Eh, couldn't be bothered to play it on my 360, don't see any reason to play it on my Wii.

Is that a screenshot from the actual Wii version? It looks like rank, open ass.

I could see the sniper section of the single player campaign being interesting, having to hone some more tactile steadying skills.

It would be cool if they toss some liberal "artstyle" into this game, though we're most likely to just get scaled down textures and models.

@Tubatic

That, or they totally dumb it down so your bullet hits pretty much from anywhere.

Why did everyone buy WAW for the Wii?! The graphics sucked, wii can do much much better, WE all know it, so why do you fatten there wallets? Make them know what we want, stop buying everything they throw, and maybe we will get something decent. I sware I will not buy this game if the graphics do not beat Red Steel...

@h5e51515o5: this is your 6th comment today about W@W not looking as good as Red Steel. Just saying you might want some new material (and a spell check).

That header image is more than generous.

I feel so sorry for Treyarch. They could probably do much better if Activision would just let them concentrate on one project at a time instead of rushing them all the time.

@h5e51515o5: I'm just saying at least 8 comments in two hours saying the same exact thing doesn't help your case. It's like going to see some stand-up and having the comic repeat the joke several times for people who didn't get it the first time.

Ok, I just want to get it out there. I hate how other Wii owners buy games that are crap, and when a fanboy comes to bash them, all they can say is "Wii Controls win!" Wii owners need to stop buying crap, and actually stand up for once. Right now, most Wii owners are eating s**t. I want to say this so that if this games graphics do suck, no one should buy it.

Why should no one buy it if the graphics suck? Cus, read my other posts, like the 50 I have posted. and watch the video...

One way this could be a great deal for Wii owners is, if they include all the DLC maps with the game. Which they probably will, because the Wii just doesn't do big DLC map packs. If they don't include all that stuff, than yeah that would be kind of stupid. They should even add a new map, or two only for this version.

It does kind of suck that 3rd Party company's treat Wii owners with less respect than they do 360/PS3 owners. If the rolls were reversed you know for a fact that a Wii port to the 360/PS3 would be getting a ton of extra features. So it should be the same the other way around!

Like defending crappy games like Red Steel? I got it day one and was sorely disappointed with it. Graphics do not make the game.

If they build it from the ground up with a good online multiplayer then this good actually be good , the wii mote is awesome for playing fps games when done right.
Lets hope it wont become a quick dirty cash in port.

You do realize that "most of (us) Wii owners" here are not "eating shit" as you say, right? =P

Truth be told, I'm not really interested in this. I mean, I can't see it doing terribly well. Many people I know own some combination of consoles, so they've had CoD4 already and with CoD6 or whatever launching soon, they're not gonna pick up an old game either.

Am I the only one here who likes the fact that they only focus on 360/PS3 (Infinity Ward)?

I mean, aside from being a better developer, they only focus on two consoles, whereas Treyarch focuses on what seems like every platform available, and that can't be good for quality. Add that to the fact that Trayarch was already subpar to begin with, and you end up with good, but not great, games. I mean, it'll be hard to fuck up what Infinity Ward did with MW, but it sucks that Activision just whores Treyarch like crazy without giving them a chance to redeem themselves with their own games.

Besides, you aren't showing a whole lot of respect to your consumer when you port a nearly two year-old game to their platform of choice. Honestly, I would be PISSED if I was getting something that other gamers have been enjoying for almost two fucking years already, AND they're getting the sequel when I'm getting part one. Then again, it IS Activision (Unfortunately).

@WarZombie

Finally someone who is not sucking up to them! haha. I love Treyarch, COD 3 for the 360 is my favorite COD because you actually use a lot of teamwork all all...

Way to keep up with the times, Wii. Way to suck up and be bored while your friends come out with another hugely successful game by rereleasing your friend's hugely successful game, Treyarch.

@ Perri actually its 2 years old. But its still a good game as far as Im concerned. Where I stand on this game? Well its good for people who only have wii, they get to play this great game.

"I'll be spending my money on things like Fragile, Muramasa, Little Kings Story, Tatsunoko Vs. Capcom & Darkside Chronicles and not this tardy, cheap, whored out port of a game."

Pretty much that. While I love Modern Warfare, I already played it, and there is too much good games coming out for the Wii, I won't spend my money on ports. Sorry Activision.

If it was a port it would be awesome, no PS2 port because there was no PS2 version! :D But it could be a DS port :( I know it won't, but it might look more like the DS version than the 360 version.

They're making CoD4 on Wii NOW?! why don't they just make MW2?

I just know it'll be a lightgun game !

Too little, too late.

@Vexed Alex

In the purist FPS sense, I can totally see what you're saying and agree: Lock on goes along way to mucking this up as a straight up FPS. But the brilliant part was the ability to move in 3D space and line up that lock-on in the first place.

Compared to the field of view/ turning controls on Red Steel, its an excellent advance and, at least for me, proved the concept of the wiimote+nunchuk control scheme.

@pwnan

Really? I hadn't heard that at all! If only someone with an avatar had made 8 comments about it... maybe then...