Quantcast


Clearing up some PS3 Oblivion misinformation photo

Today I met and spent significant time with Bethesda and their most important title, Oblivion. I spent half of my day playing the expansion for the Xbox 360 and PC, Shivering Isles, and the other half playing the PlayStation 3 version of the title.

While messing around, I cleared up a few rumors floating around about the PS3 version of the game. I'd like to share them with you and make sure you can seperate the truths from the lies:

Rumor: To decrease loading time, the developers put five versions of the game on the Blu-ray disc of the PS3.

Truth: Not true. They squeezed all the content of one game, not five. Load times are not drastically reduced across the board either. Most loads will not take as much time as they do on the 360.

Rumor: The PS3 version will not be able to accept downloadable content -- specifically horse armor -- because of the machine's limitations.

Truth: A rep for the game said this was also false. He said their ability to do downloadable content relies on the permission of Sony and how they want to handle microtransactions, not any restrictions that may exist on the PS3 hardware.

Finally, a random fun fact: The PlayStation 3 version of Oblivion supports up to 720p -- but you should know, the game looked much better on Sony's console. 








More gaming stories around the web. Got news? Submit yours to tips@destructoid.com



Post a comment! You can also post a photo below:

Comment with Facebook





Click connect and comment instantly!

Comment with Dtoid





New? SIGN UP - it takes 5 seconds

46 comments | showing # 1 to 46
prev next

Fenris's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/12/2007 14:10
Fenris
I have read that the 360 version will have an update to the shaders on the graphics engine to bring it up to par with the PS3, is that true?

Toneman's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/12/2007 14:11
Toneman
780p? Is this some sort of new hybrid of 720p and 1080p?
bluexy's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/12/2007 14:14
bluexy
So is it worth buying a PS3 yet?

Thank god Sony has their publishers/developers to pull their shit together and make this a decent console.
ZekeThePlumber's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/12/2007 14:14
ZekeThePlumber
Actually 780p is the one and only true HD. Don't let anyone tell you otherwise.
World Famous's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/12/2007 14:15
World Famous
Fixed it Tone, sorry. It's been a long day and past few days.

I personally don't like Oblivion, but it does look much better on the PS3. As with a lot of games, they just look sharper on the PS3 than they do on the 360.
CannibalCalvin 's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/12/2007 14:15
CannibalCalvin
I dont think this would be a reason to buy a ps3. Its a port of a game you can get on a cheaper system.

No wait, THERES BLUE-RAY! ALL HAIL BLUE-RAY! MASTER OF THE NEXT GEN! WE ARE NOT WORTHY TO STAND IN ITS PRESENCE!
World Famous's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/12/2007 14:16
World Famous
Yes, the 360 version will get the same upgrade the PS3 version boasts.
HarassmentPanda's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/12/2007 14:20
HarassmentPanda
Summa, I know the new pixel shader is supposed to drastically improve the look of the game (particularly with objects in the distance). But, how did the game look on PS3 without any anti-aliasing? I'm sure it was sharp, but was it jaggy at all?

I have this game on 360, but never really got into it; still interested in maybe trying it again one day.
Namelessted's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/12/2007 14:21
Namelessted
oh cool, Summa got to actually talk with them about it. I read some of this on IGN yesterday and thought it was interesting. Now I am going to sound like a fool on the Podtoid when it comes out as I yelled about this. But still, it shouldn't be difficult to put downloadable content onto the PS3.
Mrs_Violence's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/12/2007 14:22
Mrs_Violence
hmm still not going to turn my head..it looks great on the 360, and my hubby and i would know..I watched all 120 hours of gameplay..(plus still going with the new knights of the nine quests)..and it looks fantastic...i wouldn't go and buy a 600 dollar console just to see a game that already looks perfectly fine to me..And blue ray can go and suck it..
360 FO LIFE!!!!!!!!!!
Namelessted's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/12/2007 14:24
Namelessted
What they really need to fix is collision detection with creatures "twitching" down hills crazily after you kill them. That and when I am running on a slight downhill slope i manage to run faster than gravity pulls me down, then i fall and get hurt. THAT is what needs to get fixed.
danc4498's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/12/2007 14:25
danc4498
I know that part of the reason it looks better is because of the new shader engine they made for the game. But apparently that same engine is going to make it's way to the 360 by way of an update, or something like that.
Toneman's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/12/2007 14:25
Toneman
Oh 720, ok. When it said 780 I wasn't sure if you meant 720 or 1080. Hurray for fixes!
Snaileb 's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/12/2007 14:25
Snaileb
120 hours? Fuck that.
World Famous's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/12/2007 14:28
World Famous
I didn't notice any big jaggie problems. It just looked better to me, that's about it.
relik's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/12/2007 14:30
relik
Is there going to be extra achievements on the 360 expansion?

Mrs_Violence's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/12/2007 14:34
Mrs_Violence
um dont know about the achievements..cause we didn't get any..AND YES OVER 120 hours Biatch!
Matthew Mac's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/12/2007 14:35
Matthew Mac
@Relik

I believe Bethesda took advantage of the new Achievement policy and added 250 achievement points to the Knights of the Nine expansion.
yaesir's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/12/2007 14:41
yaesir
I think they put AF16x on the game.

Because there wasn't any AF on the 360.
Fenris's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/12/2007 14:54
Fenris
I have to think that the sharper look has to do with the increased developement time.

I keep hearing people talk about how the PS3 will have better graphics, but I don't see how. The 360 has the better GPU, I can believe that it will have better physics down the road but I doubt the graphics.
World Famous's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/12/2007 14:58
World Famous
Fenris, to me, most games look better on the PS3. They have a certain sharpness in person that the 360 versions do not.
Dot's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/12/2007 14:59
Dot
"Finally, a random fun fact: The PlayStation 3 version of Oblivion supports up to 720p -- but you should know, the game looked much better on Sony's console. "
According to the latest rumors, the new shaders that facilitate this will eventually make their way to the PC/X360 versions via either a patch or the Shivering Isles expansion itself.
Justice's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/12/2007 15:00
Justice
Does it come with shivering isles and the other expansion included?
Liquid Pig's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/12/2007 15:01
Liquid Pig
I think its funny how Summa says that most ps3 games look sharper then on the Xbox 360. Yet all the reviews on major sites, IGN and Gamespot state the exact opposit. So how can we believe the guy when he says this one looks sharper?
Snaileb 's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/12/2007 15:05
Snaileb
Because Summa can cure aids. Why would you contradict someone who can cure aids? Are you a terrorist?
Fenris's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/12/2007 15:06
Fenris
Is it on games that were previously released on the 360? If so I would tend to think it was the longer development cycle, but I don't know. I pretty much figured that the rendering would be GPU related.

In the end it doesn't really matter, I have my console of choice and am enjoying it. I was just curious.
Cyberxion's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/12/2007 15:17
Cyberxion
Snaileb, I'm a terrorist! But that has nothing to do with why I think that Summa is off on his estimation, when it flies in the face of everything pretty nearly everyone else has ever said.

But then I remember that this is just a blog, and while there is a certain level of polish to the proceedings that might give people the idea that these guys are highly paid professionals, they're just regular joes, passing along info and giving their opinions on stuff relating to our mutual hobby. While often entertaining, it hardly rates above your average forum post in terms of importance.

In other words, regardless of whether or not he's right, Summa is free to say whatever he wants about anything he wants, and it will never matter much, aside from the value one might get out of having his unique personal insight. And on that point, your mileage may vary.
mix's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/12/2007 15:24
mix
Defending Summa here...Most of the screen shots comparing games on those sites also look better to me. The 360 shots were more colorfull; whereas, the PS3 ones were more life like, darker and sharper. Its all based on persoal preferences, some may like the Wii over the other systems....
Bob Arctor's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/12/2007 15:28
Bob Arctor
So should I buy it for the PS3 or the 360? I do need another game for both, does the expansion not come with the PS3 version, is it still seperate via download?

With people talking about a game that comes out later than the other and looking better what about VF 5 which version to buy then? Is the Xbox going to look better because it comes out later? Also acheivements pts
Is it me or is my PS3 collecting dust because its glossy or because I'm not playing it?
mix's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/12/2007 15:33
mix
The glossy attracts the dust.......trust me, but not playing it is a factor.
World Famous's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/12/2007 15:35
World Famous
I don't really care what other sites say, I can only go by what my eyes see and have seen.

And no, the PS3 version does not come with Shivering Isles content.

As far as the expansion coming for the PS3, they didn't say.
Aaron Mxy Yost's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/12/2007 15:36
Aaron Mxy Yost
Fact: the PS3 version of Oblivion has just a burlap sack filled with leaves for a body.
World Famous's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/12/2007 15:39
World Famous
Another note about 360 vs PS3 graphics: I personally think the differences between the two are more or less subjective, so to say I'm wrong or misguiding you because some other site said different isn't really valid.
mix's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/12/2007 15:41
mix
Every site can do a comparison and say what they like best, there is no right answer, just what you as an individual gamer likes.
Namelessted's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/12/2007 15:54
Namelessted
lick my nuts puppet. I still defend my position, i just have to alter my statement slightly. It is still true that if you downloaded the GTHD shit right aways you have to delete the whole thing and redownload it to get the updated version.

also cocks.
World Famous's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/12/2007 15:56
World Famous
Oblivowned!
's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/12/2007 15:59
Neil
Summa = Rumor police!

I agree I noticed after spending a considerable amount of time with either the 360 or PS3 that the PS3 just looks crisper and sharper.
lukewind's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/12/2007 16:49
lukewind
I also got to see the PS3 version of Oblivion and while it was a bit sharper the textures are far superior on the 360. It really is not a big enough difference to mention but I guess that is why Summa does what he does..wink!
Namelessted's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/12/2007 16:55
Namelessted
Just to make a general statement because I have nothing better to do with my time. I think the differences between the Xbox 360 and the PS3 will be on par to or maybe less significant than the differences between the PS2 and the Xbox.
Ashdate's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/12/2007 16:55
Ashdate
Are you sure the 'double-duping' information isn't real? I mean, it was reported in EGM as quoted by Todd Howard. We're not talking about some rank and file here, we're talking about the executive producer of the game:

http://www.gamesetwatch.com/2007/01/ps3_oblivion_seeing_double_to.php

I'm just saying that the likelihood you were lied to (intentionally or not) is there.

- Eddie
Cyberxion's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/12/2007 17:06
Cyberxion
That's the Summa. That what you're saying is an opinion, just as subjective as that of any forum poster out there, and that as such, the matter or whether or not you're right or wrong is rendered moot. It's your opinion, and people inclined to give you shit for it should remember that.

In other words, it was a joke meant to make a point. Ill thought out perhaps, seeing as it's backfired and all, but a joke all the same.

If I really thought that you were being ass backwards, regardless of whether or not I acknowledged that it was your opinion, I probably would've said something more about it than that. Really. I'm just that sort of asshole.

Cyberxion's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/12/2007 17:07
Cyberxion
The point. That's the point. Goddamn my lack of proofreading skills.
World Famous's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/12/2007 19:04
World Famous
I am not responsible for what other sites say or report. This is what a Bethesda Oblivion guy told me today and this is what I saw. If someone else from Bethesda says something else, then so be it.

I'm only telling you what I was told and saw.
Ashdate's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/12/2007 22:09
Ashdate
Well, when you actually didn't say "the Bethesda Oblivion Guy told me there wasn't that 'double-duping' that was rumored."

You said:

"Truth: Not true. They squeezed all the content of one game, not five. Load times are not drastically reduced across the board either. Most loads will not take as much time as they do on the 360."

I mean, sure you're not responsible for what other sites report, but you are responsible for what you say, and what you said wasn't "I was told they only have a single 'copy' of the game on the disc," but rather that all "'double-duping' rumors were completely false."

It's a big difference.

- Eddie
Liquid Pig's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/13/2007 00:10
Liquid Pig
namelessted the diffrence was huge, its not even close to that this time around.
killdozer69's Avatar - Comment posted on 10/04/2009 15:35
killdozer69
I know it's been awhile since Oblivion came out. But I have one HUGE compliant about it. I loved Oblivion. But because of the LIMITATIONS of the PS3, which I own, the whole game itself totally freaks out after around 459 hours of gameplay. That might seem like a lot of time, but for a game like Oblivion, it's not. Not if you spend time to build your character, and play every quest and do the shivering isles and Knights of the Nine quest, and try to explore every cave and ruin there is, as well as miscellaneous exploring. That's why the PS3 couldn't handle the other add-ons that were available for the PC and Xbox. So when all the time and effort I put in my 59.99 Oblivion game on my 399.00 console went bye-bye, that's when I decided that the PS3 is an inferior machine. Sony won't be getting any more of my money as far as video games go.
prev next

Comment with Facebook





Click connect and comment instantly!

Comment with Dtoid





New? SIGN UP - it takes 5 seconds

Comments policy

Destructoid is an open discussion community. You don't need to "audition" to post a comment - just speak your mind. We respect differing opinions on the site, so have at it. Be smart, funny, insightful, clueless, or cute -- but back it up with substance. Keep your cool, keep it fun. We only ask that you act respectfully and above all: don't be a troll and ruin it for everyone else. Don't bring down gamers or we'll, you know, gently shoot you in the face and stuff you into a flaming mailbox. Each comment is your opportuntity to make this community awesomer. Is that even a word?

Avoiding the banhammer only requires common sense: spamming, trolling, racism, NSFW stuff, and other forms of sucking will not be tolerated. If anyone is griefing please report abuse. Be good. Don't suck!