Beth made it clear that there wouldn't be DLC for PC, there's no point whining about it.

More brown environments with guns. It was novel at first, now you're bleeding the cow dry!!!

@PhazonYoshi

Don't you mean PS3?

Also, in light of this and The Pitt I've decided to wipe my savegames and restart clean. I've installed so many mods and custom texture packs that after this long into the game I can't remember which version is which.

just wait for the goty edition fallout, we ps3 owners can't get "dlc" but it don't say a thing about a disc based expansion in the form of the goty edition fallout. be patient and just watch, i'm willing to bet the ps3 will eventually get it, just on disc.

...Yes I did.

Anyway, yes, it's a bitch, but it wasn't exactly a secret, plus GOTY is likely.

@lub, you mean this entire generation?

@char

Probably because of the content level. All things considered all three DLC packs roughly equal Shivering Isles.

Looks really good. I do not understand why everybody complains about bugs and glitches, I've run into them, but thy never spoiled the game for me.

It's not a patch, it's a DLC. We can see now that the MQ ended so that Beth can continue the story later, after additional dev time. As additional content, you can't exactly say Fallout 3 wasn't packed with content by itself, can you?

I just dont like that the content is exclusive but you still have to pay for it. Like I always say, isnt that part of what the $50 XBL fee is for?

Yep, I give Beth the one finger salute as I fuck them out of my money that they seemingly didn't want anyway for these DLC's which I normally would be fucked out of.

It adds new perks too right?

@seph

$50 yearly is for the bandwith and the servers....I think.

@ de BLOO
Then what are they doing with all of the money they're getting from the advertisements littered all over XBL?

Also... does that header pic just scream "DONT CROSS THE STREAMS" to anyone besides me?

I'd like to see Beth drop some Oblivion into a Fallout DLC. Maybe something like the Postman. Visit the Pacific NW where people are few and far between, but everything isn't brown and dirty.

Hey everyone, did you see what Detox did there?

Made a post talking about the article at hand rather than just a single word in someone's comment?

Fallout 3 comments inevitably fall into two categories -- well-thought out responses to the topic at hand, and PS3 owners butthurt about the lack of DLC and/or pissed at Bethesda for some kind of slight.

If we could somehow refine internet whining into a sustainable fuel source, PS3 owners complaining about Fallout and Bethesda could power Nevada. Maybe one of you smarter folks can start working on that.

It was never a secret that the DLC would be exclusive. The inevitable Got Y edition will correct that so can we move on. I agree the, it would have made more sense to make this the first DLC. Regardless, I havnt been disappointed by Bethesda yet (ok a little by anchorage) so I'm looking forward to more Fallout. To bad most games can't offer this much gameplay for $60 - and they're an indepedent developers. Studio's releasing 6 hour games for $60 could learn a thing or two from Bethesda.

Char commented earlier. Don't get your panties in a bundle.

Doesn't make his post any more worthwhile... and seriously, do you think I take anything on the Internets serious enough that I would let it affect how I wear my panties?

P.S. Please don't tell the wife about my panty wearing issue.

I don't know why Ps3 owners are surprised. Bethesda made it clear whilst the game was in developement that the 360 was the LEAD platform, and the other versions would be ports. It makes sense to put your eggs in the basket that is most likely to sell in numbers. Seeing as Sony is now the prefferred platform for Japanese games, maybe they assumed that the take-up for a Westewrn RPG would be slower (I'd like to see the sales figures for the different platforms). Add to that, Bethesda were a PC dev house first and foremost, and Microsoft's obvious clout with PC devs, is something the 360 has that the PS3 does not. Afterall, was that not the Xbox's mission statement - to give the PC devs a console to work with, that could give them the tools that they used for PC games? I feel for the PS3 guys, because they are clearly losing out, not just here, but in many other instances also.

Comment about the actual article, rather than a reply to someone else's stupid comment:

Very cool. I loved the first two, even though the Pitt had me stressed out for about a day after launch because of all the problems, but it was nothing really. Waiting doesn't matter, and I didn't lose money.

Anyway, I found them pretty fun, but I too was a little confused as to why they didn't bump up the level cap earlier, like in just a patch or something, then start releasing non-linear quests in the DLC, rather than largely predetermined pathing systems. Operation: Anchorage (yes, that's the name- not 'Project: Anchorage,' silly) was guilty of this, as was the Pitt in a way, except that the Pitt was much better written in my opinion.

I look forward to this, for sure.