Quantcast
Destructoid Japanator Tomopop Flixist
Dtoid Forums now support TapATalk and ForumRunner on your iOS/Android devices. Whoot.

Destructoid review: Golden Axe: Beast Rider photo

I'm an action game obsessive and nothing gets me going more than a solid, brainless, gory hack n' slash. Part of the blame for this love of action can be traced back to the good old days of the scrolling brawler, a genre to which Golden Axe once proudly belonged.

One of the most famous brawlers ever, Golden Axe was a huge arcade and Mega Drive hit, widely popular amongst kids for its violence and simple co-op formula. Although it really wasn't all that great a game, it remains a hugely nostalgic title for many gamers, and with nostalgia comes the lure of the cash-in.

Fast-forward to 2008, and our cash-in has arrived. Golden Axe: Beast Rider makes only the most tenuous of connections to the original franchise, throwing away the retro brawler style, the famous playable characters and even the staple co-op, providing instead an action game that is Golden Axe in nothing but name. 

A cash-in this most certainly is, but is Beast Rider a case of Golden Axe, or Moldy Slacks? Read on and find out ...

Golden Axe: Beast Rider (PS3, Xbox 360 [reviewed])
Developed by Secret Level
Published by Sega
Released October 14th, 2008

Golden Axe: Beast Rider places you in the role of Tyrus Flare, a redheaded warrior woman who is charged with avenging the persecution of her sisterhood by classic Golden Axe villain Death Adder. With precious few cutscenes or any real hint of story, the plot remains firmly in the background and, just like the Golden Axe of old, you could easily forget it was there completely.  

With very little storyline to go off or even care about, Beast Rider plunges you firmly into the action and expects you to stay there until the end. The vast majority of the game will be spent crossing swords with half-naked savages who scream annoyingly at you, interspersed with the the obligatory beast riding that this title so proudly promotes.

We'll focus first on the close quarters combat, of which there is a surprising amount. If you go into Beast Rider expecting a standard hack n' slash affair, then you will fail. The game quickly beats you into conforming with its own idea of combat, producing a more methodical and "strategic" approach to fighting. 

Borrowing somewhat from Heavenly Sword, the enemies in this game use different colors to telegraph their actions. Attacks that glow orange can be dodged with a simple press of the left shoulder button, while blue attacks are parried with the right shoulder button. Green attacks can be either dodged or parried. Once you have successfully avoided the blow, you can counter attack by pressing either A for a weaker, broader slash, or X for a stronger and more focused strike. 

Using the counter system is key to success in Beast Rider, and at times it works incredibly well. You can cancel most of your moves in order to dodge or parry, so players are rewarded for paying attention to the screen and keeping a constant attack going while simultaneously making sure to deflect blows and counter-attack. It is, in fairness, a solid system.

Sadly, however, solid does not automatically equal fun, and as good as the combat system's implementation is, it's simply not very enjoyable. At times you can feel rather impressive when you string a chain of attacks and combos together, but the slow pace and lack of real reward do little to make the game interesting. Even the gory finishing moves seem soulless and cold, like Beast Rider is just going through the motions because it has to, not because it wants to. 

It's a pretty challenging title, but with so little to care about, what might have been a pleasantly difficult experience becomes a frustrating and annoying chore. This isn't helped by commands not always feeling responsive, and enemies that attack you from offscreen to render a counter nigh impossible. 

Which brings us to the beasts, and the burning question: Why did they even bother? If you watch trailers or read promotional material, you'll be led to believe that Golden Axe: Beast Rider is all about the riding of beasts. In truth, beasts are nothing more than sluggish and flimsy wastes of time that are only useful for knocking down barriers and precious little else.  Even the massive and impressive ones are weak as water and annoying to control. With attacks that can't be canceled or lined up effectively, it's far more efficient to ditch your ride before each battle, tackle the enemies on-foot, and then use your monster for transport only -- not that they're even all that much quicker.

In truth, the lauded beasts are little more than glorified go-karts or fragile meat shields, only truly effective when being ridden by one of your enemies. The game could possibly have been better without them, and certainly isn't enhanced by their presence.  

Tyrus has access to a few magical attacks, including a projectile in the form of a broken Golden Axe, which is also used in some boring "puzzles" that consist of little more than "find a target, throw axe at target, open door." Very much like the beasts, magical fireballs and axe throwing tricks do little to add to the experience. Perhaps if Secret Level had focused on improving the promising basics of its combat instead of adding uninteresting distractions, a much better game overall could have been had.

Each stage is graded, based on such things as damage taken/received and completion time. You can replay the main game's stages in a free mode to improve your score, which would have added to the experience if, of course, any of the stages were worth replaying. If one can't care about the thing in the first place, why would one go back to try and be better at it?

In addition to the main game, there are also challenge arenas which consist of more of the same. It's simply Tyrus in an area full of enemies that appear in waves. The sad thing is, you'll be hard pressed to tell the difference between this mode and the main game, save for the fact that it cuts out all the pointless rubbish and cuts to the chase.

Graphically, the game meets industry standards and there's not a lot more that can be said. The art direction is a mish-mash of IPs that have gone before, with some Lord of the Rings here and some God of War there. Ironically, the one look it doesn't copy from is Golden Axe itself, save for the inclusion of Gnomes and their iconic music. Even that fails to raise a smile, however, in this altogether drab and emotionless experience.

Golden Axe: Beast Rider is not a terrible game. At its core is a perfectly adequate combat system that has potential to be something great. However, the lack of speed, flow or excitement undoes a lot of the good found within. Ultimately, it is a slow-paced and drab affair that makes no real effort to connect to the player. In such an environment, what could have been minor annoyances are magnified to significant grievances, and what might be interesting ideas are lost completely. 

For action junkies, a weekend's rental might provide some distraction. For other people, there is so much better coming out at this point of the year that Golden Axe: Beast Rider is not worth your time, let alone your money. Not even the inclusion of co-op would have made this one any the better, no matter how angry you might be that it was excluded.  

Score: 5 -- Mediocre (5s are an exercise in apathy, neither Solid nor Liquid. Not exactly bad, but not very good either. Just a bit "meh," really.)









More gaming stories around the web. Got news? Submit yours to tips@destructoid.com

Jim Sterling serves as reviews editor for Destructoid.com, head of the Podtoid podcast, and produces a number of news stories, original features, one-of-a-kind videos. With his passionate argumentative style, controversial opinions, harsh delivery, and dedication to brutal honesty Sterling is a name that you can't help but recognize. Likes PS2, iPod Touch, Silent Hill 2, Metal Gear Solid, Dynasty Warriors 3 Meet the rest of the team



Post a comment! You can also post a photo below:

Comment with Facebook





Click connect and comment instantly!

Comment with Dtoid





New? SIGN UP - it takes 5 seconds

29 comments | showing # 1 to 29
prev next

MrSadistic's Avatar - Comment posted on 10/22/2008 16:43
MrSadistic
Wow, it got a higher score than I expected.
Kathos's Avatar - Comment posted on 10/22/2008 16:47
Kathos
I'm surprised this even got scored period.
mix's Avatar - Comment posted on 10/22/2008 16:47
mix
I had no hope whatsoever with this title as soon as I heard it was single player and it was based on riding around on shit.

They should have just made it multiplayer and true to the arcade version then it might have been sweet.
Anus Mcphanus's Avatar - Comment posted on 10/22/2008 16:59
Anus Mcphanus
Did anyone actually think this would be good?
Darren Nakamura's Avatar - Comment posted on 10/22/2008 17:08
Darren Nakamura
Sounds about right.
Kyousuke Nanbu's Avatar - Comment posted on 10/22/2008 17:09
Kyousuke Nanbu
I'm going to buy this game based on this review.
Coonskin05's Avatar - Comment posted on 10/22/2008 17:10
Coonskin05
Wow, this got a better score than I was expecting. I was guessing in the 2-4 range.
thebza's Avatar - Comment posted on 10/22/2008 17:12
thebza
so it's better than the horrible fracture and armored cores, but not quite as good as the near perfect silent hill.. eh..

Very nice review sterling, fair and everything.. i liked this one a lot, good job.
TheToiletDuck's Avatar - Comment posted on 10/22/2008 17:26
TheToiletDuck
It's good to see a fair review for a game that is clearly mediocre not terrible. If i see this for 7pounds i may pick it up.
Stodgy Gamer's Avatar - Comment posted on 10/22/2008 17:43
Stodgy Gamer
I have to also agree with Jim on this one, while it is by no means a terrible game (see Yaris) it would make for a decent budget title once it drops at least below thirty dollars. Although I believe that if it did have co-op (which wasn't that the point of the arcade versions?) it would have been a slightly better game, but no where near buying at full price considering the fact that you have AAA games releasing almost every week for about three to four weeks.
akathatoneguy's Avatar - Comment posted on 10/22/2008 17:51
akathatoneguy
Seems about right from all that I've heard: it sounds like a functional, yet underachieving, game that is worth a slight diversion.
DarkTravesty's Avatar - Comment posted on 10/22/2008 18:00
DarkTravesty
"weekend's rental might provide some distraction"
and i'm about to go do that. if its there i'll rent it.
DaedHead8's Avatar - Comment posted on 10/22/2008 18:14
DaedHead8
Ehh, that was weird. What I meant to say is, I'll probably get this when it's less than $20. I'm still really burnt about the lack of multiplayer. It would be like if they remade pong and didn't include multi, it's just senseless.
mrplow8's Avatar - Comment posted on 10/22/2008 19:14
mrplow8
Jim only gave this a mediocre score because he's indifferent about innovation.
Maurice Tan's Avatar - Comment posted on 10/22/2008 19:33
Maurice Tan
Good review, you hit the core aspects very well.

It's not a terrible terrible game, it's just.. meh. I had some hopes when you start to dish out some nice counter moves and combos early on, but all of that went to hell when two enemies attack you with two differently colored attacks...

Ah well, please stay away from changing loved games for the worse Sega. You've tried and failed enough times by now.
Y0j1mb0's Avatar - Comment posted on 10/22/2008 19:40
Y0j1mb0
A Golden Axe game with no co-op? Sad.

I'll pick it up when it's 20 bucks. Say in a month.
Bob Muir's Avatar - Comment posted on 10/22/2008 21:00
Bob Muir
Sounds par for course for the Sega of late.
Nubc4kes's Avatar - Comment posted on 10/22/2008 21:28
Nubc4kes
Why did they decide to take a run-of-the-mill side-scrolling brawler and turn it into a single player action game?

The world my never know.
Demtor's Avatar - Comment posted on 10/22/2008 22:45
Demtor
Sega fails, yet again. If Castle Crashers has shown us anything, its that 2D beat em ups can still be fun today. Imagine if they had made this as a sprite based 2D beat em up, it would be amazing. Or even a 2.5D ala Bionic Commando:Rearmed.

Sega, where everything must be 3D and not half as fun as you remember.
Sharpless's Avatar - Comment posted on 10/23/2008 00:03
Sharpless
So, Jim Sterling sucks at games, confirmed?
ninjikiran's Avatar - Comment posted on 10/23/2008 00:52
ninjikiran
It is sort of under Mediocre based on my play though and beast riding is indeed terribly clunky and unrewarding. The Parry and Evade system is novel but fails sometimes when there are multiple enemies attacking you, besides the fact that the enemy is like glued to you so you cant manual evade far as I could see and got. I'll keep playing through to the end but I am definately happy I didn't purchase the game and decided to give it a rent.
Noah's Avatar - Comment posted on 10/23/2008 01:15
Noah
Bummer, the pics look pretty awesome, riding larger than life monsters around...too bad it didn't work out. Good review
Altered Beets's Avatar - Comment posted on 10/23/2008 01:49
Altered Beets
Why would anyone make a new installment of a game with a huge fan base and then not make the game anything like its predecessor?

Yeah, for money and all, but the Golden Axe fan club is so old-school, you're not exactly going to blaze up the market by name recognition alone. Word of mouth is going to sell the sucker.

Not using almost any of the classic ideas or gameplay? Just bad planning on the part of the producers/designers.
nicojay's Avatar - Comment posted on 10/23/2008 08:23
nicojay
Oh dear I'm very late asking this but what do you think would have made for better pacing Jim.
Is it that the game doesn't adhere to the tenets of beat-em-up crowd control play? Are the enemy too similar in attack type? Are the beasts really that bad, the original's mounts were a simple new weapon, that they should be dismissed?
Holyetheline's Avatar - Comment posted on 10/23/2008 09:04
Holyetheline
i pretty much saw this coming
Jinky Williams's Avatar - Comment posted on 10/23/2008 10:57
Jinky Williams
Golden Axe without multiplayer = why bother?

If they would have just called it "Beast Rider" it would have raised the review score by whole point.
zavage's Avatar - Comment posted on 10/27/2008 10:01
zavage
I guess golden axe should just be a legendary game to be left in the past this game could have been lots better though
KidKobun's Avatar - Comment posted on 10/27/2008 11:29
KidKobun
Such a tremendous let down. I'll place it right next to my copy of Bullet Witch. *Sob*
Anna Hannah's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/18/2011 07:50
Anna Hannah
If they would have just called it "Beast Rider" it would have raised the review score by whole point.
Best regards, Anna, CEO of iscsi rhel
prev next

Comment with Facebook





Click connect and comment instantly!

Comment with Dtoid





New? SIGN UP - it takes 5 seconds

Comments policy

Destructoid is an open discussion community. You don't need to "audition" to post a comment - just speak your mind. We respect differing opinions on the site, so have at it. Be smart, funny, insightful, clueless, or cute -- but back it up with substance. Keep your cool, keep it fun. We only ask that you act respectfully and above all: don't be a troll and ruin it for everyone else. Don't bring down gamers or we'll, you know, gently shoot you in the face and stuff you into a flaming mailbox. Each comment is your opportuntity to make this community awesomer. Is that even a word?

Avoiding the banhammer only requires common sense: spamming, trolling, racism, NSFW stuff, and other forms of sucking will not be tolerated. If anyone is griefing please report abuse. Be good. Don't suck!