games  anime  |  toys
Destructoid is gaming news, community, videos, and sometimes love. Take the tour or jump in with Facebook:

 


Blow: Microsoft harms XBLA game quality photo

Jonathan Blow, the twisted mastermind behind critical darling Braid, has criticized Microsoft's certification requirements, suggesting that the overall quality of an Xbox Live Arcade game can be hurt if too much time is wasted making the platform holder happy.

"They removed some of the requirements for XBLA games, but there are still a lot of requirements, and I believe that, at least for a single-player game like my game, the vast majority of these requirements are unnecessary," Blow explained. "I put in a tremendous amount of work meeting all these requirements, when I could have put that work into the actual game, and made it even a little more polished, little bit better."

Blow stated that the certification process certainly wasn't bad enough to stop him releasing the game on Xbox Live (obviously), but that the requirements are geared toward triple-A titles, which isn't useful for everybody. On a differing subject, he also stated that money wasn't his goal, and he actually doesn't care how well Braid sells. He also stated he has no sequel planned, nor is he "waiting in the wings with a level pack, or DLC or anything."

Microsoft's problem, as it always has been, is that it's far too controlling. If it wants XBLA to have a library of fun, creative games, then it needs to stop applying chokeholds to everything that passes through its hands. Maybe XNA will be a fertile soil for budding developers, but I don't know if The 'Soft will ever lose its megalomaniacal tendencies long enough for indie developers to want to stick around.


Continue: More Xbox Live Arcade stories





prev next

28 comments | showing # 1 to 28

---AMARU---'s Avatar
---AMARU--- at 08/08/2008 12:09
i played the trial version of braid and if the creator thinks it could have been better, well microsoft; FUCK YOU because i thought that game was amazing.
Brilliam's Avatar
Brilliam at 08/08/2008 12:09
As an indie dev who's been on the other side of the fence (I did compliance QA for 360 games), I'll say this: those requirements may have hurt his game a lot, but they made a LOT of other games WAY more tolerable. I'd love to know which rules, specifically, he means. Leaderboard/Achievement/etc integration?
Josh Tolentino's Avatar
Josh Tolentino at 08/08/2008 12:35
I hope Braid hits the PSN. PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE JONATHAN BLOW
Samit Sarkar's Avatar
Samit Sarkar at 08/08/2008 12:36
On a differing subject, he also stated that money wasn't his goal, and he actually doesn't care how well Braid sells.

Right. Wasn't this the same guy who was talking about the pricing of the game at $15 and citing "the Space Giraffe problem"? I don't mean to call him out, but it's obvious that he does care how well it sells -- it's only natural, so why even pretend that the opposite is true?
dantevsninjas's Avatar
dantevsninjas at 08/08/2008 12:36
It's a shame that microsoft still feels the need to lock down everything on XBL. This is just a continuation of the same failed policy that they had to backpedal on during the original Xbox days in order ot get online in EA games. With LittleBigPlanet on the way for Sony, and XNA in the pipeline, not to mention games like Spore, there's huge potential for user-generated content to breathe new life into games, and MS is basically putting the kibosh on that. That's the one sticking point where PSN has the advantage: Sony is embracing the idea of having an open platform for gamers to create and share content. There was a lot of buzz in that area when the Live Marketplace first launched, with the potential for individuals to make/sell game content, and while XNA shows them inching in that direction, the whole thing just feels like a missed opportunity.
Timmeh's Avatar
Timmeh at 08/08/2008 13:06
I'm with Samit, this guy flip flops every time the subject of money is brought up. Just tell us you wanted to at least make a little money and be done with it.
Crunshii's Avatar
Crunshii at 08/08/2008 13:06
"Microsoft's problem, as it always has been, is that it's far too controlling."

and this will never change.
Tubatic's Avatar
Tubatic at 08/08/2008 13:13
I guess I'll check the source, but what type of requirements? It seems like the speed runs were something required for some sort of leaderboard quota, though they kind of work (outside the context of the game.

I'm all for quality control and platform standards, though. If you're gonna show up to dinner party, its good to follow the customs.
NihonTiger90's Avatar
NihonTiger90 at 08/08/2008 13:16
Johnny Boy wants to make money. Well all know that. That's the only reason anyone actually makes games. Just admit it, Blow.
falinter's Avatar
falinter at 08/08/2008 13:34
@Nihon
Not necessarily. Not all artist create art for profit.

That is if you subscribe to the school of that thought that games are art.
Tubatic's Avatar
Tubatic at 08/08/2008 13:39
@Nihon

Jason Rohrer doesn't get paid for Passage, or any of his games.
Sharpless's Avatar
Sharpless at 08/08/2008 14:28
@Nihon
Um, cynical much? Money certainly isn't the only reason anyone makes games. It's a factor, more for some than for others. You can't honestly tell me that no one does it for the love, though. You don't make a game like Braid to make tons of money. If he makes Braid 2: Back In The Habit, then yeah, but as it stands...
lvl54spacemonkey's Avatar
lvl54spacemonkey at 08/08/2008 14:49
Xbox Cert isn't actually too bad. They are willing to let any minor fails go by. Really it's only major things like crashes, hangs and major graphical corruption they will bock on. there's more to it obviously but they aren't all that bad. They are real bug finding machines though. Much better than Sony are.
Miguelcar808's Avatar
Miguelcar808 at 08/08/2008 14:53
How did Yaris got out ?
dtomek's Avatar
dtomek at 08/08/2008 15:00
If the regs had anything to do with the game looking like what we got, and not what was in the pic in the article. I say that was time well spent.
manasteel88's Avatar
manasteel88 at 08/08/2008 15:27
Blow seems to not care if his game puts up Penny Arcade type downloads, but it seems he does care about the money. Probably right now he's just sitting back and hoping that his work is accepted as both critically and commercially.

Now take your XBLA money and make us another excellent game Mr. Blow.
Dan CiTi's Avatar
Dan CiTi at 08/08/2008 15:35
Is Johnny familiar with the PSN's requirements? It seems a lot more lenient. I'd get Braid again for PSN(better controller).
Leathersoup's Avatar
Leathersoup at 08/08/2008 15:54
@Samit Sarkar

What I think he was trying to say is that he's not trying to make a ton of money off of the game but he doesn't want to end up in debt because of it.
okenny's Avatar
okenny at 08/08/2008 15:56
@To-Those-Concerned:

Before you become to critical of Nihon, watch the 1Up Interview with Jonathan Blow where he clearly states he wants to make money on this game.

I think this is partly the maturity of Indie developers as they are dealing with bigger publishers. They make these statements partly because they are not very accustomed to how big publishers do things and also, on a lesser level, they want to control expectations. Before N+ came out, that developer went shooting off at the mouth about XBLA quality and how it would hurt his game... he ended up having one of the best XBLA launches ever. The fact is XBLA games have online, achievements, Standard definition support as well as HD, and a whole slew of other things because Microsoft tries to get as much of that in for us, the consumers.

Yeah, certs suck but it does the end-user good in the long run. I'm okenny and I approve this message.

- Paid for by Microsoft.
monosylabik's Avatar
monosylabik at 08/08/2008 16:06
and psn will gladly welcome you with open arms good buddy. ahahaha
Vitamin Awesome's Avatar
Vitamin Awesome at 08/08/2008 16:08
Hmmm.... Methinks I'm going to get into this "Game Making" thing. I've dabbled a bit here and there, nothing more than a ROM hack or a mod, with the exception of making a cube that spins depending on the controller input for the dreamcast, but With all this talk of indie developers making games for companies like Sony and Microsoft, I say why not? I know M$ is sporting the XNA, but what does Sony have that's the equivalent for the PS3? I haven't heard anything, so any input would be helpful.
Wedge's Avatar
Wedge at 08/08/2008 19:03
Hay that's nice now gimme the PC version you've had done for months =<
Poopface Morty's Avatar
Poopface Morty at 08/08/2008 21:03
"@Nihon
Not necessarily. Not all artist create art for profit.

That is if you subscribe to the school of that thought that games are art. "
No. But only the ones with any business sense and a hope to make a living, do.
Crumpet Lips's Avatar
Crumpet Lips at 08/08/2008 22:30
You know what also hurts the XBLA? Releasing games for 1200-1800MS Points. -_-
AKK's Avatar
AKK at 08/08/2008 23:36
Wait....

So, first he says it wasn't his fault, it was Microsoft's fault that it costs this much.

Then he tells 1up that he priced it at 1200 points so he would break even because it was not well known and he wanted to at least not lose anything.

Now, he doesn't care how well it sells?

Make up your fucking mind.

Or blow me.

Hah. ._.
TheStripe's Avatar
TheStripe at 08/09/2008 01:12
I feel like those of you giving this guy static haven't played the game yet.

This gentleman deserves paid for his art. So what if he's talking out both sides of his mouth?
mistic's Avatar
mistic at 08/09/2008 03:59
I'm still getting his game as soon as I unpack my 360 :-)
Burnt Meatloaf's Avatar
Burnt Meatloaf at 08/09/2008 05:26
This whole article is pointless unless specific grievances are cited. Complaining that there are interface and API guidelines you have to follow is not a valid reason in itself. This was also in the article:

"They didn't try to dictate the game design, as many publishers might -- they were very hands-off there, and what is in the final game is exactly what I wanted to put there."

So, does that mean that Microsoft's guidelines are largely biased towards product presentation and compatibility, and not game content? What exactly is the problem?

Making games for a distribution network is not like making them for the PC. A lot of small developers do not understand this.
prev next

Comment with Facebook





Click connect and comment instantly!

Comment with Dtoid





New? SIGN UP - it takes 5 seconds

Comments policy

Destructoid is an open discussion community. You don't need to "audition" to post a comment - just speak your mind. We respect differing opinions on the site, so have at it. Be smart, funny, insightful, clueless, or cute -- but back it up with substance. Keep your cool, keep it fun. We only ask that you act respectfully and above all: don't be a troll and ruin it for everyone else. Don't bring down gamers or we'll, you know, gently shoot you in the face and stuff you into a flaming mailbox. Each comment is your opportuntity to make this community awesomer. Is that even a word?

Avoiding the banhammer only requires common sense: spamming, trolling, racism, NSFW stuff, and other forms of sucking will not be tolerated. If anyone is griefing please report abuse. Be good. Don't suck!

 
New on Destructoid.TV play all videos

Loading
Loading Destructoid Videos




    Win this!
    Reminder: We're giving away six copies of Magnacarta 2!



    Dtoid Twitter    Got news?   tips@destructoid.com

    Reviews & Previews
    Mahjongg Artifacts 2 review
    Dragon Age: Origins review
    Lost Winds: The Winter of the Melodias review
    Osmos review
    Space Invaders Extreme 2 review
    Half-Minute Hero review
    JU-ON: The Grudge review
    Kenka Bancho: Badass Rumble review
    Thexder Neo review
    Domino Rally review
    more reviews
    PS3's 256-player MAG
    Rooms The Main Building
    Skate 3
    Hudson's bringing back the Bonk
    James Cameron's Avatar
    Bomberman Battlefest
    Calling
    Bad Company 2's multiplayer
    Partying like it's 1959 in BioShock 2's multiplayer
    BioShock 2 through the eyes of Big Daddy
    more previews


    - The Dtoid Army is 49591 strong -

    Showing Cblogs with 3+ faps   show all

    Call for entries: do the wrong thing

    New to Dtoid? Read the survival guide




     Originals
    Jim Sterling: How to respond to a videogame review





















    More Destructoid Originals




     Popular now more
























    Destructoid's editorial lovefest is:
    Nick Chester
    Editor-in-Chief
    Jim Sterling
    Reviews Editor
    Dale North
    News Editor
    Hamza Aziz
    Community Manager
    Anthony Burch
    Features Editor
    Rey Gutierrez
    Video editor & director
    Niero
    Founder, publisher
    Letters to the editors
    tips@destructoid.com
    Associate Editors
    Ashley Davis Jonathan Holmes
    Brad Nicholson Jonathan Ross
    Brad Rice Jordan Devore
    Chad Concelmo Matthew Razak
    Colette Bennett Tom Fronczak
    Conrad Zimmerman Topher Cantler
    Dyson Samit Sarkar
    Contributors
    Adam Dork
    Ben Perlee
    Daniel Lingen
    Joseph Leray
    Joe Burling
    Mikey
    Will Maddock
    Stella Wong





     

     
      get involved

    register or login
    post a blog
    post a forum
    enter a contest
    contribute a news tip
    suggest a feature
    be a guest editor
    support

    new member's guide
    login assistance
    tech support
    report abuse
    email our editors
    read our dev blog
    nuclear crisis?
    keep in touch

    RSS feed
    Twitter
    Facebook
    Myspace
    Flickr
    Game nights
    Meetup+play online
    seriously

    about Destructoid
    advertising
    terms of use
    privacy policy
    jobs at MM
    buy our crap
    our network

    Tomopop
    Japanator
    Despingation?




    Destructoid is an independently-run publication forged by our love of video games and the gaming community's need of accountable enthusiast press
    living the dream since March 16, 2006