Yeah, it could've been easier with a press of a button, and yeah, I'm sure your game pad doesn't allow you to get to cover nicely and accurately, but I don't quite give a shit, since you're stating you've review a PC game as well, and mouse + keyboard > Your stupid fucking gamepad any day of the week, for cover or for aiming.
I had no problems whatsoever dealing with the recoil or damaging enemies, scoring headshots (that's one way to quickly lower the amount of times you have to hit an enemy).
I've had tremendous fun playing the game, and the only complaint really are the endings and the core mandatory story to give you a moral imperative in order to allow you to kill so many cops and innocent civillians.
The rest is more than fine on the PC.
Also, to all people who disagree, write a length, picture filled, ell spelled cblog and put a link in here.
I still 100% agree with that review.
@BlackDove
Welcome to the internetz, where people have different opinions. Please don't stay too long.
I think you'd get more attention if you announced to the gaming media that you were doing away with numerical scores, than you would by slowly having your review score added to the bottom of the list on metacritic for each game. Think about it, no one know half of the sites that show up for posting a review of those games. When 73 reviews show up for a game no one is going to notice destructoid in the mix unless it's the very best of very worst score.
Just market the idea of no numerical scores and force people to read the actual review so they can decide what they would score it on their own.
And so the cycle perpetuates itself throughout eternity.
Welcome to Common Sense, where people like you should really pay attention to the points people make in thier posts.
The point was that he didn't review the versions the article states he reviewed. He only reviewed the Xbox 360 version. Where he may be right about the game on the platform that he's played on, he's most certainly wrong when it comes to another, namely the PC.
That's not a difference of opinion.
That's incompetence.
Twilight Princess was also a disappointment, btw.
I didn't read anywhere that he reviewed anything other than the 360 version.
"Kane and Lynch: Dead Men (PlayStation 3, Windows, Xbox 360 reviewed)
All this simply stated that the game has come out on the following systems, but he used the Xbox 360 version for his review. So I think cutting back on the venom would be a good idea.
Also, calling one of the more intelligent writers on Destructoid incompetent? He's the one who has the ability to have his reviews put on the front page. If you disagree, lets see your points other than a "Keyboard + Mouse = Win" argument. Why don't you write your own blog posting that differs from this one?
According to what we (read: Aaron) have been told by the guys who run Metacritic that the whole no score idea has been tried more frequently than you'd think, with frequently disappointing results. As much as we'd like to think otherwise, many gamers just don't feel like reading a bunch of words with no summarizing numerical score at the end; most sites that have tried have unfortunately fallen by the wayside in terms of relevance and readership.
I hate review scores, don't get me wrong, but it's just not a logical decision to ditch them altogether. Not YET, anyway.
BlackDove:
No need to be a dick about it -- the system label just has the wrong emphasis. I assumed it'd be marginally obvious that "PS3, Windows, 360 reviewed" would mean that while it was out for the PS3 and Windows, it was specifically reviewed on the 360. I'm changing it now.
@ lemon
Manhunt 2 was rated 2.5. Also, as stated in the manifesto last night, reviews aren't meant to be compared to each other.
Didn't get a chance to try out the DM, no. The betrayal mechanic certainly sounds really interesting, but if it's based off the esentially unsatisfying shooting mechanics, it'll probably be disappointing as well.
I think IGN or somebody said that it was fun, but eventually devolved into nothing mor ethan a gimmicky version of CTF due to the boring gunfights.
Oh, I dunno about that -- the bits where Kane and Lynch shamelessly rips off great Hollywood movies actually rank among its best moments. The problem isn't that the game is too Hollywood, if there is such a thing; it's that the non-cinematic stuff just plain blows.
Also if you're bored of reviewing shit, overhyped games, why don't you give Ace Combat 6 a whirl? Another game (like Flatout Ultimate Carnage) that is released alongiside bigeer titles (e.g. Forza 2) but is actually more funz!!
Let me know, cheers.
Army of Two got pushed back for a reason! And lets just say if that extra time isn't spent well, EA gonna be in a world of hurt. Don't hold your breath.
In practice of course, it's pretty rough. After each map you're booted ALL the way back out. this adds an artificial lag of 3-5 minutes before you're able to get back into the mix. There's also some type of error that boots people from games before they start. A few of my friends are having the issue, so I assume it's not an isolated incident.
I think the 3 is a little too harsh, but I agree it's not a great game. (the first half anyway) is a good six pack rental. Get a buddy and some beers, and it's not a bad time.
Certainly isn't dethroning Mario Galaxy/Zack & Wiki/Umbrella Chronicles anyway.
Thats my problem! The attention to care and detail was clearly focused on that aspect of the game. They get so caught up in how good the story mimics a movie that they don't stop to think two seconds about the gameplay. It's as if they forget what the core aspect of a videogame is! No one gives a rat's ass how good they story is if the game can't function right. I think devs are just to excited to jump at a chance to try and rival Hollywood in any way. And at the same time, they loose the soul of what videogaming is all about.
Whether you like the keyboard or mouse, that's your own issue, and one that nobody cares about.
It is however, shall we say, empirical, that it's much easier to control a game with a keyboard and a mouse, than a game pad. It's the reason games like CoD4 on the 360 have "auto targeting" where you push two buttons, and your crosshairs end up on the enemy.
Game wise, I'd say Reverend's review is spot on regarding the console, but it's absolutely wrong when it comes to the PC side of things (and therefore, his entire view on the GAME is false, due to the crippled appliance he used to review it with). And that line of text that claims that the game is reviewed on all hardware it's released for, is misleading, which is why Reverend made the good call of changing it (since it's essentially a lie). It only represents one VERSION of the game.
As far as annoying goes, you may be right about the PC Arrogant users. Personally, I find a bunch of bloggers that rate themselves as rogue, independant and super cool, kind of annoying when they take down their stories in the wake of a silly hilarious lawsuit, and then don't even report on it in order to stay under the radar, when we all know if they weren't involved, it'd be the story generating good laughs for an entire day (possibly being the story of the day).
See, I find conformism a little more annyoing Jim, well, that and the hipocrisy of ragging on mainstream journalists for their sensationalist tricks to gain readership, and then turning around and taking a sentence from the review of one source, and embellishing it to state "ASSASSIN'S CREED SUCKS ON THE PS3" in order to be real edgy and on the cusp of breaking news (I get it, nobody else got the idea to falsely missquote "PS3 shows frame slowdowns in comparison to the Xbox 360 version", hoo boy, did you break that story or what).
Yes, I do believe I find that more annoying than my PC bred arrogance. While one is maybe a product of bad manners, the other is unprofessional, incompetent and misleading to a whole slew of readers.
I'd assume the next step is to ban me for treason or something, disguising it with "That guy is a jackass" reasoning. It'd go in line with the whole feigning of ignorance and lying 101.
This site reviews games mainly for consoles, get your reviews elsewhere if that's what you want but don't think you're raging against the machine here, you're just being annoying.
I know that sites that have tried to go without numerical scores have had bad results, but Destructoid doesn't depend on reviews for it's only source of page views. I think Destructoid would be able to survive any storm that occurred from dropping numerical values. Just think about it some more, you're in a rare position of strength that could let you pull it off.
Yes Kyousuke, I like my PC a lot, but I don't feel the urge to stick my dick into everything I like, unlike possibly you.
I am well aware what this site reviews and how it goes about it, and I will be sure to take your fifth grade elementary school input to heart when I make my decisions about what to read, believe you me. Also, telling me that I'm annoying helps a lot too, it essentially guarantees me to be less annoying in the future. Congratulations, you have raised my awarness by 2.
Now why don't you go solve world hunger or something.

surf dtoid with 

Rising (10+)
People you follow
















follow


