games  anime  |  toys
Destructoid is gaming news, community, videos, and sometimes love. Take the tour or jump in with Facebook:

 


Destructoid review: Fire Emblem - Radiant Dawn photo

I hate tactical games. I hate strategy games, real-time strategy games, and tactical RPGs. I would rather drive screws into my nostrils with the business end of a power drill and, of course, apply a nail gun to my eyes than play a tactics title. But Linde stole all my Castlevanias, kidnapped my cat and said I can't play Trauma Center until I wrote this review. I drove a few screws into the soft part of my skull in an attempt to assuage his evil, but alas, he made me do it anyway. 

And I, consummate professional that I am, picked myself up from the kitchen floor still moist with the tears of my tantrum and set out to give this one a good, fair shake. Perhaps Fire Emblem: Radiant Dawn would be the game that finally opened my mind, reconciled me with my nemesis, opened for me the doors to a new realm of gaming. So did it work?

Fire Emblem: Radiant Dawn (Wii)
Developed by Intelligent Systems
Published by Nintendo of America

Release Date: November 5, 2007

In Fire Emblem: Radiant Dawn, you control the members of the Dawn Brigade, a team of revolutionaries fighting back against unjust occupation forces in their homeland. And these guys are cartoonishly, insanely unjust – you know, the type of guys who run their own soldiers through for incompetence and then retreat to their own private shadow patch to cackle ominously to themselves. The lead character for the Good Guys is the rather pretty magic user Micaiah, also known as “the silver-haired maiden. Some fresh-faced and strapping young upstarts join the party, and your band hits the streets to deal with the invaders, and the occasional ruffian bandit that the occupation party tends to overlook. And you know, the plot doesn’t get too much deeper than that.

The story takes place across four different sections, and each section of the main plot is divided into a series of goals. Your dudes enter a new area, converse blandly with each other about the objective, and then the battlefield’s yours. Their abilities are all pretty standard fare – elemental and healing spells or archery from range, and then there are the sword dudes who have to be in adjacent squares. Happily, you can move and attack on the same turn, but if your opponent is directly adjacent to you, they will counterattack. When hovering over an enemy, you can see right away whether it’s a fair match or not, as an opponent’s basic stats are displayed alongside yours. Additionally, objectives will vary on different battlefields – sometimes you will need to defeat all the foes on the field, and at other times, you need bring down only a key enemy. Some missions require you to move your entire party to a certain exit point intact, and others merely require you to survive for a set number of turns.

To say the plot is derivative and the characters are two-dimensional is an understatement. This is not the kind of game you play for the riveting story experience. Since Radiant Dawn is actually a sequel to a previous GameCube title, I asked a pal who was into the series and learned that the heroes of Radiant Dawn, the Daein people, were actually the bad guys in the previous game. Now, their country crushed by the last war, the spirited folks of the Dawn Brigade are standing up to their unfair overlords – which might be an interesting turnabout for fans of the series, but to a newcomer, it feels precisely like every other “young anime revolutionaries take on cruel government master” game you’ve ever played.

Except you’d better not get attached to the characters, because they can die, permanently. You can get a game over if you lose Micaiah or one of the other characters key to a particular mission, but your dutiful troops are as good as dust in the wind. This would be quite an interesting opportunity to philosophically explore our relationships with our player characters, to raise our stakes and intensify the game experience. But at times certain missions are so difficult as to feel like sheer brutality, and losing your new favorite front-line superstar who you’ve been grooming and leveling meticulously for ages in one cheap coup de grace is about as philosophically inspiring as a stick in the eye. You always read those silly blog stories about some idiot who flung his Wii remote at the TV or dashed it against the wall, and you laughed at the need for those snug little Wii remote jackets. That idiot was playing this game, and if you plan to play it, you might want to get a cozy little snuggler for your Wii remote, too.

Look. I write navel-gazing philosophical bull on emotional connection and and character personalization in games all the time. But a super hardcore tactical game, which requires that you make your characters into statistical assets is not the place to try and tug heartstrings on the fragile nature of life and death. It’s nothing short of infuriating here, and once you start viewing your characters as disposable target marionettes, you can’t even be bothered to invest the time in them it would require to create a useful fighting force. There are no lessons on character value to be found here – each section of the game unfolds from a different character’s point of view, and even your disposable folks have established identities. So all it really means is get ready to reset, reset, and reset.

This is, of course, a tactical game, and let me stress again that I hate the genre. And yet I ground and grueled my way through as many painful, throbbing inches of this insanely dull, totally hardcore title that I could stand. Though there are helpful tutorials along the way, this definitely seems like the thick of the tactical RPG genre – I don’t think I’m a dull crayon, but this game seems to me to be punitively difficult, the territory of the stat-obsessed, the battlefield veteran, the experienced and detail-oriented resource manager. I went into it with an open mind and a persistent attitude, and I think it’s safe to conclude that if you’ve never tried a strictly tactical game before, this isn’t one to start with.

And you might be tempted to pick it up, because it looks RPG-beautiful, with tons of good looking characters with weird hair colors and intense expression, and lots of swirling full-motion cutscenes. In fact, I’d hazard that they’re some of the nicest FMVs I’ve yet seen on the Wii. Almost PlayStation 2 quality. –I kid, I kid. The game is pretty, the music is listenable, and all the girls are hot. If you are into tactical games, all of these elements provide a nice backdrop. If you’re not, don’t let them fool you.

But here’s the thing I don’t get – and this is the reason why even those master strategists who love a hardcore tactical challenge might want to avoid this title. It’s, like… barely even a Wii title. It doesn’t make use of any Wii functionality at all, except for the fact that you can point at menus – and that’s kind of annoying in this context, just pointing away, stabbing at menus all day. It doesn’t use the nunchuk, there are no motion controls, no voice dialogue, and the battlefields themselves seriously look about identical to the Path of Radiance screenshots I looked at. We’re talking about a GameCube title here. Normally one would expect a next-gen sequel to have some next-gen features, but Radiant Dawn has next to none.

All in all, it’s kind of a crummy package, I think – but I’ve the sneaking suspicion fans of the Fire Emblem series, or those who love a real tactical challenge, might adore it. The plot’s weak, the characters blab on too much, and the whole deal’s very last-gen, but for the truly dedicated, it’s playable, I guess. Rent it if you're a tactical geek -- everyone else should forget it.

Score: 5.0


Continue: More wii stories





prev
next 50 comments

107 comments | showing # 1 to 50

Ratcliff's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/26/2007 17:02
Ratcliff
so... like are the screws still in your head or... what's ah, what's the deal with that?

also tactics games ARE boring as hell.
bottled dark's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/26/2007 17:03
bottled dark
and fire emblem keeps on doing the same thing.
king3vbo's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/26/2007 17:13
king3vbo
Fire Emblem not innovating? NOOOOOOOOO WAY!!
ShinSennju's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/26/2007 17:14
ShinSennju
Fire Emblem games do appeal to a really small crowd, but that small crowd loves them.
Izaak's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/26/2007 17:15
Izaak
BRAVO Destructoid. You let a Strategy hater review a Strategy game. Can you be even more stupider? That's like making a Nintendo-hater review a Nintendo game. OF COURSE he's going to give it a bad score!
ShadowXOR's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/26/2007 17:26
ShadowXOR
ShinSennju: That small crowd is also known as "Japan".
ShadowXOR's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/26/2007 17:28
ShadowXOR
Also if you aren't a fan of strategy games, you shouldn't review this at all. It doesn't matter if there is nothing else to review that is just stupid. You don't have to love them but this is just asinine.
SaxAttk's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/26/2007 17:29
SaxAttk
Well Izaak, I believe you've given me my good laugh for the day.
Lord The Night Knight's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/26/2007 17:32
Lord The Night Knight
Are you trying to outdo that gamespot guy?
F Whipple's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/26/2007 17:34
F Whipple
I agree, it doesn't make sense for someone to review a genre that they absolutely do not like. As it is, now-gen features be damned, I can't wait to get my hands on this game.
Variable Gear's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/26/2007 17:38
Variable Gear
@ Leigh Alexander:

"But here’s the thing I don’t get – and this is the reason why even those master strategists who love a hardcore tactical challenge might want to avoid this title. It’s, like… barely even a Wii title. It doesn’t make use of any Wii functionality at all, except for the fact that you can point at menus – and that’s kind of annoying in this context, just pointing away, stabbing at menus all day. It doesn’t use the nunchuk, there are no motion controls, no voice dialogue, and the battlefields themselves seriously look about identical to the Path of Radiance screenshots I looked at. We’re talking about a GameCube title here. Normally one would expect a next-gen sequel to have some next-gen features, but Radiant Dawn has next to none."

Yep, this is my main gripe with Fire Emblem: Radiant Dawn. I can put up with uninteresting stories, flat characters, and difficult strategic situations to fight my way through - but I hate it when titles do not take full advantage of the system they are on. Why even put a Fire Emblem game on the Wii if you aren't going to use all of the features that the system provides?

Also, does Radiant Dawn really have no voiced dialog? I thought Path of Radiance had VO in the CG cutscenes - which I assumed would carry over to the sequel, but I guess I was wrong. Also, you said that the player can navigate the menus by pointing the Wii Remote at the screen. So, can you not use the pointer in the heat of battle - do you have to use the D-Pad?

Also, Cocks.
joeisremy's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/26/2007 17:48
joeisremy
Starting off a review with how much you hate the genre of the game your are reviewing could have lead to two different things: 1 the surprise "I like the game despite the fact i hate these types of game" or 2:I hate it. Now to readers starting a review like that that going to assume you would go with one but instead you went with 2. Good for you, you hate rpgs. Next time you don't want to Review one I'll do it for you.
cnote81's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/26/2007 17:49
cnote81
Reading that review was a waste of my time, and so was reading this comment.
kadosho's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/26/2007 17:54
kadosho
I will nod along with this one. I have never been much of a strategy game lover, and Fire Emblem's design just seems boring. If a huge game like this doesnt have a core plot, then whats the point of forming a team in the first place? bah..

Maybe Fire Emblem should be set aside, until they can be more creative with the title.
DanGale's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/26/2007 18:03
DanGale
So I would imagine it's exactly the same as Path Of Radiance. In which case I've not long finished PoR and there's no need to look into this game for a good while yet. Well, that's if it ever comes out over here.
ShadowXOR's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/26/2007 18:05
ShadowXOR
Leigh Alexander: If I don't like strategy games I don't play them. If I do like strategy games and I play them, I would like to read a review by someone else that plays them. What purpose does it serve me to read a review by someone who doesn't share my views? And by having someone write a review that doesn't enjoy strategy games you are writing it for people that weren't interested in this game in the first place. The people interested in this game enjoy strategy games and they want to hear if someone that enjoys strategy games thinks it sucks, because then it is definitely bad. As of right now they have no clue because you don't like strategy games. If you don't see how flawed this is...I would be stunned.
afalker's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/26/2007 18:17
afalker
@Shadow:

She has a point about genre bias, people who love a type of game are just as susceptible to giving a biased review than someone who doesn't enjoy that type of game. Perhaps you should give her some kudos for trying a game that is outside her comfort zone and giving it an honest chance. She correctly prefaced her article in the interest of full disclosure, but gave the game an honest review. Maybe other reviewers could take a page from this review.
Colette Bennett's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/26/2007 18:19
Colette Bennett
I don't mind reading a review of a writer who dislikes a genre; I don't need a cheerleader when I read a review. On the other hand I'm not much of a strategy fan either. I can't say how I would react to someone writing a review of an RPG when they hated RPGs, but at any rate I still find the alternate point of view interesting.
ShadowXOR's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/26/2007 18:22
ShadowXOR
But if I love strategy games then won't I be biased to liking it just as the reviewer is? Basically, going by what you said she is reviewing the game for people that wouldn't be buying this game anyway, rather than for people that are generally considering a purchase and looking to reviews for that clarification from like-minded people.

To me it just doesn't make sense. Review for the crowd that may actually play the game if it's any good. If a strategy fan didn't like the game, other strategy fans probably won't either. If someone who hates strategy doesn't like the game, that just leaves me looking for a different review since obviously we don't like the same genres we probably won't like the same games.
ZargonX's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/26/2007 18:25
ZargonX
I think it might be more appropriate if Fire Emblem were really a series that made any effort to reach out to those who don't like hardcore strategy; it is, however, most definitely not. So, yes, I would expect someone who doesn't like the genre to certainly not be won over by the FE series.

That said, for games that do try to bring people into new genres, having someone who dislikes said genre do the review is always an interesting read.
Edarios's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/26/2007 18:27
Edarios
yeah, why did you review this?
ShadowXOR's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/26/2007 18:29
ShadowXOR
I definitely find an outsider's view "interesting", but it is hardly a useful review for anyone seriously considering purchasing the game. I think it would have been more suitable as a C-Blog or as an article that was not a review. If we only get one review for this game, it should be one that is a valuable tool in deciding between a purchase, a rental, and skipping it altogether. She says that you might want to buy it if you are a hardcore strategy player, but she doesn't really know what we like so that doesn't really mean anything.
Kyousuke Nanbu's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/26/2007 18:41
Kyousuke Nanbu
Oh wow, for someone who doesn't like SRPG's Fire Emblem is a BAD start, its brutal and unforgiving, even on the easiest difficulty.

I don't like em because in FE games its to stacked toward my enemy. I still remember the yelling and cursing my friend did when he was trying to beat Radiant stones, nothing like completing everything and finding the super secret spell book, only to be crit by the boss on your first attack.
Chad Concelmo's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/26/2007 18:44
Chad Concelmo
The Fire Emblem series is one of my favorite series of all time, so I would have been just as biased in the other direction. Wouldn't that be an issue as well?
Also, 10 out of 10! :)
Lukich's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/26/2007 18:44
Lukich
I agree with ShadowXOR here. Your opinion is definitely something that could be useful, because you are outside of the genre, but a full blown review? Not being a fan of the genre probably means you don't play many games of this type, meaning you also don't know what's typical of the genre. "Is this feature groundbreaking?" You have no idea because you've never played another game like it? Again, your thoughts are appreciated, but I definitely won't be counting on this review to help me make my decision.
Mike Hawk's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/26/2007 18:49
Mike Hawk
no, the crowd that likes FE isn't just japan. FE is one of my favorite series. i'm not terrific at it, but i know what i'm doing, since this is the 6th i've played.

@lord the night Knight- i don't think she was trying to outdo the GS review. Gamespot's review was- It's too hard for us on easy b/c we're retarded and i wish there was waggle and mii support. leigh just doesn't like SRPGs so even if she wasn't trying, she'll tend to give it a lower score.
ShadowXOR's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/26/2007 18:51
ShadowXOR
Chad Concelmo: I never said I wanted a fanboy reviewing it either, just someone that likes strategy games. Why do you have to take it to the opposite extreme? You addressed the point on the most primitive level, it isn't black and white. And for the record I'm not a Fire Emblem fan...hell, I've never even played one.
Diomeneus's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/26/2007 18:55
Diomeneus
I'm a hardcore stat muncher and I loved the first two fire emblem games (GBA and the expansion) so I was a little disappointed that a tactics hater (it is very understandable to dislike the genre, but I happen to love it) happened to be reviewing it. Do you think a red mage such as myself would enjoy it? I am very capable of making invincible characters with delicate and rule devouring tactics (no pun intended).
Wedge's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/26/2007 18:58
Wedge
Fire Emblem is Fire Emblem. It's hardcore strategy, and if you can't play strategy games and think out and check every space of every move you make, then yes, you're going to suck at this. I actually find Fire Emblem games generally easy, because when you do have a tactical sense, the enemy is totally predictable, and the classes are well balanced so you always have the advantage.

The review is moot because I already know what the game is like without playing it. You could go play the GBA ones and it'd be the same too. If nothing else, with all the bitching about "waaa waaa Nintendo makes too much kiddy casual shit", you have to respect them for having a long running hardcore strategy franchise like this.


Also Dan, this game came out a while ago (in the US anyways).
xaelus's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/26/2007 19:01
xaelus
I had to register to say this, I read destructoid everyday and I enjoy it. I read the reviews hell even when I don't agree with them. Everyone got all crazy when they reviewed Assassins Creeds and gave it a low score. Other outlets gave it high scores, what bothered Rev Anth didn't bother someone else as much. It is called OPINION.

Now unless I am mistaken this is a blog, blogs are the opinions of the writers. So if Leigh doesn't like the game, it is her opinion. Who's telling you to read it? I read it because I played the Fire Emblem games on the GBA and gamecube and I can see exactly where she is coming from. And I LIKE the genre. If you put someone who is absolutely in love with the genre you will have someone talk about how perfect the game is and how the flaws are minuscule. But the truth is most of the time the flaws are minuscule because the writer is such a fanboy or fangirl of the genre/series.

Is this review bias? Yeah. Aren't all reviews biased? No one can make a completely subjective response unless you bring someone in who has played literally no video games, and that won't help you either. If you LIKE the genre then read her review and see what the problems are. The 5.0 is what it is to HER not anyone else.

"I never said I wanted a fanboy reviewing it either, just someone that likes strategy games." Then go read IGN or GameSpy or any gaming magazine that gets sponsors to raise the scores. Destructoid likes to be honest, if it makes you go up in arms than you better get more open minded.

Oh yeah and if you don't want to see honest journalism than just read another website.
Hamsizzla's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/26/2007 19:03
Hamsizzla
she has no point about genre bias, people who enjoy this type of game will not particularly always like it.. I enjoy FPS games but did i like Red Steel?? No.
The Incredible Edible Egg's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/26/2007 19:07
The Incredible Edible Egg
I love this series, unless I have to play it.
Lukich's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/26/2007 19:10
Lukich
I don't think a fan of the genre would be totally biased for it, though. If anything, that would give the reviewer the ability to compare it with other entries in SRPG's.
Edarios's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/26/2007 19:15
Edarios
I'm confused, are these destructoid reviews supposed to be taken seriously or not?

after all, this type of thing is the deciding factor in shelling out 50 for a game or not...

and yes, its her opinon, but usually when you take advice you try to get it from someone who knows their shit on the matter, right?
Chad Concelmo's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/26/2007 19:20
Chad Concelmo
@ShadowXOR,
You're right, I was being unfairly extreme. My horribly expressed point was just that I loved the game and would have given it a much higher score. Sometimes whether you like the genre or not doesn't really make a difference; it just comes down a person's opinion. Fire Emblem is probably the least "hardcore" in the tactics genre (that honor goes to something like Disgaea), so I think having a self-proclaimed non-fan review the game is perfectly reasonable in this particular situation. :)
nilcam's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/26/2007 19:28
nilcam
First off, props for giving a genre you hate a fair try. Especially, when you're giving a go to one of the more "hardcore" strategy titles.

I am, admittedly, a turn-based strategy game whore. I love that the gameplay is purely tactical and lacking in unnecessary side quests and random encounters. Random encounters annoy me to no end.

I would rate this game a 9. It does an incredibly good job following up Path of Radiance and improves upon that game immensely. The battle scenes and cut scenes are infinitely better in this game and I'm quite enjoying the story. Having the player view the war from both sides has been rather enjoyable. A buy for SRPG fans.
ectogamut's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/26/2007 19:38
ectogamut
I agree with ShadowXOR's sentiments that people unexperienced with SRPGs should not be writing a review on one. But more to the point, this isn't really a review of the game, but more of a criticism of the very premise of SRPGs in general, the culture surrounding them, and the mentality of the SRPG userbase.

For example, I would never have decided to buy Mario Galaxy based solely on the opinion of someone who has never played a Mario game before... I can't relate to that kind of person, I have no shared experiences I can draw on... UNLESS they could explain to me, in detail, what makes this game so fun or not fun.

SRPG games are meant for a small group of people who enjoy statistics and strategy, and if you don't like that sort of thing why would I care what you think about games which delve deep into statistics and strategy?
GigaMach's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/26/2007 19:57
GigaMach
@Shadow and others who find Destructoid's reviews are problematic:

There is a vast resource of opinions for nearly every game one could hope to search on Google. There's whole magazines and sites dedicated to every genre, pro and con, imaginable. There's a site that will remain nameless (rhymes with "flamehacks") that usually has a wide enough array of fan-made reviews to wrap ones head around; Often poorly written, but usually sincere and earnest. How can we complain about Destructoid's reviews when the whole process of "review" is steeped in bias and opinion? If you simply want to know the features of a game, read the back of the box. If you want to know wether the game simply functions as intended, rent it and see.

The only, ONLY, reason to read a "review" is to get someone's opinion on a game. In this case, if FE had changed the reviewer's mind about SRPG's, would the review have been more or less valid? I contend "NO" to both options. From what I understand, I have fairly similiar game preferences to Leigh. Does that make her word gospel? Not necessarily, but it makes her review more informative to my biases. And if I want another opinion, there's one just a click away.

My point? Rather than complain about a reviewers inability to write a "valid review" (of which there is NO SUCH THING, because reviews have no empirical formula by which we can measure their "validity" against) share your opinion of the game, or seek other reviews and see if they don't have common threads that point to the big picture.

OR...argue on the internet for hours and improve your typing skills.
SlimJimm's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/26/2007 20:00
SlimJimm
Im surprised that most people here are angry at Ms. Alexander.

Fire Emblem is definitely not everyone's cup of tea. Its true its a very niche series. I like them, but even I wouldnt give it a 10, or even a 9. I really do with they would make the games a bit more pretty and with all the text voice acting would be nice. Of course if it turned out to be crap voice acting I would be crying for them to take it away.

I will probably buy this game when its a bit cheaper. For a GC game turned wii they should have priced it the same as Resident Evil 4 (29.99).
Wedge's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/26/2007 20:11
Wedge
Leigh, your complaints about the gameplay _are_ about your dislike of the genre. Because they are only valid complaints for someone that can't play these games to start with. Many of your problems with the game are pluses for people that like these kind of games.
ectogamut's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/26/2007 20:14
ectogamut
"To be fair, I think that scoring games is enormously archaic, a convention designed to pander to a not-so-thinking audience (read: us as impatient children). Now that games are as complex as they are, scoring is much more arbitrary and ultimately, I feel, useless. I score every time I review; I have to, that's the way it's done." ~ Leigh Alexander on 09.25.2007

I feel bad for you. You explained the game from an outsider's perspective: something that might come in handy for about 1/5th of the people who bothered reading a Fire Emblem review. You seem to have a history of taking a hard stance (read: playing Devil's advocate) against games with which you have no experience (the big one being Halo 3). I'm not condeming you for that; it's a valid strategy when the goal is to create controversy, which leads to more hits on the site and more comments in the... err... comments section. I think most people take issue with the 5/10 you gave this game; as archaic and childish as that is, that's where the disagreements start. It's too bad you had to give this game a number.
Wedge's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/26/2007 20:22
Wedge
Yeah, agreed. The real problem here is it has a number.
Bulrog's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/26/2007 20:24
Bulrog
One of the definitive points of the Fire Emblem series is that once your character is dead, its gone for good. This shouldn't be pointed out as a negative factor of the game. Its what keeps the player attached to his/her characters.
timmet's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/26/2007 20:45
timmet
Ok, here's what I don't get. If you hate tactical games? Why are you reviewing one? If a music reviewer hates country music, he should not be reviewing country music? Why? Because people who are looking for country music reviews want to know how that country music compares to other country music. If someone likes tactical games, and they want to know if this is a good game, the reviewer should at least like tactical games so his opinion is valid. How does this help someone who likes tactical games and wants to know how this game stacks up? It doesn't. Stick to reviewing game catagories that you know about, and please, leave reviews of catagories that you don't know about to someone who does.
Lukich's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/26/2007 20:59
Lukich
@Leigh

It's not that your opinion is invalid because you don't like tactical games and I don't think that someone on the opposite end of the spectrum (LOVES Fire Emblem) would be any better. There's just a balance to these kinds of things. One should be versed in what they are trying to review. What you reviewed here is a strategy RPG, and the impression you made was that you weren't versed in strategy RPG's. That's all I'M (not sure about everyone else :D) trying to say.
ectogamut's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/26/2007 21:00
ectogamut
Well okay, I'll begrudgingly admit that challenging someone's preconceived notions about a game, in addition to generating buzz (unintended side effect?), is also a good exercise of critical thinking skills, the only cure for rampant fanboyism. Also thanks for the clarification on the score:

"5 – Average. Half of the time the game is fun, half of the time it isn't, for whatever reason. This game is absolutely average in every single way -- neither exceptional nor face-melting awful."
ShadowXOR's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/26/2007 21:06
ShadowXOR
You guys are trying so hard to be different that it's actually becoming really unappealing. I'm not asking you to blow Fire Emblem, but if you're reviewing a strategy RPG you better be versed in the genre so that you can compare and contrast new things it brings to the table as well as slap it down for old problems that aren't resolved. You don't have the experience to do either.
Imako's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/26/2007 21:09
Imako
5.0 sounds about right. I'm a fan of the gameboy series, but the gamecube spinoff never sat right with me. If I bought this new wii one and nothing was improved (can you really not select units w/ the wiimote?), I would be pissed off.
nilcam's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/26/2007 21:17
nilcam
@ShadowXOR: A score of 5 on a 10 point scale is average. The idea of 7 being average is a school thing and does not translate in the real world. I like that Destructoid's scale is real world and not school based.

Your avatar is off the f*cking chain.
emo zema's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/26/2007 21:17
emo zema
i don't like that someone who hates tactical games rated this not really fair .
oh well i'm still buying it .
prev next 50 comments

Comment with Facebook





Click connect and comment instantly!

Comment with Dtoid





New? SIGN UP - it takes 5 seconds

Comments policy

Destructoid is an open discussion community. You don't need to "audition" to post a comment - just speak your mind. We respect differing opinions on the site, so have at it. Be smart, funny, insightful, clueless, or cute -- but back it up with substance. Keep your cool, keep it fun. We only ask that you act respectfully and above all: don't be a troll and ruin it for everyone else. Don't bring down gamers or we'll, you know, gently shoot you in the face and stuff you into a flaming mailbox. Each comment is your opportuntity to make this community awesomer. Is that even a word?

Avoiding the banhammer only requires common sense: spamming, trolling, racism, NSFW stuff, and other forms of sucking will not be tolerated. If anyone is griefing please report abuse. Be good. Don't suck!

 
New on Destructoid.TV play all videos

Loading
Loading Destructoid Videos


    Win this!
    Dive in! meetup+play for a chance to win a PC

    Dtoid Twitter    Got news?   tips@destructoid.com

    Reviews & Previews
    Resident Evil: The Darkside Chronicles review
    Left 4 Dead 2 review
    Call of Duty: Modern Warfare Reflex review
    Arkedo Series - 02 SWAP! review
    EyePet review
    more reviews
    Legend of Zelda Spirit Tracks
    Monster Hunter Tri
    Hooking onto, under and above Just Cause 2
    PS3's 256-player MAG
    Rooms The Main Building
    more previews


    - The Dtoid Army is 50768 strong -

    Showing Cblogs with 3+ faps   show all

    Call for entries: do the wrong thing

    New to Dtoid? Read the survival guide




     Originals
    Jim Sterling: The ultimate PC gamer to-do list





















    More Destructoid Originals




     Popular now more






















    Team Destructoid   tips@destructoid.com
    Nick Chester
    Editor-in-Chief
    Niero
    Founder, publisher
    Jim Sterling
    Reviews Editor
    Hamza Aziz
    Community Manager
    Dale North
    News Editor
    Rey Gutierrez
    Video editor & director
    Anthony Burch
    Features Editor
    Colette Bennett
    Tom Fronczak Brad Nicholson
    Ashley Davis Ben Perlee
    Conrad
    Zimmerman
    Chad Concelmo
    Jonathan Holmes Jonathan Ross
    Brad Rice Jordan Devore
    Will Maddock Matthew Razak
    Dyson Joseph Leray
    Topher Cantler Samit Sarkar
         
      Dexter
    Adam Dork
    Daniel Lingen
    Hollie Bennett
    Joe Burling
    Mikey
    Stella Wong

    Josh Tolentino




     

     
      get involved

    register or login
    post a blog
    post a forum
    enter a contest
    contribute a news tip
    suggest a feature
    be a guest editor
    support

    new member's guide
    login assistance
    tech support
    report abuse
    email our editors
    read our dev blog
    nuclear crisis?
    keep in touch

    RSS feed
    Twitter
    Facebook
    Myspace
    Flickr
    Game nights
    Meetup+play online
    seriously

    about Destructoid
    advertising
    terms of use
    privacy policy
    jobs at MM
    buy our crap
    our network

    Tomopop
    Japanator
    Despingation?




    Destructoid is an independently-run publication forged by our love of video games and the gaming community's need of accountable enthusiast press
    living the dream since March 16, 2006