games  anime  |  toys
Destructoid is gaming news, community, videos, and sometimes love. Take the tour or jump in with Facebook:

 



Speaking of MMO's, Colette, have I got a story for you! If I may speak bluntly, and I shall, it seems as no surprise that SOE's Vanguard: Saga of Heroes is not doing well. Or in their words: "...right now Vanguard is doing decently but not as well as we hoped." Don't you just love it when they pour sugar on cankers?

Let's reminisce back to when I sat down with the (SUPER NICE) Sigil folks back at CES. Before we even got started, I put my tactful foot in my mouth: "That looks like the old Everquest 2!" As expected, I got uber grilled for saying that and glaring looks from across the sofa. They were quick to point out the moving shrubbery, etc etc etc. Fine, so it was prettier. I shrugged apologetically and performed the upwards eyebrow shitface grin of honesty, letting them defend it without going for the jugular. Nobody wants to walk out of a nice PR meeting with a battle axe through their heads. I was civil to Sigil.

Vanguard was also by far more ambitious than EQ2 with its real estate and fellowship concepts. But it was still very EQ2ish; clearly. Did it appear to me like a game that filled a gaping void in the current MMO space? I just couldn't see it. Life is short, so I figured I'd shut my trap and watched how the Warcraftites would judge it when it hit in the market. Obviously, most didn't care for it. A breaking official statement from SOE now echoes my gut reaction...

"SOE is in discussions with Sigil regarding the future of Vanguard and Sigil Games in Carlsbad. Talks are going well and first and foremost, our primary concern right now is what's best for Vanguard and its community. We want to ensure that this game and its community have a healthy future. The specifics that we work out over the coming days will all be with that single goal in mind."

What does that mean? It means that right now Vanguard is doing decently but not as well as we hoped. If you haven't read my last long post that outlined some of the things that went wrong during development, etc., please do. So the bottom line is that SOE is going to be getting more involved with Sigil and Vanguard - our relationship is going to become even tighter - much tighter. At this point I can't say much more than that.

Does this mean an acquisition? I can't say at this point.

Does this mean more or less people at Sigil? I can't say at this point.

Does this mean management changes at Sigil? I can't say at this point.

Is Vanguard dead? Nah. But it's obviously bleeding. I hope that whatever comes out of this implied acquisition or restructuring does more than keep it afloat. In fact, maybe they'll be smart enough to stop positioning it as a premium MMO and get this out to the bargain aftermarket asap before mass hysteria breaks out. Can't blame them for the vague update, though. It's typical -- even if the plane is going down in burning flames, flight instructors are trained to keep passengers calm and high on oxygen.

Take in the full sedative in at VGneGro.com

[Artwork by Atheistium] 


Continue: More Captain Obvious stories





prev next

21 comments | showing # 1 to 21

Niero's Avatar
Niero at 05/01/2007 00:35
I know the guys that run it. Zing!
Colette Bennett's Avatar
Colette Bennett at 05/01/2007 00:49
Maybe you can talk them into changing the name to VG Negro, then.
blackacidevil's Avatar
blackacidevil at 05/01/2007 00:55
that shit looks like wow and eq2 got smashed together about 6 years ago and they threw in the "be a skeleton" gimmick
Mxyzptlk's Avatar
Mxyzptlk at 05/01/2007 00:56
It's a shame they had to rush this out before it was ready. Oh well, another one soon to bite the dust from the sound of it.
blackacidevil's Avatar
blackacidevil at 05/01/2007 00:59
they should just cut that shit loose. who's gonna play it unless it's free, but that means its gonna be shit and nobody wants to play a poor persons game
Loque's Avatar
Loque at 05/01/2007 01:03
Yeah, I loved vanguard, I was probably the biggest fanboy on this site.

They effed it up hard.

Even on my computer, less than a year old, top of the line, it glitched all over the place. Bad frame rates. Performance sucks.

fellowships? Caravans? BAH! that's content that isn't even in the goddamn game yet. Get used to the vast, openness of the game, half of it isn't even filled.

Lvl 50s are quitting in droves, because they grind up to max (mostly on mobs made for lvl 40s) and Raid content and lvl 50 content really isn't even there.

Same goes for Diplomacy and tradeskilling high end content is n't even there, and low end content really doesn't work.

So they try to jenk you into paying for another month, by offering "Double XP weekends" the weekend after billing.

Basically, you're paying to play a beta.
Not happening.

The classes are great, unique, some of the most fun I've had in an MMO. Expirience grinding is something I've grown to love, I miss hard MMOs.

But seriously. When the biggest fear in the game is not "Hmm are there mobs that will kill me between here and there?" but is instead "hmm, I wonder if my quest/mob/items/party is broken" or even worse, "I wonder if I'll fall through the earth between here and there!" Major issues.

Hell, I knew it was over for me when I died from diplomacy.
That's right. I got killed with patient words during a parley.

Link below to it, quite funny.
http://i11.photobucket.com/albums/a166/r4diopir4te/Parleydtodeath.jpg

Niero, I'd use that as the picture for anything vanguard. it doesn't get any better than that.

But really. I've got hopes still for the game. I'll be back in 6mo to see how it's doing. It can only go up, and really, the game has ALOT of potential. Alot.

Niero's Avatar
Niero at 05/01/2007 01:28
"Basically, you're paying to play a beta."

Loose cannon! I know what you mean, though. I have three good friends that want to love it but still play Warcraft as their main game.
Loque's Avatar
Loque at 05/01/2007 03:44
Yeah, especially if you're an old EQ player. You really want to love Brad's creation because it reminds you of EQ, but you can't.

And yeah, I'm playing WoW.

Anyone got a 7 day trial into LotrO I can steal? :D
Crunshii's Avatar
Crunshii at 05/01/2007 07:30
ouch... this reminds me of Kung Pow...

/Niero looks at Sigil hands...
"Does it hurt Sigil?"... "no"
/Niero poors lemon, salt, gasoline and lights it up.
"Does it hurt now?" "um.... uh... im burning im burning!!"

/Niero: "Rub it all on my hair" :)
jonaphin's Avatar
jonaphin at 05/01/2007 08:09
Hey Guys,

I'm Jonathan, a.k.a. Jonaphin, cofounder of VGNecro.com. We probably run the best fan site for Vanguard SOE, me and Lifebane.

First and foremost, we won't rename the website (LMAO !) for security purposes and political reasons...

Secondly, I would like to add my opinion on the Vanguard community. Unlike 99.9% of all other MMOs Vanguard's average player age is about 30. The playing crowd is largely coming from EQ and EQ2. What does this mean in terms of community?
- Responsible plyers: I yet have to remove a post on the forums of VGnecro)
- Demanding players: Go try to sell these guys World of Warcraft and you'll see them protest all the way to the white house! The Vanguard community is a tough crowd, I tell ya!
- Patient players: At least in our community, most everyone knows there are bugs in the game (as in any other games) and take proactive steps to help the devs (we quit whining a long time ago)... For example, we have made the formidable Bug-O-Matic http://vgnecro.com/bugs and are working hand in hand with the Vanguard developers and class leaders to make the game experience always more enjoyable.

As Loque put it, this game is full of potential, and probably not recommended to casual or WoW players in general (I'll get flamed for that, though my point is not to disgrace the WoW players in any fashion)

Whatever happens next may be a pact with Satan or not, but for the players it will certainly be for the best.
jonaphin's Avatar
jonaphin at 05/01/2007 08:21
howdy! ( Lifebane here, I am too lazy to go find my login so I mooched Jonathan's ) Think the info from Sigil speaks for itself, what more an I add other then it does often times seem like a beta, but that fits the general opinion of the game thus far.

oh yes Mr Niero sir, you stated "Vanguard was also by far more ambitious than EQ2 with its real estate and fellowship concepts" The fellowship concept was in during beta then pulled out for "modifications". It has yet to be reimplemented.

laterz!

Lifebane
vgnecro.com
Artadius's Avatar
Artadius at 05/01/2007 08:33
jonaphin: Every MMO has a honeymoon where the vast majority of it's player base get off on nothing more than bashing whatever competitor out there is #1 (in this case) WoW by flaunting unverifiable and biased views (really, you can't say you're not biased) such as those you just presented above.

The fact of the matter is, there are probably MMOs out there that when compared to Vanguard can bring up many of the same points when comparing the two as you just did for Vanguard vs. WoW. It's all relative to the viewpoint of the fanbase (ESPECIALLY the fanbase with a vested interest in a fan site).

The gaming industry needs LESS games like Vanguard that try to be something they're not while baiting and switching their playerbase who typically can not be bothered with demanding a meaningful and worthwhile (in terms of money invested) product.

And before you jump to conclusions, no I do no play either Vanguard or WoW or any other MMO currently...though I have experience playing them since The Realm many years ago so I do have some sort of idea about the subject.
Milhouse's Avatar
Milhouse at 05/01/2007 08:33
Well goodluck for your game. My MMO is the Matrix Online, something which the casual gamer will laugh his ass at me, but well, there's no single other RPGs with a dynamic official story progressing daily. I'm a mature roleplayer and I'm sure that like the Vanguard players, the good things in my game greatly overshadow the bad ones. Sad thing however that this short after launch management is already in panic mode.
Artadius's Avatar
Artadius at 05/01/2007 08:36
Granted, you did preface what you said with "my opinion"... so, pardon me if I cam off a bit standoffish on said opinion.
jonaphin's Avatar
jonaphin at 05/01/2007 09:20
No problem Artadius, I enjoy a good debate ^_^

I played WoW for about a year though, and while WoW is great fun (A good chunk of its 8.5 million players will gladly support this assumption) its purpose and intent are to please the masses, and it does so greatly! Now, like with Milhouse and plenty others, the video game industry is faced with an aging (not so old but getting there undeniably :p) population of gamers, aka veteran gamers. Vanguard, in its own fashion, is definitely aimed at vets, and more precisely, those coming from EQ and EQ2.
JamesSorensen's Avatar
JamesSorensen at 05/01/2007 09:42
it is simple, in the sad state of the MMO, if you weren't established well before WOW, like FFXI and Everquest.... you really have no chance unless you are something NEW and great that people are drawn very well too.
Crunshii's Avatar
Crunshii at 05/01/2007 10:50
hmmm... to what James said... he has a point,

like DBZ looks like ripped from other MMO's to be put together, but the name will make it a success... same with Lotro.

but that doesnt mean Vanguard hasnt met to the expectations, just means they need some... Life... Bane... lol.

considering new MMO's that are going to go beyond is Aion, and im waiting for may 12 to see what SE has to announce...
Loque's Avatar
Loque at 05/01/2007 16:44
So, yeah, what's happening is exactly what I said.

You guys are paying to play a beta. That's not how it's supposed to work.
PwnDaddy's Avatar
PwnDaddy at 05/02/2007 15:41
i know a couple people playing Vanguard. It doesn't look very impressive, even at the level cap. Hell, neither does LotRO. WoW didn't look special in the first launch months either; mebbe we'll see how these games can perform after some major content pathces and whatnot.
bigbro2004's Avatar
bigbro2004 at 05/03/2007 04:03
Good eye Niero, there needs to be people like us working for these companies. Save us all the time and money.
prev next

Comment with Facebook





Click connect and comment instantly!

Comment with Dtoid





New? SIGN UP - it takes 5 seconds

Comments policy

Destructoid is an open discussion community. You don't need to "audition" to post a comment - just speak your mind. We respect differing opinions on the site, so have at it. Be smart, funny, insightful, clueless, or cute -- but back it up with substance. Keep your cool, keep it fun. We only ask that you act respectfully and above all: don't be a troll and ruin it for everyone else. Don't bring down gamers or we'll, you know, gently shoot you in the face and stuff you into a flaming mailbox. Each comment is your opportuntity to make this community awesomer. Is that even a word?

Avoiding the banhammer only requires common sense: spamming, trolling, racism, NSFW stuff, and other forms of sucking will not be tolerated. If anyone is griefing please report abuse. Be good. Don't suck!

 
New on Destructoid.TV play all videos

Loading
Loading Destructoid Videos




    Win this!
    Reminder: We're giving away six copies of Magnacarta 2!



    Dtoid Twitter    Got news?   tips@destructoid.com

    Reviews & Previews
    Mahjongg Artifacts 2 review
    Dragon Age: Origins review
    Lost Winds: The Winter of the Melodias review
    Osmos review
    Space Invaders Extreme 2 review
    Half-Minute Hero review
    JU-ON: The Grudge review
    Kenka Bancho: Badass Rumble review
    Thexder Neo review
    Domino Rally review
    more reviews
    PS3's 256-player MAG
    Rooms The Main Building
    Skate 3
    Hudson's bringing back the Bonk
    James Cameron's Avatar
    Bomberman Battlefest
    Calling
    Bad Company 2's multiplayer
    Partying like it's 1959 in BioShock 2's multiplayer
    BioShock 2 through the eyes of Big Daddy
    more previews


    - The Dtoid Army is 49584 strong -

    Showing Cblogs with 3+ faps   show all

    Call for entries: do the wrong thing

    New to Dtoid? Read the survival guide




     Originals
    Jim Sterling: How to respond to a videogame review





















    More Destructoid Originals




     Popular now more
























    Destructoid's editorial lovefest is:
    Nick Chester
    Editor-in-Chief
    Jim Sterling
    Reviews Editor
    Dale North
    News Editor
    Hamza Aziz
    Community Manager
    Anthony Burch
    Features Editor
    Rey Gutierrez
    Video editor & director
    Niero
    Founder, publisher
    Letters to the editors
    tips@destructoid.com
    Associate Editors
    Ashley Davis Jonathan Holmes
    Brad Nicholson Jonathan Ross
    Brad Rice Jordan Devore
    Chad Concelmo Matthew Razak
    Colette Bennett Tom Fronczak
    Conrad Zimmerman Topher Cantler
    Dyson Samit Sarkar
    Contributors
    Adam Dork
    Ben Perlee
    Daniel Lingen
    Joseph Leray
    Joe Burling
    Mikey
    Will Maddock
    Stella Wong





     

     
      get involved

    register or login
    post a blog
    post a forum
    enter a contest
    contribute a news tip
    suggest a feature
    be a guest editor
    support

    new member's guide
    login assistance
    tech support
    report abuse
    email our editors
    read our dev blog
    nuclear crisis?
    keep in touch

    RSS feed
    Twitter
    Facebook
    Myspace
    Flickr
    Game nights
    Meetup+play online
    seriously

    about Destructoid
    advertising
    terms of use
    privacy policy
    jobs at MM
    buy our crap
    our network

    Tomopop
    Japanator
    Despingation?




    Destructoid is an independently-run publication forged by our love of video games and the gaming community's need of accountable enthusiast press
    living the dream since March 16, 2006