Quantcast


Climax dev dumps on rail shooters, recalls Dreamcast photo

Climax made Silent Hill: Shattered Memories, and I liked that game. But I also liked Resident Evil: Darkside Chronicles and Dead Space: Extraction, two games that Climax's Sam Barlow kind of dumps on. His dumping point? The rail shooting aspect.

Barlow on rail shooters: "Without badmouthing people, a lot of the games they've been complaining about are rail shooters and a rail shooter wouldn't have sold no matter what platform you put it on because it's a rail shooter and that's a niche genre that had its heyday back in the Dreamcast."

I don't think that's what really held them back, though. I think it has more to do with the Wii audience and what type of game they expect. Of course, Climax is feeling pretty good about the "mature game" audience on the Wii after releasing Shattered Memories. While I loved Shattered Memories, I'd argue that the other two were definitely more "mature" than it was.

Destructoid, are you so opposed to rail shooters that you'd write a game off as quickly as Barlow did? I replayed Panzer Dragoon last month, so don't ask me.

Silent Hill dev: On-rail shooters died with Dreamcast [CVG]








More gaming stories around the web. Got news? Submit yours to tips@destructoid.com

Dale North is Destructoid's Editor-In-Chief, a founding editor, and specialist in Japanese gaming. An accomplished musician, Dale was reporting from Japan during the earthquakes of 2011. Luckily, he got the fuck out alive and is home in America now with his wife and beloved corgi, Einstein. Dale is also a co-founder of Destructoid's sister anime site Japanator. Likes Corgis, Sega Saturn, PSP, iPhone, Photographic tools. Meet the rest of the team



Post a comment! You can also post a photo below:

Comment with Facebook





Click connect and comment instantly!

Comment with Dtoid





New? SIGN UP - it takes 5 seconds

39 comments | showing # 1 to 39
prev next

RenegadePanda's Avatar - Comment posted on 01/22/2010 13:22
RenegadePanda
I love lightgun shooters, I'm still waiting for another Guncon 3 game for PS3 (since TC4 sucks), and I still go back and play Ghost Squad and HOTD on my Wii every now and then. And if I still had a CRT TV, I'd be playing Time Crisis 1-3 weekly.
Pushtrak's Avatar - Comment posted on 01/22/2010 13:37
Pushtrak
I'd never buy a light gun game new or at full price.
Gen Eric Gui's Avatar - Comment posted on 01/22/2010 13:39
Gen Eric Gui
Wait what.

Dead Space/RE being more "Mature" then Shattered Memories? How so? You have a point if all you consider mature is blood and violence, but in terms of the game being more in tune with a mature audience and being thematically mature, then you're dead wrong, and I can't really see how you'd even come to that conclusion.

And no, he's right. Rail shooters are going to sell like crap no matter where they are released, because as much as certian people (myself included) like them, there are a million others who won't touch them. And the fact that companies like Sega and even gamers themselves are writing off Mature games on the Wii becuase of poor RAIL SHOOTER sales is pure insanity. When a game with the polish and love of Bayonetta comes out on the Wii and sells poorly, you'll have a point to make. When the only evidence you can point at is Mad World and Rail Shooters selling poorly, you need to rethink your damn position.
danthemagnum's Avatar - Comment posted on 01/22/2010 13:40
danthemagnum
Yeah, rail shooters are a rental at best for me. At least, one's that use the Wii Remote.
Jumbo's Avatar - Comment posted on 01/22/2010 13:42
Jumbo
I just picked up a copy of Panzer Dragoon Orta the other day. That game is dope.
Chris Carter's Avatar - Comment posted on 01/22/2010 13:45
Chris Carter
Fuck, Panzer Dragoon (especially Orta) transcends the rail shooter genre. It's in it's own league.
Klarden's Avatar - Comment posted on 01/22/2010 13:46
Klarden
Depends on the game. Usually rail shooters just don't have a lot of content to keep you interested. But there are great examples. And great experiments based on rail shooter formula (killer7)
jawshoeuh's Avatar - Comment posted on 01/22/2010 13:48
jawshoeuh
Not into rail shooters myself... at least not enough to purchase them. They can be good times for sure, but I can kind of agree with his Dreamcast heyday comment... the thrill is mostly gone for me these days.
LK4O4's Avatar - Comment posted on 01/22/2010 13:54
LK4O4
Lightgun shooters certainly aren't bad games, but I'm certainly not going to pay $50 for one. I think this guy has a point here. The Dreamcast was really the last time simple arcade-style games thrived on consoles.
flabzilla's Avatar - Comment posted on 01/22/2010 14:00
flabzilla
There ok now and again, but 3 high profile rails shooters in one year is a bit much, especially after the previous year of old rail shooter ports.

Plus two of them are franchises that are usually third person shooters and pretending that your bringing the same kind of experience as the original games across isn't going to work.
The Silent Protagonist's Avatar - Comment posted on 01/22/2010 14:12
The Silent Protagonist
Rail shooters get a bad rap because of length, which is because they adapted an arcade-style mentality that many alleged "hardcore" gamers just never grew up on. It doesn't help that these people associate length with dollar value, which is also a big misnomer.

Then again, these are also likely people that expect a story driven experience, which is why we have stupid shit like Story Mode in Tekken 6. That's not a railshooter, but why the fuck does it need a story mode. I hit the other guy, he falls down - that's the story.

Shooters are the same way - its about shooting the fuck out of things. Its not like I knew the shambling corpse that wants my brains anyway. If I have a gun that can take down an alien mothership, all I need to know is the gun is that powerful, I'm not going to look for a backstory there, just getting the fastest time or highest score I can.
FatherChesz's Avatar - Comment posted on 01/22/2010 14:15
FatherChesz
I've picked up plenty of rail shooters over the last year. I'm not normally inclined to buy them at full price, but exceptions have been made for Resident Evil.
Spectreman's Avatar - Comment posted on 01/22/2010 14:24
Spectreman
* Onrail shooters are the perfect rent, but never worth full game price.
Adam11's Avatar - Comment posted on 01/22/2010 14:28
Adam11
Hate to say it but I agree w/ Climax. I love Dead Space & Resident Evil but rail-shooters are just 0% interesting to me. I haven't played the rail-shooters but Shattered Memories is pretty "mature." And I don't even mean it has T & A. The themes and ideas are geared towards a mature audience, how we deal with death, depression, drug-use, etc.
ProperlyParanoid's Avatar - Comment posted on 01/22/2010 14:31
ProperlyParanoid
I fail to see how Resident Evil is more mature than Silent Hill.

Anyway, if rail-shooters were cheaper I would get them, but I won't pay 50 dollars for a 6 hours long game in which I can't even move.
spoot-smeg's Avatar - Comment posted on 01/22/2010 14:38
spoot-smeg
I do enjoy rail shooter games :)
Ganjookie's Avatar - Comment posted on 01/22/2010 14:51
Ganjookie
I like rail shooters. They feel like a good ole arcade zombie shooter or Time Crisis type game.
ponceturtle's Avatar - Comment posted on 01/22/2010 14:57
ponceturtle
Woa wait there is a misunderstanding with the rail shooting thing. Star Fox is not a rail shooter. Star fox is a shooter similar to 1945, ikaruga or sin and punishment you still have control of your character and what you decide to do. Rail shooters like RE DC and Dead space EX doesn't give you any control even if you decide the path you want, all you do is shoot and kill 3 enemies move foward and kill 3 more getting boring the second time around.
thomascirca's Avatar - Comment posted on 01/22/2010 15:03
thomascirca
Rail shooters definitely have a place in the market. However, I will agree that rail shooters haven't been the same since the Dreamcast days. I'm surprised no one has mentioned Rez, that was quite an unique rail shooter. It's hard to throw a blanket over rail shooters since there's so many types; they span from Area 51 to Starfox to Dead Space and beyond.
fulldamage's Avatar - Comment posted on 01/22/2010 15:08
fulldamage
Rail shooters are tricky. At a basic level, you can sit someone down in front of a rail shooter (even better if it's co-op) and guarantee something of a good time, briefly. For an arcade, they're perfect. But as an entertainment investment these days, they seem fairly lightweight compared to titles from other genres in terms of content; really closer to a "toy" than a video game in terms of depth.

It would be nigh-impossible to get me to drop money for a rail-shooter these days unless it is phenomenal - but, that said, Rez and Panzer Dragoon Orta are all-time favorites of mine for sheer fun. And the vehicle levels in RE5 were rail-shootery and generally good times! (goddamn you, NDesu on professional mode. Damn you straight to rock troll hell.)
True Axiom's Avatar - Comment posted on 01/22/2010 15:10
True Axiom
Rail shooters are okay in concept, however they are usually kind of generic (with the major, major exception of Rez) and their invariably quite short, which means that, especially today when it's so easy to rent games instead of buying them.

Also, the comment about RE: On Rails and Dead Space: On Rails being more mature than Silent Hill: Shattered Memories is *ludicrous, and I cannot begin to respond to it because the shrill laughter is making it hard to type. Yes, two games about obliterating zombies into masses of red goo are more mature than a game about personal struggles and violence combined. That's like saying Se7en is less mature than Saw because the latter has more blood. That Titanic is less mature than Jugs XVIII because the latter has more breasts. It's completely ridiculous.
Blue Odeyssey's Avatar - Comment posted on 01/22/2010 15:20
Blue Odeyssey
On the Wii, great otherwise its just not worth the investment.
KingSigy's Avatar - Comment posted on 01/22/2010 15:34
KingSigy
Railshooters are great, though. The Dreamcast just had some stupid gun law or whatever that prevented a first-party model from coming out.
Xzyliac's Avatar - Comment posted on 01/22/2010 15:58
Xzyliac
I'd never take a shit on rail shooters overall as there are some I quite like however I think he raises a very valid point. The best rail shooters (as evidenced by the comments) had their days. Now does that mean the genre is no good anymore? Not really. It just means that developers don't put out as many rail shooters with the quality of some of the older stuff before we figured out how to make 3D space really work to our advantage.
Holyetheline's Avatar - Comment posted on 01/22/2010 16:16
Holyetheline
I LOOOOOOOOVE Shattered Memories... On rails shooters really aren't the popular with me anymore but I used to enjoy them quite a lot. I think he's partially right but they're still a fun genre.
ICLHStudios's Avatar - Comment posted on 01/22/2010 16:24
ICLHStudios
My problem with on rail shooters is not that they inherently suck or anything, some of them are really great games, the problem is that there has never been an on the rails game that would not be made many times better if you had full control over character movement (with of course some alterations to the level design to accommodate that), so when those games come out in modern times it comes across as incredibly lazy and falls flat next to the gameplay of real FPS'.
EdgyDude's Avatar - Comment posted on 01/22/2010 16:35
EdgyDude
I'm not much into rail shooters (HOTD:O didn't do crap for me), but i did like RE:DC and DS:E (BTW, RE:DC > DS:E) that said i'm with Gen Eric Gui here, the Wii's problem with "mature" games is that maturity is mainly based of gore and cursing and so far not one game has been given true full AAA treatment (development, promotion, quality assuurance).

Madworld lacked hard in the replay and gameplay department. Silent Hill Shattered Memories (which i loved) lacked in the promotion department, calling it re-imaging was a complete mistake, people saw it as a remake even though it wasn't mostly due to developers way to mask things on the Wii "it's not an on-rail shooter, its'a first person guided experience" ¬_¬ .

IMO developers have by this point poisoned the proverbial well, pretty stupidly if i may add, if you consider that development on the Wii is already a fraction of what it is for PS3 and X360 instead of investing part of the savings into good promotions they have been pretty damn stingy AND released subpar games ( spin-offs, motion control remakes and ports) to boot. They expected cash cows for low input and they failed and now we are all paying for it.
Klempky's Avatar - Comment posted on 01/22/2010 17:02
Klempky
As stated above, Panzer Dragoon and Star Fox are definitely not rail shooters, but are basically shmups with an extra axis of movement, which I'm all for.

With that out of the way, I honestly have never seen the appeal in rail shooters. Sure, I've played them here and there at the arcade, but to actually bring one home isn't an investment I'd like to make. If I wanted to point and click wildly, there are plenty of flash games out there that offer that, and if I really wanted to, I could probably get tits as a reward, all for free. Not my bag, is all.
Zcdrike's Avatar - Comment posted on 01/22/2010 17:11
Zcdrike
I'd agree that Dead Speace Extraction was a mature game, but House of the Dead Overkill and Resident Evil are fairly juvinile especially in terms of plot and character development. I think that Mature games that are marketed properly sell just as well on the Wii as they do on 360 and PS3, but most publishers just throuw them into the market with only some minor web and magazine ads then act surprised when nobody bought the game because nobody fucking knew it existed unless they read Nintendo Power or Nintendo World Report.
bobyoko's Avatar - Comment posted on 01/22/2010 20:01
bobyoko
so, i usually fall on the side of mot liking rail games, usually. i have to say that re:dc is a really good game, despite it's inherent lack of directional controls. it is far longer than the usual 6+ hrs you usually get from a rail game, and it also has some depth in that you can upgrade all the weapons. i'd like to thank dtoid for sending it to me on the free this month, you guys rock!

as for silent hill, i'm dying to play it. just waiting until i get through the half dozen games i got for christmas this year. i'll apologize in advance if i have to purchase tats v capcom first, however, as that game MUST join my collection.
RchardNixon's Avatar - Comment posted on 01/22/2010 20:30
RchardNixon
I love rail shooters, but most of them are pretty short. I usually just rent them and finish them quick. If they were longer or cheaper, I'd start buying more of them. I know I'm definitely buying Sin and Punishment 2 though. That looks amazing. And If they would come out with a good Starfox game, I would buy that as well. The first two Starfox games are still fun to play through. This article reminded me, why isn't there a Panzer Dragoon on the Wii? That would rule. The Wii is perfect for these type of games. Just make them longer or cheaper or add replay value or something. As it stands now, most of them are just rentals.
Face's Avatar - Comment posted on 01/22/2010 21:10
Face
I like rail shooters. This guy is not badmouthing them. He is just saying a rail shooter is a hard sell in todays market. And I absolutely agree with that statement.
destructony's Avatar - Comment posted on 01/22/2010 23:06
destructony
My money's still waiting for a Time Crisis re-make
pedrovay2003's Avatar - Comment posted on 01/23/2010 00:02
pedrovay2003
I don't get why people dump on rails so much. I loved the ones that were released on the Wii so far.
GohanGVO's Avatar - Comment posted on 01/23/2010 00:42
GohanGVO
He's not dumping on the genre; rather, he's commenting on why it's a bit absurd that EA and Sega are disappointed with the overall sales of their on-rails shooters for the Wii.

Protip to EA and Sega: You can't sell an appetizer as a main course and expect to make money.
AdamantiumHip's Avatar - Comment posted on 01/23/2010 13:53
AdamantiumHip
Im sorry but people who complain about a game being a rail shooter are morons. You might as well bitch about rpgs, or first person shooters, or rag on ANY genre. Not to mention rail shooters are perfect for the wii's controls.
AdamantiumHip's Avatar - Comment posted on 01/23/2010 16:27
AdamantiumHip
not to mention, extraction and darkside were damn fine games, on rails or not, what does it matter if they were fun, well made games? It's not like there's a vast amount of mature, well made, good games on wii. and now thanks to people like this idiot who thinks on rails = suck, we are likely to see even less good games on wii than before. when silent hill finally gets to the uk, it makes me sad to think that because of the wii's audience mainly being morons, it will probably be one of the last genuinely good and mature games for the system.
Pyrex is Metal's Avatar - Comment posted on 01/23/2010 21:37
Pyrex is Metal
Am I really gonna hafta come out and say it, his point is BS, on the reasoning that shattered memories sold like ass. It ain't the shooters, it's the audience. And throwing out legnth is jacked cause all the shitty shovelware sells just fine half the time.
Pyrex is Metal's Avatar - Comment posted on 01/23/2010 21:41
Pyrex is Metal
Also @Lucas Says

have you watched Se7en AND Saw. Se7en is more mature, no argument there, but it is also bloodier as Saw 1, by slot, as Saw 1 had very little on screen blood and gore. Try busting out a slasher like Bloody Valentine 3d with that comparison.

Not hatin' just sayin'
prev next

Comment with Facebook





Click connect and comment instantly!

Comment with Dtoid





New? SIGN UP - it takes 5 seconds

Comments policy

Destructoid is an open discussion community. You don't need to "audition" to post a comment - just speak your mind. We respect differing opinions on the site, so have at it. Be smart, funny, insightful, clueless, or cute -- but back it up with substance. Keep your cool, keep it fun. We only ask that you act respectfully and above all: don't be a troll and ruin it for everyone else. Don't bring down gamers or we'll, you know, gently shoot you in the face and stuff you into a flaming mailbox. Each comment is your opportuntity to make this community awesomer. Is that even a word?

Avoiding the banhammer only requires common sense: spamming, trolling, racism, NSFW stuff, and other forms of sucking will not be tolerated. If anyone is griefing please report abuse. Be good. Don't suck!