly features. The statistics and arguments Ledonne uses to defend videogames are completely fair, but his presentation of the opposition sadly isn't.

ere

In the end, and despite all its technical flaws and blatant stacking of the deck in Ledonne's favor, I can't think of a single reason why the average gamer (or indeed, the average parent) shouldn't watch Playing Columbine. It includes some truly interesting dialogue from the biggest names in the games-as-art movement, it covers a a broad range of topics without necessarily feeling like it overreaches itself, and it avoids the pitfall of focusing too much on the original game and its creator.

I still think SCMRPG! is a hypocritical, ineffective work of art whose latter half entirely undermines the brilliance of the former, but I'll be damned if I didn't enjoy Playing Columbine.






 Setup email comments

Unsavory comments? Please report harassment, spam, and hate speech to our community fisters, and flag the user (we will ban users dishing bad karma). Can't see comments? Apps like Avast or browser extensions can cause it. You can fix it by adding *.disqus.com to your whitelists.

 Quickposts
Status updates from C-bloggers

ikiryou avatarikiryou
Starting over from scratch after dying in a roguelike MMO
Occams avatarOccams
I've been listening to the live stream of the phone call with the remaining militia jackasses in Oregon all morning and its the saddest, funniest thing I've heard in a while.
FakePlasticTree avatarFakePlasticTree
Next South Park RPG is releasing in the first fiscal year of 2017, apparently. It'll probably be fractured but whole. Can't wait! D':
OrochiLeona avatarOrochiLeona
Waaaait a minute... From a design standpoint.. Wouldn't a bodysuit look better with shoes/boots, thus .GASP. precluding bare feet? Say it aint so! :'''(
gajknight avatargajknight
Hey guys, there's a new episode of PStoid up. You should go listen to it, I hear Phil takes his shirt off. I mean, it's a podcast so you can't see it. But you can IMAGINE it!
Larxinostic avatarLarxinostic
Yesterday, I brought a banana with me to my job for my lunch break. Some yokel must have swiped it, for I never saw it again, nor got to eat it. My response when: [img]http://i.imgur.com/wrZt8SO.png[/img]
darrenhupke avatardarrenhupke
"At launch, playing through most of the single player content will give you enough Fight Money to get Alex for free!" Will it be possible to earn enough FC by April for the next character DLC? I'm guessing not.
Gamemaniac3434 avatarGamemaniac3434
Right, looking for advice. Just redeemed four old XCOM games from a humble bundle a few years back, so I wanted advice on which one I should give a looksie to first. Got 5 choices, kind of thinking terror from the deep or apocalypse. Any suggestions?
ikiryou avatarikiryou
Never be first to avert your eyes when locked in a staring contest with a cat. You must push through the pain if you ever wish to become truly whole, to win this eternal conflict of wills. Bonus XP is awarded on Thursdays!
Pixie The Fairy avatarPixie The Fairy
S Magala Plate first fight! :D
FlanxLycanth avatarFlanxLycanth
I have basic knowledge of two other languages (with certificates to prove so) and I decided today that soon I shall be fluent in both. One at a time though.
Sir Shenanigans avatarSir Shenanigans
If you had to pick one: Firewatch, Not a Hero, or Layers of Fear?
Shinta avatarShinta
I'm soooo glad that they kept the gyroscope controls intact with Gravity Rush Remastered, and that they work well. First Dual Shock 4 game to ever use them well. If you turned them off in options, you're really missing out. Helps you fine tune aim.
Solar Pony Django avatarSolar Pony Django
Even Luigi gets it.
Alphadeus avatarAlphadeus
Alone With the Psychopath (2014) - I wrote this song after being inspired by the Epic Rap Battle of History between Jack the Ripper and Lecter. I think it sounds neat, and doesn't rip off too much from the song that inspired it =p
TheBlondeBass avatarTheBlondeBass
Tell me who downvoted my smash 4 opinion or the cat gets it. I'm not joking around.
Torchman avatarTorchman
Is that new digimon game any good or no? I know there's the review but I'd like feedback from a couple others too
OrochiLeona avatarOrochiLeona
People bitching that "(insert character) Needs Nerfing" because they lost to them several times online, incoming in T-5 days.
Nathan D avatarNathan D
For some reason I had a dream that I was playing a new Jet Set Radio game. It was open world and had an amazing day/night cycle. It was wonderful, yet horrible...
Barry Kelly avatarBarry Kelly
4.6 Million XCOM operatives down and down! [url]https://xcom.com/xcom-2-stats[/url] 66% from Collateral damage. Never mind the Alien invasion, cars are the real threat
more quickposts


Contest!


Seriously

Invert site colors

  Dark Theme
  Light Theme


Destructoid means family.
Living the dream, since 2006

Pssst. konami code + enter

modernmethod logo



Back to Top


We follow moms on   Facebook  and   Twitter
  Light Theme      Dark Theme
Pssst. Konami Code + Enter!
You may remix stuff our site under creative commons w/@
- Destructoid means family. Living the dream, since 2006 -