Quantcast


Bobby Kotick: People prefer sequels  photo

Evil Activision CEO Bobby Kotick has been shooting his evil mouth off again, upsetting gamers with his evil opinions. This latest is aimed at those who want original IP, with Kotick arguing that people like sequels, so why bother doing anything new?

"A small segment of very vocal gamers say everything has to be new and different every year," explains Kotick (evilly). "Actually, people are happy with existing franchises, provided you innovate within them."

As much as I'd like to disagree with Kotick, I can't do so in good faith. What he says is true, people are happy to accept sequel after sequel after sequel. However, I wouldn't say that's a good thing, more a problem with the mainstream consumer. Just because a "small segment of very vocal gamers" believes something, that doesn't mean they're wrong. 

The problem with Activision is that it sees zero merit whatsoever in an original franchise that isn't whored out with endless sequels and spin-offs. There is room for both original, standalone titles and huge franchises, but with Activision, you need to guarantee that your game will see at least ten followups or it isn't interested. That, I think, is Kotick's biggest problem. 

Y'know, that and his blood pacts with Satan's grim wizards.








More gaming stories around the web. Got news? Submit yours to tips@destructoid.com

Jim Sterling serves as reviews editor for Destructoid.com, head of the Podtoid podcast, and produces a number of news stories, original features, one-of-a-kind videos. With his passionate argumentative style, controversial opinions, harsh delivery, and dedication to brutal honesty Sterling is a name that you can't help but recognize. Likes PS2, iPod Touch, Silent Hill 2, Metal Gear Solid, Dynasty Warriors 3 Meet the rest of the team



Post a comment! You can also post a photo below:

Comment with Facebook





Click connect and comment instantly!

Comment with Dtoid





New? SIGN UP - it takes 5 seconds

42 comments | showing # 1 to 42
prev next

JohnnyMavric's Avatar - Comment posted on 08/20/2009 13:20
JohnnyMavric
so true.
Fozzo's Avatar - Comment posted on 08/20/2009 13:22
Fozzo
Kotick is the worst thing to happen to the gaming industry. He only cares about profits and not fresh, high quality games.
Sentry's Avatar - Comment posted on 08/20/2009 13:23
Sentry
Industry leaders should do more leading, and less pandering.

People will purchase quality product, if properly executed and marketed, sequel or no.
pd771's Avatar - Comment posted on 08/20/2009 13:25
pd771
That little troll Kotick is right. I hate him, but he's right.
wanderingpixel's Avatar - Comment posted on 08/20/2009 13:26
wanderingpixel
The prick is right. Sadly.
hermes's Avatar - Comment posted on 08/20/2009 13:27
hermes
Why so offended?

What he says, even if upsetting to same vocal people is totally accurate. People may complain about it, yet we will see a lot of people (and I mean A LOT) buying Call of Duty 6, Assasins Creed 2, Halo 3.5, Guitar Hero 7 and Final Fantasy 13...

I get the hate for Activision and Kotick, but he is a business man, and one thing you can't complain about him with that quote is that he doesn't know their audience.
Super Drybones's Avatar - Comment posted on 08/20/2009 13:30
Super Drybones
Okami sold less then every version of Madden I believe. I wish Sentry was right, but it probably won't happen fast or wide spread enough.
Chris Carter's Avatar - Comment posted on 08/20/2009 13:31
Chris Carter
Here is my assessment:

Activision is a business. Bobby Kotick is making Activision money, and by proxy, happy. Kotick is doing a damn good job at sucking consumers dry in every facet of the market possible. Hell, he's even exploiting things like DLC in every way possible to build his empire.

What Activision will do one day, when they hit some sort of monetary ceiling, is realize:

Oh my God. We look like total pricks.

Their PR will have a complete overhaul, and Kotick will be forced out because he can't keep his mouth shut.

Honestly, Kotick is a complete asshole: it's not WHAT he's doing, it's HOW he's doing it. He literally mocked consumers last week, which I've never even HEARD of before in business. You can take everyone for all their worth, like the consumer whore/lambs that they are, but actually coming out and taunting them for it?
TheBigFeel's Avatar - Comment posted on 08/20/2009 13:41
TheBigFeel
I see it as the mainstream doesn't want or have the time to peruse original content for the Portals in a sea of Barbie Pony Fitness Camp games. They leave it to us, the devoted gamers, to vet games and make the initial plunge. "If it's good it'll get a sequel, and that's when I'll jump in." I doubt it's a conscious thought, but that seems to describe the bad-sequels-make-assloads-of-money phenomena

@Magnalon: I can't wait for that day to come. Do you think that's what happened to EA?
lou's Avatar - Comment posted on 08/20/2009 13:41
lou
@Magnalon "Oh my God, we look like total pricks" may stop you and me from prick-like behavior, but it never stops corporations. When Kotick is gone, they will replace him with another prick.

Not all businessmen or CEO are pricks, but I do think that it's a job pricks are very, very good at.
Electrium's Avatar - Comment posted on 08/20/2009 13:47
Electrium
Yeah, people buy sequels, that's a fact. For the very same reason chain stores/restaurants are successful: familiarity. Jim is 100% right though, that doesn't mean you need to milk every franchise you have dry and then some (GUITAR HERO?!?!) before you do something original. And that doesn't mean the people who want new projects are wrong or idiots. It's disgraceful for a business representative to speak of his market like that.

I wish someone would pull a John Shephard and have enough of his snide insinuations. (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FESOPPP5YEQ if you don't know what I'm talking about)
Xhumation's Avatar - Comment posted on 08/20/2009 13:49
Xhumation
Seriously Kotick is a troll with a sense for business. Nothing more
JonahFalcon's Avatar - Comment posted on 08/20/2009 13:53
JonahFalcon
You have to have a Gears of War, Bioshock, Mass Effect and Dragon Age before you can have a Gears of War 2, BioShock 2, Mass Effect 2 and Dragon Age 2.
Shadowiii's Avatar - Comment posted on 08/20/2009 13:53
Shadowiii
Hooray, so more Guitar Hero games instead of quality DLC, and more WW2 shooters? This sounds FANTASTIC.
I've already committed to never buy another Activision game ever again (including MW2), and this just helps me renew that commitment.
YoTanaka's Avatar - Comment posted on 08/20/2009 13:58
YoTanaka
The original article is a good read:
http://www.economist.com/people/displaystory.cfm?story_id=14209881

Also, GH6 will flop. I'm calling it. Then he will change his tune. Unless Dj Hero does well, then its just a change in focus....
hermes's Avatar - Comment posted on 08/20/2009 14:03
hermes
@JonahFalcon: Not always... It is true that most sequels are inspired by good, sucessful original games; but then I am sure the world canlive without a new Spyro or a new Kane & Lynch...
The Prodigal Son's Avatar - Comment posted on 08/20/2009 14:05
The Prodigal Son
@Magnalon:: Agreed. The harsh reality is that the averaqe consumer IS a moron. That's why these suits think they can mock them to their faces. The whole philosophy of the consumer having the power (by choosing what to purchase) only works if the consumer chooses not to buy something. What happens is that people like to play games, and sequels are safe -- more of the same. If consumers spend their money, they want to make sure they are getting something they will "enjoy". It's risky at $50-$60 a pop to go out and buy something different. Hence why "different" games don't do as well as over-advertised,rehashed games.

It's kinda like drug addiction. You may start out getting the good shit, but after a while, it doesn't matter what quality it is -- you need your fix. That's what's happening here. Game companies are no longer as eager to risk their multi-million dollar budgets for something that may or may not sell because it's innovative.

Consumers keep buying the "safe" stuff they keep putting out because there aren't any other obvious alternatives. Some of us find that in indie or flash games, but the majority of game consumers aren't the kind of consumers here on D'toid. Gaming is so mainstream now that there's no longer a market to please "purists", or those that demand a more satisfying and differentiated experience. I do, however, hope Kotick has his day. I loathe being treated like a fucking statistic or coin purse.
aresef's Avatar - Comment posted on 08/20/2009 14:06
aresef
Millions of sheeple walk into video game stores across the country once a year to purchase the $50-60 roster update with they call a new Madden game. That doesn't necessarily make it any good.

Jackass.
Kraid's Avatar - Comment posted on 08/20/2009 14:25
Kraid
Of course they like sequels look at the Pokemans!
EternalDeathSlayer's Avatar - Comment posted on 08/20/2009 14:26
EternalDeathSlayer
@ aresef: Actually, I'd say it does make it kind of good.
Jumbo's Avatar - Comment posted on 08/20/2009 14:28
Jumbo
Activision is what Activision is. Hating them is like hating Wal-Mart. You're gonna spend a lot of time hating and you're gonna have nice little list of self-righteous (and perhaps totally correct) opinions about how what they do is wrong and they should do something different and none of it is gonna do a goddamn thing to change anything. Relax. Spend your energy supporting games you like instead of demonizing capitalist pigs.
D-503's Avatar - Comment posted on 08/20/2009 14:36
D-503
@arsef: Doesn't mean its bad either.

People like originality AND people like sequels. There's probably room in this word for both. Just because something is a sequel doesn't make it any worse than a game that isn't. I praise originality, but without sequels we wouldn't have Call of Duty 4, Ocarina of Time, or Half-Life 2, which are very original each in their own way while still being sequels.
triclops41's Avatar - Comment posted on 08/20/2009 14:38
triclops41
Kotick is more or less right, and same goes for raiding price of WaW2, but he is such a flaming a-hole about it, and was such a bald-faced hypocrite about Sony needing to drop PS3 prices, that it sickens me to agree with such a turd.
manasteel88's Avatar - Comment posted on 08/20/2009 14:38
manasteel88
He is right. I love Super Mario Bros 3. It happened to be the 3rd iteration. The first one was fun but the 3rd one was better fun. If they had called it Miyamoto Time (with mario replaced by a small Shigeru Miyamoto) instead of Super Mario Bros 3, I don't think it would have been as interesting.
triclops41's Avatar - Comment posted on 08/20/2009 14:39
triclops41
*raising*
dj-anon's Avatar - Comment posted on 08/20/2009 14:51
dj-anon
Yup, it's sad that people keep asking for sequel after sequel, always hoping the next one will be better.
BattyAdroit's Avatar - Comment posted on 08/20/2009 14:58
BattyAdroit
I hate his mindset. Seriously. This man is a cancer to gaming.
Spivey's Avatar - Comment posted on 08/20/2009 14:59
Spivey
Wait... Didn't they just release Prototype? And that Wolverine game? And DJ Hero? And Singularity?

Oh, wait. Sorry, I had a thought of my own there for a second. Activision is evil blah blah blah.
Darren Nakamura's Avatar - Comment posted on 08/20/2009 15:00
Darren Nakamura
Sad but true. You can't fault him for speaking the truth.
Kaspar's Avatar - Comment posted on 08/20/2009 15:10
Kaspar
The people he is talking about aren't people per se, unless you call soccer moms etc people.
hermes's Avatar - Comment posted on 08/20/2009 15:17
hermes
@Spivey: Wolverine is a licenced game tied to a movie, I wouldn't count that as original. Singularity is not even out, and was pushed to 2010. DJ Hero, original? Even the name shows that it is another Guitar Hero spinoff with more accesories. And previous examples has shown us that the only reason for Activision to release prototype is because the are going to turn it into a yearly sequel.
Elsa's Avatar - Comment posted on 08/20/2009 15:18
Elsa
... what Dexter said. Kotick is there to make money, people buy sequels. Sequels are much easier and cheaper to produce than a new IP. Even if an inventive new IP is produced... it will doubtless have sequels if it sold at all well.
... and the vicious cycle begins again...
Pencoin's Avatar - Comment posted on 08/20/2009 15:20
Pencoin
Its unfortnate we give the name sequels to two things.

Sequel: The next in the series. Mario Galaxy. Final Fantasy 13.

Sequel: Tosh like Guitar Hero 234, Modern Warfare 4672456.
Spivey's Avatar - Comment posted on 08/20/2009 15:38
Spivey
@hermes: Though part of certain franchises, those games are far from sequels. So suddenly, it's unoriginal to base a game on an established IP? Fuck, looks like game design is for chumps. If you're calling DJ Hero just another guitar hero spinoff, well, I can see you've never seen DJ Hero. And Singularity is indeed in development.

As far as those other examples? Christ, there's no winning with that kind of logic. Is it a sequel? BOO ACTIVISION, STIFLING CREATIVITY! Is it original? BOO ACTIVISION, THEY JUST WANT TO MAKE SEQUELS! Criminy.

Publishers have yearly cash cows to be able to afford to take risks on new games and IPs. That's why I excuse EA's yearly milking of football fratboys, since they gave us games like Rock Band, Dead Space, and Mirror's Edge.
MrSlippery's Avatar - Comment posted on 08/20/2009 15:43
MrSlippery
That does it. I'm buying all activision titles used from now on.

I am not putting money towards Kotick's next gold plated car that runs on Leprechauns.


You think he wouldn't be greedy purely on the fact that WoW alone will be a steady source of income for his company. Maybe the other CEO's of companies made fun of him at the recent "people who are rich as fuck" function, and he's feeling like he did in elementary school all over again.
Dr Milkdad's Avatar - Comment posted on 08/20/2009 16:30
Dr Milkdad
I'm not going to say he's right or wrong, I'm just going to say I hate that prick and his shit eating grin.
ShadowKirby's Avatar - Comment posted on 08/20/2009 16:57
ShadowKirby
"However, I wouldn't say that's a good thing, more a problem with the mainstream consumer. " It's not really the mainstream consumers that are the problem. It's not the mainstream that gets giddy over Halo 3, GTA 4, the 6th or whatever generation of pokemon, Bioshock 2, GoWs 3, Fallout 3. Holy shit, hate as much as you want but everyone wants the next Mario to be more like the old Mario, the new Zelda to be like the old Zelda and the new Metroid to be like the old Metroid. People bitch when they change things and they still bitch when it remains the same.
Anus Mcphanus's Avatar - Comment posted on 08/20/2009 17:24
Anus Mcphanus
It's sad but true.

Kotick is still being a prick about the way he's going about announcing these things though.
Holyetheline's Avatar - Comment posted on 08/20/2009 17:34
Holyetheline
All I have to say is Turok 2: Seeds of Evil was the high point for that franchise, after that it was all downhill. Sequels....... <--- Hours ago I went off on this comment and it was going to be a good one... but I've lost my train of thought. You can thank the person who interrupted me while I was in the middle of commenting.
Midgetsnowman's Avatar - Comment posted on 08/20/2009 19:22
Midgetsnowman
@Dr Milkdad: Ironically, the activision business model is hurting WoW a lot. theres serious bugs with getting into instances on the older servers. Blizzard's known about it for damn near 9 months now and they still havent been able to find a way to fix it or even given people any sort of useful update on what theyre trying.
Sexualchocolate's Avatar - Comment posted on 08/21/2009 04:01
Sexualchocolate
The capitalist system should allow creativity to shine through sales of interesting, exciting, new products - however WE (well, when i say we, i mean the millions of 12 - 16 year old kids who make up 80% of the "gamer" demographic) have ruined that by buying sequel after sequel and giving Kotick reason to act as he does.

We enable him to be a dick and publish sequels over interesting new games.

I for one will not buy this years sports game, I'll get last years pre-owned at a fraction of the price, fuck the 2 new features, fuck the rosters.

I've got a guitar hero, I will not be buying a new one.

I'm going to try as hard as i can to avoid buying MW2, but if i see it cheap on ebay or pre-owned somewhere (yeah right) I'll probably pick it up.

But i will avoid giving Kotick ammo by buying any Activision sequel new at retail.
Mr Kite's Avatar - Comment posted on 08/21/2009 10:57
Mr Kite
People just hate change, they're afraid to spend their money with amount of risk.
prev next

Comment with Facebook





Click connect and comment instantly!

Comment with Dtoid





New? SIGN UP - it takes 5 seconds

Comments policy

Destructoid is an open discussion community. You don't need to "audition" to post a comment - just speak your mind. We respect differing opinions on the site, so have at it. Be smart, funny, insightful, clueless, or cute -- but back it up with substance. Keep your cool, keep it fun. We only ask that you act respectfully and above all: don't be a troll and ruin it for everyone else. Don't bring down gamers or we'll, you know, gently shoot you in the face and stuff you into a flaming mailbox. Each comment is your opportuntity to make this community awesomer. Is that even a word?

Avoiding the banhammer only requires common sense: spamming, trolling, racism, NSFW stuff, and other forms of sucking will not be tolerated. If anyone is griefing please report abuse. Be good. Don't suck!