Quantcast


Something about sex: It's only obscene if you ain't got that green photo
Want your blog on our home page? Answer this!

[Editor's Note: We're not just a (rad) news site -- we also publish opinions/editorials from our community & employees like this one, though be aware that it may not jive with the opinions of Destructoid as a whole, or how our moms raised us. Want to post your own article in response? Publish it now on our community blogs.]

It's a sad fact of life, but cold hard cash is the ultimate caveat. The truth is, almost any rule can be circumvented if Benjamin Franklin is a member of the negotiating team.

A little paper pressed discretely into the palm gets you past the velvet rope at the club while the masses stand and gripe. A high-dollar attorney turns jail time into community service. Even in the Middle Ages, indulgences meant carte blanche on all the deadly sins you could get on the scoreboard; a vigorous jingle of your coin purse was like shaking the Etch-a-Sketch of your soul back into a blissful tabula rasa.

When it comes to moral standards in digital entertainment, the game is no different. There's one set of rules for the heavy hitters; meanwhile, everyone else is told to "do as I say, not as I let those other guys do."

Apple recently revealed their Janus-like visage to iPhone game developers and other app creators when over 5000 apps were pulled from the iTunes store due to "objectionable content". When asked by affected app developers what criteria was used to determine the suitability of app content, they were provided with the following guidelines:

No images of women in bikinis.
No images of men in bikinis.
No skin.
No silhouettes that indicate that Wobble can be used for wobbling boobs.
No sexual connotations or innuendo: boobs, babes, booty, sex.
Nothing that can be sexually arousing.
No apps will be approved that in any way imply sexual content.

According to a spokesperson, Apple was receiving complaints from women who "found the content getting "too degrading and objectionable" along with parents who had issues with what their children were able to access via the iTunes store.



Now we know why it wasn't released on the iPhone.

Now, we all have different opinions about what is and isn't objectionable. Wherever you lie on that spectrum, however, it can't be disputed that Apple has the right to structure and restrict content as they see fit. If they choose to refuse certain app or game content in order to pursue or retain a family/PC sensitive demographic, I can at least understand the move, even if I don't agree with it.

The problem is this: while thousands of independent app and game developers were negatively affected in many ways, the media giants who also run with the skin-peddling pack have received no rebuke or mandate to alter their content whatsoever.

Playboy's app? Un-pulled and uncensored; I suppose the fact that they are female bunnies and not actual human women means that the app is free from "degrading and objectionable" content. No different than watching Animal Planet, really.

Victoria's Secret's app? Still happily providing release to teenagers everywhere who know that iPhone screen protectors aren't just to keep dust out.

GQ, FHM, and Sports Illustrated? Apparently, their bikini and lingerie shots with women staring demurely back over their own asses at me aren't actually sexual because the objectification has a recognizable brand name slapped on it.



Truly, they are paragons of virtue.

So Apple gets to have their cake and eat it too. They get to look wholesome for making an example of the pervy little guys as they play Puritan for street cred with the moral majority. At the same time, the "smut" producers with clout get out of Apple's bed, zip up their pants, and leave a fat envelope on the nightstand as they tiptoe out the back.

The individuals at Apple enforcing this decision are no different than crooked cops who make a public show of busting the guy slinging dime bags on the quad for college money so that they can keep accepting bribes from the heroin syndicate without losing their jobs.

By this point, you may be asking yourself why you should even care. This content purge apparently doesn't affect you much as a gamer, even if you play primarily on an iPhone. You weren't going to buy the wobbly boob app anyway, right? ... RIGHT?

To a certain extent, I agree with that mentality. A guy who was apparently weaned too soon being denied his ability to use accelerometer technology to reclaim his lost youth via unstable mammaries is hardly deserving of a march on Washington. I personally think the majority of the content getting cut from the iTunes store in this move, gaming or otherwise, is almost entirely lacking in merit.

That being said, the issue here is not the few iPhone games being impacted in the moment, but rather the precedent that is being set. The model that Apple uses to generate revenue with the iTunes store is being studied by all the major players in the game industry as it moves inexorably towards a future driven by digital distribution.



Fair and just application of moral standards!

As gaming giants continually look to maximize profits by broadening their appeal, the danger of in-game content being more directly impacted by these sorts of two-faced initiatives over time is tangible. The message that this type of event sends independent developers is clear. Bioware may have the muscle to stand up for their sideboob against the platform proctors, but you do not.

The types of boundary pushing and unapologetic exploration of mature themes that are most prevalent in the independent realm are subtly undermined by the implicit threat that a small timer's meal ticket may be revoked at any moment. For those that value the evolutionary impetus that the true risk-takers provide for the gaming industry, the potential impacts of these hypocrisies and double-standards are clear.

For the rest of you, there may be no cause for immediate alarm, but remember -- the road to hell is paved with good exceptions.

This promoted blog was written for our March Monthly Musing assignment, "Write something about sex." You too could get promoted if you write something about sex in videogames over on the Community Blogs.








More gaming stories around the web. Got news? Submit yours to tips@destructoid.com



Post a comment! You can also post a photo below:

Comment with Facebook





Click connect and comment instantly!

Comment with Dtoid





New? SIGN UP - it takes 5 seconds

19 comments | showing # 1 to 19
prev next

themizarkshow's Avatar - Comment posted on 03/18/2010 06:21
themizarkshow
Having any one group in charge of precedents like that is scary to me. Steam being a part of Valve and not it's own thing has always struck me as sketchy. Apple's pulling of content and rejecting other stuff for no reason has always felt wrong. Google buying up smaller companies to make them part of their coming skynet architecture. Microsoft being, well, Microsoft...

Kinda makes ya shiver.
Chris Carter's Avatar - Comment posted on 03/18/2010 10:22
Chris Carter
Haha, what mizark said.
Elsa's Avatar - Comment posted on 03/18/2010 11:35
Elsa
Interesting... though I guess we get into the whole "parental controls" and age appropriate content issue with the use of a virtual store...
Beyamor's Avatar - Comment posted on 03/18/2010 17:27
Beyamor
And so the "no skin" rule incites a wave of skeleton porn. Mmm.

I'd support Apple's removal of content if it weren't for the double standard. It's their platform, they have to be responsible for what's on it so sure, even if I'm a fan of bikinis, I can see why they would be taken off (uh, but not in a gratifying way). Still, this here, this I object to. Thanks for the post, even if it's just one more brick in my growing wall of cynicism.
HoodedMiracle's Avatar - Comment posted on 03/21/2010 15:11
HoodedMiracle
Very well written. As someone who browses the app store, I despise their policies. D:<
Syn's Avatar - Comment posted on 03/21/2010 15:29
Syn
That's BS of Apple...but I can't not support them any more than I already do, never given them a dime, heh.

Can't stop the technophiles though.
Keriaku's Avatar - Comment posted on 03/21/2010 15:30
Keriaku
All good points, but as an iPod Touch user, doesn't seem like much we can do about it.
Mr Andy Dixon's Avatar - Comment posted on 03/21/2010 15:42
Mr Andy Dixon
That explains why all my apps disappeared.
Bennyishere's Avatar - Comment posted on 03/21/2010 15:51
Bennyishere
Adriana Lima is in this post, so I will support it with all my life.
CoruptAI125's Avatar - Comment posted on 03/21/2010 16:20
CoruptAI125
It's a sad truth that things like this happen everyday.
grafkhun's Avatar - Comment posted on 03/21/2010 17:29
grafkhun
I liked the tie in with the 'Apple's distribution being studied by others' at the end; I kept thinking to myself, how is this game related and then you explain it. Very nice article.
Clum-Z-Boy's Avatar - Comment posted on 03/21/2010 17:32
Clum-Z-Boy
That was a fantastic article, very well written.

Unfortunately though, I don't think there is much we can do... in fact, maybe nothing at all. Content developed by small-time people gets pulled, the big names get exclusivity; when people wanna fap, they don't care about the politics behind it, they just want an app that'll give 'em tits (though I still don't know why you'd go to your iPhone for it). Sad, but true.
Kaspar's Avatar - Comment posted on 03/21/2010 17:42
Kaspar
If you aren't writing a book now, you better start soon, because you, sir, are by far the best damn blogger on this site.
fulldamage's Avatar - Comment posted on 03/21/2010 20:52
fulldamage
Props! Excellent observations, well stated! It's a bad precedent for which no one is currently being held accountable. And yet, it's sort of a natural part of the cycle of these things - if original or provocative content is censored off of the iProducts, eventually people who look for those things will migrate to some other platform/medium/form of entertainment, which will be the Next Big Thing until somebody monetizes it and makes it toothless all over again.
Corak's Avatar - Comment posted on 03/21/2010 21:29
Corak
Its funny because there are parental controls built into the device. I could care less really because I never downloaded any of those kinds of apps but I still think its shitty of Apple. I know they can control the app store how they see fit, but it still smacks of control freak behavior. Also, their web browser Safari is built into the phone, and I can see boobs real quick with a fast image search on Google. Hmm time to censor that too right?
Jizl Tizl's Avatar - Comment posted on 03/21/2010 23:05
Jizl Tizl
Obviously the app store is theirs to control, but I do wish they could give better reasons for some of their actions. For a while, I felt like I was seeing a lot of $1 half-star rated slideshows with maybe 10 pics of grossly fake women in lingerie popping up in the top 25 sections. If I was responsible for the quality of the app store, I wouldn't want it being littered with that kind of stuff. At least the Playboy and VS apps have a bit more quality to them. I don't see why Apple couldn't say that they were removing some of these cheap, nearly pointless junk apps for quality reasons.
KwikPwn's Avatar - Comment posted on 03/22/2010 00:44
KwikPwn
Seems a bit hypocritical, you can can rent/purchase movies from iTunes that have nudity in them right?

Why are app developers held to a higher standard than Hollywood?
Sir playedallot's Avatar - Comment posted on 03/22/2010 02:07
Sir playedallot
Do wup
do wup
do wup
do wup
do wup
do wup
do waaaa
m4j0rtr4g3dy's Avatar - Comment posted on 03/22/2010 04:06
m4j0rtr4g3dy
Here comes P.C. Fascism. Get ready for more watered down "entertainment" topped with some oversensitivity.
prev next

Comment with Facebook





Click connect and comment instantly!

Comment with Dtoid





New? SIGN UP - it takes 5 seconds

Comments policy

Destructoid is an open discussion community. You don't need to "audition" to post a comment - just speak your mind. We respect differing opinions on the site, so have at it. Be smart, funny, insightful, clueless, or cute -- but back it up with substance. Keep your cool, keep it fun. We only ask that you act respectfully and above all: don't be a troll and ruin it for everyone else. Don't bring down gamers or we'll, you know, gently shoot you in the face and stuff you into a flaming mailbox. Each comment is your opportuntity to make this community awesomer. Is that even a word?

Avoiding the banhammer only requires common sense: spamming, trolling, racism, NSFW stuff, and other forms of sucking will not be tolerated. If anyone is griefing please report abuse. Be good. Don't suck!