If Red Steel were worth playing, than it could only work on a console with motion controls, and rely exclusively on said controls. Now while I frankly don't care what Ubisoft does with Red Steel 2 after they release it, I would greatly appreciate knowing if it is a game worth playing. I have eard many complaints about clunky controls from non-journalists, and having never seen a negative preview from a game journalist, I don't really care for their opinions on the matter until they make the review (which is often significantly more critical).

I really want Red Steel 2 to be a worthwhile game, but I can't tell without playing it. Has anyone demoed the game to say how the controls are?

Red Steel was the single most disappointing game ever. Why should owners of the Nintendo Vagina be the only ones to experience it? The entire world should feel the sadness that only Red Steel can deliver.

I'm with Phantomile (in the Twilight zone).

@ Your moms hot lover

LOL agreed! Although RS2 looks promising. Well have to wait and see.

well, if a game wants to become 'real', it needs to be on a 'real' system.
the casuals have the wii - it's yours, you win!
stay outta my xbox/ps3!

I'm pretty sure the only reason anyone would buy Red Steel is if they only owned a Wii.

If Wii owners are too good for it then you're not going to find someone on the 360 or PS3 who wants it either Ubisoft!

@Ender_x

Being on a real system will not make a game good especially one as flawed as Red Steel.

"This isn't a well regarded series by any stretch of the imagination"

I really couldn't care less about Red Steal either, but come on don't over-exaggerate how bad the series is. First off, only one game has come out for the so called "series" so far, and it was a launch game with problems. It didn't review all that well, but it was still a million seller none the less. So If Red Steal 2 comes out, gets good reviews and sells really well, are you saying that people should ignore that fact and not like the franchise just because they screwed up the quality of the first one?

If it turns out to be a good a game, than it could be cool on other platforms as well, because the cell shaded artstyle looks cool, but I can't see Ubisoft putting it on any other system though. Just for the fact that it would lose face with Nintendo and right now the Wii is a cash-cow for Ubisoft, so I can't see them doing it anytime soon. Plus this is just a producer of the game, so he was probably asked the question at PAX and answered it from what he would want to happen. So of course he would love for the game to be on every platform, then he would have a secure job for the next few years.

Just give me No More Heroes for 360...

"Sorry Nintendo.... The first one really really sucked bad..."

Why would you say sorry to Nintendo? It's Ubisoft's game, so Nintendo had nothing to do with the development of the first game, or the second one for that matter. Its just on their console, but they didn't make it!

I think Red Steel would work a hell of a lot better on a different console. RS2 I still have no opinion on since I haven't played it yet. In all honesty I wouldn't mind more RS tho.