I was watching my friend play Super Paper Mario today and while he was playing I immediately caught sight of some clues to a future puzzle. My friend misinterpreted these as something else and moved on without hesitation. I didn't say anything though of course because I didn't want to ruin his challenge. Sure enough though, he got stuck and could not figure out how to move on. The puzzle in question is a simple one and we all, for the most part, have probably experienced this same set up before. In the room before there were five torches and only three of them were lit. In the next room were five unlit torches and it should be obvious by now what kind of puzzle this is. The most basic logic behind this game design is, "The question is in this room, but the answer is not."
In all my years of gaming I have to come to realize that games are finally reaching the status and history needed to be considered a form of art. What I am referring to exactly is as the title of this entry states. The language of video games. If you watch an experienced gamer playing a level side by side with someone who has hardly touched a game you will notice a distinct difference on their screens. It isn't that the experienced gamer is probably further and it is not about hand-eye coordination. It is how he or she is interpreting what's on the screen. Visually cracked wall? Try busting it down. Hitting it makes a different sound? Try busting it down. Maybe there's a hidden area here, I'll try sliding down the wall to see if the camera follows... So on and so forth. If you think about the things we do in a game you'll realize we've all been trained to do certain nuances. Anyone that's played a FPS will instinctively know to always aim for the head. We do these things when playing games because it is the very same games that have groomed us as competent readers of this brave new language.
If you read enough books you'll begin to notice certain plot devices or techniques the author uses to create a desired effect upon you the reader. This is what I've begun to notice in video games. Once you make this distinction, it becomes blatantly obvious. Collecting quests, man the turret while we throw floods of crap at you to shoot, there's a bright light on that door i think we should go to it, oh no the door closed and it's an ambush! I mean if you think about it, even an original game like Katamari is pretty much a blown out of proportion yet quirky collecting quest. That's the entire game, a collecting quest. I'm not trying to deface the game, I rather enjoy it immensely. My point is that when you break any game down to its roots it becomes undeniably familiar. Certain roots are needed for a game to be a game and it's these roots I want you to notice. Next time you play a game, really think about what you're doing. Ask yourself, "Have I done this before?" or "Why is this familiar?" Games are complex things and yes, they are also fun, but let's show the world that we're not just wasting time, we're educating ourselves in a language that is both new and exciting.
|
Now this is my kind of blog. A+
It's a lot like after watching far too many TV shows and movies, I can predict what's going to happen. Often quoting them verbatim.
Good write-up at any rate. The deconstruction of the system always helps others learn.
Ah brilliance, sir, brilliance! I have written about this as well in my defending of games as art. You have just identified the semiotics of gaming and have shown us ourselves as we game.
My question is about whethere we need new signs for this. Should we create our own esoteric language to describe these things? Does one exist already?
In 2d fighters I refer to any quarter circle motion as "hado" whenever I'm telling anyone moves. It's always "hado forward/backward/twice" et al.
It will grow as the medium does, and people like us exist, talk must continue for language to grow.
This was a very interesting read, it's cool to realize that in a game, we look fr certain aspects or devices and then judge how to handle the situation. It's just like any other art form like movies, books, and TV
nice blog, you are true, there are always some archetype in every media, whether it's movie, book, animation, and even Games.
Interesting, but it's more of the same problem-solving techniques than art. Just because games/movies/books often use the same mechanics and methods for solving problems like "locked door", "sniper on the roof" etc, doesn't mean it's suddenly art. It only means there is a lack of creativity in designing puzzles or plot devices.
I agree. I think thats one of the reasons gamers can get easily annoyed with non-gamers when playing with them. We don't realize that what we see as simple logic is completely new and strange to them.
WIN WIN WIN
wonderful blog post. you're now on my friends list, cause i wanna keep track of you.
its is true what you say, however it is not a valid argument to qualify games as art, like many here has already stated. i agree with you and soul3150 in that we will soon need to adapt a gaming language, that doesn't consist of words, but rather of nuances in how we experience things. we are educating ourselves.
Excellent read!