OMG!!!! Mario Galaxy only got a 9.5 on Gamespot and a 9.7 on IGN, but that means they are not perfect and I can't buy them cause I have tied my self esteem to this game and that's like them saying that I am not great in every way and that makes my mum a liar.

Don't they know how important numbers are?!? If it's not a ten on every site that means I won't buy it unless the ratings system doesn't go up to ten in which case I will accept a five or a three but really what site uses 3? There's no room for nuanced reviewing in three. I'll go as low as two for a thumbs based reviewing system but both of those thumbs had better be thrust skyward and they better carry my self-image with it.

My self esteem needs to be high to survive the coming battle, cause 9.5 + 9.7 = 19.2, which is 2.8 (the number of testicles Aleister Crowley had) less than 23! Ewige Blumenkraft! The eye and pyramid I tattooed onto my penis is glowing, this means that Mr Gay, the evil ruler of the Illuminatus is rising from his pit within the Pentagon to eat our souls. Why couldn't they have just given Super Mario Galaxy a 10!? Then we would all be okay insetead of doomed, damn IGN Wii is so totally biased against WII, everyone knows it. And Gamespot is a front for the John Dillinger Died for you society and we all know what they are like.

The numbers are important people, never let any sensible arguments persuade you to think differently. Common sense is just one of their tricks to blind you from the reality that Super Mario Galaxy should have recieved a TEN.

I might still pick it up though.