I want two man reviews because people are different, and imperfect. Its impossible to be totally subjective, personal opinions always come through. The more points of view you get, the more likely you will get a decent idea of how much you would enjoy the game. If both reviewers pretty-much agree, well that just means that the points they bring up are strengthened. If they dont, then i go with whichever review makes more sense to me.
I suppose its not exactly necessary to have two-man reviews, because theres so many reviews out there on the internet, but its still nice. Particularly since i like the dtoid reviews more than most others.
But anyway, now i will go and actually read your review!
Also, there is a smithing game to get better equipment and improve existing ones and you neglected to mention that equipment is one thing but your patapons are another as with better supplies you can create stronger and stronger patapons, one that cost 1,000 kaching to make will be a thousand times better than one that does not.
That said, there are a lot of things they don't explain, the smithing game I mentioned is one of them, the miracle system was also hell till I found a video.
That is a whole lot to read but I don't read reviews to see if people agree with me. Just like I don't read movie reviews for people to agree with me. I like it when someone disagrees with me because then we can have a conversation about but a one person review doesn't have a conversation at all. It is just one long piece of text where if I played the game, I already know those things.
Sorry, I wrote more than I thought.
BURN HIM AT THE FUCKING STAAAAAAAAAKE
Read reviews from different sites!
They all have a slightly different flavor to their reviews.
4 or more reviewers are better than 2 reviewers anyways.
2 reviewers per game would be better, but with all those games and limited number of reviewers, it can't always happen.
Also reaching and attaining fever is not the whole goal for a level. As you said sometimes the rhythm gets off between you and the boss. Its part of the strategy to know when to "stop fever" on purpose and start a new rhythm to get in sync with the boss's behavior.
A review is a review. Its an opinion, I respect that even if others dont agree with it. I love the game and personally would rate it higher, but thats my opinion. But I do think that the above points are valid against some of the things you mentioned in the review.
A quick review recap segment in the Podtoid. Have a couple of editors discuss the game, the reviewer defends themselves and another editor basically fires the points in these here comments at them, allowing for the discussion which goes on here to go on in a segment on Podtoid.
There. Wasn't that good?
(Wardrox and I thought of it)
I might give it another go but the sound of my PSP is a bit fucked. So I don't think I can get into this really. I want to, but I can't.
Or how about not doing reviews at all - send the reviews out as newsletters to people that refuse to bitch about .05 differentials :D
Or you could just continue this review system.
Or let us review the games because we're so much better than you. Obviously.
Fuck you. You've got an opinion, assholes. So does Jim. Go jerk off onto your PSPs and cry about it.
@Jim Sterling
I don't think there's anything wrong with asking for two reviews. I like double reviews because they provide two different takes. If I were using a Destructoid review to help me decide whether or not to buy a game, it would be more helpful to have two reviewers, so one could either lend weight to, or provide a counterpoint for, the other. It's not necessarily about needing someone to agree with them.
For me, anyway. For these other pussies, who knows?
Also, from what I read, you're terrible at this game.
Jim wrote the review, and did so with gusto. He didn't like the game. Quit acting like goddamn infants.
My 1st post got to ya Jim didn't it!
I'm with Jim on this, I LOVE the game but you have to respect that it does suck at times.
Frankly I believe its one of the most overrated games of the year so far, but for what it is I'm almost glad that that's the case.
Too bad you couldn't have the review out a little earlier though.
I do definitely agree with you that this game needs a free roam mode of sorts, as I am sick of doing the hunting grounds and minigames at times.
WHAT IS THIS PARPPA
I personally have Patapon and its a great game. Definetly an 7.5/8. Action, Rhythm, Customizable units, Challenging, new gameplay mechanics, awesome art, awesome music...
Jim you fail. I want another reviewer. Even Reverend "Was the game coded by Jesus Christ and God? No? then is a 3.5" Anthony could have given the game higher than that.
People have to realize that the score isn't as important as the words on the page. Stop going for knee-jerk responses and start opening your eyes.
When you diss somebody's work, you really ought to offer up some sort of explanation or reason to back it up. Running in and saying "Bad review is bad, dur hur hur" just makes you look like a little shit.
Unless of course you are, in fact, a little shit, in which case you have my apologies. Well done.

surf dtoid with 






Rising (10+)
People you follow





























follow


