games  anime  |  toys
Destructoid is gaming news, community, videos, and sometimes love. Take the tour or jump in with Facebook:

 


Christian Children's Fund refuses donation from Gygax memorial fundraiser photo

As you may well be aware, Dungeons & Dragons creator Gary Gygax passed away this year. His memory was classily honored by geekfest GenCon, who raised over $17,000 in an auction for Gygax's favorite charity, the Christian Children's Foundation. The CCF, however, has decided to refuse the money.

Why? Because the money was raised with the sale of D&D merchandise.

I really cannot get over how myopic and frankly despicable that is. Because the money came from a gaming convention, apparently it's not clean enough for the good little Christian boys and girls that the CCF looks after. The group is claiming that this is about the "integrity" of its name, which it says it won't lend to events it had no hand in.

If you ask me, refusing the money shows a far greater lack of integrity than accepting a perfectly valid $17,000. Would the CCF had turned down a donation from a Church bake sale? Somehow, I don't think so. Filthy, Satanic D&D players, however, are not welcome.


Continue: More Religion stories





prev 50 comments
next 50 comments

107 comments | showing # 51 to 100

SnakeDude4Life's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/04/2008 11:30
SnakeDude4Life
Screw the CCF!

I hope somebody crucifies the shithead who refused the money.
Cube's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/04/2008 11:30
Cube
Im going to hell I played through all 6+ cds of Baldur's Gate 1 and 2.

and worth it to be tainted I don;t even like kids anyway.
Sharpless's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/04/2008 11:32
Sharpless
I'm going to just skip the comments and reasonably assume that there's a lot of irrational and ignorant anti-religious sentiment. So let me say this:

I apologize, on behalf of these people. It was a dick move, and we should've graciously accepted it. The end.
John B's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/04/2008 11:33
John B
Jim ... Jim ... Jim ..

You should have known what any topic about a Christian group vs. a gaming group would have devolved into, especially when it comes to a Christian group spurning a gaming group who is trying to do a good deed.
Jim Sterling's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/04/2008 11:36
Jim Sterling
"You should have known what any topic about a Christian group vs. a gaming group would have devolved into"

Oh I did.

I just don't want it said that Jim never explained things clearly enough for those at the back of the class.
necrozen's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/04/2008 11:37
necrozen
When I was 12 the church told my grandma that D&D lead to satanism. That day she made me burn all my books in her fireplace. I had been buying them since I was 10, mowing lawns to raise the money.

While I was sad that I lost those books, I am happy this happened in the long run. It showed me, early on, how full of shit Christians can be and taught me to reject religion and embrace other philosophies marked with self empowerment, common sense, and intelligence rather than fear and ignorance. These were philosophies I may have otherwise ignored at the time.

D&D does not push people away from Christianity. I can say that dumb-ass Christians, however, seem, to be doing a great job of it.
moggle's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/04/2008 11:38
moggle
This is a bunch of bullshit. I could maybe understand it if they turned down the money if it came from Satan's Return to Earth Charity Fund, but this is Dungeons & Dragons, people! There's more brutality and "acts of evil" in the Bible than there is in the average tabletop game. To turn down that money is just quite silly and backwards, and the Christian Children's Foundation should be ashamed of themselves.
DinnertimeNinja's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/04/2008 11:39
DinnertimeNinja
@Bizznet,

The existence of THAT speaks horrible of the human race in general.

I feel cold and sad now.
Tubatic's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/04/2008 11:42
Tubatic
What's most unfortunate to me, is that the CCF is more or less denying a dying wish, in an indirect sort of way.

Because of the medium of the contribution, a person that wished to help a specific group of people cannot aggregate that money to those specific people.

Ideologies are what they are, but there's got to be some consideration for the children (no pun intended). So much black and white for a grey world . . .
MellowNinja's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/04/2008 11:47
MellowNinja
Again, it's their decision.

It may not be a great decision, but I wouldn't be so negative about it. I can see why it chose not to accept the donation.

A Christian foundation that doesn't want to be associated with magic and may easily be likened to Wicca or something similar. It's the same reason why a few Christian organizations distance themselves from the Harry Potter universe.

The thing is, the decision is coming from someone who doesn't really understand D&D. Same with the organizations distancing themselves from HP.

Maybe the decision maker thinks this was a drastic situation and wanted the donation, but believed that a small percentage may link D&D to something like Wicca. Granted, that most likely wouldn't happen, but it's that small chance that keeps them from accepting the donation.

Anyway, it's more involved than one would think. And yes, I think they should have accepted it based on the fact of D&D's creator liking that charity, and I'm assuming a Christian himself.

Not accepting frees them from making a long winded needless explanation of why the donation was accepted and why it would be acceptable.

On a side note, I still don't see why the few church organizations see harm in these games or Harry Potter type media. One only has to refer Lord of the Rings. That's one of the most infamous fantasy universes created by a well known Christian. It's full of magic. Harry Potter has a ton of Christian references as well.

As a Christian, I can see both sides to the argument. When there's a small chance someone may link something to Wicca or something similar, it's best to move away from it. I would prefer to do the opposite and explain the difference. However, there are those who find it easier to distance themselves.

Apparently, D&D has been associated with Wicca among the older conservative Christian groups after doing a quick and ACCURATE google search...
necrozen's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/04/2008 11:48
necrozen
"I can understand why they turned it down. I don't like it, but I understand. I imagine they get a great deal of money from the sort of people who still see D&D and the like as Evil. They have to be careful with their endorsements because it might end up costing them a good deal of potential donation money which, in turn, will hurt their cause."

Or they could have used this opportunity to enlighten their ignorant followers. Shown them that, not only does it NOT lead to Satanism, but the folks who do it are actually pretty swell dudes who EVEN donated some cash.

They instead took the easy way out and at the same time continued to support their followers ignorant notions.

But you know what, I wouldn't have expected any different. Sadly, this is the way it operates most of the time. Which is why they are always in the dark.
Citizen Erased's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/04/2008 12:03
Citizen Erased
Another case of religion warping people thinking into a horrific mess of contradiction and intolerance.

Way to go CCF!
You once again prove my point that religion is stupid.
GigaMach's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/04/2008 12:18
GigaMach
Here is the stated reason the CCF turned down the money:

"As [with] many non-profit organizations, CCF is selective in its endorsements or support in order to maintain the integrity of its name and logo. We cannot lend our name to an event for which we have no involvement. This decision should in no way be interpreted as CCF holding an opinion on Mr. Gygax, gaming enthusiasts or the game Dungeons and Dragons."

To assume anything else is to project your own religious beliefs on the organization. That goes for non-christians as well. If you think the CCF SHOULD have taken the money, you are imposing your beliefs on the CCF. If you think the CCF SHOULDN'T have taken the money because you think D&D is evil, you are imposing your beliefs on the CCF.

Whether you like the decision or not, the reason they made the decision was stated. Judging the decision for anything other than the stated reason is ignorant, unless you can point to proof that the stated reason is false.

As for the argument that they should have taken the money because "need is need", I would question the logic behind this. From a non-believers point of view, would you accept help from a Christian organization that made a point of letting people know they had given you help, in an effort to further their name and vision? A name and vision you DON'T believe in?

"But when you give to the poor, do not let your left hand know what your right hand is doing," Matthew 6:3

In this case, maybe the Gygax fund should have given anonymously if their concern was for the recipients and not for the act of giving.

In the same way, the Christian needs to determine what their motivation is to have an organization that helps the needy, and whether they are promoting their own name or the name of God.

Finally, I wonder what platform this comes under, Jim? Is D&D a Wii game? PS3? Maybe we change the tag line of Destructoid from "Hardcore Video Game Blog" to "Hardcore Video Game Blog until Jim Sterling Chooses to Voice his Political and Social Agendas"?

I'm joking, of course. Jim has NO agendas. Ever. ;-)
Jim Sterling's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/04/2008 12:21
Jim Sterling
GigaMech:

The money was raised and donated by GenCon, an event which Destructoid both attended and covered.

Nice try, although I'd been waiting for that one. <3
chadandjody's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/04/2008 12:35
chadandjody
Let's play devils advocate here for a minute.

What if NAMBLA had offered to donate CCF $10,000 and CCF turned them down? *Nobody* on this board (I hope) would be at all outraged. Why? Because it would be a consensus that NAMBLA is awful and we the Destructoid community don't approve of them. There would be no comments on "how dare they turn away money no matter who it's from".

Now, in reality, CCF has turned down money from Gygax. Detoiders are all in a nerd rage over it because we like Gygax. Well I'd guess CCF doesn't share our love for him. How does that not make Detoiders hypocrites?? "You can't turn down money from causes we like, just one's we dont like!"

<end devils advocate>
akathatoneguy's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/04/2008 12:41
akathatoneguy
@ Zanthax-

Why would you feel ashamed? I don't feel ashamed for every racist thing white people do, or every dumb thing America does abroad, or any other thing that someone that is *not* me but looks like me/lives where I live/believes in the same things does. It's not as if you personally refused the money. Don't overreact to all the atheists who want to generalize.

And before I get attacked, I am not a member of any particular religion, I'm just tired of know-it-all atheists using any possible reason to bash an entire group of people, many of whom are good people and are perfectly reasonable and tolerant.

I love how we all get angry when the dumb actions of a gamer who ends up murdering someone or killing someone for an Xbox 360 get used to make assumptions about all of us, but you guys don't mind turning the actions of a few ignorant Christians into a Christian bashing event.
Jim Sterling's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/04/2008 12:48
Jim Sterling
chadandjody:

I'll resist the urge to tear into that comment and just state that I am invoking the South Park "Dude, you fuck kids" clause. The clause that suggests that everything is thrown out of the window when it involves dudes who want to fuck kids.

The GenCon organizers don't advocate kiddy fiddling. NAMBLA does. Really, that's reason enough.
Triphoppin's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/04/2008 12:51
Triphoppin
disappointing once again, but what can you do right? people will think and do what they want no matter anything...differing opinions. I'm just disappointed that the children are the ones who will not benefit from this.
GunSlap's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/04/2008 12:51
GunSlap
Perhaps they should just create the "Gary Gygax Children's Foundation".
Extacet's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/04/2008 12:55
Extacet
Before anyone rails on me about a bias of some sort let me assure you I have no religious biases. But in my albeit limited experience working with non-profit organizations in america this doesn't seem that peculiar to me. Generally it would be odd for a NPO in America to accept a donation collected in their name without their consent.

You can take what I said or you can disagree with me, I'm not guaranteeing that they aren't bigots. But in my experience what their PR rep said is not that bizarre even if I don't agree with it.
chadandjody's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/04/2008 13:01
chadandjody
@Jim: The point isn't Nambla (although the court does accept your South Park defense) or GenCon, the point is most people are upset because they like Gygax and since they like Gygax they jump on the bandwagon of "CCF should take the money no matter where it comes from".

I'm merely trying to point out that it's not always okay to take the money, thus the extreme example of Nambla. Not everyone has our fondness of Gygax so who are we to nerd rage over when CCF doesn't want his money. Just because we like him doesn't mean everyone else has to.
necrozen's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/04/2008 13:08
necrozen
Even more sickening are the apologists who have to support this kind of nonsense because they are part of the same religion as the people who made this terrible decision.

You folks use as much word wizardry as you like to try and make this sound sensible. You've been doing it for years and I doubt you'll stop now. It's what keeps the church stagnant and repulses forward thinkers. Instead of educating people and growing outward you attempt to justify their wrongdoing, never daring to question it, covering it with layer after layer of bullshit -- no matter how insulting, confusing or hurtful it may be.

The bottom line is that they refused money because they have a history of wrongfully accusing D&D of leading to satanism and now they either accept the money and risk confusing the people they have programmed or turn it away and look like douche bags. Of course they aren't going to say it has nothing to do with his involvement with D&D in THE STATEMENT! Are you kidding me! You can't tell me that the only thing I can site in this argument is their OWN STATEMENT!

"I'm sorry sir. The thief said in his statement that he didn't do it, despite his history of theft we have to drop the case."

Attempt to spin it however you like, but those who know their history understand their motives.
aaronf's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/04/2008 13:11
aaronf
Sooo... why not give the money to another, more deserving charity? Religious charities ultimately exist for one reason: religious conversion. Secular charities actually want to do some genuine good.
necrozen's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/04/2008 13:12
necrozen
Shit, that should read: "Of course they ARE going to say..."

I get all flabbergasted when talking about stupid shit like this. Plus it is election day and I'm already at my wits end.
RICHARD BLOCKER's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/04/2008 13:14
RICHARD BLOCKER
@ BIZZNET

That shit is hilarious! Back in college I worked with this nut who was always passing me little books like that.
Extacet's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/04/2008 13:18
Extacet
necrozen,

I hardly think the knowledge of a history of conflict between the conservative side of a religion and D&D gives you the insight to 'understand their motives'. This is not the religion Christianity speaking here this is a single NPO that happens to be founded by Christians.
necrozen's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/04/2008 13:18
necrozen
"I'm merely trying to point out that it's not always okay to take the money, thus the extreme example of Nambla. Not everyone has our fondness of Gygax so who are we to nerd rage over when CCF doesn't want his money. Just because we like him doesn't mean everyone else has to."

So because the dude was involved with some books that have fake magic in them, the kids have to do without the money? Please tell me you are fucking joking man. Seriously.

You know the truth is that the church demonized D&D just like they demonize everything and it has bitten them in the ass. Of course they won't admit they were wrong! So the alternative is to turn it down.
Bioautographical's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/04/2008 13:22
Bioautographical
"Just because we like him doesn't mean everyone else has to."

It has nothing to do with who people like or don't like. Accepting their help for needy children isn't an endorsement. And yeah, anyone who would even TRY to compare the "evil" of D&D to the evil of kidfucking is just . . . good grief. That's not even apples and oranges. More like apples and kidfucking.
necrozen's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/04/2008 13:24
necrozen
@ Extacet

So you are telling me that:

(a) Christian groups have been demonizing D&D since I was a baby.

(b) Someone related to D&D has money raiseed in his name and attempts to donate.

(c) They refuse the money, saying that it hurts the integrity of their name.

(d) This is in no way related to their history of demonizing D&D.

Well. That is brilliant. I love how you come to that conclusion.
Extacet's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/04/2008 13:29
Extacet
Integrity of their name could have nothing to do with said demonizing. Again as I previously said, the laws for NPO organizations accepting money in america can be rather convoluted. So if the money was raised without their knowledge and consent, I don't know for a fact but I can see how it could cause them more touble than it could be worth for them, especially if they have tax exempt status.

I'm trying to look at this objectively, believe me I harbor no love of christianity. But you've already put out reasons yourself that you would be biased in this argument, and you're already making broad generalizations about a single organization based on the entie religion. You logic has leaps in it.
Garfogze's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/04/2008 13:32
Garfogze
This is why I'm always hesitant when people ask me if I'm a Christian. Not the best represented religion...
necrozen's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/04/2008 13:37
necrozen
@ Extacet

Excuse me for leaping a bit. You are trying to defend a group of people who have turned down money for children based on what? Taxes? Paperwork? Or maybe it's the fact that they've been demonizing his product for the last 30 years? Hmmmm....

I don't know. This is a tough one...

There is a chilling disinterest for the children who will miss that money in the "voice" of your comment. You speak of numbers and money and consent - they are a charity. If someone raises money and gives it to them, unless they are fucking Charles Manson, I don't see why they shouldn't take it!

And then you gloss over the churches history of demonizing D&D as if it shouldn't even matter. The reason people get away with shit like this is because people like you defend them, in my opinion.
GigaMach's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/04/2008 13:39
GigaMach
@ Jim: Good point. GenCon ranks for sure. I was just adding to the snark. My bad. You STILL have no agendas. <3

@ necrozen:
"You know the truth is that the church demonized D&D just like they demonize everything and it has bitten them in the ass. Of course they won't admit they were wrong! So the alternative is to turn it down."

First off, the CCF does not represent "The Church". That's like saying you, as a gamer, represent "The Gamers". Secondly, CCF is not withholding money from anyone. They are choosing not to accept and redirect the GenCon money. They did not take it then burn it, or spend it on something unrelated. The money was redirected, by the group, to another charitable org. that I'm sure is thankful.

Now, for my part: I do not condone the CCF's take on the subject. I don't see GenCon or Gygax or D&D representing anything that goes against the Christian Gospel. Just because I see the logic of a reason doesn't mean I agree, and I think this pertains to the other "apologists".

Necrozen, and much or Destructoid, you seem to have a strong sense of social justice. What are you involved with to further that? Do you have any ideas for alternatives?
Extacet's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/04/2008 13:46
Extacet
Why make a distinction between money from charles manson and D&D if money is just money? Just curious.

There is no disinterest in the children, the money will most likely make it to a different children's charity and I'm not that worried about where it will go. The Gygax camp are a good bunch of folks. All I'm telling you is based on what I've observed working with other groups. I hear what you're saying about them demonizing D&D, believe me. My Magic The Gathering collection faced much religious persecution ;). I wont say I agree with what happened, but I can see how in the crappy beurocracy that deals with non-profit organizations, things could get complicated.
chadandjody's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/04/2008 13:51
chadandjody
@GigaMach and Extacet,

It's pretty obvious by now this is just a chance for people to transpose their preconceived notions about Christianity onto an article that is really more about a business decision then anything else. Best to just move along.
eternalplayer2345's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/04/2008 13:53
eternalplayer2345
This is ridiculous, who are we to not except charity? They should be glad to take the money. This just proves that sometimes being christian isn't hard it's being grouped with these people.
necrozen's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/04/2008 13:55
necrozen
@ GigaMach

If they are a Christian Fund, how can their actions NOT speak for Christians? Why have it in the name then?

I, as a gamer, DO represent Gamers to Non Gamers - we, as humans, compile information based on observation. So while they do not, alone, represent Christianity, their actions get lumped in with all the actions of Christians I observe and I then form an opinion about it. I can't believe I have to explain this.

I understand that they didn't burn the money. But why redirect it? Why not take it? Why make a big deal about it then? Why put a negative spin on this positive gift of giving? That man wanted to leave a legacy and instead the charity makes it into this negative ordeal by not accepting it! Why?

And finally, you seem to speak negatively of Destructoid's strong sense of justice? Why? Is that wrong? Should we not be upset by this? Since you are the charity police, do I have to report my duties to you? Fine. I donate time, especially in the winter, to a small, non-religious soup kitchen and homeless shelter in Covington Ky. During the coldest nights we take turns staying open all night so they don't freeze to death. Is that good enough for you? Do you need more examples of my community action? I don't talk about it because I do it to better the world, not to brag. And I certainly wouldn't ask other people to give ME proof of their community action. That is really rude, I think.
Capn Birdseye's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/04/2008 14:10
Capn Birdseye
I don't see that refusing a donation shows a lack of integrity - they believe for whatever reason that D&D is teh debil, and accepting handouts from an associated organisation is definitely in line with their beliefs.

Whether they are nutcases or not is another story, but hey, it's their charity.
Capn Birdseye's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/04/2008 14:10
Capn Birdseye
I don't see that refusing a donation shows a lack of integrity - they believe for whatever reason that D&D is teh debil, and accepting handouts from an associated organisation is definitely in line with their beliefs.

Whether they are nutcases or not is another story, but hey, it's their charity.
necrozen's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/04/2008 14:23
necrozen
@ Capn Birdseye

True. But Christians act as if I don't have the right to criticize the decisions of Christian Organizations. Like it is an insult to them personally. I say, if you are insulted on behalf of a Christian Organization, then ask them to disassociate themselves from your religion or ask them to act rationally. But don't get up in arms when a corporation with your religion in their title does something stupid and I call them out on it. And it's not as if this was some little backwoods operation. This was the CCF. Any other non-christian corporation who denied a donation for reasons like this would be torn apart by now. But because they have christian in the title...
the Golden Avatar's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/04/2008 14:24
the Golden Avatar
Wow. I just realized that Destructoid has CCF ads. How ironic. At least we know Jim is willing to stick it to the man; even when that man is paying his bills.
GigaMach's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/04/2008 14:27
GigaMach
@ necrozen

No no. I'm sorry if it sounded like that. I mean that you have a noticeably strong sense of social justice, and I applaud that. I was honestly trying to find common ground, as opposed to focusing on our differences. I am certainly NOT the charity police. I really just wanted to look at the good we, as a gaming community, CAN do together, even as we have very different ideological differences.

Peace.
the Golden Avatar's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/04/2008 14:28
the Golden Avatar
http://dl.getdropbox.com/u/109257/CCF.PNG
necrozen's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/04/2008 14:37
necrozen
@ GigaMach

Excuse me if I come out on the offensive (read with sarcasm, your request seemed invasive), but it always seems that no one minds if I criticize wrongs -- unless of course it has something to do with Christianity, in which case people make exceptions and I get angry and start reading everything as an attack.
Jayson Napolitano's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/04/2008 14:54
Jayson Napolitano
Haha, wow. I own that Dungeons and Dragons box set that the image came from. That's oldschool stuff.
GigaMach's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/04/2008 15:14
GigaMach
@ necrozen

Thanks for the reconsideration. It is hard to be assertive on the internet without sounding attacking or sarcastic. Sorry again.
RWarrior1CO's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/04/2008 15:20
RWarrior1CO
What the hell? I've never gotten the crusade against by D&D by SOME Christians. You aren't supposed to be demons and devils in that game. They're enemies. You *kill* them. Come on.
Extacet's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/04/2008 16:36
Extacet
necrozen,

I'm not meaning to attack you either man, just wanted to register that. I just wanted to put out another possible side from a bit of experience I have with NPOs doing volunteer work on small computer networks :) Worked with an accountant for a year at a Big Brother's Big Sister's office and they had some finnicky ways about dealing with money. I don't think the system works very well.

I really do agree the judgement placed on games by the right wing of christianity is wrong, and I really just get it being a deist at best as fa as religion goes. My dad chucked my copy of Final Fantasy 7 back in the day, so I've had my differences too. I'd just hate for there to be animosity towards a group with a good cause over a possible misunderstanding you know?
AliasWyvernspur's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/04/2008 18:48
AliasWyvernspur
My mom had always gotten on my case about playing D&D, but she wasn't some crazed zealot who banned me from playing it.

(I guess you could label me as) a Christian, but I never saw any demonic things with D&D, or Lord of the Rings, etc. But then, I'm a geek, so I guess not...

...my Slayer CDs on the other hand...

I guess a way to tell if their excuse is legit is to see what other donations were either accepted or rejected. I'd do the research, but I'm lazy.

/shrug
Churchy's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/04/2008 19:07
Churchy
Grr... Why do jerks like this have to go aobut sticking other christians with this horrid stigma. As a christian if people sent me a bunch of money, unless it was illegally obtained I'd take it, especially if I was a charity.
prev 50 comments next 50 comments

Comment with Facebook





Click connect and comment instantly!

Comment with Dtoid





New? SIGN UP - it takes 5 seconds

Comments policy

Destructoid is an open discussion community. You don't need to "audition" to post a comment - just speak your mind. We respect differing opinions on the site, so have at it. Be smart, funny, insightful, clueless, or cute -- but back it up with substance. Keep your cool, keep it fun. We only ask that you act respectfully and above all: don't be a troll and ruin it for everyone else. Don't bring down gamers or we'll, you know, gently shoot you in the face and stuff you into a flaming mailbox. Each comment is your opportuntity to make this community awesomer. Is that even a word?

Avoiding the banhammer only requires common sense: spamming, trolling, racism, NSFW stuff, and other forms of sucking will not be tolerated. If anyone is griefing please report abuse. Be good. Don't suck!

 
New on Destructoid.TV play all videos

Loading
Loading Destructoid Videos


    Win this!
    Dive in! meetup+play for a chance to win a PC

    Dtoid Twitter    Got news?   tips@destructoid.com

    Reviews & Previews
    Crossfire Remote Pistol review
    Resident Evil: The Darkside Chronicles review
    Left 4 Dead 2 review
    Call of Duty: Modern Warfare Reflex review
    Arkedo Series - 02 SWAP! review
    more reviews
    Avatar
    GT Racing Motor Academy
    Bad Company 2 beta dishes out meaningful experiences
    Legend of Zelda Spirit Tracks
    Monster Hunter Tri
    more previews


    - The Dtoid Army is 50826 strong -

    Showing Cblogs with 3+ faps   show all

    Call for entries: do the wrong thing

    New to Dtoid? Read the survival guide




     Originals
    Jonathan Holmes: Why No More Heroes HD could mean a Wii total victory





















    More Destructoid Originals




     Popular now more






















    Team Destructoid   tips@destructoid.com
    Nick Chester
    Editor-in-Chief
    Niero
    Founder, publisher
    Jim Sterling
    Reviews Editor
    Hamza Aziz
    Community Manager
    Dale North
    News Editor
    Rey Gutierrez
    Video editor & director
    Anthony Burch
    Features Editor
    Colette Bennett
    Tom Fronczak Brad Nicholson
    Ashley Davis Ben Perlee
    Conrad
    Zimmerman
    Chad Concelmo
    Jonathan Holmes Jonathan Ross
    Brad Rice Jordan Devore
    Will Maddock Matthew Razak
    Dyson Joseph Leray
    Topher Cantler Samit Sarkar
         
      Dexter
    Adam Dork
    Daniel Lingen
    Hollie Bennett
    Joe Burling
    Mikey
    Stella Wong

    Josh Tolentino




     

     
      get involved

    register or login
    post a blog
    post a forum
    enter a contest
    contribute a news tip
    suggest a feature
    be a guest editor
    support

    new member's guide
    login assistance
    tech support
    report abuse
    email our editors
    read our dev blog
    nuclear crisis?
    keep in touch

    RSS feed
    Twitter
    Facebook
    Myspace
    Flickr
    Game nights
    Meetup+play online
    seriously

    about Destructoid
    advertising
    terms of use
    privacy policy
    jobs at MM
    buy our crap
    our network

    Tomopop
    Japanator
    Despingation?




    Destructoid is an independently-run publication forged by our love of video games and the gaming community's need of accountable enthusiast press
    living the dream since March 16, 2006