[The Defense Force is an article series that roots for the underdog, plays Devil's Advocate and otherwise defends the indefensible. If something's hated, and we deem that hatred unjust, you can guarantee the Defense Force will mobilize.]
Quick Time Events, otherwise known as QTEs, are the black sheep of the gameplay family. The mere utterance of their inclusion in a videogame elicits groans and gripes from gamers around the world. They have been accused of many things -- removing the sense of immersion, breaking the game's flow, or simply being lazy design. People don't like QTEs.
This sounds like a job for the Defense Force! Quick Time Events, while certainly bad in the wrong hands, definitely have a place in the world, and I fear that a few bad eggs have spoiled what can otherwise be an effective and worthwhile approach to interactive entertainment.
So, please join us as we explain why QTEs have a place in the videogame medium, and really aren't as bad as everybody says they are. Defense Force MOBILIZE!
The main issuewith QTEs, as I see it, is the knee-jerk reaction that they inspire in people. Despite the fact that a number of popular games have used them quite well, they suffer from a preceding reputation, and a stigma that has never scrubbed off thanks to some poorly implemented examples. It can take ten years to build a good reputation, but only ten seconds to build a bad one. This is very true in the case of Quick Time Events.
Let's look at some bad examples, first of all. QTEs are certainly not always good, and there are plenty of games that provide evidence of this. Resident Evil 4 and Resident Evil 5 are perfect examples, shoving QTEs into a number of cutscenes for no other reason than to ambush you. This is an incredibly tasteless use of the QTE, and one I've always found very cheap. Clumsily throwing time-sensitive button commands at you when you least expect it is a lazy way to develop a game, and the QTEs have always remained a grim stain on what was otherwise a pair of fine Capcom titles.
Another good example of bad QTEs would be From Software's Ninja Blade. This game loved Quick Time Events so much that they were advertised on the back of the box. However, the game was almost a 60/40 split in favor of QTEs, as Ninja Blade effectively played itself while you merely pressed buttons.
Quick Time Events are often used to show you animations that were too difficult to develop interactively, while still giving players a sense of control over what they were seeing. Ninja Blade failed so badly because the player was constantly forced to watch the button commands and not the animations. So, while the game itself was throwing beautiful visuals around, the player was too busy concentrating on his controller to notice. The game would have been better off simply using these sections as straight cutscenes so that the player could at least watch what was going on.
So, how are QTEs done right? The trick is not to overdo them, let them flow naturally as part of the game, and create a plausible illusion that player is truly having an effect on the on-screen action. The best example one could provide is Quantic Dream's Indigo Prophecy. This macabre adventure game broke up the dialog and investigative gameplay with a number of QTE segments that were brilliantly devised and worked very well. There are a number of things Indigo Prophecy did well with regards to Quick Time Events:
- They adequately prepared you: QTEs were preceded by a countdown and a warning to get ready. The game didn't ambush you or try and score a quick, cheap victory over your character.
- The control input felt contextual: One of the biggest strengths of Indigo's QTEs was that the button and analog stick commands were contextual. For example, during many of the acrobatic sections, you would move the sticks in certain directions. The directions corresponded to the on-screen action. For physically strenuous activities, the game would force you to press the shoulder buttons rapidly, one after the after. This would cause a physical strain on the player, and you actually felt as tired as the characters would.
- There was room for error: Unlike QTE segments in other games, where failure of one command means death, Indigo Prophecy gave you "lives," which would allow you to mess up a few times. Even better, screwing up would change the way the QTE played out. So, if you fail a jump, the character will stumble and suffer on-screen consequences. Something as simple as a stumble creates an immeasurably improved sense of interactivity.
- The QTEs never upstaged the animation: Unlike with Ninja Blade, the QTEs of Indigo Prophecy were implemented in a way that allowed you to still observe the action. The stick movement commands were placed center-screen and were translucent, allowing you to see everything behind them. There was also a slight delay between commands and animations, allowing you to see the fruits of your labors.
Indigo Prophecy's QTEs were, simply put, expertly crafted and they remain proof that the gameplay mechanic is a very valid one that can be just as thrilling as any other interface. Many of Indigo's button-press sequences left me feeling exhilarated and like I had accomplished something awesome. The QTEs were tense, action packed, and paced perfectly. I wouldn't have had that game pan out any other way.
Another good use of QTEs is a game like God of War. Of course, God of War helped popularize QTEs, so the game can certainly be forgiven for using them. Even so, they were used sparingly and sensibly, which is key to a successful Quick Time Event. It made sense to hammer a button when Kratos was pushing a heavy object, and the twisting of analog sticks worked very well when he was yanking a Gorgon's head off. Not all the commands were contextual -- many of the finishers revolved around hitting arbitrary face buttons -- but the sequences were not overused and, since there was so much action in the rest of the game, these QTEs merely added to the game, rather than take away from them.
The flow of the QTEs in God of War also worked quite well. You chose to initiate them yourself when performing finishers, rather than be attacked by them when the game decided you MUST press these buttons at the right time in the right place. Immersion wasn't broken, and these segments were not so overbearing that they felt like they were negatively impacting the game.
Of course, God of War is helped by the fact that QTEs are used to make off-screen ladies orgasm in a sex minigame. That makes a case for the mechanic all on its own.
Sometimes, the only difference between a QTE and what some would call "normal" gameplay is the fact that there are on-screen button commands. Take, for example, Batman: Arkham Asylum. This game was praised for its combat system, and nobody once mentioned the Quick Time Events. Yes, the combat is full of them, but you never considered it because the game didn't say "Hit Triangle." Instead, while Batman is beating up bad guys, a little symbol appears above the heads of enemies about to attack. When the symbol is seen, players have to hit the Triangle button so that Batman will counter the attack.
It is, for all intents and purposes, a QTE. It's just a QTE that's been dressed up to look more appealing and "game-like."
You could extend the idea of the "disguised QTE" even further, in fact. Take your average 2D fighter, for example. A Street Fighter or a BlazBlue. You input a series of arbitrary button presses in order to make something happen. The only real difference is that instead of having the necessary buttons appear on-screen, you have to pause the game and look into the Commands Menu to find out how to pull off a certain move. You are doing the exact same thing as you do with a QTE -- you're pressing predetermined buttons in order to make preset animations appear on-screen. The only difference is the way it's presented to you. It's worth thinking about.
Yes, Quick Time Events aren't always good. In fact, they've been tarnished entirely by lazy games that make you button-mash every time you want to open a door. However, done right, they are just as valid a mechanic as any other and, really, there's not much difference between a QTE and any other instance where you're pressing buttons to make things happen. It's all about the presentation, more than anything else.
Sure, hating on Quick Time Events is understandable, but just because there are bad examples of an idea, that doesn't make the idea itself inherently bad. There are games out there that demonstrate how QTEs can work, and work well, so it's not fair to instantly judge a game simply because it includes them.
If you disagree with any of that, please hit triangle ... NOW!
Contest:
4:00 PM on 09.18.2009
| 
I suppose you could argue that optimal play would lead towards highly desirable moves at any given point, but I think a core element of QTE's is that it's usually a required set of specific button presses at certain times.
Maybe that's another possible way to make QTE's be hated less: Have them lead to positive outcomes, but not have them be required to reach a success state.
Thankfully I can appreciate QTE thanks to my first experience with it being Shenmue. They did it right, and it's that experience that helps me see the beauty in modern QTE today.
Seriously: worst EVER (and lazy) use of QTEs in a video game, bar-none.
On other note, Heavy Rain looks like a winner in this area.
Good article Jim.
You can also call the finisher moves in No More Heroes QTEs as well, and were great examples of staying in context and adding extra emotion to the battles. After a round of slicing with A over and over, the final blow combined with a strong arm movement in a certain direction produced some awesome moments.
In-game controls for a fighter are consistent and established. Sure, superficially you may be "triggering" "animations", save for that "x" always equals "x" and "x after y" always equals "x after y". The context doesn't change based on the narrative's progression thus far.
If QTEs were a pool of selectable pre-rendered animations, learned by and available to the player, than I'd be readier to accept the comparison, but that's NOT what they are. They remove the contextual input that the player has been presented with thus far, for the sake of an animation or an emotion or whatever. Intuitive interaction becomes muddied.
Though I do agree with you that, when done properly, it can be very much worth it. Especially when the illusion of control remains intact.
Give a nice opportunity for the game to show what badass tricks it has up its sleeve.
Can you tell me what happened?
I had to hit ctrl+F to see if anybody was going to talk about Dragon's Lair. Good thing I'm not the only one who read this article and thought it needed some love for Dirk Darling
Long story short, they build up these REALLY cool two henchmen, and the entire finale ends up being a QTE. The fights would have been really cool otherwise, but I think they got lazy.
And yes, I really like that game, screw the review. One of the funnest shooters I've played in years.
The SF4 comparison is indeed a bit too far fetched. After all, the player can actually decide when to pull off one of those moves. The fact that the game forces you to push buttons in a predetermined pace at a predetermined moment is imho a defining thing for QTEs to be QTEs.
Totally agree with the rest of it though.
For a moment I thought this was"QTEs are blatantly better than Natal" post
I never had a problem with timing as well, I like the fact that QTE's force you to pay attention during cut scenes, like with heavenly sword, makes you receptive to the story and what's going on.
And I think the difference between fighting game commands and bad QTE's is that QTE's don't really provide choice, whereas fighting games have multiple options. Bad qte's kind of feel like watching a movie on a computer that has a screensaver turn on every 10 minutes, except if you forget to move the mouse, the movie starts over from the beginning.
And what Dexter said.
Everything else is very convincing....hmmm...I'll give Dante Inferno my last chance to enjoy games with heavy use of QTEs.
This is, and continues to be, my issue with all QTE's. Injecting response indicators into standard gameplay ala Arkham Asylum - indicators that, while useful, still allow you the option to respond or not without affecting your ability to progress - is the closest thing to a reasonable counterpoint that you have, and, IMO, it's the only way to do it.
Maybe offer the option for people to turn on button prompts in a menu somewhere for accessibility's sake, but otherwise, implement them a little more subtly, so that I might feel like I'm at least succeeding at remembering which button I should press when "that" happens.
Anything else is just "play-by-numbers".
That's a serious question. The article made a good point until the last few paragraphs.
Otherwise, I'm not able to agree with the rest, especially the comparison to Arkham Asylum and fighting games. In Arkham Asylum, you can still control Batman normally when someone is about to hit you instead of locking out all other controls and only allowing you to hit the counter button or taking a punch to the face. At least you know that triangle will always be the counter button and not something random every time, where QTEs commonly have inputs that don't relate to what you normally do during game play. In fighting games, there tend to be many ways to attack at once and messing up the input only means the move won't come out properly and whatever punishment the person you're fighting decides to dish out.
@king zetta: k...
My best example for the solution to that type of gameplay is from Ocarina of Time. Remember when the re-deads jumped on your back and hugged you to death while making that creepy moaning noise? It scared the hell out of me the first time I played it. It still does. Typical control is taken from you, but you know you have to figure something out to keep yourself alive - THAT is exciting.
Madworld's QTE's usually weren't too bad either. Since you got to actually do the motions Jack was doing onscreen, you felt more involved. So once motion controls hit PS3/360 next year, maybe we'll see some improvement in this area.
Though in TR: Underworld they made a more interesting thing - a simple slow-mo when something dangerous happens.
For example: you are some highly acrobatic guy with a sixth sense. Behind you is a guy with a gun and in front of you is a window you must jump out of. You run to the window, jump and at the same time the guy shoots. Your character knows, that the bullet will hit his leg so he must dodge it. The standard qte will play out like this: the button prompt appears to dodge the bullet, you press it right and the next animation plays as the character dodges the bullet and runs. And if you fail another animation plays where the bullet hits his leg and he plummets to death or something like that. That does allow dev's to make two animations sets with better than in-game animation, but leaves you with only two outcomes. What i would like to see is: when the button prompt to dodge the bullet appears the bullet is already being fired and flies all the way to your characters leg in real time, while "dodging bullet" animation starts playing out as soon as you press the button. So in this case we can have several outcomes depending on how fast you've pressed the prompted button. That would be much more interesting to play.
Though I disagree with the part of them being in Resident Evil 4. I thought that they added an extra sense of tension to the cutscenes, as if the game is telling you "the second you put down that contoller, I'm taking your f***ing head!".
Of course, in RE5 the events come up not very often, making you forget that they're there. Remember the boss in Chapter 5-1? Half the times I've played that level I forgot theres a QTE when he appears, and die because of it (garnering groans from my partner if I'm playing online).
great point about arkham asylum
P.S. I really would like Capcom to remake God Hand using the RE5 engine. Or at least put Gene and all his powers in RE5.
A)The Wiimote/Nunchuk doesn't give a fuck about you swinging it.
B)You pushed B by accident grasping for the A button.
C)You accidently read your friend's prompt.
I've never been able to finish the game, due entirely to the stupid QTE's. At no point in time should the outcome of a game be based on random waggle-based QTE. EVER.