Got news?   tips@destructoid.com  |  Never miss a story:   RSS + Twitter + YouTube
Hey! New here? Destructoid is a gaming discussion community, updated nearly every 20 minutes. Make a quick avatar to comment and enter our contests. Take the tour!

 


Home Analysts updates

Dave Jaffe keeps it real once again: Another call for a one console universe

10:03 PM on 01.13.2008, Jonathan Holmes 74 comments

Dave Jaffe keeps it real once again: Another call for a one console universe photo
     Analysts

Dave Jaffe is a multi-faceted man. When he's not openly criticizing the company that has written his pay checks for most of his career, feuding with gaming blogs, or actually working on the occasional game himself, he takes the time out to make hugely controversial statements about our industry that either work gamers into a fine lather of discontent or a make them beam from ear to ear with glee.

His latest statement is perhaps one of his tamest, but I'm sure it will still be enough to ruffle some feathers. He's making the old "One console to rule them all" argument we're all far too familiar with. What sets Jaffe apart from the pack is how un-rehearsed and genuine his thoughts sound.

Quoteth Jaffe- ""A lot of people will say: well, the game companies would never agree to this or that or the other. And to me, that is part of the problem our business has overall. Competition is great. But I think the leaders of the biggest groups should come together from time to time- like the big Mafia families do in the movies- and make some decisions together for the overall health of the business. Heck, maybe they already do this and I am just not aware. But if they do, they have not made the right decision on the one thing I think that could benefit gamers and game makers in a massive way: a single console." 

My thoughts after the jump.

[Via GameDaily]

 

 

I agree with Jaffe one hundred percent. Like how movie studios are slowly deciding to support Blu-ray over HD DVD, game developers need support one console so a final "winner" can be crowned. That has never really happened before, as every five years or so we start all over with one, two, or even three new console formats. This is a big part of why gaming isn't more main stream. Casual consumers can't deal with being forced to "pick a side". They will wait until one format wins, then buy it. That's what they did with VHS/Beta, that's what they are doing now with Blu-ray/HD DVD, and that's what they will always do with game consoles unless the industry puts a stop to it. 

Let me be clear, I don't want a one console world, but I do want one universal programming format for all consoles to share. Like with PC's, multiple hardware developers could still be in competition, but they would all have to stick to the same format. If this happened, no hardware developer could use "console exclusives" to sell their inferior or over priced hardware ever again! W00T! Oh baby, that's a what I like!

Third party developers would also benefit, as install bases for various consoles would no longer be an issue. Imagine the risks third parties could take knowing that a game they made for the PS3 could also be played on the 360 and the Wii. The install base for the game would be at least 10 times larger, and so would be the potential for sales. 

I think the thing that holds the "one console future" back is simple short sightedness and greed. Sony, Nintendo and Microsoft all want the "one console future". They just can't agree on who's console the "one console" should be. All three have been voting for themselves seven years running now, resulting in a three way tie that does nothing but limit the industry.

Third parties aren't much better, running scared from consoles that already have great games, hoping to their less than deserving titles will sell well on more barren hardware.  How many third party developers have said they are reluctant to develop for Nintendo consoles because they can't compete with Nintendo's first party releases? I'd try to count, but I have to got to sleep in eight hours so I don't have the time.

If we had one programming format for all consoles, third parties wouldn't need to worry about that kind of competition. There would be room for everyone. All that third parties would have to worry about is making the best games they could. Sadly, this is precisely what they don't want. As it is now, third parties can sell essentially the same game twice to the same people on by putting said game on two different consoles and adding the slightest differences between the two versions of the game.  In a one format future, such shenanigans would not be an option.

That's enough ranting for one day. What do you think, D-Toid? Surely there are pro's and con's to a one console future. If you were king, how would you have it?


Next page: More console war stories




tazarthayoot's Avatar
tazarthayoot at 01/13/2008 22:04
YOU'RE GONNA WANNA USE CAPSLOCK WHEN TYPING IN THE DTOID FONT, OTHERWISE IT LOOKS LIKE...WELL THAT.
tazarthayoot's Avatar
tazarthayoot at 01/13/2008 22:04
Also Dave Jaffe is batshit insane.
Sam Spectre's Avatar
Sam Spectre at 01/13/2008 22:05
I'm not sure, if there was only one console there wouldn't be enough healthy competition. However a universal programming format does sound nice.
Samit Sarkar's Avatar
Samit Sarkar at 01/13/2008 22:08
“I’m too old for this crop”?

But yeah, it would never happen. Nintendo is obviously going in a different direction (innovation/gameplay over graphics), and Sony and Microsoft probably like that they can push the different facets of their individual consoles. Or at least that’s what I think.
iateyourhorse's Avatar
iateyourhorse at 01/13/2008 22:11
Is it just me or do companies rely on the console war material to attempt to get quite a bit of sales?, I always saw this as extra marketing if they can show off more. In the world of one console how can you advertise your product effectively when its the only system in the market?

Kinda unrelated, but remember the infamous Nintendo Power magazine quotes about the 'Graystation/Graystation Poo, Dreampants and the Whatbox(?)'.
Jonathan Holmes's Avatar
Jonathan Holmes at 01/13/2008 22:11
JJ Rage, you have clearly given this a lot of thought. I bow to your infinite wisdom.

Seriously though, if you think about what you said for even a brief moment you'll realize how silly it was. There are valid arguments against a one console universe, most having to do with chip production companies going out of business and hardware infrastructure innovation becoming stagnant. None of them involve the old "Imagine the movie industry with one studio" trick. All one need do is look at the DVD industry to see why that's invalid.

@ Tazar, yeah, but the text wouldn't fit with caps lock down. I know you can still read it, you cheeky monkey.
taumpytears's Avatar
taumpytears at 01/13/2008 22:12
When will this guy shut the hell up? He is like the crazy drunk of the gaming industry. Make another game already!
Dexem's Avatar
Dexem at 01/13/2008 22:15
One console would never work. If anything, what we should have is two consoles. One for the motion controls and last gen graphics like the Wii. And another that is similiar to the PS3/Xbox 360. This way we will have the one console future but in a more reasonable manner. The day we see the PS360 is the day we see a hardcore/ deathmetal/ screamo britney spears band. Hopefully that day will never come.
Jonathan Holmes's Avatar
Jonathan Holmes at 01/13/2008 22:15
AH!

Fine, thanks to you Bomber, I'll make the edit.
Orionsaint's Avatar
Orionsaint at 01/13/2008 22:24
This rant all stems from the fact that Jaffe is currently making games for Sony. Who aren't doing so well at the moment. In other words he's blaming his recent failures, not on the fact that they were lame games, but the fact he had to produce them on a system that's currently considered the losers system, but Jaffe can't blame Sony. He can't bite the hand that feeds him. So he blames it all on not having a one system world. If we had that, all the hardcores gamers who are currently on 360. Would have played his cute lil racing game, whatever its called and see how great it is, and we'd all be kissing mr one hit wonders ass right now.
JJ Rage's Avatar
JJ Rage at 01/13/2008 22:24
@Jonathan

So because my comment was short I didn't put thought into it? I've been in this discussion before.

One needs only look to Microsoft to see the effect a lack of competition can have on innovative thinking. Not to mention the effect a "one console market" would have on system prices. There is a reason there are monopoly laws.

Competition is the best thing for the consumer. It always has been. It can be seen in every industry, especially electronics.

If you find yourself wishing there was only one console, just imagine that the "one console" was the Nintendo Wii.


Yeah. This one console world isn't all rainbows and sunshine now is it?
Shin Oni's Avatar
Shin Oni at 01/13/2008 22:27
As much as i'm for the "single console" format, it just can't happen. Mainly cause someone's gonna want more money thanks to our human minds. Along with that, people just can't make up their minds. They'd be alot of confusion and disputes on what goes on, what stays, yatta yatta. I'd love it, but that's about as big of a claim as "World Peace"

Though if such a thing were to happen, it'd help in making these already confused ass parents on what to get and stopping alot of those stupid "What's better? Wii, PS3, or 360?" type questions. I get tired of people asking me or someone else to make an opinion for them or make an opinion simple fact. I can go on about this but the general idea is out there.
Orionsaint's Avatar
Orionsaint at 01/13/2008 22:28
Jaffe hates being stuck making games for system. He wants to make games for every system. Just say it. This whole one system world to cater to Jafee is ridiculous! It's all about him!
Y0j1mb0's Avatar
Y0j1mb0 at 01/13/2008 22:28
All I want to hear from Jaffe is when that Twisted Metal Black Remake is coming. Seriously a guy puts out a couple of hit games and we have to be assaulted with his opinion about all things gaming.

As for the subject at hand, the only way it will happen is when the other two consoles aren't making money or give up their hardware model like Sega did. Somehow I don't see that happening anytime soon.
Orionsaint's Avatar
Orionsaint at 01/13/2008 22:29
Jaffe hates being stuck making games for one system. He wants to make games for every system. Just say it. This whole one system world to cater to Jafee is ridiculous! It's all about him!
Orionsaint's Avatar
Orionsaint at 01/13/2008 22:31
If Jaffe's games were popular and all the rage right now. He wouldn't be talking about a one system world. He'd happy and content, like he was, when GOW was king of the hill.
Tofucube's Avatar
Tofucube at 01/13/2008 22:36
forget that
the last thing i want is one console that everyone has to buy. I mean if everyone buys one console and all the games go to it, when does the next console come out? next generation consoles come out in a attempt to steal away users from other consoles. If they have nothing to gain from making a new console they will hold onto that console for as long as they can. 10 years and no new console released, thats not the market i want.
JJ rage is also right about innovation. Microsoft beat apple down in the OS wars and what did we get? We got a operating system that was basically repackaged over and over. Apples comes back and microsoft suddenly has to try and compete again and they dont know how to do it. Vista fails and the new MS Office is suppose to be really bad as well.
In the short run it sounds nice but it in the long run it would fail. would probably kill the console market and boost the PC market.
ShadowXOR's Avatar
ShadowXOR at 01/13/2008 22:37
In my opinion he's a douche bag.
Orionsaint's Avatar
Orionsaint at 01/13/2008 22:38
It's Jaffe's world. We all just live in it. Right Dave?
F Whipple's Avatar
F Whipple at 01/13/2008 22:42
I doubt it'll ever happen. Even with absolutely no third party support nintendo could put out a console and survive on first person games while still making money.
F Whipple's Avatar
F Whipple at 01/13/2008 22:42
*first party*

I'm a moron
madninja's Avatar
madninja at 01/13/2008 22:43
I think I found what to debate with you. It is on!
Cyberxion's Avatar
Cyberxion at 01/13/2008 22:45
Does Jaffe ever think before he speaks? Sure this would make things easier for developers, but I can't imagine that it would be good for us.
Orionsaint's Avatar
Orionsaint at 01/13/2008 22:47
No Cyberxion, but it would be good for David Jaffe and that's all that matters.

Here's some advice for Jaffe, start making games for 360 & Wii.
relik's Avatar
relik at 01/13/2008 22:48
Developers would still be in competition with each other if we had just one console. Even more so without exclusivity to hide behind.

Can't see it ever happening, but I'd be for it.
Jonathan Holmes's Avatar
Jonathan Holmes at 01/13/2008 22:51
That's better, JJ.

But still, your missing the point. Like I said, one console format would rule, like we have with DVD's and PC's. Windows may suck, but thanks to the universal format it gives us, the PC has taken off. Before that it was Apple, Digital, Ibm, Atari, Commodore, the list goes on. It was a mess. No one knew who to back, so no one bought computers. Even worse, PC's were incredibly expensive due to the low demand.

Only when the universal OS came to be did the PC go mainstream. Demand increased, hardware companies really had to compete honestly instead of using "exclusives" to force people to buy their products, so hardware prices went down. Game consoles need the same treatment.

A one programming format console world would lead to better third party product and cheaper, more powerful hardware. That's what it did for PC's and DVD players. The fact that you don't want that to happen is odd.

And the Wii is my favorite current gen console. So I guess we're different in a whole bunch of different ways, huh?

@ Tofucube You'd hate for everyone to have to buy 1 console? How come? The way things are now everyone has to buy 3 consoles. 3 is 3 times more expensive than 1. That's not better, is it?
Cyberxion's Avatar
Cyberxion at 01/13/2008 22:51
@Orionsaint

I wonder at what point Jaffe's brain snapped and he started thinking that we ought to give a shit about anything he has to say, ever.

The guy is like the biggest douche-bag in the industry.
Lukich's Avatar
Lukich at 01/13/2008 22:55
I just don't think its possible. There's always going to be someone who thinks they can do it better or take a piece of the pie for themselves.

Plus, I can't imagine that my Wii would have cost $250 if it had to have the power to support all the titles that are on the 360 and PS3. No, I rather like how it is right now.
Orionsaint's Avatar
Orionsaint at 01/13/2008 22:55
I know, when we all stopped gushing over what a great developer he was and his last game flopped! If we had a one world system though. He'd be the God gaming right now.
Lukich's Avatar
Lukich at 01/13/2008 22:59
@Jonathan

So do the similarities to PC's also include the need to constantly upgrade to keep up with the trend?
Orionsaint's Avatar
Orionsaint at 01/13/2008 22:59
It's never gonna happen. It's pointless and ridiculus to debate a one system world. Microsoft needs Apple. Paramount needs Warner. Tupac needed Biggie. Competition Inspires Creativity.
Orionsaint's Avatar
Orionsaint at 01/13/2008 23:01
You want proof competition inspires creativity? Look at the Madden series ever since it killed it's competition. Yeah I rest my case.
Orionsaint's Avatar
Orionsaint at 01/13/2008 23:05
When's the last time EA really tried to make any new innovations in it's Madden series? It's the same crap every year, with a few addons and tweaks
Promagnum's Avatar
Promagnum at 01/13/2008 23:06
@Orionsaint
"Competition inspires creativity"
I'm not to sure about that. If you think about it realistically, any true artist challenges himself rather than competes. All inventors eventually run out of ideas, it just depends on the mileage.

This poses a very interesting question though, I was just talking to a friend about this last week.
He is what you would call a Pro-Xbox-fanatic, I'm more on the fence because to me it has always been about the games, not what I'm running it on. But we both agreed that having one console may in fact bring the industry back to what it was about to begin with - gaming.
Could drop the over all increase in product costs (out of your pocket), and allow developers to focus more on the games rather than meeting the quos.
Either way, yeah I don't see it happening as I've never seen logic work in a corporation before.
Pacman's Avatar
Pacman at 01/13/2008 23:07
A unified system will never happen. There are plenty of reasons (I think a lack of competition is one) I believe this, but that's unimportant. However, I think Jaffe saying it's for the health of the business is contrived to say the least. The video game industry is doing better now in terms of supporting multiple systems than it ever has, and to be honest I don't think that will change in the foreseeable future.

Would it give gamers a uniform platform from which to play games? Sure. But I think we would lose games that are crafted for specific architecture alone.

Also, one media format is not always the consensus. CD may be the most common music format, but vinyl has made a resounding comeback in recent years, and mp3 and ogg formats are also popular with certain segments of the population. Hell, right now dvd and HD/blu-ray are competing for shelf space in the home (even if the latter are supposed to be the future of video). In my opinion, more choice is better.
Jonathan Holmes's Avatar
Jonathan Holmes at 01/13/2008 23:14
@ Lukich, I'm still using Windows XP, and I am a professional blogger, os what does that tell you? Tons of developers still make XP compatible software, so it's not a problem. In fact, I have never upgraded my OS... ever. Every five years or so I'll buy a new computer, and I do so for the hardware, not the new OS. It's nice that the new OS comes with it, but it's not a big deal.

Consoles should be the same way. All y'all arguing against a one console future need to remember that it's never happened. How do you know it will suck so bad? All I know for sure is how we have it today. You need to buy a $400 PS3, a $400 360, and a $250 Wii in order to play all the best games out there.

You can't tell me that this is an ideal arrangement.
Orionsaint's Avatar
Orionsaint at 01/13/2008 23:20
Where's that new ESPN 2K Football game to take us to the next level when we need it?
Velt's Avatar
Velt at 01/13/2008 23:25
Competition is important and is part of all industries, even videogames.

If you got a good product more developers will bet money on it, if you do things right you will sell a ton of those consoles.
If the first thing happens then it probably is because you have hit the right spot with the programing base.

One console or one programing format would only change the excuses. We would hear the developers going on about the weaknesses of the programing codes or the downsides of the "one console".

For us, the consumers, a monopoly on the programing or on the hardware is not good, not good at all.
Orionsaint's Avatar
Orionsaint at 01/13/2008 23:35
Lukich's Avatar
Lukich at 01/14/2008 00:03
Maybe I'm just short-sighted and am incapable of seeing what you guys see. I just don't see it.

I like that I was able to purchase the Nintendo Wii for $250. I like that once I make that initial investment, I can play every game that comes out for that system at its best and not have to use "medium" settings because I didn't upgrade to the most recent hardware. If a one console world is really the ideal situation, why not just convince everyone to develop games for the PC?
Boolean's Avatar
Boolean at 01/14/2008 00:10
Although it would never happen, a one console world would be great. I don't buy a console for the console, I buy it for the GAMES. Having one set of hardware for EVERY developer to makes games on would be a God send.
Jonathan Holmes's Avatar
Jonathan Holmes at 01/14/2008 00:33
@ Lukich. PC's give us the illusion of what a "one gaming OS" world would look like. But as of now it's just an illusion.

Sony, Nintendo, M$, all have consoles out. So technically it's a 4 format race, PS3, Wii, 360, and Windows XP, or Vista, or whatever they're doing now.

If there were no consoles, then we'd be able to look to PC's for what a one format gaming landscape would look like. But as of now we still don't know.
The_Psychopsilocybin's Avatar
The_Psychopsilocybin at 01/14/2008 01:12
A one console market would be impossible because there is always a company who is going to try to compete. When Nintendo created their first console it owned 85% percent of the market, but SEGA came in with the genesis and stole a little over half of the market. My point is that no one company can control the console war forever, because there is always new competition to try and take it.

While I'm sure everyone would like to live in this perfect world where one console can play all games but that world is impossible and communistic, so Dave is a commi-bastard.
GuitarAtomik's Avatar
GuitarAtomik at 01/14/2008 02:16
A one console future would NOT be a good thing. It wouldn't work either.

You can't compare it to the TV or DVD player market because those platforms aren't as complicated. If you put in a DVD today, it doesn't look any better than if it came out 10 years ago. The movie doesn't have graphics that need to scale up or down. DVD players don't have an online platform that needs to be played over. You don't have to choose between the "classic" controller or "motion" controller. The analogy just doesn't work.

This argument would have held up a little better before the Wii released but not anymore. The success of both the Wii and the Xbox 360 (and to a lesser extent the PS3) shows that there's a market for both types of consoles. High end, and low end.

Imagine if this ONE console used the same online strategy as Nintendo and that was the only game in town. Not cool. You could say that 3rd party companies could come up with their own online platforms and they could compete but then the user base would be split up again between them and every game would have to take those platforms into consideration. That's assuming this one console lets you use any other platform but it's own.

Imagine if the Wiimote was an optional controller that didn't come with the console. Would it still be a success? Do remember the Xbox motion controller that came seperately?

There's just too many variables in the video game market to compare it to any other platform. It would never work and if it happenned, it would NOT be good for the consumer.
Conrad Zimmerman's Avatar
Conrad Zimmerman at 01/14/2008 02:25
I like the idea of being able to make one hardware investment and have the capability to play every game that comes to market but I know in my heart that it just simply couldn't work.

We aren't going to stop buying games, that's a given. So, knowing this, a developmental standard OS would kill the advancement of new technologies in gaming. The single-console theory would result in a complete stagnation as the industry would have no motivation to lay out the R&D costs for new hardware. Why would they? We'd still be buying games for a fifteen year old system because there was nothing else available and we like video games.

Console makers made new consoles because they had to, because competition arose with more advanced hardware. This didn't come about because some philanthropist decided that they wanted the world to have more polygons and higher framerates.

And your argument about the DVD industry is utter crap. DVDs exist because of competition between television makers leading to the demand for greater resolution images, creating a competitive format against Laserdisc (despite the relative obscurity of that format) and the opportunity to make us all buy our VHS tapes again. Oh, and look at that! Now we have two new formats which might seem like they're competing with each other when the real fight is against DVD. Once one of the HD formats wins, it will slowly gain market share against DVD because it is a superior format.
Lukich's Avatar
Lukich at 01/14/2008 02:35
You know, I still don't get what this "gaming OS" is supposed to mean. What is he arguing that we should standardize? Looking through the comments and the replies you've made to mine, I don't know if we are talking about hardware or something else. So what the hell are we talking about?
skruloos's Avatar
skruloos at 01/14/2008 03:18
I love the idea of one programming format, however, it IS a pipe dream. On the plus side, having a level playing field will actually get developers to work harder at making their individual games stand out. This is good because third party developers might finally push the hardware as much as first party developers. Instead of relying on exclusives or crappy marketing strategies, they might actually have to develop good games that can push the boundaries of that one console. Competition will still exist between developers instead of console manufacturers.

The bad news is that the boundaries can only be pushed so far. There are only so many ways to trick a system or overclock it before it burns out. You'll eventually come up to a situation where the hardware simply won't go any farther.

That being said, this could also open up a new development space for third party hardware manufacturers of peripherals. Let's say we followed the DVD standard and console and game manufacturers formed a group to decide on a universal standard. Let's say that this console was top of the line, best of the best. Who is to say that at some point down the road, Nintendo couldn't create a peripheral like the Wiimote for alternate control schemes?

It's a good argument to be sure. I'm all for a one format future. But there would have to be a few requirements. The system would need to be around the $400 mark and have at least the power of the PS3/360. It would need an online service like Xbox Live. It would need a replaceable/upgradeable hard drive. It would need two forms of control: WiiMote-type and traditional. It would need at least 6 USB ports for future upgrade use. It would need built-in ethernet and WiFi. And the group would be required to set standards for new systems every 5-7 years or so. This way, we get a system that will be pretty well used for close to a decade until the next one comes out.
DarQraven's Avatar
DarQraven at 01/14/2008 03:56
I like the prospect of a one-console future or at least cross-compatible-consoles future, but I don't see it happening anytime soon. Not because of arguments against it, but because of money.
The day Microsoft helps any other company earn money is the day hell freezes over.;)

Still, I don't think hardware advancement would just stop. That's silly. As I read it, we're talking about consoles here, not PC's.
A single PC system is DEFINITELY not going to happen. That's farther away from all probability than Jaffe's plan. That market would still do R&D, and if the "one console to rule them all" lagged 15 years behind the PC, guess what's going to happen? People would buy a PC.

Also, the way EA and Ubisoft are going about their business now, is it really that unimaginable? The reason that games still have to be ported is that there are three competitors, all three with no desire to cut the others some slack, and all in it for profit and great justice. They also spend an assload of money buying up titles/developers (I'm looking at you, MS) to be (timed) exclusive to their system
Right now, the console makers have the largest interest in the publishing/sales of games.

--
If somehow a fourth party would come in between that did not mess around with systems, but instead bought up ALL titles and published them....they would have enough leverage to make big N, MS and Sony do whatever the hell they want them to.
And a unified code base would be one of their first interests
--

EA would probably want to do that, so would activision. Problem is, they're not big enough yet.
To quote the immortal words of Captain Will Turner: It's all a matter of leverage.
Or time. Or both. What the heck do I know...
prev next 50 comments

Returning Dtoiders: login now to post a comment

Destructoid is an open discussion community. You don't need to "audition" to post a comment - just Create an avatar now - it's fast and free: PLUS you also get your own gaming blog and begin posting stories and uploading videos in our open community area that may also appear on our home page. Sign up and we'll guide you through it, it's easy and 100% anonymous.




 Original Videos

 Reviews
Mad Dog McCree Gunslinger Pack
Overlord II
Yosumin Live!
Let's Tap
Ghostbusters: The Video Game (Wii)
View all Game Reviews

 Community blogs -   39764 Dtoiders!

This month's theme: Untapped Potential

New to Dtoid? Read the survival guide


 Originals

The best and worst '4th' videogames EVER!











more original Destructoid stories



 Popular now more













Destructoid is:
Nick Chester
Editor-in-Chief
Jim Sterling
Reviews Editor
Dale North
News Editor
Hamza Aziz
Community Manager
Anthony Burch
Features Editor
Rey Gutierrez
Video editor & director
Niero
Founder, publisher
Letters to the editors
tips@destructoid.com
Associate Editors
Ashley Davis Jonathan Holmes
Brad Nicholson Jonathan Ross
Brad Rice Jordan Devore
Chad Concelmo Matthew Razak
Colette Bennett Tom Fronczak
Conrad Zimmerman Topher Cantler
Dyson Samit Sarkar
Contributors
Adam Dork
Ben Perlee
Daniel Lingen
Joseph Leray
Joe Burling
Mikey
Will Maddock
Stella Wong




get involved

register or login
post a blog
post a forum
enter a contest
discuss a review
contribute a news tip
write a guest editorial
support

new member's guide
login assistance
tech support
report abuse
email our editors
read our dev blog
nuclear crisis?
keep in touch

RSS feed
Twitter
Facebook
Myspace
Flickr
Game nights
Meet-ups
seriously

about us
advertising
terms of use
privacy policy
jobs at MM
buy our crap
our network

Tomopop
Japanator




Destructoid is an independently-run publication forged by our love of video games and the gaming community's need of accountable enthusiast press
living the dream since March 16, 2006