![]()
|
|
![]()
Call it what you like -- milking a franchise or delivering what the market demands -- but Activision have made no bones about exploiting their key titles. Among them is the highly successful Guitar Hero, the first signs of this being last year's Guitar Hero Encore: Rocks the 80s, the mediocre (but full priced) Guitar Hero II "expansion." Now Activision are actively planning to introduce band-specific titles to the market, even on the heels of announcing that they'd be supporting the upcoming Guitar Hero World Tour title with significant downloable content. Metallica has already been confirmed, and with other names aleady being thrown around, it seems we'll see a number of band-specific Guitar Hero titles in the near future. But can an entire band carry a single game? Activision decided to start it off with a bang, giving Rock and Roll Hall of Famers Aerosmith their very own Guitar Hero game, Guitar Hero: Aerosmith. Does the expansive library of the Boston rockers stand up, or is Guitar Hero: Aerosmith the poster-game for downloadable content? Answers after the jump. Guitar Hero: Aerosmith (Xbox 360, PlayStation 3, PlayStation 2, Wii)
Brad Nicholson (PlayStation 3) At this point, I believe we’re all familiar with the way a Guitar Hero game works. Basically, you buy a cheap plastic guitar and hit colored buttons in the sequence that the corresponding colored lights show up on the screen. The vast majority of the time, these colored lights stand for musical guitar notes, while a somewhat trendy song plays in the background. Guitar Hero is all about the suspension of disbelief and the ability to maintain a certain level of patience with redundancy. The sequels to the Guitar Hero franchise work much the same way. Guitar Hero: Aerosmith surprisingly features the band Aerosmith. After my initial shock that the band was included in the package, I noted that despite focusing on a single band, the game feels ridiculously stale. Considering that the game came out after Rock Band, one would assume that vast improvements would have been made. In fact, it’s hard to spot many changes from Guitar Hero III or even II. The save system is still clunky, the menus are still boring, the tablature all looks the same, and even the way the game handles the set list is still very much the same. The same cast of characters has been recycled, and the rewards are still given out in the same intervals.
I could have done with more Aerosmith and less trivial music. One of the biggest letdowns was the decision to feature songs like “Beyond Beautiful” and “Movin’ Out” instead of “Janie’s Got a Gun,” or “I Don’t Want to Miss a Thing.” There’s really no point in having a game revolve around a band when you miss on songs this popular. Aerosmith has a piece of the collective music consciousness. Why not utilize the library more appropriately?
Nick Chester (Xbox 360) Prior to the release of Guitar Hero: Aerosmith, Neversoft was very careful to make one thing clear: the game is not simply Guitar Hero III with Aerosmith shoehorned into it. When Harmonix released their seemingly-contractually-obligated Guitar Hero Encore: Rocks the 80s, it was a decent title, but not necessarily one that could stand alone along with the rest of the series. With Guitar Hero: Aerosmith, Neversoft weren't going to make the same mistake. Turns out this is a noble but failed effort. Outside of some rushed documentary-style cut-scenes and some new art assets, Guitar Hero: Aerosmith is, well, Guitar Hero III with Aerosmith shoehorned into it. In theory, this isn't necessarily a bad thing; fans of the series get more of the same gameplay that they love and Activision writes the checks. Unfortunately, Guitar Hero: Aerosmith is the most boring installment of the series to date, mainly due to the game being (mostly) locked into the song library of the aging rockers from Boston.
The game's visuals are on par with Guitar Hero III, which is to say that it looks clean and sharp in high-definition, but is marred by archaic animations and ugly, unfortunate design choices. If any members of Aerosmith were motion captured in a studio to bring their digital avatars to life, it was a waste of their time. Steven Tyler looks like an old puppet, an exaggerated version of an already ridiculous old rocker, his lips flapping up and down without purpose. Guitarist Joe Perry struts and jives, rocking robotically on stage, perhaps performing signature moves that would be recognizable to fans (taking of his belt and using it to whip his guitar, for instance). As in real life, the remaining members of the band fade behind the animatronic Toxic Twins, looking bored and lacking any real personality.
Which leads to the burning issue: outside of marketing it as its own product at retail (and making a ton of cash in the process), there's no reason why what truly defines Guitar Hero: Aerosmith (the music) couldn't have been offered as downloadable content. Even for the true Aerosmith fan, it's hard to believe that some band-themed arenas, exclusive documentary footage, and the digitized rockers would offer enough to warrant a full price tag. Score: 5.0 – (If you're not an Aerosmith fan but like the Guitar Hero experience, this title might keep you mildly entertained for one or two play sessions. If you are a true Aerosmith die-hard, my advice is to wait until they release this material as downloadable content for the upcoming Guitar Hero World Tour; what's offered here is not enough to justify the standalone cost.)
Next page: More Reviews stories ![]()
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|

![]() |
get involved register or login post a blog post a forum enter a contest discuss a review contribute a news tip write a guest editorial |
support new member's guide login assistance tech support report abuse email our editors read our dev blog nuclear crisis? |
keep in touch RSS feed Myspace Flickr Game nights Meet-ups |
seriously about us advertising terms of use privacy policy jobs at MM buy our crap |
our network Tomopop Japanator |
|
|
||||||
living the dream since March 16, 2006 |
||||||
2:56 PM on 08.02.2008, 


